throbber
Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 1 of 18 PagelD #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`)
`)
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`GENZYME CORPORATION and
`AVENTISINC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS GENE THERAPIES, INC.,
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS
`CORPORATION, and NOVARTIS AG
`
`Defendants.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiffs Genzyme Corporation (“Genzyme”) and Aventis Inc. (“Aventis”) (collectively,
`
`“Plaintiffs”), for their Complaint against Defendants Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Novartis
`
`Pharmaceutical Corporation, and Novartis AG (collectively, “Novartis” or “Defendants”), allege
`
`as follows:
`
`Nature of the Action
`
`1. This is a civil action under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 1 ef seq., for infringement of
`
`United States patents. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants infringe United States Patent
`
`No, 6,596,535 (the “’535 Patent”); United States Patent No. 7,125,717 (the “’717 Patent”); United
`
`States Patent No. 7,785,888 (the “888 Patent”), United States Patent No. 7,846,729 (the “’729
`
`Patent”), and United States Patent No. 8,093,054 (the “’054 Patent”’) (collectively, the “Asserted
`
`Patents”) through the unauthorized manufacture, use, and sale of recombinant adeno-associated
`
`virus vectors (“tAAVvectors”) for their gene therapy drug Zolgensma®.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 2 of 18 PagelD #: 2
`
`The Parties
`
`2. Plaintiff Genzyme is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
`
`Commonwealth of Massachusetts, having its principal place of business at 50 Binney Street,
`
`Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142.
`
`3. Plaintiff Aventis is a limited liability company organized and existing underthe laws
`
`of the State of Delaware withits principal place of business at 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater,
`
`New Jersey 08807. Genzymeis a wholly-owned subsidiary of Aventis.
`
`4. Oninformation and belief, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. is a corporation organized
`
`and existing under the laws of Delaware, having its corporate offices and principal place of
`
`business at 2275 Half Day Road, Suite 203, Bannockburn,Illinois 60015. On information and
`
`belief, Novartis Gene Therapies may be served via its registered agent, Corporation Service
`
`Company, 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, Delaware 19808.
`
`5. On information and belief, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation is a corporation
`
`organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, having its corporate offices and principal
`
`place of business at a principal place of business at
`
`1 Health Plaza, East Hanover, New
`
`Jersey 07936. On information and belief, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation may be served
`
`via its registered agent Corporation Service Company, 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington,
`
`Delaware 19808. On information and belief, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation is the direct
`
`or indirect parent of Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. and hasat all times directed and controlled the
`
`infringing actionsofits subsidiary.
`
`6. On information and belief, Novartis AG is a corporation organized and existing under
`
`the laws of Switzerland, having its corporate offices and principal place of business at
`
`Fabrikstrasse 2, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. On information and belief, Novartis AG is the direct
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 3 of 18 PagelD #: 3
`
`or indirect parent of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. and
`
`has at all times directed and controlled the infringing actions of its subsidiaries.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`7. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331
`
`and 1338(a).
`
`8. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. for at least the
`
`reasons that Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc.
`
`is incorporated in Delaware, knowingly transacts
`
`business in Delaware, maintains a registered agent in Delaware, and, on information and belief,
`
`has engaged in, and made meaningful preparations to engagein, infringing conduct in Delaware.
`
`9, This Court has personal jurisdiction over Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
`
`because Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation is incorporated in Delaware, knowingly transacts
`
`business in Delaware, maintains a registered agent in Delaware, avails itself of this Court in
`
`numerous lawsuits that
`
`it and/or its related entities have filed before this Court, and, on
`
`information andbelief, has engaged in, and made meaningful preparations to engage in,infringing
`
`conduct in Delaware.
`
`10. On information and belief, this Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Novartis
`
`AG because of its contacts with this forum,
`
`including its regularly and intentionally doing
`
`business here, availing itself of this Court in numerous lawsuits that it and/or its related entities
`
`havefiled before this Court, and/or committing acts giving rise to this lawsuit here. Alternatively,
`
`on information and belief, this Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Novartis AG under
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2).
`
`11. Venueis properin this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) with respect to Novartis
`
`Gene Therapies, Inc. for at least the reason that it resides inthis district.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 4 of 18 PagelD #: 4
`
`12, Venue is properinthis district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) with respect to Novartis
`
`Pharmaceuticals Corporationfor at least the reason thatit resides in this district.
`
`13. Venue is properin this district pursuant to at least 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c) with
`
`respect to Novartis AG.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`Background of the Technology at Issue
`
`14. The Asserted Patents relate to recombinantviral vectors useful in gene therapy (among
`
`other things), as well as methods for the preparation and use of such vectors. Gene therapyis a
`
`groundbreaking medical technique to treat or cure disease by modifying a person’s own genes.
`
`One mechanism by which gene therapy can work is by introducing functional copies of a gene
`
`(called a “‘transgene”’) into a patient’s cells that have a faulty or missing natural version of the
`
`gene. By doing so, gene therapy cantreat, or even cure, a genetic disorder.
`
`15. Gene therapy can be performed by packaging and delivering a transgeneto the cells
`
`of a patient using recombinantviral vectors, such as recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV)
`
`vectors that are incorporated into adeno-associated virus (AAV). However, obtaining sufficient
`
`levels of transgene expression can be a hurdle for effective gene therapy.
`
`In some cells,
`
`expression of the transgene necessary to provide a therapeutic effect can be slow to initiate or
`
`does not initiate atall.
`
`16. When an AAV virus containing a rAAV vector is administered to a patient, a single-
`
`stranded viral vector DNAcontaining the transgeneis transferred into a target cell. The incoming
`
`single-stranded DNA must then be converted to a double-stranded DNA molecule by the target
`
`cell’s own cellular mechanisms. This formation of double-stranded DNAis a key rate-limiting
`
`step in the transfer of genetic material from the rAAV vector and the ultimate ability for
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 5 of 18 PagelD #: 5
`
`expression of the transgene in a cell. Thus, double-stranded DNA formation is needed for
`
`efficient expression of a therapeutic protein and for functional gene therapy.
`
`17. The inventor of the Asserted Patents, Dr. Barrie J. Carter, discovered thatrAAV vector
`
`DNA canbe engineered to self-adopt a double-stranded conformation upon delivery to a target
`
`cell, and can be packaged in a mannerto facilitate this conformation so that the cellular processes
`
`needed to express the therapeutic protein encoded by the vectortransgene can begin immediately
`
`once the vector is introduced into the cell.
`
`In other words, the vectors described in the Asserted
`
`Patents eliminate the need for the target cell to convert single-stranded DNA to double-stranded
`
`DNA. The Asserted Patents refer to this technology as “intrastrand base pairing” vectors, which
`
`are also widely knownin thefield as “self-complementary vectors.” Using the intrastrand base
`
`pairing technology of the Asserted Patents, the onset of gene expression is increased, so more
`
`cells can receive genetic material at a given dose of rAAV vector or the rAAV vector can be
`
`effective at a lower dose as compared to conventional rAAV vectors. This discovery formed the
`
`basis for later improvements on different ways to generate self-complementary vectors, which
`
`have now beenincorporated into important gene therapy platforms. Thus, the Asserted Patents
`
`represent a significant leap forward that allows functional gene therapy.
`
`The Asserted Patents were Licensed
`
`18. Building upon the technology of the Asserted Patents, Dr. Richard Samulski’s
`
`laboratory at the University of North Carolina identified one way to form the intrastrand base
`
`pairing vectors described by the Asserted Patents.
`
`In May 2013, Asklépios BioPharmaceutical,
`
`Inc (“AskBio”’), which was co-founded by Dr. Samulski, entered into a license agreement with
`
`Genzyme, whereby AskBio received certain nghts to the Asserted Patents. The rights that
`
`Genzymelicensed to AskBio included a limited right to sublicense. Notably, the rights Genzyme
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 6 of 18 PagelD #: 6
`
`licensed to AskBio expressly excluded the field of treating spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).
`
`AskBio therefore could not have sublicensed rights related to treating SMA.
`
`19. In June 2015, upon information and belief, AskBio entered into a sublicensing
`
`agreement with AveXis, Inc. (now Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc.), which granted AveXis, Inc.
`
`certain rights to the technology of the Asserted Patents. On informationand belief, the AskBio-
`
`AveXis, Inc. sublicense made Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. aware of the Asserted Patents before
`
`it began marketing Zolgensma®. Because AskBio hadnorights to the Asserted Patents in relation
`
`to SMA, however, its sublicense could not include any rights related to the treatment of SMA.
`
`20.
`
`Despite the express carve-out of SMA from the Genzyme-AskBio license (and
`
`therefore the AskBio-AveXis, Inc. sublicense), on information and belief AveXis, Inc. used the
`
`technology licensed from AskBio to generate Zolgensma® for treatment of SMA.
`
`Zolgensma®
`
`21. On April 9, 2018, Novartis AG announced that it had entered into an agreementto
`
`acquire AveXis, Inc. On May 15, 2018, the transaction closed and AveXis, Inc. became a wholly-
`
`ownedindirect subsidiary of Novartis AG. Theclosing of the transaction was accompanied by a
`
`press release quoting the CEOs of Novartis AG and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
`
`regarding the relationship with AveXis,Ine.
`
`22. On May 24, 2019, AveXis, Inc. obtained FDA approval to market Zolgensma®
`
`(onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi) as a gene therapy product intended to treat certain children
`
`less than two years of age with SMA. On September 2, 2020, Novartis AG announcedthat
`
`AveXis, Inc. had been renamed and rebranded as Novartis Gene Therapies,Inc.
`
`23. Following FDA approval of Zolgensma®, AveXis, Inc. promptly began sales and
`
`active promotion of the productin the United States for the treatment of SMA,and has continued
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 7 of 18 PagelD #: 7
`
`sales and promotion after being renamed Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. Zolgensma® is a gene
`
`therapy product indicated for use in certain children less than two years old with SMA. A true
`
`and correct copy of the current Zolgensma® package insert dated October 2021 is attached as
`
`Exhibit A.
`
`24. Zolgensma® is an adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy product that
`
`delivers a copy of the humansurvival motor neuron (SMN) geneinto target motor neuroncells
`
`of the child, which results in expression of the SMN protein in the motor neuron cells. The
`
`Zolgensma® drug productinfringes the Asserted Patents by using AskBio’s self-complementary
`
`tAAV vectors, which are covered by and based on the fundamental innovation of the Asserted
`
`Patents.
`
`25. On information and belief, Zolgensma® has been and is currently manufactured by
`
`Novartis Gene Therapies,
`
`Inc.
`
`in Libertyville,
`
`Illinois and Durham, North Carolina. On
`
`information and belief, Zolgensma® was previously also manufactured in Longmont, Colorado.
`
`Patents-in-Suit
`
`26. The °535 Patent, entitled “Metabolically Activated Recombinant Viral Vectors and
`
`Methods for the Preparation and Use,” issued on July 22, 2003 to inventor Dr. Barrie J. Carter.
`
`The 535 Patent was originally assigned to Targeted Genetics Corporation, then was subsequently
`
`assigned to Genzyme Corporation. A true and correct copy of the ’535 Patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit B.
`
`27. The ‘535 Patent issued from U.S. Patent Application No. 09/634,126, which claims
`
`priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/160,080, which wasfiled on August 9,
`
`1999,
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 8 of 18 PagelD #: 8
`
`28. The ‘535 Patent expired on August 8, 2020.
`
`It was valid and enforceable under United
`
`States Patent Laws during its term and whenthe infringement occurred.
`
`29. The °717 Patent, entitled ‘“Metabolically Activated Recombinant Viral Vectors and
`
`Methodsforthe Preparation and Use,”issued on October24, 2006 to inventor Dr. Barrie J, Carter.
`
`The ’717 Patent issued from a continuation of the ’535 Patent. The ’717 Patent was originally
`
`assigned to Targeted Genetics Corporation,
`
`then was subsequently assigned to Genzyme
`
`Corporation. A true and correct copy of the ’717 Patent is attached as Exhibit C,
`
`30. The ’717 Patent expires on March 29, 2022.
`
`It has been valid and enforceableat all
`
`times since issued, and remains valid and enforceable.
`
`31. The ’888 Patent, entitled ““Metabolically Activated Recombinant Viral Vectors and
`
`Methodsfor the Preparation and Use,” issued on August 31, 2010 to inventor Dr. Barrie J. Carter.
`
`The ’888 Patent issued from a continuation of the ’717 Patent. The ’888 Patent was originally
`
`assigned to Targeted Genetics Corporation,
`
`then was subsequently assigned to Genzyme
`
`Corporation. A true and correct copy of the ’888 Patent is attached as Exhibit D.
`
`32. The 888 Patent expired on August 8, 2020. It was valid and enforceable under United
`
`States Patent Laws during its term and whenthe infringement occurred.
