throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`MSN LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED
`and MSN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. ____________________
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (“Otsuka”), by way of Complaint against
`
`Defendants MSN Laboratories Private Limited (“MSN Laboratories”) and MSN Pharmaceuticals
`
`Inc. (“MSN Pharmaceuticals”) (collectively, “MSN”), hereby alleges as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is a civil action for patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,501,730 (“the
`
`’730 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 10,905,694 (“the ’694 Patent”) (collectively, the “Patents-in-
`
`Suit”) arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 100 et seq.
`
`2.
`
`This action arises out of MSN’s submission of an Abbreviated New Drug
`
`Application (“ANDA”) No. 216949 (“MSN’s ANDA”) under § 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug
`
`and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), 21 U.S.C. § 355(j), seeking U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`(“FDA”) approval to commercially manufacture, use, offer for sell and sell in the United States,
`
`and/or import into the United States, generic versions of Otsuka’s SAMSCA® tolvaptan tablets
`
`(15 and 30 mg) (“MSN’s ANDA products”) prior to the expiration of the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 2 of 11 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`PARTIES
`
`3.
`
`Otsuka is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan with its
`
`corporate headquarters at 2-9 Kanda Tsukasa-machi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8535, Japan.
`
`Otsuka is engaged in the research, development, manufacture and sale of innovative
`
`pharmaceutical products.
`
`4.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant MSN Laboratories is an Indian corporation,
`
`having its principal place of business at MSN House, C-24, Industrial Estate, Sanathnagar,
`
`Hyderabad-18, Telangana, India.
`
`5.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant MSN Pharmaceuticals is a corporation
`
`organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of business at 20
`
`Duke Road, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854.
`
`6.
`
`On information and belief, MSN Pharmaceuticals is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
`
`MSN Laboratories.
`
`7.
`
`On information and belief, MSN Pharmaceuticals and MSN Laboratories develop,
`
`manufacture, and/or distribute generic drugs for sale and use throughout the United States,
`
`including in Delaware.
`
`8.
`
`On information and belief, MSN Pharmaceuticals and MSN Laboratories are agents
`
`of each other with respect to the development, regulatory approval, marketing, sale, and/or
`
`distribution of generic drug products. On information and belief, the acts of MSN Pharmaceuticals
`
`and MSN Laboratories complained of herein were done with the cooperation, participation, and
`
`assistance of, and at least in part for the benefit of, each other.
`
`9.
`
`On information and belief, MSN Pharmaceuticals and MSN Laboratories have
`
`cooperated and assisted in the preparation and filing of MSN’s ANDA for MSN’s ANDA products,
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 3 of 11 PageID #: 3
`
`
`
`and will be involved in the manufacture, importation, marketing, and sale of the drug that is the
`
`subject of MSN’s ANDA if it is approved.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`10.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1331, 1338(a), 2201 and 2202.
`
`11.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over MSN Pharmaceuticals because, on
`
`information and belief, MSN Pharmaceuticals is a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of Delaware.
`
`12.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over MSN Laboratories because, inter alia,
`
`MSN Laboratories, itself and/or through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, has purposefully availed
`
`itself of the rights and benefits of Delaware law by engaging in systematic and continuous contacts
`
`with Delaware. On information and belief, MSN Laboratories directly or indirectly is in the
`
`business of developing, manufacturing, marketing, importing, offering to sell and selling
`
`pharmaceutical drug products, including generic drug products, throughout the United States,
`
`including in Delaware. Upon information and belief, MSN Laboratories derives substantial
`
`revenue from the sale of those products in Delaware and has availed itself of the privilege of
`
`conducting business within Delaware. Delaware would be a destination of MSN’s ANDA
`
`products upon approval and marketing of the ANDA involved in this action. MSN Laboratories’s
`
`filing of its ANDA constitutes a formal act that reliably indicates its plans to engage in marketing
`
`of the accused infringing ANDA products in Delaware.
`
`13.
`
`Alternatively, assuming that the above facts do not establish personal jurisdiction
`
`over MSN Laboratories, this Court may exercise jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 4(k)(2) because (a) Otsuka’s claims arise under federal law; (b) MSN Laboratories is a
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 4 of 11 PageID #: 4
`
`
`
`foreign defendant not subject to general personal jurisdiction in the courts of any state; and (c)
`
`MSN Laboratories has sufficient contacts with the United States as a whole, including but not
`
`limited to manufacturing and/or selling pharmaceutical products distributed throughout the United
`
`States, such that this Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over MSN Laboratories satisfies due process.
`
`14.
`
`This Court also has personal jurisdiction over MSN Laboratories because it has
`
`affirmatively availed itself of the jurisdiction of this Court through the assertion of counterclaims
`
`in suits brought in this District and/or by being sued in this District without challenging personal
`
`jurisdiction. See, e.g., Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. MSN Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al., Civil
`
`Action No. 19-926 (D. Del.); Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al., v. MSN
`
`Laboratories Private Ltd. et al., Civil Action No. 18-1785 (D. Del.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals,
`
`Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd. et al., Civil Action No. 16-1255 (D. Del.).
`
`15.
`
`Venue is proper as to MSN in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and
`
`1400(b).
`
`OTSUKA’S SAMSCA®
`
`16.
`
`Otsuka is the holder of the New Drug Application (“NDA”) No. 22-275 for
`
`SAMSCA® tablets in 15 and 30 mg dosage forms (“SAMSCA® tablets”).
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`The FDA approved NDA No. 22-275 on May 19, 2009.
`
`SAMSCA® is an oral medication used to treat hyponatremia (low blood sodium
`
`levels) in adults with conditions including congestive heart failure, cirrhosis and Syndrome of
`
`Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 5 of 11 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`19.
`
`The ’730 Patent, entitled “Process for Preparing Benzazepine Compounds or Salts
`
`Thereof” was duly and legally issued on August 6, 2013. A true and correct copy of the ’730
`
`Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`20.
`
`The ’730 Patent claims compositions made by processes for preparing novel
`
`benzazepine compounds.
`
`21.
`
`The ’730 Patent is owned by Otsuka and is listed in Approved Drug Products with
`
`Therapeutic Equivalents (the “Orange Book”) in connection with NDA No. 22-275 for
`
`SAMSCA® tablets.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`According to the Orange Book, the ’730 Patent expires on September 1, 2026.
`
`The ’694 Patent, entitled “Pharmaceutical Solid Preparation Comprising
`
`Benzazepines and Production Method Thereof,” was duly and legally issued on February 2, 2021.
`
`A true and correct copy of the ’694 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
`
`24.
`
`The ’694 Patent claims pharmaceutical solid preparations obtained by particular
`
`methods.
`
`25.
`
`The ’694 Patent is owned by Otsuka and is listed in the Orange Book in connection
`
`with NDA No. 22-275 for SAMSCA® tablets.
`
`26.
`
`According to the Orange Book, the ’694 Patent expires on April 7, 2030.
`
`MSN’S ANDA
`
`27.
`
`Upon information and belief, MSN submitted ANDA No. 216949 to the FDA under
`
`21 U.S.C. § 355(j) seeking FDA approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for
`
`sale or sale in the United States, or importation into the United States, of MSN’s ANDA products,
`
`which are generic versions of SAMSCA®.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 6 of 11 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`28.
`
`Upon information and belief, ANDA No. 216949 contains certifications pursuant
`
`to 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) (“Paragraph IV Certifications”), alleging that no valid,
`
`enforceable claim of the ’730 Patent or the ’694 Patent will be infringed by MSN’s ANDA
`
`products.
`
`29.
`
`Otsuka received a letter sent by MSN, dated January 24, 2022, purporting to be a
`
`“Notice of Paragraph IV Certification” for ANDA No. 216949 (“MSN’s Notice Letter”) pursuant
`
`to § 505(j)(2)(B) of the FDCA and 21 C.F.R. § 314.95. MSN’s Notice Letter notified Otsuka that
`
`MSN had filed ANDA No. 216949, seeking approval to engage in the commercial manufacture,
`
`use, offer for sale, sale or importation of MSN’s ANDA products before the expiration of the
`
`Patents-in-Suit.
`
`30.
`
`Otsuka commenced this action within 45 days of receipt of MSN’s Notice Letter.
`
`COUNT I
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF ’730 PATENT
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`Otsuka incorporates each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`
`Upon information and belief, MSN submitted to the FDA ANDA No. 216949
`
`seeking approval to commercially manufacture, use, offer to sell and/or sell MSN’s ANDA
`
`products in the United States, or import them into the United States, before the expiration of the
`
`’730 Patent.
`
`33.
`
`Upon information and belief, MSN submitted to the FDA, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV), a certification alleging that the claims of the ’730 Patent are invalid,
`
`unenforceable and/or not infringed.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 7 of 11 PageID #: 7
`
`
`
`34.
`
`Upon information and belief, in its ANDA No. 216949, MSN has represented to
`
`the FDA that MSN’s ANDA products are pharmaceutically and therapeutically equivalent to
`
`Otsuka’s SAMSCA® tablets.
`
`35. MSN has actual knowledge of Otsuka’s ’730 Patent.
`
`36.
`
`Upon information and belief, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A), MSN has infringed
`
`one or more claims of the ’730 Patent, including at least claim 1, by submitting, or causing to be
`
`submitted, to the FDA ANDA No. 216949, seeking approval to commercially manufacture, use,
`
`offer to sell or sell MSN’s ANDA products, or import them into the United States, before the
`
`expiration date of the ’730 Patent.
`
`37.
`
`Upon information and belief, if ANDA No. 216949 is approved, MSN intends to
`
`and will offer to sell, sell in the United States, or import into the United States, MSN’s ANDA
`
`products.
`
`38.
`
`Upon information and belief, if ANDA No. 216949 is approved, MSN will infringe
`
`one or more claims of the ’730 Patent, including at least claim 1, under § 271(a), either literally or
`
`under the doctrine of equivalents, by commercially making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or
`
`importing MSN’s ANDA products, and/or by actively inducing infringement by others under §
`
`271(b) and/or contributing to infringement under § 271(c), unless this Court orders that the
`
`effective date of any FDA approval of ANDA No. 216949 shall be no earlier than the expiration
`
`of the ’730 Patent and any additional periods of exclusivity.
`
`39.
`
`Otsuka will be irreparably harmed by MSN’s infringing activities unless this Court
`
`enjoins those activities.
`
`40.
`
`Otsuka does not have an adequate remedy at law.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 8 of 11 PageID #: 8
`
`
`
`COUNT II
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’694 PATENT
`
`41.
`
`42.
`
`Otsuka incorporates each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`
`Upon information and belief, MSN submitted to the FDA ANDA No. 216949
`
`seeking approval to commercially manufacture, use, offer to sell and/or sell MSN’s ANDA
`
`products in the United States, or import them into the United States, before the expiration of the
`
`’694 Patent.
`
`43.
`
`Upon information and belief, MSN submitted to the FDA, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV), a certification alleging that the claims of the ’694 Patent are invalid,
`
`unenforceable and/or not infringed.
`
`44.
`
`Upon information and belief, in its ANDA No. 216949, MSN has represented to
`
`the FDA that MSN’s ANDA products are pharmaceutically and therapeutically equivalent to
`
`Otsuka’s SAMSCA® tablets.
`
`45. MSN has actual knowledge of Otsuka’s ’694 Patent.
`
`46.
`
`Upon information and belief, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A), MSN has infringed
`
`one or more claims of the ’694 Patent, including at least claim 1, by submitting, or causing to be
`
`submitted, to the FDA ANDA No. 216949, seeking approval to commercially manufacture, use,
`
`offer to sell or sell MSN’s ANDA products, and/or import them into the United States, before the
`
`expiration date of the ’694 Patent.
`
`47.
`
`Upon information and belief, if ANDA No. 216949 is approved, MSN intends to
`
`and will offer to sell and sell in the United States, and/or import into the United States, MSN’s
`
`ANDA products.
`
`48.
`
`Upon information and belief, if ANDA No. 216949 is approved, MSN will infringe
`
`one or more claims of the ’694 Patent, including at least claim 1, under § 271(a), either literally or
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 9 of 11 PageID #: 9
`
`
`
`under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing
`
`MSN’s ANDA products, and/or by actively inducing infringement by others under § 271(b) and/or
`
`contributing to infringement under § 271(c), unless this Court orders that the effective date of any
`
`FDA approval of ANDA No. 216949 shall be no earlier than the expiration of the ’694 Patent and
`
`any additional periods of exclusivity.
`
`49.
`
`Otsuka will be irreparably harmed by MSN’s infringing activities unless this Court
`
`enjoins those activities.
`
`50.
`
`Otsuka does not have an adequate remedy at law.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Otsuka respectfully requests the following relief:
`
`A.
`
`The entry of judgment under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A) that MSN has infringed at
`
`least one claim of each of the Patents-in-Suit by MSN’s submission of ANDA No. 216949 to the
`
`FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use, offer to sell and/or sell MSN’s ANDA products in the
`
`United States, and/or import them into the United States, before the expiration of the Patents-in-
`
`Suit;
`
`B.
`
`The entry of judgment under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), (b) and/or (c) that MSN’s making,
`
`using, offering to sell, selling or importation of MSN’s ANDA products before the expiration of
`
`the Patents-in-Suit will infringe, actively induce infringement and/or contribute to the infringement
`
`of those patents under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), (b) and/or (c);
`
`C.
`
`The issuance of an order that the effective date of any FDA approval of MSN’s
`
`ANDA products shall be no earlier than the expiration date of the Patents-in-Suit and any
`
`additional periods of exclusivity, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A);
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 10 of 11 PageID #: 10
`
`
`
`D.
`
`The entry of a preliminary and permanent injunction, enjoining MSN and all
`
`persons acting in concert with MSN from commercially manufacturing, using, offering for sale or
`
`selling MSN’s ANDA products within the United States, or importing MSN’s ANDA products
`
`into the United States, until the expiration of the Patents-in-Suit, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. §§
`
`271(e)(4)(B) and 283;
`
`E.
`
`The entry of a preliminary and permanent injunction, enjoining MSN and all
`
`persons acting in concert with MSN from seeking, obtaining or maintaining approval of the ANDA
`
`until the expiration of the Patents-in-Suit, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(e)(4)(B) and 283;
`
`F.
`
`The issuance of a declaration that this is an exceptional case and an award to Otsuka
`
`of its costs, expenses and disbursements in this action, including reasonable attorney fees, pursuant
`
`to 35 U.S.C. §§ 285 and 271(e)(4);
`
`G.
`
`An award to Otsuka of any further appropriate relief under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4);
`
`and
`
`H.
`
`An award to Otsuka of any further and additional relief that this Court deems just
`
`and proper.
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00316-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/10/22 Page 11 of 11 PageID #: 11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`John D. Murnane
`Joshua I. Rothman
`Alicia A. Russo
`Zachary L. Garrett
`VENABLE LLP
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`(212) 218-2100
`
`March 10, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Jeremy A. Tigan
`
`
`
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@morrisnichols.com
`jtigan@morrisnichols.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
`
`11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket