`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI
`SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED, and
`ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP,
`
`v.
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 20-1524-LPS
`
` [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, this 28th day of April, 2021, that Defendant Seagen Inc.’s
`
`Motion to Stay or Dismiss (D.I. 10) is GRANTED as follows:
`
`1.
`
`The above-captioned action is STAYED for no more than 90 days, absent further
`
`order of the Court;
`
`2.
`
`During the pendency of the stay, the Parties shall file joint status reports a minimum
`
`of every 30 days, starting from April 23, 2021 regarding developments in Seagen, Inc. v. Daiichi
`
`Sankyo Company, Limited, No. 2:20-cv-337 (E.D. Tex.) (the “Texas case”), irrespective of
`
`whether interim joint status reports are also filed; and
`
`3.
`
`During the pendency of the stay, the Parties shall file interim joint status reports to
`
`advise the Court in a timely matter of any developments in the Texas case—including, but not
`
`limited to, any decision rendered concerning venue—that may impact whether the stay in the
`
`above-captioned action should be lifted prior to the expiration of 90 days or extended past 90 days.
`
`_____________________________
` Chief, United States District Judge
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