`
`33. The ’729 Patent, entitled ‘“‘Metabolically Activated Recombinant Viral Vectors and
`
`Methodsfor the Preparation and Use,”issued on August 28, 2008 to inventor Dr. Barrie J. Carter.
`
`The ’729 Patent issued from a continuation of the ’888 Patent. The °729 Patent wasoriginally
`
`assigned to Targeted Genetics Corporation,
`
`then was subsequently assigned to Genzyme
`
`Corporation. A true and correct copy of the ’729 Patent is attached as Exhibit E.
`
`34. The °729 Patent expired on August 8, 2020. It was valid and enforceable under United
`
`States Patent Laws during its term and whenthe infringement occurred.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 9 of 18 PagelD #: 9
`
`35. The ’054 Patent, entitled ‘“Metabolically Activated Recombinant Viral Vectors and
`
`Methods for the Preparation and Use,” issued on January 10, 2012 to inventor Barrie J. Carter.
`
`The ’054 Patent issued from a continuation of the ’729 Patent. The ’054 Patent was originally
`
`assigned to Targeted Genetics Corporation,
`
`then was subsequently assigned to Genzyme
`
`Corporation. A true and correct copy of the ’054 Patent is attached as Exhibit F.
`
`36. The 054 Patent expired on August 8, 2020. It was valid and enforceable under United
`
`States Patent Laws during its term and whenthe infringement occurred.
`
`37.
`
`On information and belief, Defendants had knowledge of the ’535 Patent, the ’717
`
`Patent, the ’888 Patent, ’729 Patent, and the ’054 Patentat least as early as when Novartis Gene
`
`Therapies, Inc. entered into the license agreement with AskBio.
`
`Count I: Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,596,535
`
`38. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegationsset forth in paragraphs | through 37 above
`
`as thoughfully set forth herein.
`
`39.
`
`Oninformation and belief, Defendants commercial manufacture, importation, use,
`
`offerto sell, or sale of Zolgensma®infringes one or moreclaimsof the ’535 Patent, including but
`
`not limited to claim 1, under 35 U.S.C. § 271 (a).
`
`40. Although the *535 Patent expired on August 8, 2020, prior to expiry Defendants
`
`infringed the °535 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) at least by making, using, and/or
`
`selling Zolgensma®in the United States.
`
`41. On informationand belief, Defendants’ pre-expiration manufacture, use, and/or sale
`
`of Zolgensma®infringedat least claim 1 of the ’535 Patent.
`
`42. The ’535 patent has one independent claim, claim 1. Claim1recites:
`
`A recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vector comprising a single-stranded
`heterologous nucleotide sequence comprising a region which formsintrastrand base pairs
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 10 of 18 PagelD #: 10
`
`suchthat expression of a coding region of the heterologous sequence is enhancedrelative
`to a second rAAV vector that lacks sufficient intrastrand base pairing to enhance said
`expression, wherein the region which formsintrastrand base pairs is in a coding region.
`
`43. On information and belief, Zolgensma®contains a rAAV vector that comprises a
`
`coding region of the SMW gene(i.e., a heterologous sequence) that forms intrastrand base pairs
`
`by utilizing intrastrand base pairing vector technology to increase the efficacy of the drug. See
`
`Exhibit A (11. Description” (“[Zolgensma®]
`
`is a recombinant self-complementary AAV9
`
`containing a transgene encoding the humansurvival motor neuron (SMN)protein.”)).
`
`44. Plaintiffs have suffered damages as a result of Defendants’ infringement of the 535
`
`Patent.
`
`45. On information and belief, Defendants’ infringement has been willful. Since having
`
`knowledge of the *535 Patent, Defendants knew or should know that their actions infringe the
`
`°535 Patent.
`
`CountII: Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,125,717
`
`46. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 45 above
`
`as though fully set forth herein.
`
`47.
`
`On information and belief, Defendants commercial manufacture, importation, use,
`
`offerto sell, or sale of Zolgensma® infringes one or more claims of the ’717 Patent, including but
`
`not limited to claims | and 2, under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a) and/or(b).
`
`48. On information and belief, Defendants’ manufacture, use, and/or sale of Zolgensma®™
`
`infringes at least claims | and 2 of the ’717 Patent.
`
`49, On information and belief, Defendants have induced infringement of the ’717 Patent
`
`of at least claim | of the ’717 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). Defendants knew of the ’717
`
`Patent, and that their conduct and communications induces users of Zolgensma® to directly
`
`-10-
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 11 of 18 PagelD #: 11
`

`infringe the *717 Patent. For instance, by means of the Zolgensma™ label provided by Defendants
`
`and through other communications, Defendants instruct, direct, and encourage users of
`
`Zolgensma® and others with respect to the use of Zolgensma® with the knowledge that such use
`
`according to the label infringed the ’717 Patent, intending that physicians and/or health care
`
`providers in the United States performed the directly infringing activities. On information and
`
`belief, such conduct by Defendants was intended to cause, and actually resulted in, direct
`
`infringementin the United States.
`
`50. The ’717 patent has two independent claims, claim 1 and claim 2. Claim | recites:
`
`A method for introducing a polynucleotide into a cell, comprising contacting the
`cell essentially in the absence of an AAV helpervirus with a recombinant adeno-
`associated virus (rAAV)particle comprising an rAAV vector under conditions that
`allow uptake of the rAAV vector, whereby the rAAV vector is introduced into the
`cell, wherein the rAAV vector comprises a single-stranded heterologous nucleotide
`sequence comprising a coding region which forms intrastrand base pairs suchthat
`expression of the coding region of the heterologous sequence is enhancedrelative
`to a second rAAV vectorthat lacks sufficient intrastrand base pairing to enhance
`said expression, wherein the rAAV vector comprises one or more inverted terminal
`repeat (ITR) sequence flanking said heterologous sequence
`
`51. Claim2 recites:
`
`A method for expressing a polynucleotide coding region in a cell, comprising
`subjecting the cell to conditions which allow expression of the coding region,
`whereby the coding region is expressed, wherein the polynucleotide coding region
`is introduced into the cell by contacting the cell essentially in the absence of an
`AAVhelpervirus with an rAAVparticle comprising an rAAV vector, wherein the
`rAAV vector comprises a single-stranded heterologous nucleotide sequence
`comprising the coding region which forms intrastrand base pairs such that
`expression of the coding region of the heterologous sequence is enhanced relative
`to a second rAAV vector that lacks sufficient intrastrand base pairing to enhance
`said expression, wherein the rAAV vector comprises one or moreinverted terminal
`repeat (ITR) sequences flanking said heterologous sequence.
`

`52. On information and belief, Zolgensma® contains a functional copy of the SMN gene
`
`(i.e., a heterologous sequence) packaged in rAAV9. Oninformation and belief, Zolgensma*
`
`-ll-
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 12 of 18 PagelD #: 12
`
`contains arAAV vectorthat contains a coding region of the SMW genethat forms intrastrand base
`
`pairs by utilizing intrastrand base pairing vector technology to increase the efficacy of the drug.
`
`See Exhibit A (“11. Description.”’). On information and belief, Zolgensma
`
`® contains a rAAV
`
`vector that contains one or more ITR sequences flanking the SMWN sequence.
`
`53. On information and belief, when administered to a patient, Zolgensma®delivers a
`
`copy of the coding region of the SMN geneto a cell where the SMN protein is expressed. On
`
`information and belief, Zolgensma®is administered withouta helpervirus.
`
`54. Plaintiffs have suffered damages as a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ’717
`
`Patent and will continue to suffer damages as long as those infringing activities continue.
`
`55. On information and belief, Defendants’ infringement has been willful. Since having
`
`knowledge of the °717 Patent, Defendants knew or should knowthat their actions infringe the
`
`"717 Patent.
`
`Count ILI: Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,785,888
`
`56. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations set forth in paragraphs | through 55 above
`
`as thoughfully set forth herein.
`
`57. On information and belief, Defendants commercial manufacture, importation, use,
`
`offerto sell, or sale of Zolgensma®infringes one or moreclaims of the ’888 Patent, including but
`
`not limited to claim 1, under 35 U.S.C. § 271 (a),
`
`58. Although the ’888 Patent expired on August 8, 2020, prior to expiry Defendants
`
`infringed the *888 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) at least by making, using, and/or
`
`selling Zolgensma® in the United States.
`
`59. On information and belief, Defendants’ pre-expiration manufacture, use, and/or sale
`
`of Zolgensma”infringedat least claim 1 of the ’888 Patent.
`
`-12-
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 13 of 18 PagelD #: 13
`
`60. The ’888 patent has one independentclaim, claim 1. Claim | recites:
`
`A recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) preparation, which rAAV virus
`preparation is essentially free of helper virus, comprising an rAAV particle,
`wherein the rAAV particle comprises an rAAV genome, wherein the rAAV
`genome comprises a heterologous nucleotide sequence comprising a coding region
`and one or more inverted terminal
`repeat
`(ITR)
`sequences
`flanking said
`heterologous sequence, wherein the total amount of unique sequencepresent in the
`heterologous sequenceis about one-half of the heterologous sequence and wherein
`the heterologous sequence forms intrastrand base pairs along most or all of its
`length such that expression of the coding region is enhanced relative to an rAAV
`vector that lacks sufficient intrastrand base pairing to enhance expression.
`
`61. On information andbelief, Zolgensma® contains a functional copy of the SMN gene
`
`(ie., a heterologous sequence) packaged in AAV9. Oninformation and belief, Zolgensma®
`
`contains a rAAV vector that contains arAAV genome and a coding region of the SMN genethat
`
`formsintrastrand basepairs by utilizing intrastrand base pairing vector technologyto increase the
`
`efficacy of the drug. See Exhibit A (11. Description.”). On information and belief, Zolgensma”
`
`contains a rAAV vectorthat contains one or more ITR sequences flanking the SMN sequence.
`
`62. On information andbelief, Zolgensma® does not contain a helpervirus.
`
`63. Plaintiffs have suffered damages as a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ’888
`
`Patent.
`
`64. On information and belief, Defendants’ infringement has been willful. Since having
`
`knowledge of the ’888 Patent, Defendants knew or should know that their actions infringe the
`
`888 Patent.
`
`Count IV: Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,846,729
`
`65. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 64 above
`
`as though fully set forth herein.
`
`-13-
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 14 of 18 PagelD #: 14
`
`66. On information and belief, Defendants commercial manufacture, importation, use,
`
`offerto sell, or sale of Zolgensma® infringes one or more claims ofthe ’729 Patent, including but
`
`not limited to claim 1, under 35 U.S.C. § 271 (a).
`
`67. Although the ’729 Patent expired on August 8, 2020, prior to expiry Defendants
`
`infringed the *729 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271 (a) at least by making, using, and/or
`
`selling Zolgensma® in the United States.
`
`68. On information and belief, Defendants’ pre-expiration manufacture, use, and/or sale
`
`of Zolgensma®infringed at least claim 1 of the ’729 Patent.
`
`69. The ’729 patent has one independent claim, claim 1. Claim | recites:
`
`A method for preparing a recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV),
`method comprising:
`1) incubating a host cell under conditions that allow AAV replication and
`encapsidation, wherein said host cell comprises:
`(a) arAAV vector comprising a heterologous nucleotide sequence
`and one or more AAV inverted terminal repeat (ITR) sequences flanking
`said heterologous sequence, wherein the vector is less than about 2.5 kb,
`and
`
`the
`
`(b) AAV rep function, AAV cap function, and helpervirus function
`for AAV; and
`2) purifying rAAVparticles produced from the host cell, wherein the rAAV
`particles comprise a rAAV genome which forms intrastrand base pairs along its
`length, such that expression of a coding region of the heterologous sequenceis
`enhancedrelative to arAAV vectorthat lacks sufficient intrastrand base pairing to
`enhancesaid expression
`
`70. On information and belief, Zolgensma® has been and is prepared using a hostcell
`
`under conditions that allow AAV replication and encapsidation and then purifying the rAAV
`
`particles produced from the hostcell to select for rAAVparticles containing vectors encoding the
`
`SMN transgene.
`
`71. On information and belief, Zolgensma® contains a functional copy of the SMN gene
`
`(i.e., a heterologous sequence) packaged in rAAV9.
`
`Oninformation and belief, Zolgensma®
`
`-14-
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 15 of 18 PagelD #: 15
`
`contains a rAAV vector that contains arAVV genomeand a coding region of the SMN genethat
`
`formsintrastrand basepairs along its length by utilizing intrastrand base pairing vector technology
`
`to increase the efficacy of the drug. See Exhibit A (11. Description.”). On information and
`
`belief, Zolgensma® contains a rAAV vectorthat contains one or more ITR sequencesflanking the
`
`SMN sequence.
`
`72.
`
`Oninformationand belief, Zolgensma® contains a rAAV vectorthat is less than
`
`about 2.5 kb.
`
`73. Plaintiffs have suffered damages as a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ’729
`
`Patent.
`
`74. On information and belief, Defendants’ infringement has been willful. Since having
`
`knowledge of the ’729 Patent, Defendants knew or should know that their actions infringe the
`
`°729 Patent.
`
`Count V: Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,093,054
`
`75. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 74 above
`
`as thoughfully set forth herein.
`
`76. On information and belief, Defendants commercial manufacture, importation, use,
`
`offer to sell, or sale of Zolgensma® infringes one or more claims of the 054 Patent, including but
`
`not limited to claims 1 and 19, under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a) and/or (b).
`
`77. Although the ’054 Patent expired on August 8, 2020, prior to expiry Defendants
`
`infringed the ’054 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) at least by making, using, and/or
`
`selling Zolgensma® in the United States.
`
`78. On information and belief, Defendants’ pre-expiration manufacture, use, and/or sale
`
`of Zolgensma® infringedat least claims 1 and 19 ofthe ’054 Patent.
`
`= 15s
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 16 of 18 PagelD #: 16
`
`79. On information and belief, Defendants have induced infringementprior to the expiry
`
`of the ’054 Patent of at least claim 1 of the ’054 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). Defendants
`
`knew of the ’054 Patent, and that their conduct and communications induced users of Zolgensma™
`
`to directly infringe the 054 Patent. Forinstance, by means ofthe Zolgensma® label provided by
`
`Defendants and through other communications, Defendants instructed, directed, and encouraged
`
`users of Zolgensma® and others with respect to the use of Zolgensma® with the knowledgethat
`
`such use accordingto the label infringed the ’054 Patent, intending that physicians and/orhealth
`
`care providers in the United States performed the directly infringing activities. On information
`
`and belief, such conduct by Defendants was intended to cause, and actually resulted in, direct
`
`infringement in the United States.
`
`80. The ’054 patent has two independentclaims, claim | and claim 19. Claim 1 recites:
`
`A composition comprising a purified recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV)
`particle comprising an AAV capsid and a single-stranded rAAV vector genome,
`wherein the rAAV vector genome comprises in the 5' to 3' direction: a 5’ AAV
`inverted terminal repeat (ITR) sequence, a first heterologous nucleotide sequence,
`an internal AAV ITR sequence, a second heterologous nucleotide sequence, and a
`3' AAV ITR sequence, whereinthefirst heterologous nucleotide sequence can form
`intrastrand base pairs with the second nucleotide sequence along mostorall ofits
`length.
`
`8l.
`
`Claim 19 recites:
`
`A method of expressing a polynucleotide coding sequence in a cell, comprising
`subjecting the cell to conditions which allow expression of the coding sequence,
`wherein the coding sequence is introduced into the cell by contacting the cell
`essentially in the absence of an AAV helper virus with a composition comprising a
`purified recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) particle, wherein the rAAV
`particle comprises an AAV capsid and a single-stranded rAAV vector genome,
`wherein the rAAV vector genome comprises in the 5' to 3’ direction: a 5’ AAV
`inverted terminal repeat (ITR) sequence, a first heterologous nucleotide sequence,
`an internal AAV ITR sequence, a second heterologous nucleotide sequence, and a
`3' AAV ITR sequence, whereinthe first heterologous nucleotide sequence can form
`intrastrand base pairs with the second nucleotide sequence along mostorall ofits
`length, and wherein the first or the second heterologous nucleotide comprises the
`coding sequence.
`
`-16-
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01736-UNA Document1 Filed 12/10/21 Page 17 of 18 PagelD #: 17
`
`82. Oninformationand belief, Zolgensma® contains a functional copy of the SMN gene
`
`(i.e., a heterologous sequence) packaged in rAAV9. Oninformation and belief, Zolgensma®
`
`contains a single-stranded rAAV vector genomethat contains a coding region of the SMN gene
`
`that formsintrastrand base pairs byutilizing intrastrand base pairing vector technologyto increase
`
`the efficacy of the drug. See Exhibit A (“11. Description.”). On information and belief,
`
`Zolgensma® contains an AAV capsid. On information and belief, Zolgensma® contains a rAAV
`
`vector that contains one or more ITR sequences flanking the SMN sequence.
`
`83.
`
`84.
`
`On information and belief, Zolgensma® doesnot contain a helpervirus.
`
`On information and belief, when administered to a patient, Zolgensma® delivers a
`
`copy of the SMN gene to a motor neuron cell where the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket