throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 504 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 53664
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 20-125 (GBW)
`(CONSOLIDATED)
`
`)))))))))
`
`
`)
`
`NATERA, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ARCHERDX, INC., ARCHERDX, LLC and
`INVITAE CORP.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`NATERA INC.’S CONCISE OF FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
`FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT DEFENDANTS PCM, STRATAFIDE, AND
`LIQUIDPLEX PRODUCTS DO NOT INFRINGE ANY OF THE ASSERTED PATENTS
`(D.I. 430 at 11-13; D.I. 449 at 4-5)
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Derek J. Fahnestock (#4705)
`Anthony D. Raucci (#5948)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@morrisnichols.com
`dfahnestock@morrisnichols.com
`araucci@morrisnichols.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Natera, Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Bhanu K. Sadasivan
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`650 Live Oak Ave., Suite 300
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 815-7400
`
`William G. Gaede, III
`Jodi L. Benassi
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`415 Mission Street, Suite 5600
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`(628) 218-3800
`
`Mandy H. Kim
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`18565 Jamboree Road, Suite 250
`Irvine, CA 92612
`(949) 757-6061
`
`October 25, 2022
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 504 Filed 10/25/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 53665
`
`In accordance with the Court’s October 3, 2022 Order (D.I. 461), Plaintiff Natera Inc.
`
`(“Natera”) respectfully submits this separate concise statement of material facts as to which there
`
`exists a genuine issue warranting denial of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment that
`
`Defendants’ PCM, Stratafide, and LiquidPlex Products Do Not Infringe Any of the Asserted
`
`Patents.
`
`1.
`
`The Court construed the term “target loci” to mean “selected segments of nucleic
`
`acid of interest of an individual. D.I. 243 (Markman Opinion), 5.
`
`2.
`
`The Court’s construction expressly included scenarios where multiple DNA
`
`sources are present and the circulating tumor DNA is selected as the target:
`
`It may be that a single biological sample may contain material from multiple
`individuals. It may be possible, nonetheless, to practice the claims on such a
`sample, provided that each time it is practiced all of the target loci are selected from
`a single individual (i.e., the portion of the sample that is derived from that same
`single individual). For example, an individual looking to test for Y chromosome
`linked disorders could obtain a sample of mixed DNA from a mother and a fetus,
`target DNA of the fetus, and practice the claim with respect to the target loci of
`that fetus despite the presence of multiple DNA sources in the sample (Tr. at 27-
`28) The Court’s construction is not intended to exclude such possibilities.
`
`D.I. 243 (Markman Opinion), 6, fn. 3 (emphasis added).
`
`3.
`
`Defendants admitted: “just because you have a mixed sample that includes DNA
`
`from multiple individuals doesn’t mean you can’t target DNA from just one individual. You surely
`
`can. I just gave you an example of what you could do.” D.I. 442 (Natera’s Opposition to
`
`Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment), 10 (citing D.I. 185 (Claim Construction Hearing
`
`Tr.), 27:20-24).
`
`4.
`
`The specification expressly contemplate that the source of DNA target loci can be
`
`from more than one individual. D.I. 17-1, Ex. 1 (’814 Patent), 105:28-30 (“whether the sample is
`
`[sic] pure genomic sample from a single individual or mixture of individuals”).
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 504 Filed 10/25/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 53666
`
`5.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,515,679 titled “System and Method for Cleaning Noisy Genetic
`
`Data and Determining Chromosome Copy Number,” is not an asserted patent in this action. D.I.
`
`452-12 (’679 Patent), Ex. 3.
`
`6.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,526,658 titled “Methods for Simultaneous Amplification of
`
`Target Loci,” is not at issue in this action, and is not a family member of the Asserted Patents. D.I.
`
`434-2, Ex. B (Spellman Tr.), 46:13-14.
`
`7.
`
`The term “individual” is not recited in the asserted claims of the ’220, ’814, and
`
`’172 Patents. D.I. 17-1, Ex. 1 (’814 Patent), Claim 1; D.I. 17-1, Ex. 2 (’172 Patent), Claim 1; D.I.
`
`391-2, Ex. 5 (’220 Patent), Claim 1.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Bhanu K. Sadasivan
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`650 Live Oak Ave., Suite 300
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 815-7400
`
`William G. Gaede, III
`Jodi L. Benassi
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`415 Mission Street, Suite 5600
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`(628) 218-3800
`
`Mandy H. Kim
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`18565 Jamboree Road, Suite 250
`Irvine, CA 92612
`(949) 757-6061
`
`October 25, 2022
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Derek J. Fahnestock
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Derek J. Fahnestock (#4705)
`Anthony D. Raucci (#5948)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@morrisnichols.com
`dfahnestock@morrisnichols.com
`araucci@morrisnichols.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Natera, Inc.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 504 Filed 10/25/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 53667
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on October 25, 2022, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed
`
`with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to all
`
`registered participants.
`
`I further certify that I caused copies of the foregoing document to be served on October 25,
`
`2022, upon the following in the manner indicated:
`
`Brian E. Farnan, Esquire
`Michael J. Farnan, Esquire
`FARNAN LLP
`919 North Market Street, 12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`Edward R. Reines, Esquire
`Derek C. Walter, Esquire
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`Ian Moore, Esquire
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`767 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`Priyata Y. Patel, Esquire
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`2001 M Street NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`/s/ Derek J. Fahnestock
`__________________________
`Derek J. Fahnestock (#4705)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket