`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 21-998 (MN)
`
`)))))))
`
`
`)
`)
`
`CONTINUOUS COMPOSITES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MARKFORGED, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`JUDGMENT FOLLOWING JURY VERDICT
`
`24
`This __th day of April 2024, the Court having held a jury trial and the jury having
`
`rendered a unanimous verdict on April 11, 2024 (see D.I. 312), pursuant to Rule 58(b) of the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Continuous Composites, Inc.
`
`(“Plaintiff”) and against Defendant MarkForged, Inc. (“Defendant”) with respect to
`
`infringement, inducing infringement, contributory infringement, anticipation by prior invention,
`
`anticipation by prior public use, obviousness, written description, and any other invalidity
`
`defenses or counterclaims as to claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 11,173,660 (“the ‘660 patent”);
`
`2.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for damages in
`
`the amount of $17,341,310.00 for a reasonable royalty for the period November 16, 2021 through
`
`December 31, 2023 as a result of Defendant’s infringement of claim 4 of the ‘660 patent;
`
`3.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff with respect to
`
`non-infringement and written description of claim 2 of the ‘660 patent;
`
`4.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant with respect to
`
`anticipation by prior invention, anticipation by prior public use, and obviousness of claim 2 of
`
`the ’660 patent;
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-00998-MN Document 321 Filed 04/24/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 18866
`
`5.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff with respect to
`
`non-infringement of claims 17, 19, 20–21, 24–25, 27, and 29 of U.S. Patent No. 9,511,543;
`
`claims 1, 5, 9, and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 10,744,708; and claims 1 and 8 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`10,759,109 (D.I. 123 & 127); and
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Judgment shall have the effect of denying as moot
`
`all motions made by the parties pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`IT IS STILL FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for any party to move for costs
`
`and attorneys’ fees (including under 35 U.S.C. § 285) is extended to fourteen (14) days after the
`
`time for appeal has expired or within fourteen (14) days after issuance of the mandate from the
`
`appellate court (whichever is later), and no party shall file any such motion before that time.
`
`The Honorable Maryellen Noreika
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`