throbber
Case 1:21-cv-01717-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/06/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`)
`MATTHEW KING
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`WALGREENS CO., AND WALGREENS
`)
`EASTERN CO.,
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`
`C.A. No. _____________________
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF REMOVAL
`
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446, 28 U.S.C. §1441(a) and (b), and 28 U.S.C. § 1332,
`
`Defendants Walgreen Co. (“Walgreens”) and Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc. (“Walgreen Eastern,”
`
`and together with Walgreens, “Defendants”)1, remove the action brought by Plaintiff Matthew
`
`King in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, styled Matthew King v. Walgreens Co., and
`
`Walgreens Eastern Co., Case No. NK21C-10-027-RLG (the “State Court Action”) to this Court.
`
`In support, Defendants state as follows:
`
`Background
`
`I.
`
`
`1.
`
`On October 29, 2021, Plaintiff Matthew King (“Plaintiff”) filed the State Court
`
`Action against Defendants in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Kent County. Plaintiff
`
`demanded a jury trial in the State Court Action.
`
`2.
`
`In his Complaint, Plaintiff claims that Defendants violated the Delaware Medical
`
`Marijuana Act by refusing to hire Plaintiff in 2019. Plaintiff alleges that he “lost income,
`
`suffered financial problems, suffered emotional distress, and experience disruption to life.”
`
`Compl. ¶12.
`
`
`1 The Complaint improperly named Defendants as “Walgreens Co.” and “Walgreens Eastern
`Co.” Defendants’ corporate names are “Walgreen Co.” and Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc.,”
`respectively.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01717-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/06/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`3.
`
`The Complaint was served on Defendants by service on their resident agent on
`
`November 15, 2021. A true and correct copy of the Notices of Service, Summonses, and
`
`Complaint is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`4.
`
`This Notice of Removal, together with all process, pleadings and orders served on
`
`Defendants, or otherwise on file in the lawsuit, are being filed in this Court within thirty (30)
`
`days after the initial service of Summons on Defendants. The removal is therefore timely under
`
`28 U.S.C. § 1446(b).
`
`5.
`
`Exhibit A contains copies of all documents filed in the State Court Action. A
`
`copy of Defendants’ Notice of Removal will be promptly filed with the Superior Court of the
`
`State of Delaware, in which this action was filed.
`
`6.
`
`A Civil Cover Sheet will be filed concurrently with this Notice of Removal
`
`pursuant to Local Rule 3.1.
`
`Grounds for Removal – Diversity Jurisdiction
`
`II.
`
`
`7.
`
`This Court has original jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332,
`
`based upon diversity of citizenship between Plaintiff and Defendants and an amount in
`
`controversy exceeding $75,000 excluding interests and costs. Removal is appropriate pursuant to
`
`28 U.S.C. § 1441 in that it is a civil action between diverse parties.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiff is a citizen of Delaware. See Complaint at ¶ 1.
`
`Walgreens is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in
`
`Deerfield, Illinois. See Declaration of Joseph B. Amsbary, Jr. (“Amsbary Aff.”) ¶2, attached as
`
`Exhibit B. Therefore, Walgreens is a citizen of the State of Illinois for the purposes of diversity.
`
`See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1) (a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of any State in which it
`
`is incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business).
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01717-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/06/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 3
`
`
`
`10. Walgreen Eastern is a New York corporation with its principal place of business
`
`in Deerfield, Illinois. See Amsbary Aff. ¶3. Therefore, Walgreen Eastern is a citizen of the State
`
`of Illinois and the State of New York for the purposes of diversity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1)
`
`(a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of any State in which it is incorporated and of the
`
`State where it has its principal place of business).
`
`11.
`
`Accordingly, there is complete diversity between the parties. See 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1332(a).
`
`12.
`
`Defendants deny liability and deny Plaintiff’s assertion of damages. Plaintiff
`
`alleges no specific amount in controversy; however, based upon Plaintiff’s allegations, including
`
`a request for special damages, back pay and front pay, as well as compensatory damages and
`
`attorneys’ fees, the alleged amount in controversy is more than $75,000, exclusive of interest and
`
`costs. See Compl. at p. 4 (“WHEREFORE” clause).
`
`13.
`
`Plaintiff seeks general compensatory damages, special damages, attorneys’ fees
`
`and costs, pre and post-judgment interest and such other relief as the Court deems proper. See
`
`Compl. at p. 4 (“WHEREFORE” clause).
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`
`14.
`
`Removal of this action is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) and (b) since it is a
`
`civil action brought in a state court. The federal district courts have original jurisdiction under 28
`
`U.S.C. § 1332 because there is complete diversity of citizenship between the parties.
`
`15.
`
`The State Court Action was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware,
`
`Kent County. Kent County, Delaware is situated in the United States District Court for the
`
`District of Delaware. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441, this Court is the appropriate
`
`forum to entertain this Notice of Removal.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01717-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/06/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 4
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, for these reasons, Defendants respectfully remove the State Court Action
`
`to this Court.
`
`
`
`Dated: December 6, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`PINCKNEY, WEIDINGER, URBAN
`& JOYCE, LLC
`
`
`/s/ Elizabeth Wilburn Joyce
`Elizabeth Wilburn Joyce (DE No. 3666)
`Patricia R. Urban (DE No. 4011)
`Megan Ix Brison (DE No. 6721)
`2 Mill Road, Suite 204
`Wilmington, DE 19806
`(302) 504-1497 (Tel.)
`(302) 442-7046 (Fax)
`ewilburnjoyce@pwujlaw.com
`purban@pwujlaw.com
`mixbrison@pwujlaw.com
`
`Attorneys For Defendants
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01717-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/06/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Removal has been served
`
`by first-class United States mail, postage prepaid, this 6th day of December, 2021, upon:
`
`Patrick C. Gallagher, Esq. (DE No. 5170)
`Alexis N. Stombaugh, Esq. (DE No. 6702)
`JACOBS & CRUMPLAR, P.A.
`750 Shipyard Drive, Suite 200
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`
`
`
`/s/ Elizabeth Wilburn Joyce
`Elizabeth Wilburn Joyce (DE No. 3666)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket