throbber
Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 82-10 Filed 03/22/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:
`9896
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` RHYU
`EXHIBIT 10
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 82-10 Filed 03/22/19 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:
`9897
`
`_ CAP today (HST AR)
`v. 13, no. 3 (Mar. 1999)
`General Collection
`W1 CA709
`Received: 03-23-1999
`
`\_
`
`. --~MWll=IWtiHftdtiliPM~l@l;IIRil/llhiff·PWIIIW•-•mm
`March 1999 /j\
`Pathology/Laboratory Medicine/Laboratory Management
`
`I ' /
`
`'Moie than on way to look for t/ER2,
`On Sept. 25, 1998 the Food and Drug
`
`l
`Williamfcheck, PhD
`
`Administration approved the ge(cid:173)
`netically engineered monoclonal an(cid:173)
`tibody trastuzurnab (Herceptin) for
`
`the treatment of patients with
`metastatic breast cancer whose tu-
`mors overexpress the HER2 protein.
`On the same day, the FDA approved
`Dako's irnrnunohistochernical assay,
`HercepTest, for the detection of HER2
`
`protein, the target of the antibody.
`Says Mehrdad Nadji, MD, professor
`of pathology at the University of Mi-
`arni School of Medicine, "For the first
`time FDA simultaneously approved
`a treatment and a test that identifies
`
`.,,;.,.-,. '""'"'"'1 en
`
`patients who ~a~da;;·for thaf)
`treatment."
`Between the a pproxima tel y
`181,000 women who are diagnosed
`annually with breast cancer and the
`thousands who have a recurrence,
`there is a large market for assays to
`qualify patients for trastuzumab ther-
`apy. (Even among newly diagnosed
`patients who do not have metastat(cid:173)
`ic disease, HER2 status is often de(cid:173)
`termined to guide chemotherapy.)
`Michael Samoszuk, MD, medical
`and scientific director of oncology
`for Quest Diagnostics Inc., and clin(cid:173)
`ical associate professor of pathology
`at UC Irvine, savs Quest's facilitv in
`,
`,
`San Juan Capistrano is running three
`autostainers up to six days per week
`to keep up with demand. "Growth
`was exponential," Dr. Samoszuk
`says. "It doubled or tripled every
`month." Since many tests are from
`archival cases, Dr. Samoszuk has
`now seen demand plateau.
`But some patients are not stop(cid:173)
`ping at one test. "There is some ten(cid:173)
`dency now for samples
`to be shopped _ around
`because people want to
`qualify for Herceptin,"
`says Ivlichael Press, MD,
`PhD, professor of pa(cid:173)
`thology at the Univer(cid:173)
`sity of Southern California Medical
`continued on page 40
`
`_,,
`
`;
`iii"
`3
`tu
`FJ
`..,
`tu
`.,,,._
`~ tu
`Ill
`r"I
`0
`,:;;:i
`rb
`0..
`
`.. .._
`
`i
`! i
`I
`
`• . ..__
`
`l
`\
`\
`
`I
`
`I
`j
`\ l
`
`Two steps forward,
`one back on Medicare
`tt,Hterage policies
`Carl Graziano
`in late January, a committee of
`representatives from the federal
`government, the College, and oth(cid:173)
`er private groups ended more than
`six months of intense negotiations
`,vith a tentative agreement on 23
`national coverage policies and oth-
`er uniform documentation and
`claims processing requirements for
`clinical laboratory services under
`Me:licare.
`-- - -- ·- ··dut by mid-February, barely two
`v,:eeks later, proposed changes to
`the package threatened to undo
`· ~:l-~ich of the committee's work.
`Under the process establisl}_ed
`for the negotiated rulemaking com(cid:173)
`mittee, each member group had
`until Feb. 15 to review the Janu(cid:173)
`ary agreement and suggest changes
`to it. Any single group's changes
`vrnuld require unanimous ap(cid:173)
`proval from the other negotiation
`parties.
`Some of the proposed changes
`submitted during the two-week
`review period appeared unlikely at
`t
`An P
`ne ax on
`press time to win unanimous sup(cid:173)
`Ttiroughout this decade, the biotechnology industry has re-
`port of the committee, which in(cid:173)
`1 · liably produced front-page news vvith a stream of star-
`cluded representatives from the
`tling discoveries, potential treatment breakthroughs, and
`Health Care Financing Adminis(cid:173)
`phenomenal profit forecasts. The deciphering of the ge-
`tration, the College, and 16 other
`netic code continues to expand the menu of diagnostic tests
`groups. (See "Negotiated rule(cid:173)
`and promises to revolutionize disease detection, pre-
`making parties," page 16.) As a re(cid:173)
`vention, and treatment.
`sult, it seemed certain that a much
`But with at least 40 disease genes patented to date, and
`anticipated consensus on the pack-
`continued on page 16 many more filed and pending, the collision of science
`
`Melody Cohleigh, MD, director of Rush~Presbyterian-St. Luke's
`Comprehensive Breast Center; requests both IHC and FISH assays
`from the laboratory of KennethBloom;MD (shov,inabove), and
`treats with Herceptin If either testls-positiv1i:""That is as good as
`you can do in 1999," she says:~'·

`
`rG~he patents push labs to their limits
`
`and commerce is having an unforeseen and unsettling ef-
`f
`1 b
`1

`1·

`f
`· Th
`ect on a oratories:
`e exc us1ve 1censmg o gene
`patents is starting to limit the tests laboratories are able to
`perform and preventing them from performing certain
`tests altogether.
`'The scope of these patents is unprecedented," says De-
`bra Leonard, MD, PhD, director of the molecular pathol-
`ogy laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania Health
`Care System, Philadelphia.
`Genetic testing patents are a small but rapidly grow-
`continued on page 30
`
`\.,.--;_,- ---ft:--i?-.:._~->¾~~~~""' •,v'.1.:/'.. .. /;.'f~e;r~!-·"f<f»:~~ :;v, .. ::1.:<>1~:-S-r,-,:x"' .. ~-s-J:•/_,> .-\ ·---·~ -~f .. '\·- -. ..-;:: ::<:.:,:_~::,.~
`ow one lab took an automation tack that went bevond a
`,
`· Page 24
`search for track.
`
`.
`
`-,
`
`CU>_
`
`Advancing Excellence
`
`~--.****************** 3-DIGIT
`I
`··,,7341 a 993
`4
`•· .. t·lATIOMAL LIBRARY OF MED
`SERIAL RECORDS SECTIOH
`8600 ROCKlJILLE PIKE
`
`L~" Mr, 20294-0001
`
`208
`
`0002~!
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`MEDICINE
`
`••r"'"•L1•111n.n-11o••uu11
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 82-10 Filed 03/22/19 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:
`9898
`
`March 1999
`
`CAP TODAY/ 5
`
`Clinton budget again.sets sights on laboratory fees
`
`tern. "Despite the slowdown in
`freeze hospital payments for a year.
`President Clinton's fiscal 2000 Medicare growth over recent years,
`budget, released last month, would
`there is still evidence to suggest
`reduce Medicare spending on
`that Medicare pays too much for
`provider payments by $7.5 billion
`some services and has not bene-
`over five years and impose nearly
`fited from cost-efficiencies that
`$195 million in new user fees.
`have occurred in the marketplace,"
`The reductions are not as drastic
`the Department of Health and Hu-
`for laboratories as those proposed in man Services reported in a bud-
`previous administration budgets.
`get summary.
`
`But the cuts would continue to chip
`The clinical laboratory fee sched-
`away at reimbursement levels that
`ule has been a frequent target of
`the CAP and other laboratory
`administration and congressional
`groups have said are already un-
`efforts to reduce Medicare spend-
`fairly low.
`ing, and the College always has
`
`icaYi:~~:~~;J~: :;:e~p o: clin-
`.·. s;ngly ~p-
`•.·· << / •> • •• /
`~~iJ;r;:~:~~~uif ;:~~
`\-• ___ ~- There_ is -still _evid~nce. > -__ --- 1 _
`- est that Med1car e.
`--
`. to sugg
`some
`pays too much for
`_--
`--
`and has not ben.
`. -- .- -- -
`•
`services
`-
`. . -
`..
`-• ef ited fr om cost-ef flcien •
`th t have occur red
`-
`-
`-
`ij -.
`. c1es
`a
`\ Jn the marketpl-ace .
`
`/
`
`\.
`
`and other provider payments.
`The College will monitor the
`budget process closely and, as in
`years past, vigorously oppose
`spending reductions that target lab(cid:173)
`oratory services and physician pay(cid:173)
`ments.
`The administration's budget pro(cid:173)
`posal also calls for Health and Hu(cid:173)
`man Services to receive authority to
`levy o_n providers $194.5 million in
`new user fees, including charges
`for claims not submitted electroni(cid:173)
`cally and for duplicate claims or
`those that cannot be processed. Oth(cid:173)
`er proposed fees include an
`idtial charge to physicians,
`providers, and suppliers to
`enroll in Medicare and sub(cid:173)
`sequent renewal fees.
`The Department of
`Health and Human Ser(cid:173)
`vices reported that it in(cid:173)
`tends to save $2.9 billion
`over five years with new
`initiatives to reduce fraud,
`waste, and abuse. Those -
`initiatives include elimi(cid:173)
`nating physician mark(cid:173)
`ups for outpatient drugs
`and imposing civil mon(cid:173)
`etary penalties when a
`physician falsely certifies the need
`for partial hospitalization services
`in certain settings. -
`On the upside, the administra(cid:173)
`tion's budget plan would provide
`$15.9 billion for the National Insti(cid:173)
`tutes of Health, $320 million more ·
`than was budgeted for fiscal 1999.
`Of the total, $8.8 billion would go to
`support grants for basic medical
`research.
`The budget proposaI also seeks
`to raise the rate of Pap smears per(cid:173)
`formed annually for women served
`by the Indian Health Service. The
`plan endeavors to increase the per~
`centage of women who have Pap
`smears to 55 percent from a 1997
`baseline of 43 percent. The Indian
`Health Service provides care to 1.4
`million American Indians and
`Alaska natives. Details of the pro-
`continued on page 8
`
`-.
`--
`...m· ent of Health a nd.
`oeparL
`-
`marY -
`. --
`an services budget sum
`-
`---
`\ Hum
`- _ - ___ .-----.
`-•-__
`-· _
`_.
`.
`
`-_
`
`cent of the national med1-
`an for all Medicare Carri-
`ers, savi~g ~edicare ab?ut
`$550 million over five
`years.
`The administration wants
`to return to "that old well,
`which we all know is_ more
`than dry," laborato1:Y md~s-
`try observer Denms Weiss-
`.
`.
`man said dunng a speech last
`month at the annual meet-
`ing of the American Clinical
`Laboratory Association, held
`in Washington; DC.
`Weissman, president and pub-
`. lisher of Washington G-2 Reports,
`said data show the cost of providing
`laboratory services rose 30 percent
`from 1994 to 1997, but federal
`_ spending on such services dropped
`10 percent during the same period.
`"Now that doesn't even indicate
`what happened prior to 1994, when
`there were other severe cuts that
`go all the way back to the 1980s,"
`Weissman stated in his speech. "So,
`we're talking about billions of dol(cid:173)
`lars that have been cut out of this in(cid:173)
`dustry."
`The administration argues that
`clinical laboratory fee schedule re(cid:173)
`ductions and other provider cuts
`are necessary to allow the federal
`government to reap the benefits of
`a more efficient health care sys-
`
`posed Con(cid:173)
`gress' tactic. Two years ago, Con(cid:173)
`gress considered proposals that, at
`best, would have reduced the fee
`schedule cap from 76 percent to 74
`percent and trimmed annual up(cid:173)
`dates. At worst, the plans would
`have reduced the cap to 72 percent
`and frozen updates for five years.
`Although Congress eventually de(cid:173)
`cided to impose the update freeze,
`lobbying by the College and oth(cid:173)
`ers prompted lawmakers to choose
`the higher of the two proposed
`caps-74 percent.
`At press time, Republicans had
`not yet completed their spending
`plan for fiscal 2000. While the GOP(cid:173)
`controlled Congress almost certainly
`will reject Clinton's proposed bud(cid:173)
`get in favor of its own, it could adopt
`elements of the administration plan
`or make similar cuts in laboratory
`
`In this issue
`
`56 Managing information
`70 Anatomic pathology
`computer systems
`89 laboratory Accreditation News
`Departments
`
`Bridging information technologies and bringing people
`together are the needs of the next few years.
`
`CAP TODA Y's 11th annual survey of anatomic
`pathology systems profiles 22 products from 19 vendors.
`
`Your Laboratory Accreditation Program link.
`
`Special
`Section
`
`c=:::J
`
`Abstracts
`93
`107 Capitol Scan
`Classifieds
`113
`Firsthand Views
`122
`
`121
`Index to Advertisers
`110
`Innovations
`Letters
`11
`114 New Products
`
`112 Newsbytes
`President's Desk
`11
`108 Q&A
`-Webwatch
`118
`
`Carl Graziano
`The Clinton administration has
`again targeted the clinical labora(cid:173)
`tory fee schedule in its latest bid to
`shave dollars from Medicare spend(cid:173)
`ing. It has also revived attempts to
`impose user fees on providers and
`
`I
`
`I
`
`-~
`
`March 1999
`Vol.13 No. 3
`
`Copyright © 1999 by the College of American
`Pathologists. Views and opinions expressed in CAP
`TODAY are not necessarily endorsed by the CAP.
`President: Thomas P. Wood, MD
`President-Elect: Paul Bachner, MD
`Secretary-Treasurer: Paul A. Raslavicus, MD
`Inirnediate Past President Raymond C. Zastrow, MD
`Governors: William R. Dito, MD; Daniel J. Hanson,
`MD; Richard J. Hausner, MD; John Bernard Henry,
`MD; Gene N. Herbek, MD; Victor Hinrichs, MD;
`Richard E. Horowitz, MD; Mary E. Kass, MD;
`Margaret S. Skinner, MD; Thomas D. Trainer, MD;
`Henry Travers, MD; Harry J. Zemel, MD
`Speaker, House of Delegates: Joseph P.
`Leverone, MD
`Vice Speaker: Mary L. Nielsen, MD
`Residents Forum Chair: James L. Caruso, r-.m
`Executive Vice President: Lee VanBremen, PhD
`Medical Editorial Board to CAP TODAY: Donald
`A. Senhauser, MD, chair; Howard M. Rawnsley,
`MD; Frederick L. Kiechle, MD, PhD; Seth L. Haber,
`MD; P.R. Gilmer Jr., MD; Rebecca L. Johnson, MD;
`Stanley Burrows, MD; Henry Homburger, MD;
`William R. Dito, MD; William W. Mclendon, MD;
`Richard A. Savage, MD; David Alter, MD
`Contributing Editors: Raymond D. Aller, MD; Ann
`Marie Blenc, MD; Stanley B. Burrows, MD; Robert P.
`De Cresce, MD, MBA; P.R. Gilmer Jr., MD; Seth L.
`Haber, MD; Gene N. Herbek, MD; Theodore Krouse,
`MD; Mark S. Lifshitz, MD; Raouf E. Nakhleh, MD;
`Richard A. Savage, MD; Michael Weiler!, MD
`Editorial Office: College of American Pathologists, -
`2215 Sanders Road, Northbrook, IL 60062 Telephone:
`847-832-7000, fax 847-832-8873, e-mail: Editorial:
`captoday@interaccess.com, Circulation: kgacki@cap.org
`Publisher: Robert McGonnagle 847-832-7476
`Editor: Sherrie L. Rice 847-832-7504, srice@cap.org
`Managing Editors: Kimberly Carey 847-832-7249,
`kcarey@cap.org; Karen Titus 847-832-7328, ktitus@cap.org
`Washington Editor: Carl Graziano 202-371-6617,
`fax 202-371-0028, cgrazia@cap.org
`Circulation Director: Kimberly Gacki
`847-832-7456, subscriptions fax 847-832-8181
`Advertising/Production Director: Alfred McAtee
`847-832-7514, fax 847-832-8873, amcatee@cap.org
`Asst. Prod. Manager/Classified Adv. Coordin(cid:173)
`ator: Bryan Nyary 847-832-7528, bnyary@cap.org
`Publisher/Sales Office: Robert McGonnagle,
`847-832-7476, fax 847-832-8873, bmcgonn@cap.org
`Advertising Representatives:
`East-John Moran, Nonvalk, CT, 203-852-9503
`Midwest-Paul Weis, Lisle, IL, 630-971-9701
`West-Pete Schulz, Pasadena, CA, 818-403-1300
`Oassified advertising: Send copy and payment in
`full to: College of American Pathologists, Bryan
`Nyary, 325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, IL 60093-
`2750, or call 847-832-7528, fax 847-832-8873. Deadline:
`11th of month preceding desired date of insertion.
`Indexed by: Hospital Literature Index. Select
`articles found in National Library of Medicine's
`Health Sen·ices/Technology Assessment Research
`on-line database. Abstracted by Barbara}. Barrett.
`Change of address: Notify publisher at least six
`weeks in advance. Include both old and new
`address and a mailing label from the most recent
`issue. Include your new postal zip code number.
`Mail to: College of American Pathologists, 325
`Waukegan Road, Northfield, IL 60093-2750.
`Advertising: The appearance of display or classi(cid:173)
`fied advertising in this publication is not a CAP
`guarantee or endorsement of the product or the
`claims made for the product by the manufacturer.
`CAP TODAY (ISSN 0891-1525) is published monthly by
`the College of American Pathologists, 2215 Sanders
`Road, Suite 200, Northbrook, IL 60062. Subscrip(cid:173)
`tions-members: $12 included in dues; nonmembers:
`$40 U.S., $60 Canada, $95 foreign. Periodicals postage
`paid at Northbrook, Ill., and at additional mailing of-
`fices. POSTMASTER: Send address
`changes to CAP TODAY, 325 Wau(cid:173)
`kegan Road, Northfield, IL 60093-
`2750. Mailed under-Canada Post
`
`Bpi I\
`N
`
`NTERNATIONAL
`
`•w International Publication Mail Sales
`
`- Agreement Number 785199.
`
`Printed in U.S.A.
`SSN 0891-1525
`
`The mission of the College of American
`Pathologists, the principal organization
`of board-certified pathologists, is to rep(cid:173)
`resent the interests of patients, the pub(cid:173)
`lic, and pathologists by fostering excel(cid:173)
`lence in the practice of pathology and
`laboratory medicine worldwide.
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 82-10 Filed 03/22/19 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:
`9899
`
`40 I CAP TODAY
`
`HER2
`
`conti1111ed from page 1
`
`Dr. Pauletti
`
`Center. "In the last year we have
`seen a substantial increase in vol(cid:173)
`ume." Dr. Press gets samples that
`have been tested in one or two oth(cid:173)
`er laboratories. Gio(cid:173)
`vanni Pauletti, PhD,
`assistant research
`scientist in the divi(cid:173)
`sion of hematolo(cid:173)
`gy/ oncology at the
`University of Cali(cid:173)
`fornia, Los Angeles,
`also gets calls from
`patients who are
`negative for HER2 by immunohis(cid:173)
`tochemistry (IHC) and want to be
`tested for HER2 by an alternative
`method, fluorescence in situ hy(cid:173)
`bridization (FISH), that both he and
`Dr. Press perform.
`Tumors that are candidates for
`trastuzumab therapy can in principle
`be detected at the DNA level by FISH
`because there is a high correlation
`between overexpression of the HER2
`protein and amplification of the gene
`
`that codes for it, HER2, both of which
`are found in 25 percent to 30 percent
`of breast cancers. Two FISH kits for
`HER2 are available, Path Vysion from
`Vysis and Inform, developed by On(cid:173)
`cor and now marketed by Ventana.
`FISH and IHC each have advantages
`and disadvantages, but they share
`one desirable feature, Dr. Nadji says:
`"Both techniques are easily applica(cid:173)
`ble to formalin-fixed paraffin-em(cid:173)
`bedded material. Therefore, they can
`both be used on archival tumor ma(cid:173)
`terial from patients whose original
`biopsy was taken many years ago
`and who now have a recurrence that
`may benefit from Herceptin treat(cid:173)
`ment." (See "The value of Herceptin,"
`page54.)
`Each method-IHC and FISH(cid:173)
`has its advocates. Says Dr. Press, "I
`think IHC is a great method and we
`use it routinely. But if a laboratory is
`doing this test for first time, I would
`strongly recommend the FISH assay.
`It is more complicated to do, but eas(cid:173)
`ier to interpret."
`Allen M. Gown, MD, director and
`chief pathologist at PhenoPath Lab-
`
`(cid:141) For in vitro diagnostic use
`
`l. Koll1oniemi, 0., et al; Int J Cancer 49:650-655
`[1991).
`2. Press, M.F., et cl; Cancer l?es. 54·2771-2777
`[1994).
`3. Penoult-Uorca, F., el cl; J Pothol. 173(1): 65-75 (1994).
`
`Dr. Gown
`
`oratories in Seattle,
`acknowledges that
`both assays will get
`you the same infor(cid:173)
`mation. "But," he
`says, "FISH is much
`more labor-inten-
`sive. And its cost to
`the patient and the laboratory is much
`higher."
`One complication is that, while
`HercepTest is approved for selecting
`patients with metastatic breast cancer
`for trastuzumab therapy, the FISH
`assays are not. Path Vysion is indi(cid:173)
`cated as a prognostic indicator and to
`predict response to standard chemo(cid:173)
`therapy in stage II patients. More im(cid:173)
`portant, results from FISH have not
`yet been correlated with response to
`trastuzumab therapy. In the Her(cid:173)
`ceptin trials, patient selection was
`with an IHC method, on which Her(cid:173)
`cepTest is based.
`As a result, says Kenneth Bloom,
`MD, director of laboratory opera(cid:173)
`tions in the Department of Pathology
`at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Med(cid:173)
`ical Center, Chicago, "Before our on(cid:173)
`cologists will give Herceptin, they
`want to know if there is HER2/ neu
`protein overexpression by IHC, be(cid:173)
`cause that is what
`has been correlated
`with treatment suc(cid:173)
`cess." Dr. Bloom
`calls treating with
`trastuzumab on the
`basis of gene am(cid:173)
`plification alone
`"more controver- Dr. Masood
`sial. No clinical data
`have been published on that yet," he
`notes.
`Shahla Masood, MD, associate
`chair in the Department of Pathology
`at the University of Florida College of
`Medicine, Jacksonville, and chief of
`pathology and laboratory medicine at
`University Medical Center, says,
`"Clinicians who want to use Her(cid:173)
`ceptin have to look at IHC, because all
`of the studies have been done with
`that and the answers are in the liter(cid:173)
`ature."
`As for clinicians using the FISH
`assay for therapeutic guidance, Dr.
`Samoszuk says, 'Tm sure that is hap(cid:173)
`pening and will continue to happen.
`There is a tremendous amount of
`confusion. We don't encourage or
`promote that, but we are aware that
`it happens." Because trastuzumab is
`directed against the HER2 protein,
`Dr. Samoszuk says, "To me it seems
`more likely that HER2 overexpres(cid:173)
`sion will predict response to drug
`than gene amplification. We need to
`wait until additional data answer
`this question."
`Predictive value is especially im(cid:173)
`portant because of the price differ(cid:173)
`ential between the two assays: Her(cid:173)
`cepTest costs about $35 per sample,
`Path Vysion about $75. Reimburse(cid:173)
`ment is about equal for the two tests.
`John Bishop, president and CEO of
`Vysis, defends the higher price of the
`FISH assay by saying, "Studies have
`
`March 1999
`
`shown that the most accurate and
`reliable determination of HER2 status
`is critical in selecting the most ap(cid:173)
`propriate therapy for breast cancer
`patients. Path Vysion and the under(cid:173)
`lying FISH technology address these
`needs, providing higher medical val(cid:173)
`ue than competing technologies."
`But many persons working in this
`area believe evidence for this claim is
`lacking in regard to trastuzumab
`therapy. For exam(cid:173)
`ple, Susan Gam(cid:173)
`mon, PhD, MBA,
`vice president of
`product develop(cid:173)
`ment at IMPATH
`Inc., says, "Those
`clinical trials are still
`underway, so the Dr. Gammon
`jury is still out."
`And Dr. Gown says, because of
`the higher price of FISH, "In order for
`me to recommend FISH, it would
`have to be demonstrated that it is
`significantly better than immuno(cid:173)
`histochemistry. To me that is still an
`open question."
`Dr. Pauletti says a clinical trial is
`now getting underway in which pa(cid:173)
`tients will be screened by IHC and
`FISH for treatment with trastuzum(cid:173)
`ab, so the relative predictive value
`of the two tests should become clear
`in the near future.
`In the meantime, in principle either
`assay should give the same result
`most of the time, since HER2 gene
`amplification and HER2 protein
`overexpression are closely correlated,
`which is supported by ample data
`in the literature. IHC has a long track
`record with pathologists and could
`therefore be the assay of choice. On(cid:173)
`cologists, on the other hand, would be
`familiar with the work of the princi(cid:173)
`pal discoverer of the prognostic val(cid:173)
`ue of HER2, oncologist Dennis Sla(cid:173)
`mon, MD, of UCLA's Janssen Com(cid:173)
`prehensive Cancer Center, a major
`force behind the clinical validation
`of trastuzumab. Dr. Slamon's group,
`with whom Dr. Press collaborates,
`favors the FISH assay.
`Specialty differences can drive
`marketing strategies, Dr. Nadji points
`out. "If a company is not successful
`with pathologists, it can bypass them
`and market directly to clinicians," he
`says. ''Right now, oncologists are sold
`on FISH because they think it is more
`sensitive. But we pathologists need to
`ask what is the clinical value of this in(cid:173)
`creased sensitivity."
`Dr. Gown is seeing a similar phe(cid:173)
`nomenon. "I occasionally get a phone
`call from an oncologist who knows
`about the FISH test from marketing
`information," he says. "But they don't
`always know that we can get the
`same information with immunohis(cid:173)
`tochemistry."
`Dr. Masood notes that coopera(cid:173)
`tive action between clinicians and
`pathologists will be necessary to de(cid:173)
`cide which one of the tests-or
`both-is going to be used. "I think
`that the indications for this testing
`continued 011 page 42
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 82-10 Filed 03/22/19 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:
`9900
`
`42 I CAP TODAY
`
`HER2
`
`co11ti11lled from page 40
`
`have to come from mutual agree(cid:173)
`ment between oncologists and pa(cid:173)
`thologists in an institution," she says.
`"Ultimately a test has to be embraced
`by oncologists, since they are the ones
`who are going to be utilizing the re(cid:173)
`sults to treat patients."
`
`As experience and data accumulate
`
`with the two methods-several
`laboratories are offering both IHC
`and FISH assays-apparent defi(cid:173)
`ciencies have been identified with
`each product. Both false-negative and
`false-positive results have been ob-
`
`served with the Dako kit. In 15 per(cid:173)
`cent to 20 percent of cases that are
`negative by IHC, FISH will detect
`. gene amplification. Whether this dis(cid:173)
`crepancy has clinical relevance is a
`topic of debate.
`As for false-positives, Dr. Paulet(cid:173)
`ti cites a meeting abstract in which
`investigators from the Mayo Clinic
`using HercepTest found among 1,142
`patients a 57 percent rate of positiv(cid:173)
`ity for clear (2+/3+) HER2 overex(cid:173)
`pression, much higher than the ac(cid:173)
`cepted 25 percent to 30 percent rate.
`Other reference laboratories, hmv(cid:173)
`ever, are not seeing such a strange re(cid:173)
`sult. Dr. Gown believes these data
`simply indicate the need to adapt
`
`assay conditions and antigen re(cid:173)
`trieval to different fixatives (ex(cid:173)
`plained later).
`(To see whether selection bias
`might explain the Mayo Clinic re(cid:173)
`sults, Dr. Pauletti checked his own
`data from a large breast cancer co(cid:173)
`hort. "Even selecting only for node(cid:173)
`positive patients with grade 3 infil(cid:173)
`trating carcinomas," he told CAP TO(cid:173)
`DAY, "the amplification/ overex(cid:173)
`pression frequency ,vas no higher
`than 32 percent. If there really was a
`bias in the Mayo Clinic population,
`it must have been that a good num(cid:173)
`ber of these people were sent to
`Mayo for a confirmation of their
`HER2 status.")
`
`Cdtl(tfi
`
`;_J-;.:-c~
`
`, - - - -
`y--
`
`The
`
`~
`
`-
`
`-
`
`---
`
`-
`
`--
`
`-
`
`-"
`
`C
`
`'MASCOT™ HematologySysteDl
`EaseofUse
`(cid:141) Push button operation
`(cid:141) Low maintenance
`(cid:141) Compact and portable
`Economical Design
`. (cid:141) 'I\venty-microliter whole blood sample
`(cid:141) Immediate and complete hematology reports
`
`MD MASCOT counts Neutrophils, Lymphocytes,
`Monoc}1es, Eosinophils, and Basophils in a full
`twenty-parameter complete blood count, and gives
`you a laboratory-quality rep01t in minutes.
`
`Moreover, the MD MASCOT is designed to
`accommodate your budget and bench top, while
`offering you:
`
`. Quality Results
`(cid:141) Clinically significant five-part \VBC differential
`(cid:141) High resolution patented technology
`(cid:141) Wide measuring ranges of WBCs, RBCs, Platelets
`
`To experience the benefits of a complete CBC with
`five-part differential for your point of care testing,
`call 1-800-858-2324 for more information. Visit our
`website atwww.cdctech.com
`
`~
`
`CDC Technologies, Inc.
`"Excellence in Point of Care'"'1
`
`One Great Hill Road, Oxford CT06478 USA, 1-800-858-2324/203-888-2323
`
`Circle No. 32 on reader service card
`
`March 1999
`
`Dr. Samoszuk
`
`With FISH, so far the chief problem
`is its technical difficulty. Says Dr.
`Samoszuk, "In my
`opinion, the FISH
`assay may be more
`difficult to perform
`and interpret. It re(cid:173)
`quires the ability to
`identify tumor cells
`under fluorescent
`light and the ability
`to count fluorescent
`signals for individual HER2 genes,
`which is sometimes more difficult
`than pictures would suggest. Our ex(cid:173)
`perience over the past month," Dr.
`Samoszuk continues, "is that a sig(cid:173)
`nificant minority of cases do lead to
`difficulty in interpretation. FISH prob(cid:173)
`ably does require more expertise to
`interpret."
`Dr. Gammon agrees. "FISH is not
`always easy to read," she says.
`But Mark Pegram, MD, assistant
`professor in the division of hematol(cid:173)
`ogy/ oncology at the UCLA Janssen
`Comprehensive Cancer Center, be(cid:173)
`lieves the required expertise can be
`learned. "FISH is too good an assay
`to dismiss because it is too complex,"
`he says.
`Although FISH is used frequently
`in cytogenetics cases, the accuracy
`of this particular application is in
`somewhat of a "honeymoon" period,
`since it has not been used widely
`enough outside of experienced hands
`to determine its reliability in general
`use, Dr. Gammon points out. "These
`are early days for HER2 by FISH
`analysis, and the industry is waiting
`to understand its robustness and in(cid:173)
`terlaboratory variability," she says.
`"Outside of our lab and a handful of
`others, the HER2 FISH assay has not
`been performed routinely in quanti(cid:173)
`ty. What will happen when 150 lab(cid:173)
`oratories with less experience start
`to try to perform this test?"
`(A question has been raised about
`a 10 percent to 15 percent rate of false(cid:173)
`negative results with DNA-based
`tests-protein overexpression with(cid:173)
`out gene amplification-in some of
`Dr. Slamon' s early work. Dr. Pegram
`explains that these results occurred
`when Southern blotting was used to
`detect gene amplification. "These
`data suggested single-gene copy
`overexpression," Dr. Pegram says.
`"But FISH testing showed that this
`was mostly a dilutional artifact." Sin(cid:173)
`gle-copy overexpression actually oc(cid:173)
`curs in only about four percent of
`cases, Dr. Pegram estimates.)
`A survey of which laboratories
`are using which test(s)-and why(cid:173)
`and their experience may prove help(cid:173)
`ful for those nmv trying to choose.
`Melody Cobleigh, MD, director of
`the Comprehensive Breast Center at
`Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical
`Center, Chicago, was one of the in(cid:173)
`vestigators in the trastuzumab tri(cid:173)
`als. She requests both assays on all
`samples and treats with trastuzum(cid:173)
`ab on the basis of either test being
`positive. "That is as good as you can
`co11ti1111ed 011 page 46
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 82-10 Filed 03/22/19 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:
`9901
`
`46 I CAP TODAY
`
`HER2
`
`c01Itinucd fro111 pngc 42
`
`do in 1999," she says. Asked whether
`this route isn't quite expensive, she
`replies, "Yes, but so is Herceptin."
`(Herceptin costs about $250 per
`weekly dose.) Comparing the two
`tests shows about a six percent rate
`of overexpression without gene am(cid:173)
`plification. Over the next year, it
`should become apparent if such cas(cid:173)
`es have a different response to
`trastuzumab than cases that are pos(cid:173)
`itive in both assays.
`Dr. Bloom's laboratory performs
`assays for Dr. Cobleigh. Asked
`·whether he has seen an abnormally
`
`high positive rate with HercepTest
`like that reported from the Mayo
`Clinic, he replies, "We have no ex(cid:173)
`perience with that at all. Our posi(cid:173)
`tivity rate is sitting at about 25 per(cid:173)
`cent and the stain has been incredi(cid:173)
`bly clean. Our true-positive cases
`have looked like pictures in a journal
`article."
`As for false-negative results on
`fixed specimens with IHC, Dr. Bloom
`attributes them to variations in
`reagents, tissue processing, and stor(cid:173)
`age. He notes that false-negatives
`can occur on fresh frozen tissue as
`well. All processing in his laborato(cid:173)
`ry is done uniformly, so conditions
`can be adjusted for optimal results.
`
`Dr. Bloom calls this "critically im(cid:173)
`portant. I think that's our huge ad(cid:173)
`vantage over reference laboratories,"
`he says. "Controlling fixation and
`tissue processing is vital to getting
`good staining."
`At the request of the oncologists,
`Dr. Bloom is now setting up FISH,
`which will be performed on the 70
`percent or so of samples negative by
`IHC. He chose to do IHC as a screen
`and FISH second because of cost and
`time. "Our issue is the time it takes to
`actually count cells," Dr. Bloom says.
`"It is fairly time-consuming." Be(cid:173)
`cause this is the first FISH test being
`performed in the laboratory, there
`were no trained technologists. So the
`
`. . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. • • • • • • • • JI, • • _ .
`
`Lliplil'lllij ......
`.. '·'··'
`!lJs B tJ -; JlJ£:l~B-11TiBTKDli=Ul~s;i,cc?c
`jJJ:U ~N 1 i!JJJJ j-l!JJ YiDBlIBf
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`- -----,
`
`.
`·································································································--····
`Configured for Accuracy & Reliability
`to ensure precise, reliable results.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket