throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 530 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 53946
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`NATERA, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`ARCHERDX, INC., ARCHERDX, LLC and
`INVITAE CORP.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) C.A. No. 20-125 (GBW)
`)
`(CONSOLIDATED)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`[PROPOSED] AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`This _ _ day of - - -~ 2022, the Court having ordered the parties to provide a
`
`revised form of scheduling order for the Court' s consideration (D.I. 462, 484), and the parties
`
`having determined after discussion that the matter cannot be resolved at this juncture by settlement,
`
`voluntary mediation, or binding arbitration;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Discovery Matters and Disputes Relating to Protective Orders.
`
`(a)
`
`Any discovery motion filed without first complying with the following
`
`procedures will be denied without prejudice to renew pursuant to these procedures,
`
`(b)
`
`Should counsel find, after good faith efforts -
`
`including verbal
`
`communications among Delaware and Lead Counsel for all parties to the dispute - that they are
`
`unable to resolve a discovery matter or a dispute relating to a protective order, the parties involved
`
`in the discovery matter or protective order dispute shall submit a joint letter in substantially the
`
`following form:
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 530 Filed 11/01/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 53947
`
`Dear Judge Williams:
`
`The parties in the above-referenced matter write to request
`the scheduling of a discovery teleconference.
`
`The following attorneys, including at least one Delaware
`Counsel and at least one Lead Counsel per party, participated in a
`verbal meet and-confer (in person and/or by telephone) on the
`following date(s): _ _ _ _ _ _ _
`
`Delaware Counsel:
`
`Lead Counsel: - - - - -
`The disputes requiring judicial attention are listed below:
`
`[provide here a non-argumentative list of disputes requiring judicial
`attention]
`
`( c)
`
`On a date to be set by separate order, generally not less than forty-eight ( 48)
`
`hours prior to the conference, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed
`
`three (3) pages, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. On a date to be set
`
`by separate order, but generally not less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to the conference, any
`
`party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, outlining
`
`that party's reasons for its opposition.
`
`(d)
`
`Each party shall submit two (2) courtesy copies of its discovery letter and
`
`any attachments.
`
`( e)
`
`Should the Court find further briefing necessary upon conclusion of the
`
`telephone conference, the Court will order it. Alternatively, the Court may choose to resolve the
`
`dispute prior to the telephone conference and will, in that event, cancel the conference.
`
`2.
`
`Motions to Amend.
`
`(a)
`
`Any motion to amend (including a motion for leave to amend) a pleading
`
`shall NOT be accompanied by an opening brief but shall, instead, be accompanied by a letter, not
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 530 Filed 11/01/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 53948
`
`to exceed three (3) pages, describing the basis for the requested relief, and shall attach the proposed
`
`amended pleading as well as a "blackline" comparison to the prior pleading.
`
`(b) Within seven (7) days after the filing of a motion in compliance with this
`
`Order, any party opposing such a motion shall file a responsive letter, not to exceed five (5) pages.
`
`(c) Within three (3) days thereafter, the moving party may file a reply letter,
`
`not to exceed two (2) pages, and, by this same date, the parties shall file a letter requesting a
`
`teleconference to address the motion to amend.
`
`3.
`
`Motions to Strike.
`
`(a)
`
`Any motion to strike any pleading or other document shall NOT be
`
`accompanied by an opening brief but shall, instead, be accompanied by a letter, not to exceed three
`
`(3) pages, describing the basis for the requested relief, and shall attach the document to be stricken.
`
`(b) Within seven (7) days after the filing of a motion in compliance with this
`
`Order, any party opposing such a motion shall file a responsive letter, not to exceed five (5) pages.
`
`(c) Within three (3) days thereafter, the moving party may file a reply letter,
`
`not to exceed two (2) pages, and, by this same date, the parties shall file a letter requesting a
`
`teleconference to address the motion to strike.
`
`4.
`
`Case Dispositive Motions.
`
`(a)
`
`All case dispositive motions were filed and briefing was completed under
`
`Judge Stark' s procedure as set forth under the prior Scheduling Order and amendments thereto.
`
`D.I. 60, 242. Pursuant to this Court's Order (D.I. 463), by October 17, 2022, the parties will each
`
`submit a one-page letter ranking the grounds for summary judgment raised in its motions for
`
`summary judgment in whatever order it chooses, but with the understanding that once the Court
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 530 Filed 11/01/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 53949
`
`denies summary judgment as to any single ground raised in the motion, the Court will not address
`
`any summary judgment grounds that were ranked after that ground.
`
`(b)
`
`Concise Statement of Facts Requirement. For each separate motion/ground
`
`for summary judgement, the moving party shall file no later than October 18, 2022 a separate
`
`concise statement, not to exceed six ( 6) pages, which details each material fact which the moving
`
`party contends is essential for the Court's resolution of the summary judgment motion (not the
`
`entire case) and as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried. Each
`
`fact shall be set forth in a separate numbered paragraph and shall be supported by specific
`
`citation(s) to the record.
`
`Any party opposing the motion shall file no later than October 25, 2022 a response
`
`to the moving party's concise statement, not to exceed six (6) pages, which admits or disputes the
`
`facts set forth in the moving party's concise statement on a paragraph-by-paragraph basis. To the
`
`extent a fact is disputed, the basis of the dispute shall be supported by specific citation(s) to the
`
`record. Failure to respond to a fact presented in the moving party's concise statement of facts shall
`
`indicate that fact is not in dispute for purposes of summary judgment. The party opposing the
`
`motion may also include with its opposing papers a separate concise statement, not to exceed four
`
`( 4) pages, which sets forth material facts as to which the opposing party contends there is a genuine
`
`issue to be tried. Each fact asserted by he opposing party shall also be set forth in a separate
`
`numbered paragraph and shall be supported by specific citation(s) to the record.
`
`No later than October 31, 2022, the moving party shall file a response to the
`
`opposing party's concise statement of facts, not to exceed four (4) pages, on a paragraph-by(cid:173)
`
`paragraph basis. Failure to respond to a fact presented in the opposing party's concise statement of
`
`facts shall indicate that fact remains in dispute for purposes of summary judgment.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 530 Filed 11/01/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 53950
`
`(c)
`
`Ranking of Summarv Judgment Motions. Pursuant to this Court's Order
`
`(D.I. 463), by October 17, 2022, the parties will each submit a one-page letter ranking the grounds
`
`for summary judgment raised in its motions for summary judgment in whatever order it chooses.
`
`The Court will review the party' s summary judgment motions in the order designated by the party.
`
`If the Court decides to deny a motion filed by the party, barring exceptional reasons determined
`
`sua sponte by the Court, the Court will not review any lower ranked summary motions filed by the
`
`party.
`
`( d)
`
`Oral Argument. Oral argument on the pending summary judgment and
`
`Daubert motions shall be held on January 24, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6B.
`
`5.
`
`Applications bv Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any application to
`
`the Court shall be by written motion. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement
`
`required by Local Rule 7 .1 .1.
`
`6.
`
`Papers Filed Under Seal. In accordance with section G of the Revised
`
`Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means, a redacted version
`
`of any sealed document shall be filed electronically within seven (7) days of the filing of the sealed
`
`document.
`
`7.
`
`Courtesv Copies. The parties shall provide to the Court two (2) courtesy copies of
`
`filings (i.e., briefs, appendices, exhibits, declarations, affidavits etc.) . Courtesy copies of
`
`appendices and exhibits should include hard tabs. This provision also applies to papers filed under
`
`seal.
`
`8.
`
`Motions in Limine. Motions in limine shall not be separately filed. All in limine
`
`requests and responses thereto shall be set forth in the proposed pretrial order. Each SIDE shall be
`
`limited to three (3) in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. The in limine
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 530 Filed 11/01/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 53951
`
`request and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each in limine request may be
`
`supported by a maximum of three (3) pages of argument, may be opposed by a maximum of three
`
`(3) pages of argument, and the side making the in limine request may add a maximum of one (1)
`
`additional page in reply in support of its request. If more than one party is supporting or opposing
`
`an in limine request, such support or opposition shall be combined in a single three (3) page
`
`submission (and, if the moving party, a single one (1) page reply), unless otherwise ordered by the
`
`Court. No separate briefing shall be submitted on in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted
`
`by the Court.
`
`9.
`
`Pretrial Conference. On April 25, 2023, the Court will hold a pretrial conference
`
`in Court with counsel beginning at 3:00 p.m.in Courtroom 6B . Unless otherwise ordered by the
`
`Court, the parties should assume that filing the pretrial order satisfies the pretrial disclosure
`
`requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). The parties shall file with the Court the
`
`joint proposed final pretrial order in compliance with Local Rule 16.3(c) and the Court's
`
`Preferences and Procedures for Civil Cases not later than seven (7) days before the pretrial
`
`conference. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties shall comply with the timeframes
`
`set forth in Local Rule 16.3(d)(l)-(3) for the preparation of the joint proposed final pretrial order.
`
`The parties shall provide the Court two (2) courtesy copies of the joint proposed final
`
`pretrial order and all attachments. The proposed final pretrial order shall contain a table of contents
`
`and the paragraphs shall be numbered.
`
`10.
`
`Jury Instructions, Vair Dire, and Special Verdict Forms. Where a case is to be tried
`
`to a jury, pursuant to Local Rules 47.l(a)(2) and 51.1 the parties should file (i) proposed voir dire,
`
`(ii) preliminary jury instructions, (iii) final jury instructions, and (iv) special verdict forms seven
`
`(7) business days before the final pretrial conference. This submission shall be accompanied by a
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00125-GBW Document 530 Filed 11/01/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 53952
`
`courtesy copy containing electronic files of these documents, in Microsoft Word format, which
`
`may be submitted by e-mail to gbw_civil@ded.uscourts.gov.
`
`11 .
`
`Jury Trial. This matter is scheduled for a 5 day jury trial beginning at 9:30 a.m. on
`
`May 8, 2023, with the subsequent trial days beginning at 9:30 a.m. Until the case is submitted to
`
`the jury for deliberations, the jury will be excused each day at 5 :30 p.m. The trial will be timed, as
`
`counsel will be allocated a total number of hours in which to present their respective cases.
`
`12.
`
`Judgment on Verdict and Post-Trial Status Report. Within seven (7) days after a
`
`jury returns a verdict in any portion of a jury trial, the parties shall jointly submit a form of order
`
`to enter judgment on the verdict. At the same time, the parties shall submit a joint status report,
`
`indicating among other things how the case should proceed and listing any post-trial motions each
`
`party intends to file.
`
`13.
`
`Post-Trial Motions. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, all SIDES are limited
`
`to a maximum of 20 pages of opening briefs, 20 pages of answering briefs, and 10 pages of reply
`
`briefs relating to any post-trial motions filed by that side, no matter how many such motions are
`
`filed.
`
`SO ORDERED this _ _ day of
`
`. \~
`
`The Honorable Gregory B. Williams
`United States District Judge
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket