`
`
`
`AMGEN INC. and
`LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiffs Amgen Inc. (“Amgen”) and Les Laboratoires Servier (“Servier,” and collectively
`
`v.
`
`C.A. No. _____________
`
`ALEMBIC PHARMACEUTICALS
`LIMITED and ALEMBIC
`PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`with Amgen, “Plaintiffs”) bring
`
`this action for patent
`
`infringement against Alembic
`
`Pharmaceuticals Limited and Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”).
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`
`
`This is a civil action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., and in particular under 35 U.S.C. § 271. This action relates
`
`to Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) No. 215238, filed by and for the benefit of
`
`Defendants with the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). Through ANDA No.
`
`215238, Defendants seek approval to market generic versions of Corlanor® (ivabradine) 5 mg and
`
`7.5 mg tablets (the “Proposed ANDA Product”), prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`7,361,649 (“the ’649 Patent”), 7,361,650 (“the ’650 Patent”), 7,867,996 (“the ’996 Patent”), and
`
`7,879,842 (“the ’842 Patent”) (collectively, “the Patents-in-Suit”).
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 2 of 15 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Amgen is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware,
`
`having a principal place of business at One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California
`
`91320-1799. Amgen discovers, develops, manufactures, and sells innovative therapeutic products
`
`based on advances in molecular biology, recombinant DNA technology, and chemistry.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Servier is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of France,
`
`having a principal place of business at 50 Rue Carnot, 92284 Suresnes Cedex, France. Servier is
`
`part of the Servier Group. Servier Group discovers, develops, manufactures, and sells innovative
`
`therapeutic products and is governed by a non-profit foundation.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited (“Alembic
`
`Ltd.”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of India, having a
`
`principal place of business at Alembic Road, Vadodara 390003, Gujarat, India.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Alembic
`
`Inc.”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, having a principal place
`
`of business at 750 Route 202, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807.
`
`Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Alembic Inc. is a wholly owned-subsidiary of Alembic
`
`On information and belief, Aaron S. Lukas is the agent for service of process in the
`
`United States for Alembic Ltd.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants collaborate with respect to the development,
`
`regulatory approval, marketing, sale, and/or distribution of pharmaceutical products. On further
`
`information and belief, Defendants are agents of each other and/or operate in concert as integrated
`
`parts of the same business group.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 3 of 15 PageID #: 3
`
`
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants acted in concert to develop the Proposed
`
`ANDA Product that is the subject of ANDA No. 215238 and to seek regulatory approval from the
`
`FDA to market and sell the Proposed ANDA Product throughout the United States, including
`
`within this District.
`
`
`
`Defendants’ ANDA No. 215238 seeks approval to commercially manufacture, use,
`
`offer for sale, sell, and/or import a generic version of Amgen’s Corlanor® (ivabradine) tablets prior
`
`to the expiration of the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants intend to act collaboratively to obtain
`
`approval for Defendants’ ANDA No. 215238, and, in the event the FDA approves that ANDA, to
`
`commercially manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Proposed ANDA Product.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`
`
`This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States,
`
`Title 35, United States Code, arising out of the submission of Defendants’ ANDA No. 215238 to
`
`the FDA.
`
`
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1331 and 1338(a), and 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
`
`
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Alembic Inc. because, on information and
`
`belief, Alembic Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware.
`
`
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Alembic Ltd. because, inter alia, it has
`
`maintained continuous and systematic contacts with this District and availed itself of the privilege
`
`of doing business in this District. On information and belief, Alembic Ltd. has acted in concert
`
`with Alembic Inc.: (1) to file ANDA No. 215238 seeking approval to commercially manufacture,
`
`use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Proposed ANDA Product in the United States, including
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 4 of 15 PageID #: 4
`
`
`
`in this District; (2) regularly and continuously transacted business within this District, including
`
`by selling pharmaceutical products in this District either on its own or through its affiliates; and
`
`(3) derived substantial revenue from the sale of those products in this District. Alternatively, this
`
`Court has personal jurisdiction over Alembic Ltd. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`4(k)(2)(A).
`
`
`
`On information and belief, if ANDA No. 215238 is approved, the Proposed ANDA
`
`Product charged with infringing the Patents-in-Suit will be marketed, distributed, offered for sale,
`
`and/or sold in this District, prescribed by physicians practicing in this District, dispensed by
`
`pharmacies located within this District, and/or used by patients in this District, all of which would
`
`have a substantial effect on this District.
`
`
`
`This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Alembic Inc. and Alembic Ltd.
`
`because they have affirmatively availed themselves of the jurisdiction of this Court through the
`
`assertion of counterclaims in suits brought in this District and/or by being sued in this District
`
`without challenging personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Pfizer Inc., et al. v. Alembic Pharmaceuticals,
`
`Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 20-1392 (D. Del.); Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
`
`v. Mankind Pharma Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 18-1689 (D. Del.); H. Lundbeck A/S, et al. v.
`
`Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited, et al., Civil Action No. 18-0113 (D. Del.); Adverio Pharma
`
`GmbH, et al. v. MSN Laboratories Private Limited, et al., Civil Action No. 18-0073 (D. Del.).
`
`
`
`For the reasons set forth above, and for additional reasons which will be supplied
`
`if Defendants challenge personal jurisdiction in this action, Defendants are subject to personal
`
`jurisdiction in this District.
`
`
`
`Venue is proper in this District for Alembic Inc. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b)
`
`because Alembic Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 5 of 15 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Venue is proper in this District for Alembic Ltd. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c)
`
`because, inter alia, Alembic Ltd. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
`
`Republic of India and is subject to personal jurisdiction in this District.
`
`THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`
`
`
`
`The Patents-in-Suit are assigned to Servier and exclusively licensed to Amgen.
`
`The ’649 Patent, entitled “-Crystalline Form of Ivabradine Hydrochloride, a
`
`Process for Its Preparation and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing It,” was duly and legally
`
`issued on April 22, 2008. A copy of the ’649 Patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`
`
`The ’650 Patent, entitled “-Crystalline Form of Ivabradine Hydrochloride, a
`
`Process for Its Preparation and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing It,” was duly and legally
`
`issued on April 22, 2008. A copy of the ’650 Patent is attached as Exhibit B.
`
`
`
`The ’996 Patent, entitled “-Crystalline Form of Ivabradine Hydrochloride, a
`
`Process for Its Preparation and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing It,” was duly and legally
`
`issued on January 11, 2011. A copy of the ’996 Patent is attached as Exhibit C.
`
`
`
`The ’842 Patent, entitled “Beta-Crystalline Form of Ivabradine Hydrochloride, a
`
`Process for Its Preparation and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing It,” was duly and legally
`
`issued on February 1, 2011. A copy of the ’842 Patent is attached as Exhibit D.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`Corlanor® (ivabradine)
`
`
`
`Corlanor® (ivabradine) is a drug used to treat certain cases of chronic heart failure.
`
`In chronic heart failure, a person’s heart does not adequately supply the body with blood, causing
`
`fatigue and weakness. Corlanor® can reduce a patient’s risk of being hospitalized due to heart
`
`failure.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 6 of 15 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`
`
`Amgen is the holder of approved New Drug Application (“NDA”) No. 20-6143 for
`
`Corlanor® (ivabradine) tablets. Pursuant to NDA No. 20-6143, Amgen markets and distributes
`
`Corlanor® (ivabradine) tablets in the United States. Corlanor® is available in 5 mg and 7.5 mg
`
`tablets.
`
`
`
`Corlanor® (ivabradine) tablets, the active pharmaceutical ingredient ivabradine, the
`
`method of manufacture, and/or their use are covered by one or more claims of the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`The Patents-in-Suit have been listed for NDA No. 20-6143 in the FDA publication Approved Drug
`
`Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, which is also known as the “Orange Book.”
`
`Defendants’ ANDA No. 215238
`
`
`
`In a letter dated December 7, 2020 (the “Notice Letter”), Defendants stated that
`
`they had submitted ANDA No. 215238 to the FDA seeking approval to commercially manufacture,
`
`use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Proposed ANDA Product prior to the expiration of the
`
`Patents-in-Suit. The Notice Letter further stated that ANDA No. 215238 contained a certification
`
`pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) (a “Paragraph IV Certification”) that the Patents-in-
`
`Suit are invalid, unenforceable, and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use,
`
`offer for sale, sale, and/or importation of the Proposed ANDA Product.
`
`
`
`Defendants were aware of the Patents-in-Suit when they submitted ANDA No.
`
`215238 with a Paragraph IV Certification.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, ivabradine hydrochloride is the active ingredient in the
`
`Proposed ANDA Product.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, ANDA No. 215238 refers to and relies upon the NDA
`
`for Corlanor® (ivabradine) and contains data that, according to Defendants, demonstrate the
`
`bioequivalence of the Proposed ANDA Product and Corlanor® (ivabradine). See 21 U.S.C.
`
`§ 355(j)(2); 21 C.F.R. § 314.94(a)(7).
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 7 of 15 PageID #: 7
`
`
`
`
`
`On information and belief, the active ingredient in the Proposed ANDA Product—
`
`ivabradine hydrochloride—exhibits a patented crystalline form.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants intend to have healthcare providers use their
`
`Proposed ANDA Product, if approved, as set forth in their Proposed ANDA Product label. On
`
`information and belief, Defendants’ Proposed ANDA Product label will instruct healthcare
`
`providers to prescribe their Proposed ANDA Product in the manner set forth in the label.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On information and belief, the FDA has not yet approved ANDA No. 215238.
`
`Plaintiffs commenced this action within 45 days of receipt of the Notice Letter.
`
`Defendants’ Notice Letter included an Offer of Confidential Access.
`
`Between December 11, 2020 and January 8, 2021, Amgen and the Defendants
`
`negotiated and reached an agreement to modify the Offer of Confidential Access.
`
`
`
`On January 13, 2021, Defendants produced documents purportedly from their
`
`ANDA No. 215238.
`
`COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,361,649
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs hereby reallege and incorporate the allegations of paragraphs 1 – 39 of
`
`this Complaint.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, the Proposed ANDA Product infringes one or more
`
`claims of the ’649 Patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by the use and/or
`
`presence in the Proposed ANDA Product of an ivabradine crystalline form as covered by one or
`
`more of the claims of the ’649 Patent.
`
`
`
`Defendants’ submission of ANDA No. 215238 to the FDA under 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)
`
`for the purpose of obtaining approval to commercially manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 8 of 15 PageID #: 8
`
`
`
`import the Proposed ANDA Product before the expiration of the ’649 Patent constitutes
`
`infringement of the ’649 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2).
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants plan to, intend to, and will commercially
`
`manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Proposed ANDA Product immediately
`
`upon approval of ANDA No. 215238 and will instruct healthcare providers to use the Proposed
`
`ANDA Product in accordance with the proposed product labeling.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, upon FDA approval of ANDA No. 215238, Defendants
`
`will infringe the ’649 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing the
`
`Proposed ANDA Product in the United States, and by actively inducing and/or contributing to
`
`infringement by others under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) and/or (c).
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants had knowledge of the ’649 Patent when they
`
`submitted ANDA No. 215238 to the FDA, Defendants knew or should have known that they will
`
`induce or contribute to another’s direct infringement of the ’649 Patent, and Defendants acted with
`
`the specific intent to induce or contribute to another’s direct infringement of the ’649 Patent.
`
`
`
`To date, Plaintiffs have not received sufficient information, materials, and things
`
`from Defendants to enable Plaintiffs to meaningfully evaluate the bases for Defendants’ assertion
`
`of non-infringement of the ’649 Patent.
`
`
`
`In the absence of the ability to meaningfully evaluate information related to
`
`Defendants’ ANDA No. 215238, Plaintiffs resort to the judicial process and the aid of discovery
`
`to obtain under appropriate judicial safeguards such information as is required to confirm their
`
`belief and to present to the Court evidence that Defendants infringe one or more claims of the ’649
`
`Patent.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 9 of 15 PageID #: 9
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs will be substantially and irreparably harmed by the infringing activities
`
`described above unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Plaintiffs have no adequate
`
`remedy at law.
`
`COUNT II: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,361,650
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs hereby reallege and incorporate the allegations of paragraphs 1 – 48 of
`
`this Complaint.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, the Proposed ANDA Product infringes one or more
`
`claims of the ’650 Patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by the use and/or
`
`presence in the Proposed ANDA Product of an ivabradine crystalline form as covered by one or
`
`more of the claims of the ’650 Patent.
`
`
`
`Defendants’ submission of ANDA No. 215238 to the FDA under 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)
`
`for the purpose of obtaining approval to commercially manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or
`
`import the Proposed ANDA Product before the expiration of the ’650 Patent constitutes
`
`infringement of the ’650 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2).
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants plan to, intend to, and will commercially
`
`manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Proposed ANDA Product immediately
`
`upon approval of ANDA No. 215238 and will instruct healthcare providers to use the Proposed
`
`ANDA Product in accordance with the proposed product labeling.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, upon FDA approval of ANDA No. 215238, Defendants
`
`will infringe the ’650 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing the
`
`Proposed ANDA Product in the United States, and by actively inducing and/or contributing to
`
`infringement by others under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) and/or (c).
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 10 of 15 PageID #: 10
`
`
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants had knowledge of the ’650 Patent when they
`
`submitted ANDA No. 215238 to the FDA, Defendants knew or should have known that they will
`
`induce or contribute to another’s direct infringement of the ’650 Patent, and Defendants acted with
`
`the specific intent to induce or contribute to another’s direct infringement of the ’650 Patent.
`
`
`
`To date, Plaintiffs have not received sufficient information, materials, and things
`
`from Defendants to enable Plaintiffs to meaningfully evaluate the bases for Defendants’ assertion
`
`of non-infringement of the ’650 Patent.
`
`
`
`In the absence of the ability to meaningfully evaluate information related to
`
`Defendants’ ANDA No. 215238, Plaintiffs resort to the judicial process and the aid of discovery
`
`to obtain under appropriate judicial safeguards such information as is required to confirm their
`
`belief and to present to the Court evidence that Defendants infringe one or more claims of the ’650
`
`Patent.
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs will be substantially and irreparably harmed by the infringing activities
`
`described above unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Plaintiffs have no adequate
`
`remedy at law.
`
`COUNT III: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,867,996
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs hereby reallege and incorporate the allegations of paragraphs 1 – 57 of
`
`this Complaint.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, the Proposed ANDA Product infringes one or more
`
`claims of the ’996 Patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by the use and/or
`
`presence in the Proposed ANDA Product of an ivabradine crystalline form as covered by one or
`
`more of the claims of the ’996 Patent.
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 11 of 15 PageID #: 11
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants’ submission of ANDA No. 215238 to the FDA under 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)
`
`for the purpose of obtaining approval to commercially manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or
`
`import the Proposed ANDA Product before the expiration of the ’996 Patent constitutes
`
`infringement of the ’996 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2).
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants plan to, intend to, and will commercially
`
`manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Proposed ANDA Product immediately
`
`upon approval of ANDA No. 215238 and will instruct healthcare providers to use the Proposed
`
`ANDA Product in accordance with the proposed product labeling.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, upon FDA approval of ANDA No. 215238, Defendants
`
`will infringe the ’996 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing the
`
`Proposed ANDA Product in the United States, and by actively inducing and/or contributing to
`
`infringement by others under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) and/or (c).
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants had knowledge of the ’996 Patent when they
`
`submitted ANDA No. 215238 to the FDA, Defendants knew or should have known that they will
`
`induce or contribute to another’s direct infringement of the ’996 Patent, and Defendants acted with
`
`the specific intent to induce or contribute to another’s direct infringement of the ’996 Patent.
`
`
`
`To date, Plaintiffs have not received sufficient information, materials, and things
`
`from Defendants to enable Plaintiffs to meaningfully evaluate the bases for Defendants’ assertion
`
`of non-infringement of the ’996 Patent.
`
`
`
`In the absence of the ability to meaningfully evaluate information related to
`
`Defendants’ ANDA No. 215238, Plaintiffs resort to the judicial process and the aid of discovery
`
`to obtain under appropriate judicial safeguards such information as is required to confirm their
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 12 of 15 PageID #: 12
`
`
`
`belief and to present to the Court evidence that Defendants infringe one or more claims of the ’996
`
`Patent.
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs will be substantially and irreparably harmed by the infringing activities
`
`described above unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Plaintiffs have no adequate
`
`remedy at law.
`
`COUNT IV: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,879,842
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs hereby reallege and incorporate by reference the allegations of paragraphs
`
`1 – 66 of this Complaint.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, the Proposed ANDA Product infringes one or more
`
`claims of the ’842 Patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by the use and/or
`
`presence in the Proposed ANDA Product of an ivabradine crystalline form as covered by one or
`
`more of the claims of the ’842 Patent.
`
`
`
`Defendants’ submission of ANDA No. 215238 to the FDA under 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)
`
`for the purpose of obtaining approval to commercially manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or
`
`import the Proposed ANDA Product before the expiration of the ’842 Patent constitutes
`
`infringement of the ’842 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2).
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants plan to, intend to, and will commercially
`
`manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Proposed ANDA Product immediately
`
`upon approval of ANDA No. 215238 and will instruct healthcare providers to use the Proposed
`
`ANDA Product in accordance with the proposed product labeling.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, upon FDA approval of ANDA No. 215238, Defendants
`
`will infringe the ’842 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing the
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 13 of 15 PageID #: 13
`
`
`
`Proposed ANDA Product in the United States, and by actively inducing and/or contributing to
`
`infringement by others under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) and/or (c).
`
`
`
`On information and belief, Defendants had knowledge of the ’842 Patent when they
`
`submitted ANDA No. 215238 to the FDA, Defendants knew or should have known that they will
`
`induce or contribute to another’s direct infringement of the ’842 Patent, and Defendants acted with
`
`the specific intent to induce or contribute to another’s direct infringement of the ’842 Patent.
`
`
`
`To date, Plaintiffs have not received sufficient information, materials, and things
`
`from Defendants to enable Plaintiffs to meaningfully evaluate the bases for Defendants’ assertion
`
`of non-infringement of the ’842 Patent.
`
`
`
`In the absence of the ability to meaningfully evaluate information related to
`
`Defendants’ ANDA No. 215238, Plaintiffs resort to the judicial process and the aid of discovery
`
`to obtain under appropriate judicial safeguards such information as is required to confirm their
`
`belief and to present to the Court evidence that Defendants infringe one or more claims of the ’842
`
`Patent.
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs will be substantially and irreparably harmed by the infringing activities
`
`described above unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Plaintiffs have no adequate
`
`remedy at law.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court grant the following relief:
`
`a)
`
`Judgment that Defendants’ submission of ANDA No. 215238 to the FDA was an
`
`act of infringement of one or more claims of the ’649, ’650, ’996, and ’842 Patents under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 271(e)(2);
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 14 of 15 PageID #: 14
`
`
`
`b)
`
`Judgment that Defendants’ making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing into
`
`the United States of the Proposed ANDA Product prior to the expiration of the ’649, ’650, ’996,
`
`and ’842 Patents, will infringe, will actively induce infringement, and/or will contribute to the
`
`infringement of one or more claims of those Patents;
`
`c)
`
`An Order pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A) providing that the effective date of
`
`any FDA approval of ANDA No. 215238 shall be a date that is not earlier than the expiration of
`
`the ’649, ’650, ’996, and ’842 Patents plus any other exclusivity to which Plaintiffs are or become
`
`entitled;
`
`d)
`
`An Order permanently enjoining Defendants, Defendants’ affiliates and
`
`subsidiaries, each of its officers, agents, servants and employees, and any person acting in concert
`
`with Defendants, from making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing into the United States
`
`the Proposed ANDA Product until after the expiration of the ’649, ’650, ’996, and ’842 Patents
`
`plus any other exclusivity to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`e)
`
`A declaration that this case is exceptional within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285
`
`and an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees, expenses, and disbursements of this action;
`
`f)
`
`g)
`
`An award of Plaintiffs’ reasonable costs and expenses in this action; and
`
`Such further and other relief as this Court deems proper and just.
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00061-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/21 Page 15 of 15 PageID #: 15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Brian P. Egan
`
`
`
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Brian P. Egan (#6227)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`began@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Amgen Inc. and Les Laboratoires Servier
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Lisa B. Pensabene
`Hassen Sayeed
`Daniel O’Boyle
`Carolyn Wall
`James Li
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, New York 10036
`(212) 326-2000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Amgen Inc. and Les Laboratoires Servier
`
`Wendy A. Whiteford
`Steven T. Tang
`AMGEN INC.
`One Amgen Center Drive
`Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789
`(805) 447-1000
`
`James A. High Jr.
`AMGEN INC.
`1120 Veterans Blvd.
`South San Francisco, CA 94080
`(650) 244-2000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Amgen Inc.
`
`January 20, 2021
`
`15
`
`