throbber
BUFFALO PATENTS, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`SPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY S.A., SPOTIFY
`AB, and SPOTIFY USA INC.
`Defendants.
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. _________
`
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 36 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Buffalo Patents, LLC (“Buffalo Patents” or “Plaintiff”) files this original
`
`complaint against Defendants Spotify Technology S.A., Spotify AB, and Spotify USA Inc.
`
`(“Spotify” or “Defendant”), alleging, based on its own knowledge as to itself and its own actions
`
`and based on information and belief as to all other matters, as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Buffalo Patents is a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State
`
`of Texas, with its principal place of business at 1200 Silver Hill Dr., Austin, Texas, 78746.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Spotify Technology S.A. (“Spotify Technology”) is a company duly
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, with a place of
`
`business located at Regeringsgatan 19, SE-111 53 Stockholm, Sweden.
`
`3.
`
`Spotify Technology, together with its subsidiaries, is an audio streaming and
`
`media services provider. It describes itself as “the world’s most popular audio streaming
`
`subscription service with a community of more than 433 million users, including 188 million
`
`Spotify Premium subscribers, across 183 markets.”1
`
`                                                            
`1 See About Spotify, https://investors.spotify.com/about/default.aspx.
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 2 of 36 PageID #: 2
`
`4.
`
`Defendant Spotify AB is a company duly organized and existing under the laws
`
`of Sweden, with a place of business located at Regeringsgatan 19, SE-111 53, Stockholm,
`
`Sweden.
`
`5.
`
`Spotify AB is a wholly owned subsidiary of Spotify Technology. Spotify AB is
`
`the main operating company of Spotify.
`
`6.
`
`Defendant Spotify USA Inc. (“Spotify USA”) is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Spotify USA Inc. may be served with process
`
`through its registered agent, National Registered Agents, Inc., 1209 Orange St., Wilmington,
`
`Delaware, 19801.
`
`7.
`
`Spotify USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Spotify AB. Spotify USA is the
`
`American operating company for Spotify.
`
`8.
`
`The Defendants named above and their affiliates are part of the same corporate
`
`structure and distribution chain for the making, importing, offering to sell, selling, and using of
`
`the accused devices in the United States, including in the State of Delaware generally and this
`
`judicial district in particular. Spotify’s annual report, for instance, states that the term “Spotify”
`
`refers to “Spotify Technology S.A. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries on a consolidated
`
`basis.”2
`
`9.
`
`The Defendants named above and their affiliates share the same management,
`
`common ownership, advertising platforms, facilities, distribution chains and platforms, and
`
`accused product lines and products involving related technologies.
`
`                                                            
`2 See Spotify’s Annual Report, at 1 (2021),
`https://s29.q4cdn.com/175625835/files/doc_financials/2021/AR/2021-Spotify-AR.pdf.
`

`
`2
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 3 of 36 PageID #: 3
`
`10.
`
`Thus, the Defendants named above and their affiliates operate as a unitary
`
`business venture and are jointly and severally liable for the acts of patent infringement alleged
`
`herein.
`
`11.
`
`The parties to this action are properly joined under 35 U.S.C. § 299 because the
`
`right to relief asserted against defendants jointly and severally arises out of the same series of
`
`transactions or occurrences relating to the making and using of the same products or processes.
`
`Additionally, questions of fact common to all defendants will arise in this action.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`12.
`
`This is an action for infringement of United States patents arising under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 271, 281, and 284–85, among others. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction of the action
`
`under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1338(a).
`
`13.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Spotify pursuant to due process and/or
`
`the Delaware Long Arm Statute because, inter alia, (i) Spotify has done and continues to do
`
`business in Delaware, (ii) Spotify regularly does or solicits business, engages in other persistent
`
`course of conduct in Delaware, and derives substantial revenue from services, or things used or
`
`consumed in Delaware, (iii) Spotify has committed and continues to commit acts of patent
`
`infringement in the State of Delaware, including making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling
`
`accused products or services in Delaware, inducing others to commit acts of patent infringement
`
`in Delaware, and/or committing at least a portion of any other infringements alleged herein in
`
`Delaware, and (iv) Spotify regularly places its products or services within the stream of
`
`commerce—directly, through subsidiaries, or through third parties—with the expectation and
`
`knowledge that such products or services will be sold or used in Delaware and elsewhere in the
`
`United States. Thus, Spotify has established minimum contacts within Delaware and
`
`purposefully availed itself of the benefits of Delaware, and the exercise of personal jurisdiction
`

`
`3
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 4 of 36 PageID #: 4
`
`over Spotify would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. In addition,
`
`or in the alternative, this Court has personal jurisdiction over (i) Spotify Technology and Spotify
`
`AB pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2), and (ii) Spotify USA because it is
`
`organized under the laws of Delaware.
`
`14.
`
`Venue is proper as to Defendants Spotify Technology and Spotify AB, which are
`
`organized under the laws of foreign jurisdictions. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c)(3) provides that “a
`
`defendant not resident in the United States may be sued in any judicial district, and the joinder of
`
`such a defendant shall be disregarded in determining where the action may be brought with
`
`respect to other defendants.” See also In re HTC Corp., 889 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2018).
`
`15.
`
`Venue is proper in this district as to Spotify USA under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).
`
`Spotify USA is incorporated in the State of Delaware, so it resides in this district.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`16.
`
`The patent-in-suit generally relates to an improved method and system of
`
`managing conference calls. The patented technology allows communities of individuals to
`
`initiate, join, and participate in conference calls. In particular, members of a community (even
`
`unknown to one another) can meet and collaborate in a freeform and unscheduled way, and yet
`
`“retain collective and individual degrees of organizational control,” such as through providing
`
`conference call data, designation of users as “speakers,” limiting the time a user is permitted to
`
`speak, etc.
`
`17.
`
`The technology disclosed by the patent-in-suit was developed by award-winning
`
`software developers, known especially for game and graphic design. Since the 1980s, Jordan
`
`Weisman has worked on and created interactive entertainment software, including a plethora of
`
`role-playing and alternative reality games. Mr. Weisman has earned more than 100 awards
`
`throughout his career and, in 2003, he was selected as the Pacific Northwest Entrepreneur of the
`

`
`4
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 5 of 36 PageID #: 5
`
`Year by Ernst & Young. Elan Lee is best known as a designer of computer games, and has had
`
`extensive experience with creating interactive programming for audiences. He has also won
`
`much acclaim, including multiple industry awards for design and innovation. Bill Redmann is an
`
`engineer who has worked on creating virtual reality technologies, including the design of
`
`interactive technologies, since the 1980s. Mr. Redmann is a named inventor on over 70 patents.
`
`18.
`
`The invention disclosed in the patent-in-suit has been cited during patent
`
`prosecution nearly 300 times and multiple times by electronics companies, including Alcatel-
`
`Lucent, Amazon, Apple, AT&T, Avaya, Blackberry, Canon, Cisco, Dolby, Ericsson, Fujitsu,
`
`Google, IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Infineon, Intel, Lenovo, LG Electronics, Microsoft, Motorola
`
`Solutions, Nokia, Nortel Networks, Palm, Panasonic, Qualcomm, Samsung, Sharp Labs,
`
`Siemens, Sony, Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon, and Vodafone.
`
`COUNT I
`
`DIRECT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,839,417
`
`19.
`
`On January 4, 2005, United States Patent No. 6,839,417 (“the ’417 Patent”) was
`
`duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for an invention
`
`entitled “Method and Apparatus for Improved Conference Call Management.” A true and
`
`correct copy of the ’417 Patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`20.
`
`Buffalo Patents is the owner of the ’417 Patent, with all substantive rights in and
`
`to that patent, including the sole and exclusive right to prosecute this action and enforce the ’417
`
`Patent against infringers, and to collect damages for all relevant times.
`
`21.
`
`Spotify made, had made, used, imported, provided, supplied, distributed, sold,
`
`and/or offered for sale products and/or systems including, for example, its Spotify Live social
`

