throbber
Case 1:21-cv-00998-MN Document 321 Filed 04/24/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 18865
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 21-998 (MN)
`
`)))))))
`
`
`)
`)
`
`CONTINUOUS COMPOSITES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MARKFORGED, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`JUDGMENT FOLLOWING JURY VERDICT
`
`24
`This __th day of April 2024, the Court having held a jury trial and the jury having
`
`rendered a unanimous verdict on April 11, 2024 (see D.I. 312), pursuant to Rule 58(b) of the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Continuous Composites, Inc.
`
`(“Plaintiff”) and against Defendant MarkForged, Inc. (“Defendant”) with respect to
`
`infringement, inducing infringement, contributory infringement, anticipation by prior invention,
`
`anticipation by prior public use, obviousness, written description, and any other invalidity
`
`defenses or counterclaims as to claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 11,173,660 (“the ‘660 patent”);
`
`2.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for damages in
`
`the amount of $17,341,310.00 for a reasonable royalty for the period November 16, 2021 through
`
`December 31, 2023 as a result of Defendant’s infringement of claim 4 of the ‘660 patent;
`
`3.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff with respect to
`
`non-infringement and written description of claim 2 of the ‘660 patent;
`
`4.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant with respect to
`
`anticipation by prior invention, anticipation by prior public use, and obviousness of claim 2 of
`
`the ’660 patent;
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-00998-MN Document 321 Filed 04/24/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 18866
`
`5.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff with respect to
`
`non-infringement of claims 17, 19, 20–21, 24–25, 27, and 29 of U.S. Patent No. 9,511,543;
`
`claims 1, 5, 9, and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 10,744,708; and claims 1 and 8 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`10,759,109 (D.I. 123 & 127); and
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Judgment shall have the effect of denying as moot
`
`all motions made by the parties pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`IT IS STILL FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for any party to move for costs
`
`and attorneys’ fees (including under 35 U.S.C. § 285) is extended to fourteen (14) days after the
`
`time for appeal has expired or within fourteen (14) days after issuance of the mandate from the
`
`appellate court (whichever is later), and no party shall file any such motion before that time.
`
`The Honorable Maryellen Noreika
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket