Case 1:20-cv-00662-RGA Document 226 Filed 01/21/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 5489
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff and
`Counter-Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`iFIT INC.,
`
`Defendant and
`Counterclaimant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 20-662 (RGA)
`
`JOINT INTERIM STATUS REPORT
`
`Plaintiff Peloton Interactive, Inc. and Defendant iFIT Inc. submit this Joint Interim Status
`
`Report pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order (D.I. 33, as amended, D.I. 194).
`
`1.
`
`Procedural History
`
`Peloton filed this case on May 15, 2020, against iFIT (f/k/a/ ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.)
`
`for infringing two of Peloton’s patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 10,486,026 and 10,639,521) and engaging
`
`in false advertising, unfair competition, and deceptive business practices. D.I. 1. iFIT filed its
`
`Answer and Counterclaims on July 13, 2020, asserting, inter alia, counterclaims for infringement
`
`of two patents (U.S. Patent No. 6,601,016 and 7,556,590), false advertising, and deceptive trade
`
`practices (D.I. 9), which it amended on August 28, 2020 (D.I. 27). On May 26, 2021, the Court
`
`granted-in-part and denied-in-part Peloton’s Partial Motion to Dismiss [iFIT’s] First Amended
`
`Counterclaims. D.I. 104 (dismissing portions of iFIT’s counterclaim Counts III and IV).
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff and
`Counter-Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`iFIT INC.,
`
`Defendant and
`Counterclaimant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 20-662 (RGA)
`
`JOINT INTERIM STATUS REPORT
`
`Plaintiff Peloton Interactive, Inc. and Defendant iFIT Inc. submit this Joint Interim Status
`
`Report pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order (D.I. 33, as amended, D.I. 194).
`
`1.
`
`Procedural History
`
`Peloton filed this case on May 15, 2020, against iFIT (f/k/a/ ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.)
`
`for infringing two of Peloton’s patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 10,486,026 and 10,639,521) and engaging
`
`in false advertising, unfair competition, and deceptive business practices. D.I. 1. iFIT filed its
`
`Answer and Counterclaims on July 13, 2020, asserting, inter alia, counterclaims for infringement
`
`of two patents (U.S. Patent No. 6,601,016 and 7,556,590), false advertising, and deceptive trade
`
`practices (D.I. 9), which it amended on August 28, 2020 (D.I. 27). On May 26, 2021, the Court
`
`granted-in-part and denied-in-part Peloton’s Partial Motion to Dismiss [iFIT’s] First Amended
`
`Counterclaims. D.I. 104 (dismissing portions of iFIT’s counterclaim Counts III and IV).
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00662-RGA Document 226 Filed 01/21/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 5490
`
`The Court held Markman hearings on June 24 and June 25, 2021, and an evidentiary
`
`hearing on September 1, 2021, and issued decisions and related orders on the disputed claim terms
`
`(D.I. 132, 141, 144, 154).1
`
`Fact discovery closes on February 22, 2022, and expert discovery closes on June 10, 2022.
`
`D.I. 194. Case dispositive and Daubert motions are due on July 8, 2022, and a pretrial conference
`
`is scheduled for September 30, 2022. Id.
`
`The Court has set a date of October 17, 2022, for the start of jury trial in this case or in the
`
`related case, Peloton Interactive, Inc. v Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC, C.A. No. 19-1903-
`
`RGA, depending on which case is first prepared to go to trial. See D.I. 33, ¶ 16; D.I. 194.
`
`2.
`
`Progress of Discovery to Date
`
`The parties have been diligently working to complete fact discovery by the February 22,
`
`2022 deadline. The parties have served and responded to several sets of document requests and
`
`interrogatories, and substantially completed document production as of June 2021. The parties
`
`will serve final infringement and invalidity contentions in February. Depositions of fact witnesses
`
`are ongoing. Based on witness availability, it appears that a few depositions will need to proceed
`
`after the current close of fact discovery. To the extent the fact discovery deadline needs to be
`
`extended to accommodate these depositions, the parties will confer in good faith and raise any
`
`issues to the Court as necessary.
`
`1
`The Court’s resolution of the parties’ disputes regarding the claim terms “performance
`parameters” and “performance data” is still pending. See D.I. 134; D.I. 132.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00662-RGA Document 226 Filed 01/21/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 5491
`
`3.
`
` Issues Pending Before the Court
`
`On January 12, 2022, iFIT moved to stay Peloton’s patent infringement claims pending
`
`resolution of IPRs for Peloton’s ’026 and ’521 patents. D.I. 215.2 The IPR petitions were filed
`
`by Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC and instituted on March 3, 2021 for the ’026 patent and on
`
`November 18, 2021 for the ’521 patent; iFIT moved to join the IPR of the ’521 patent on December
`
`17, 2021 and that motion is pending before the PTAB.3 Peloton opposes iFIT’s motion and will
`
`respond in due course. Briefing on iFIT’s motion will be completed, at the earliest, on February
`
`8, 2022. D.I. 223.
`
`The parties have no other issues to present to the Court at this time, but are available at the
`
`Court’s convenience to discuss the status of this case.
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`
`/s/ Michael J. Flynn
`
`/s/ Christine D. Haynes
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Michael J. Flynn (#5333)
`Anthony D. Raucci (#5948)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@morrisnichols.com
`mflynn@morrisnichols.com
`araucci@morrisnichols.com
`
`Attorneys for Peloton Interactive, Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Frederick L. Cottrell, III (#2555)
`Christine D. Haynes (#4697)
`920 N. King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`cottrell@rlf.com
`haynes@rlf.com
`
`Attorneys for iFIT Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`David R. Wright
`Taylor J. Wright
`Alexis K. Juergens
`
`2
`iFIT’s motion seeks a stay of Peloton’s patent claims only, and not iFIT’s patent
`counterclaims or the parties’ non-patent claims. See D.I. 215 at 3.
`3
`iFIT has not moved to join the IPR of the ’026 patent.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00662-RGA Document 226 Filed 01/21/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 5492
`
`Steven N. Feldman
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 100
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
`(213) 485-1234
`
`Lawrence J. Gotts
`Gabriel K. Bell
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, NW
`Suite 1000
`Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
`(202) 637- 2200
`
`Marc N. Zubick
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60611
`(312) 876- 7700
`
`David F. Kowalski
`Patrick C. Justman
`Adam Alexander Herrera
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`12670 High Bluff Drive
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 523-5400
`
`William J. Trach
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`200 Clarendon Street
`Boston, MA 02116
`(617) 948-6000
`
`Joseph C. Akalski
`Clement Naples
`Dennis Mai
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`1271 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10020
`(212) 906-2927
`
`January 21, 2022
`
`Robert Stewart
`Ray Nelson
`Maren Laurence
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`299 South Main Street, Suite 2000
`Salt Lake City, UT 84111
`
`Pavan K. Agarwal
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`Washington Harbour
`300 K Street, N.W., Suite 600
`Washington, D.C. 20007-5109
`
`Ruben J. Rodrigues
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`111 Huntington Avenue, Suite 2500
`Boston, MA 02199-7610
`
`Joseph A. Loy
`Ryan Kane
`Nathaniel DeLucia
`Matthew B. Hershkowitz
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`
`Gregg F. LoCascio
`Matthew J. McIntee
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`
`Robin A. McCue
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`300 North LaSalle
`Chicago, IL 60654
`
`Jonathan E. Moskin
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`90 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10016-1314
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