`
`5
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 6 of 36 PageID #: 6
`
`platform (formerly Spotify Greenroom3) and other products and/or services that allow users to
`
`set up and join a conference call, and receive a list of available conference calls (“accused
`
`products”):
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/live/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/spotify-live/id1517524960
`
`                                                            
`3 See Spotify Greenroom Is Getting a New Name—Spotify Live—And a New Home, SPOTIFY
`AB (Apr. 12, 2022), https://newsroom.spotify.com/2022-04-12/spotify-greenroom-is-getting-a-
`new-name-spotify-live-and-a-new-home/.
`

`
`6
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 7 of 36 PageID #: 7
`
`22.
`
`By doing so, Spotify has directly infringed (literally and/or under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents) at least Claim 38 of the ’417 Patent. Spotify’s infringement in this regard is
`
`ongoing.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`The Spotify platform is an exemplary accused product.
`
`Spotify has infringed the ’417 Patent by using the accused products and thereby
`
`practicing a method for a selecting participant to access a conference call.
`
`25.
`
`For example, Spotify Live (formerly Spotify Greenroom) is a social audio mobile
`
`platform that allows a user to set up and join audio rooms. A user (“selecting participant”) can
`
`access an ongoing audio room (“conference call”) by tapping on the audio room.
`
`Spotify Greenroom
`
`Source: https://support.spotify.com/us/article/spotify-greenroom/
`
`
`

`
`7
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 8 of 36 PageID #: 8
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/greenroom/
`
`
`
`Source: https://youtu.be/uFPS_4tp95U?t=183
`
`
`

`
`8
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 9 of 36 PageID #: 9
`
`Spotify Live
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://support.spotify.com/us/article/spotify-live/
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/live/
`
`Source: https://support.spotify.com/us/article/spotify-live/
`
`Source: https://support.spotify.com/us/article/spotify-live/
`

`
`9
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 10 of 36 PageID #: 10
`
`
`Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIttUK2o7Zg (0:15)
`
`26.
`
`The method practiced using the accused products includes the step of providing to
`
`the selecting participant a list of conference call data representing a subset of conference calls
`
`available.
`
`27.
`
`For example, Spotify Live (formerly Spotify Greenroom) is a social audio mobile
`
`platform that allows a user to set up and join audio rooms. A user can select and join an audio
`
`room from a list of ongoing rooms. The audio rooms provide information to users about the
`
`audio room, including title of the room, topic of the room, list of members currently in the room,
`
`name of the host, etc.
`
`28.
`
`A user (“selecting participant”) is also provided a list of available ongoing audio
`
`rooms (“representing a subset of conference calls”).
`

`
`10
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 11 of 36 PageID #: 11
`
`Spotify Greenroom
`
`Source: https://youtu.be/uFPS_4tp95U?t=163
`
`
`

`
`11
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 12 of 36 PageID #: 12
`
`Source: https://youtu.be/uFPS_4tp95U?t=183
`
`
`

`
`12
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 13 of 36 PageID #: 13
`
`
`Source: Screenshot taken during testing showing a subset of ongoing audio rooms, e.g.,
`available conference calls.
`

`
`13
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 14 of 36 PageID #: 14
`
`Source: https://youtu.be/uFPS_4tp95U?t=345
`
`Spotify Live
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIttUK2o7Zg (0:08)
`

`
`14
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 15 of 36 PageID #: 15
`
`
`Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIttUK2o7Zg (0:15)
`
`
`Source: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.bettylabs.disco&hl=en_US&gl=US
`

`
`15
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 16 of 36 PageID #: 16
`
`
`Source: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.bettylabs.disco&hl=en_US&gl=US
`
`29.
`
`The method practiced using the accused products includes the step of receiving
`
`from a selecting participant, a designation of the conference call from the list.
`
`30.
`
`For example, Spotify Live (formerly Spotify Greenroom) is a social audio mobile
`
`platform that allows a user to set up and join audio rooms. A user can select and join a room
`
`from a list of scheduled or ongoing rooms. When a user taps on the “join” button of the room
`
`they want to join, the user joins the room as a listener. If a user creates a room, the user
`
`automatically joins as the speaker or host of that room. Other users that subsequently join the
`
`room join as listeners. The platform receives a user’s designation in the audio room before that
`
`user actually joins the audio room.
`
`31.
`
`As one example, when a user joins a room as a listener, that user will only be able
`
`to listen (“designation”) to the speakers in that room.
`

`
`16
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 17 of 36 PageID #: 17
`
`Spotify Greenroom
`
`Source: https://youtu.be/uFPS_4tp95U?t=163
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/greenroom/
`
`
`

`
`17
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 18 of 36 PageID #: 18
`
`Source: https://youtu.be/uFPS_4tp95U?t=345
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/greenroom/
`
`
`

`
`18
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 19 of 36 PageID #: 19
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/greenroom/
`
`
`

`
`19
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 20 of 36 PageID #: 20
`
`
`Source: Screenshot showing the perspective of a user that joins an audio room as a listener.
`

`
`20
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 21 of 36 PageID #: 21
`
`Spotify Live
`
`
`Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIttUK2o7Zg (0:08)
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/live/
`
`Source: https://support.spotify.com/us/article/spotify-live/
`
`
`
`
`

`
`21
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 22 of 36 PageID #: 22
`
`Source: https://support.spotify.com/us/article/spotify-live/
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.bettylabs.disco&hl=en_US&gl=US
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/live/
`
`
`

`
`22
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 23 of 36 PageID #: 23
`
`
`Source: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.bettylabs.disco&hl=en_US&gl=US
`
`32.
`
`The method practiced using the accused products includes the step of granting
`
`access to the selecting participant into the conference call as a participant.
`
`33.
`
`For example, Spotify Live (formerly Spotify Greenroom) is a social audio mobile
`
`platform that allows a user to set up and join audio rooms. A user can select and join a room
`
`from a list of scheduled or ongoing rooms. When a user taps on the “join” button of the room
`
`they want to join, the user joins the room as a listener. If a user creates a room, the user
`
`automatically joins as a speaker or host of that room. Other users that subsequently join the
`
`room will join as listeners. The platform receives a user’s designation in the audio room, and
`
`grants access to the user with that designation.
`
`34.
`
`As one example, when a user joins a room, they (“selecting participant”) are
`
`granted access to the audio room (“into the conference call”) as a listener—that is, a participant
`
`that cannot talk to other participants (“participant”). When a user joins a room as a host (after
`

`
`23
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 24 of 36 PageID #: 24
`
`the creation of the room), that user will be granted access as a participant with a “speak” option,
`
`“hand requests approval” option, etc.
`
`Spotify Greenroom
`
`Source: https://youtu.be/uFPS_4tp95U?t=163
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/greenroom/
`
`
`

`
`24
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 25 of 36 PageID #: 25
`
`Source: https://youtu.be/uFPS_4tp95U?t=345
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/greenroom/
`
`
`

`
`25
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 26 of 36 PageID #: 26
`
`Spotify Live
`
`
`Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIttUK2o7Zg (0:08)
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/live/
`
`Source: https://support.spotify.com/us/article/spotify-live/
`
`
`
`
`

`
`26
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 27 of 36 PageID #: 27
`
`Source: https://support.spotify.com/us/article/spotify-live/
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.bettylabs.disco&hl=en_US&gl=US
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/live/
`
`
`

`
`27
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 28 of 36 PageID #: 28
`
`35.
`
`The citations below show that the user interface (UI) can differ depending on
`
`whether a user joins a room as a host or as a listener. Accordingly, a participant is granted
`
`access to a conference call depending on the selected designation.
`
`Source: https://youtu.be/uFPS_4tp95U?t=358
`
`
`

`
`28
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 29 of 36 PageID #: 29
`
`
`Source: Screenshot showing the host’s perspective after creating an audio room.
`

`
`29
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 30 of 36 PageID #: 30
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/greenroom/
`
`
`

`
`30
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 31 of 36 PageID #: 31
`
`
`Source: Screenshot showing the perspective of a user that joins an audio room as a listener.
`
`36.
`
`Spotify has directly infringed at least through its use of the accused products
`
`through its own testing of the accused products, and through joint infringement with its affiliates,
`
`with its subsidiaries, with its business partners, with other agents of Spotify, and/or with its
`
`customers and end-users, at least using the claimed method. Such acts of infringement include
`
`directing or controlling other persons to engage in conduct satisfying one or more elements of
`
`the asserted claims, deriving a financial or other benefit from doing so. Spotify’s direction or
`
`control of its affiliates and end-users includes regularly contracting with those affiliates and end-
`
`users. Also, as explained further below, Spotify took active steps and advised or directed
`
`customers and end-users to use the accused products in an infringing manner. See, e.g., supra
`
`¶¶ 21, 28, 31, 34.
`

`
`31
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 32 of 36 PageID #: 32
`
`37.
`
`Spotify has had knowledge of the ’417 Patent at least as of the date when it was
`
`notified of the filing of this action, and as early as February 2, 2022, when Spotify received a
`
`letter from Buffalo notifying it of the ’417 Patent.
`
`38.
`
`Buffalo Patents has been damaged as a result of the infringing conduct by Spotify
`
`alleged above. Thus, Spotify is liable to Buffalo Patents in an amount that adequately
`
`compensates it for such infringements, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty,
`
`together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
`
`39.
`
`Buffalo Patents has neither made nor sold unmarked articles that practice the ’417
`
`Patent, and is entitled to collect pre-filing damages for the full period allowed by law for
`
`infringement of the ’417 Patent.
`
`ADDITIONAL ALLEGATIONS REGARDING INFRINGEMENT
`AND PERSONAL JURISDICTION
`
`40.
`
`Spotify has also indirectly infringed the ’417 Patent by inducing others to directly
`
`infringe the ’417 Patent.
`
`41.
`
`Spotify has induced the end users and/or Spotify’s customers to directly infringe
`
`(literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) the ’417 Patent by using the accused products.
`
`42.
`
`Spotify took active steps, directly and/or through contractual relationships with
`
`others, with the specific intent to cause them to use the accused products in a manner that
`
`infringes one or more claims of the ’417 Patent, including, for example, Claim 38 of the ’417
`
`Patent.
`
`43.
`
`Such steps by Spotify included, among other things, advising or directing
`
`customers, end users, and others to use the accused products in an infringing manner; advertising
`
`and promoting the use of the accused products in an infringing manner; and/or distributing
`

`
`32
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 33 of 36 PageID #: 33
`
`instructions that guide users to use the accused products in an infringing manner. Examples of
`
`the steps Spotify has taken include the following:4
`
`Source: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/spotify-live/id1517524960
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.spotify.com/us/live/
`
`                                                            
`4 See also supra ¶¶ 28, 31, 34.
`

`
`33
`

`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 34 of 36 PageID #: 34
`
`44.
`
`Spotify performed these steps, which constitute joint and/or induced infringement,
`
`with the knowledge of the ’417 Patent and with the knowledge that the induced acts constitute
`
`infringement.
`
`45.
`
`Spotify was and is aware that the normal and customary use of the accused
`
`products by Spotify’s customers would infringe the ’417 Patent. Spotify’s inducement is
`
`ongoing.
`
`46.
`
`Spotify has also indirectly infringed by contributing to the infringement of the
`
`’417 Patent. Spotify has contributed to the direct infringement of the ’417 Patent by the end user
`
`of the accused products.
`
`47.
`
`The accused products have special features that are specially designed to be used
`
`in an infringing way and that have no substantial uses other than ones that infringe the ’417
`
`Patent, including, for example, Claim 38 of the ’417 Patent.
`
`48.
`
`The special features include, for example, hardware and/or software features that
`
`provide a participant in a conference call with a list of available conference calls, used in a
`
`manner that infringes the ’417 Patent.
`
`49.
`
`These special features constitute a material part of the invention of one or more of
`
`the claims of the ’417 Patent, and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial
`
`non-infringing use.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`Spotify’s contributory infringement is ongoing.
`
`Spotify has had actual knowledge of the ’417 Patent at least as of the date when it
`
`was notified of the filing of this action, and as early as February 2, 2022, when Spotify received
`
`a letter notifying it of the ’417 Patent. Since at least that time, Spotify has known the scope of
`

`
`34
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 35 of 36 PageID #: 35
`
`the claims of the ’417 Patent, the products that practice the ’417 Patent, and that Buffalo Patents
`
`is the owner of the ’417 Patent.
`
`52.
`
`By the time of trial, Spotify will have known and intended (since receiving such
`
`notice) that its continued actions would infringe and actively induce and contribute to the
`
`infringement of one or more claims of the ’417 Patent.
`
`53.
`
`Spotify’s customers have infringed the ’417 Patent. Spotify encouraged its
`
`customers’ infringement.
`
`54.
`
`Spotify’s direct and indirect infringement of the ’417 Patent has been, and/or
`
`continues to be willful, intentional, deliberate, and/or in conscious disregard of Buffalo Patents’
`
`rights under the patent-in-suit.
`
`55.
`
`Buffalo Patents has been damaged as a result of Spotify’s infringing conduct
`
`alleged above. Thus, Spotify is liable to Buffalo Patents in an amount that adequately
`
`compensates it for such infringements, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty,
`
`together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Buffalo Patents hereby requests a trial by jury on all issues so triable by right.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Buffalo Patents requests that the Court find in its favor and against Spotify, and that the
`
`Court grant Buffalo Patents the following relief:
`
`a.
`
`Judgment that one or more claims of the ’417 Patent have been infringed, either
`
`literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by Spotify and/or all others acting in concert
`
`therewith;
`
`b.
`
`A permanent injunction enjoining Spotify and its officers, directors, agents,
`
`servants, affiliates, employees, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents, and all others acting in
`

`
`35
`

`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01335-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 36 of 36 PageID #: 36
`
`concert therewith from infringement of the ’417 Patent; or, in the alternative, an award of a
`
`reasonable ongoing royalty for future infringement of the ’417 Patent by such entities;
`
`c.
`
`Judgment that Spotify account for and pay to Buffalo Patents all damages to and
`
`costs incurred by Buffalo Patents because of Spotify’s infringing activities and other conduct
`
`complained of herein, including an award of all increased damages to which Buffalo Patents is
`
`entitled under 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`d.
`
`That Buffalo Patents be granted pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the
`
`damages caused by Spotify’s infringing activities and other conduct complained of herein;
`
`e.
`
`That this Court declare this an exceptional case and award Buffalo Patents its
`
`reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 285; and
`
`f.
`
`That Buffalo Patents be granted such other and further relief as the Court may
`
`deem just and proper under the circumstances.
`
`
`Dated: October 11, 2022
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Matthew J. Antonelli
`Zachariah S. Harrington
`Larry D. Thompson, Jr.
`Christopher Ryan Pinckney
`Rehan M. Safiullah
`matt@ahtlawfirm.com
`zac@ahtlawfirm.com
`larry@ahtlawfirm.com
`ryan@ahtlawfirm.com
`rehan@ahtlawfirm.com
`
`ANTONELLI, HARRINGTON
`& THOMPSON LLP
`4306 Yoakum Blvd., Ste. 450
`Houston, TX 77006
`(713) 581-3000
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`
`/s/ Michael J. Farnan
`Brian E. Farnan (Bar No. 4089)
`Michael J. Farnan (Bar No. 5165)
`919 N. Market St., 12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Tel: (302) 777-0300
`Fax: (302) 777-0301
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Buffalo Patents, LLC
`
`36
`

`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket