throbber
Case 1:20-cv-01644-RGA Document 1-17 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 868
`Case 1:20-cv-01644-RGA Document 1-17 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 868
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 17
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`5/27/2020
`
`A�shot in the arm keeps�fetuses safe - Sep. 12, 2007
`Case 1:20-cv-01644-RGA Document 1-17 Filed 12/03/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 869
`
`Companies
`
`Markets
`
`Tech
`
`Media
`
`U.S.
`
`Top Stories
`7 things to know before the bell
`SoftBank and Toyota want driverless cars to change
`the world
`Aston Martin falls 5% in its London IPO
`Barnes & Noble stock soars 20% as it explores a sale
`Why it's time for investors to go on the defense
`
`Sponsors
`
`A better prenatal test?
`A biotech startup promises accurate prenatal tests without the risks of traditional
`amniocentesis.
`
`By Lisa Palmer
`September 12 2007: 7:02 AM EDT
`
`More from FSB
`Help wanted for HR firm
`A CEO and rodeo queen
`King of the mountain bike
`Current Issue
`
`(FSB Magazine) -- Life was proceeding as planned for Ravinder Dhallan, or so it seemed. Having earned doctorates in
`medicine and biomedical engineering at Johns Hopkins University, he had just started a radiation oncology residency at
`Massachusetts General Hospital. On the home front Dhallan and his wife, Hejung Christine Chang, had a daughter, and
`they were eager to see their family grow.
`Then things got complicated. Chang suffered two miscarriages. The couple was devastated and had no idea what to do.
`Only later did they realize that the miscarriages had a genetic basis. The episode left Dhallan struck by how little
`information was available to women who experienced complications during pregnancy. "It suddenly became personal," he
`says. And so he resolved to invent a better prenatal diagnostic exam.
`Dhallan had long dreamed of solving a scientific problem and building a business
`around his discovery. That's an uncommon trait in the highly structured world of
`modern medicine. Every year enterprising MDs come up with ingenious new
`therapies. But few doctors are willing to trade their medical careers for the risks
`of a startup.
`Dhallan's venture seemed particularly chancy. His goal was a test to detect fetal
`abnormalities such as Down syndrome and cystic fibrosis at an early stage in a
`pregnancy (so there's enough time for the fetus to be treated or aborted safely). It
`was no easy task. Currently the diagnostic gold standard is amniocentesis, in
`which a four-inch needle is inserted into the abdomen to extract amniotic or
`placental cells directly from the womb. The results are 100% accurate, but the
`test carries a one-in-200 risk of triggering a miscarriage and can't be performed
`until the pregnancy is 15 to 18 weeks along. An alternative, chorionic villus
`sampling, can be performed ten to 12 weeks after conception but poses a greater
`risk of miscarriage.
`Meanwhile, today's noninvasive prenatal screenings options rely on a
`combination of ultrasound imaging and blood samples drawn 11 and 16 weeks
`into the pregnancy. Accuracy rates range from 60% to 90%, and about 5% of
`tests produce false positives.
`What has made detecting genetic problems in a fetus so difficult thus far is that
`you need a test that can distinguish fetal and maternal DNA. Think needle in
`haystack: One vial of a pregnant woman's blood contains billions of copies of her
`own DNA mixed with just a few hundred copies of her baby's DNA.
`Dhallan's patented procedure, called Rapid Analysis of Variations in the Genome,
`draws 29.5 milliliters (or a mere two tablespoons) of blood from the mother's arm, isolates fetal DNA cells, and checks
`them for three copies of chromosome 21, the marker for Down syndrome. The test is 99% accurate, according to his
`published studies, and can be performed after the eighth week of pregnancy. He is now working to extend the test to
`detect cystic fibrosis.
`Dhallan has incorporated a biotech firm called RavGen (ravgen.com), based in Columbia, Md. He has raised $15 million
`for research and development and has completed two clinical trials of RavGen's prenatal screen. Dhallan is now
`recruiting clinicians and their patients for the third and last clinical trial. His test will then go up for approval from the U.S.
`Food and Drug Administration. He hopes to have a test on the market in the next few years.
`Dhallan's timing is impeccable. The number of women giving birth after age 35 - the highest-risk group for Down
`syndrome - is increasing at a rate of 1.5% each year. Last January the American College of Obstetrics and Gyne-cology
`recommended that all pregnant women be screened for Down syndrome. The occurrence of the syndrome has held
`steady over the past few years at one in every 800 to 1,000 U.S. births.
`How did Dhallan manage the transition from physician to entrepreneur? Part of the answer lies in his medical training.
`After deciding to launch RavGen, he left oncology for emergency medicine, hoping that a schedule of long-er days and
`shorter workweeks would free up time to focus on his business. But the emergency room turned out to be great training
`for the daily high-wire act of running a startup. "You get perspective," says Dhallan. "Once you've dealt with life and death
`day in and day out, other problems seem trivial." The ER also helped him develop strong leadership skills. "If someone
`has been shot six times, everyone is looking at the physician's response," Dhallan says. "If I didn't look confident, then
`everyone would lose confidence."
`On free days Dhallan read about prenatal medicine and picked the brains of entrepreneurs in many fields. "One guy had
`a concrete company," says Dhallan. "Another was a builder. I asked them how they incorporated. Who was their
`accountant? What law firm did they like?" Like many other successful entrepreneurs, Dhallan surrounded himself with
`smart people. Most of his 20 employees are scientists. His board includes a Nobel laureate and several medical experts
`affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in nearby Baltimore. To retain control of his young company, Dhallan raised
`capital from long-term angel investors, avoiding venture capitalists and strategic partners. One of his first investors was a
`college buddy; another, a childhood friend.
`Dhallan faces stiff competition. Some 15 research teams worldwide are seeking a solution for safe, reliable, noninvasive
`alternatives to amniocentesis, says Dr. Jacob Canick, director of prenatal and special testing at Women & Infants
`Hospital in Providence. One rival, Dr. Dennis Lo of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (cuhk.edu.hk), describes
`Dhallan's research as promising but inconclusive. "I was very excited, but our researchers were unable to replicate his
`work in the lab," Lo says.
`Dhallan isn't fazed. In 2004 he pub-lished his technique in the weekly Journal of the American Medical Association. A
`second paper appeared in the February issue of The Lancet, a British medical journal. And he is launching his largest
`random, double-blind study yet. On the business side, Dhallan earned an MBA at the University of Pennsylvania's
`Wharton School. Rav-Gen will soon announce a partnership with a well-known ultrasound company. "This will help our
`brand gain traction faster," he says.
`
`https://money.cnn.com/2007/09/07/smbusiness/amniocentesis.fsb/index.htm
`
`1/2
`
`

`

`5/27/2020
`A�shot in the arm keeps�fetuses safe - Sep. 12, 2007
`Case 1:20-cv-01644-RGA Document 1-17 Filed 12/03/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 870
`The news from home is equally good. After ten years of reproductive challenges, Dhallan's wife gave birth to their second
`child, a son. Matthew Dhallan is now 2 years old and thriving.
`
`Will Congress slam small inventors?
`A mother's race for a cure
`
`To write a note to the editor about this article, click here.
`
`More Small Business
`
`SAVE | EMAIL | PRINT |
`
` | REPRINT
`
`Contact Us
`
`Closed Captioning
`
`Site Map
`
`Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer.
`Morningstar: © 2018 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2018. All rights reserved. Chicago Mercantile Association:
`Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are
`proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco,
`LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow
`Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2018 and/or its affiliates.
`
`© 2018 Cable News Network. A WarnerMedia Company. All Rights Reserved.Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy.
`
`https://money.cnn.com/2007/09/07/smbusiness/amniocentesis.fsb/index.htm
`
`2/2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket