throbber
Case 1:20-cv-01703-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/20 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`____________________________________
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`STATE OF DELAWARE
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`____________________________________)
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`The United States of America, by authority of the Attorney General and through the
`
`undersigned attorneys, acting at the request of the Administrator of the United States
`
`Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), files this Complaint and alleges as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is a civil environmental action under Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive
`
`Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a),
`
`seeking recovery of response costs incurred by the United States in connection with the release
`
`or threatened release of hazardous substances at Landfill Area #1 within the Governor Bacon
`
`Health Center / Fort DuPont State Park located in New Castle County, Delaware (“Site”), which
`
`Defendant the State of Delaware owns.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`2.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and the
`
`Defendant pursuant to Sections 107(a) and 113(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a) and
`
`9613(b), and under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1345.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01703-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/20 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 2
`
`3.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under Section 113(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 9613(b), and 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c), because the claims arose, and the threatened and
`
`actual releases of hazardous substances occurred, in this judicial district.
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Defendant has owned the Site since 1947.
`
`Defendant is a “person” within the meaning of Section 101(21) of CERCLA, 42
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`U.S.C. § 9601(21).
`
`6.
`
`Defendant is an “owner” of the Site within the meaning of CERCLA Section
`
`101(20)(A), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(20)(A).
`
`GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`Site Background
`
`7.
`
`The Site encompasses approximately 10 to 20 acres that were historically used as
`
`a dump area within the Governor Bacon Health Center / Fort DuPont State Park (“the Property”).
`
`8.
`
`The Property stretches across approximately 380 acres in New Castle County,
`
`Delaware. The Property is bounded by the Delaware River to the east, the Chesapeake and
`
`Delaware Canal to the south, and a branch of the Canal to the west and north.
`
`9.
`
`Beginning with the construction of a military battery in 1864, portions of the
`
`Property were developed into numerous batteries and support buildings that eventually became
`
`Fort DuPont.
`
`10.
`
`Fort DuPont went through various phases of construction and use between the
`
`Civil War era and the First and Second World Wars.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01703-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/20 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 3
`
`11.
`
`In approximately 1937, a portion of the Property became a dump area for Fort
`
`DuPont. This dump area came to be known as Landfill Area #1, which is the Site at issue in this
`
`CERCLA action.
`
`12.
`
`Ten years later, in January 1947, Defendant acquired the Property—including the
`
`Site—from the United States through a quitclaim deed.
`
`13.
`
`Defendant began operating the Governor Bacon Health Center on the Property in
`
`1948. In 1992, Defendant turned portions of the Property into Fort DuPont State Park.
`
`14.
`
`Defendant manages Fort DuPont State Park through the Delaware Department of
`
`Natural Resources and Environmental Control (“DNREC”).
`
`15.
`
`The Site is located in the Fort DuPont State Park portion of the Property, along
`
`the bank of the Delaware River. The easternmost boundary of the Site is within the tidal reach of
`
`the Delaware River and is submerged by high tide.
`
`16.
`
`Over time, the Delaware River eroded the Site’s shoreline and exposed discarded
`
`materials.
`
`17. Walking trails in Fort DuPont State Park gave the public access to the Site and
`
`discarded materials like demolition debris, metal objects, objects associated with military
`
`operations, and objects associated with occupation of the Property over time.
`
`18.
`
`Aerial photographs of the Property show various levels of ground disturbance at,
`
`and road access to, the Site between 1947 and 1986.
`
`19.
`
`In 1985, a brush fire at the Site exposed approximately 14 gas cylinders
`
`containing chemical substances. After Defendant had the cylinders removed, approximately one
`
`foot of fill was placed on the Site.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01703-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/20 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 4
`
`Response Action
`
`20.
`
`The 1985 Site fire was followed by a series of investigations into potential
`
`hazardous substances and/or ordnance at the Site and across the Property.
`
`21.
`
`In 2003, DNREC sampling activities revealed heightened concentrations of lead
`
`and other substances within or near the Site. Lead concentrations at the Site ranged above 1,000
`
`milligram per kilogram (“mg/kg”), which is the DNREC Uniform Risk-Based Standard for lead
`
`in an industrial land use setting.
`
`22.
`
`EPA carried out a preliminary removal site evaluation pursuant to Section
`
`300.410 of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (“National
`
`Contingency Plan”), 40 C.F.R. § 300.410, between December 2011 and December 2012.
`
`23.
`
`During the preliminary evaluation, EPA encountered metallic lead in various
`
`forms at the Site, including as casing around electrical wire, as melted globules, and as small
`
`fragments.
`
`24.
`
`EPA’s sampling activities during the preliminary evaluation indicated
`
`concentrations of lead ranging up to approximately 55,500 mg/kg at the Site. These
`
`concentrations exceeded concentrations attributable to the natural environment.
`
`25.
`
`Lead is a hazardous substance as defined in Section 101(14) of CERCLA, 42
`
`U.S.C. § 9601(14), because it is listed in 40 C.F.R. § 302.4.
`
`26.
`
`On January 28, 2014, EPA approved an Action Memorandum for a time-critical
`
`removal action at the Site. EPA initiated the removal action on April 7, 2014.
`
`27.
`
`EPA’s activities throughout the removal action included excavating and removing
`
`lead-contaminated materials primarily from the tidal zone of the Site. Those materials were then
`
`transported and disposed of offsite.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01703-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/20 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 5
`
`28.
`
`As part of the removal action, EPA also constructed a revetment (i.e., a retaining
`
`wall) to armor the remaining landfill and to minimize future erosion along the bank of the
`
`Delaware River.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`The last lead-contaminated material was transported offsite on October 26, 2014.
`
`EPA completed the removal action on March 26, 2015. EPA returned to the Site
`
`on April 28, 2015, to document final Site conditions.
`
`31.
`
` On August 2, 2016, the United States sent Defendant a notice of potential
`
`liability that demanded payment of response costs incurred pursuant to CERCLA Section
`
`107(a)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(1).
`
`32.
`
`As of December 6, 2019, the United States had incurred approximately
`
`$3,779,984.60, including $136,575.03 of prejudgment interest.
`
`33.
`
`The United States has incurred costs of removal actions not inconsistent with the
`
`National Contingency Plan in responding to the release or threatened release of hazardous
`
`substances at and from the Site, within the meaning of CERCLA Sections 101(23), (24), and
`
`(25), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(23)-(25).
`
`CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`Paragraphs 1-33 are re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`Section 107(a) of CERCLA provides in pertinent part that:
`
`(1)-(4) the owner and operator of a vessel or a facility . . . from which there is a release,
`or a threatened release which causes the incurrence of response costs, of a hazardous
`substance, shall be liable for—
`
`(A) all costs of removal or remedial action incurred by the United States Government . . .
`not inconsistent with the national contingency plan.
`
`42 U.S.C. § 9607(a).
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01703-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/20 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 6
`
`36.
`
`The Site is a “facility” within the meaning of CERCLA Section 101(9), 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 9601(9).
`
`37.
`
`“Hazardous substances” within the meaning of CERCLA Section 101(14), 42
`
`U.S.C. § 9601(14), including lead, were found at the Site.
`
`38.
`
`There were “releases” or the threat of “releases” of hazardous substances into the
`
`environment at the Site, within the meaning of CERCLA Section 101(22), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(22).
`
`39.
`
`Defendant is the owner of the Site under CERCLA Section 107(a)(1), 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 9607(a)(1).
`
`40.
`
`The United States has incurred costs for a “response,” as defined in CERCLA
`
`Section 101(25), 42 U.S.C. § 9601(25), in investigating and removing the release or threatened
`
`release of hazardous substances at the Site.
`
`41.
`
`The response costs incurred by the United States at the Site were not inconsistent
`
`with the National Contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300.
`
`42.
`
`Pursuant to CERCLA Section 107(a), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), Defendant is jointly
`
`and severally liable to the United States for all response costs incurred by the United States in
`
`connection with the Site, including enforcement costs and interest on response costs for which a
`
`demand for payment has been made.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff the United States respectfully requests that the Court:
`
`1.
`
`Enter judgment in favor of the United States and against Defendant, jointly and
`
`severally, for all response costs incurred by the United States, including prejudgment interest, for
`
`response actions in connection with the Site;
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01703-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/20 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 7
`
`2.
`
`Award the United States the costs of this action, including its costs of attorney
`
`time; and
`
`3.
`
`Grant such other relief as the Court deems appropriate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`JONATHAN D. BRIGHTBILL
`Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`
`/s/ Devon A. Ahearn
`DEVON A. AHEARN
`CA State Bar Number: 307275
`Trial Attorney
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`Environment & Natural Resources Division
`United States Department of Justice
`P.O. Box 7611
`Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
`Phone: (202) 514-2717
`Email: devon.ahearn@usdoj.gov
`
`
`DAVID C. WEISS
`United States Attorney
`
`/s/ Laura D. Hatcher
`LAURA D. HATCHER
`DE State Bar Number: 5098
`Chief, Civil Division
`United States Attorney’s Office
`District of Delaware
`1313 N. Market St., Suite 400
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Phone: (302) 573-6205
`Email: laura.hatcher@usdoj.gov
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket