Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 846
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 1:23-CV-00278 (MN)
`
`
`PAYRANGE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`CSC SERVICEWORKS, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER [PATENT, NON-ANDA]
`
`This ____________ day of ________________, 2023, the Court having conducted an
`
`initial Rule 16(b) scheduling conference pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(b), and the parties having
`
`determined after discussion that the matter cannot be resolved at this juncture by settlement,
`
`voluntary mediation, or binding arbitration;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Rule 26(a)(l) Initial Disclosures and E-Discovery Default Standard. Unless
`
`otherwise agreed to by the parties, the parties shall make their initial disclosures pursuant to
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(l) by August 16, 2023. If they have not already done so,
`
`the parties are to review the Court’s Default Standard for Discovery, Including Discovery of
`
`Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”), which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see
`
`Other Resources, Default Standard for Discovery) and is incorporated herein by reference.
`
`2.
`
`Joinder of Other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. All motions to join other
`
`parties, and to amend or supplement the pleadings, shall be filed on or before February 28, 2024.
`
`Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any motion to join a party or motion to amend the
`
`pleadings shall be made pursuant to the procedures set forth in Paragraphs 8(g) and 9.
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 2 of 16 PageID #: 847
`
`3.
`
`Application to Court for Protective Order. Should counsel find it will be
`
`necessary to apply to the Court for a protective order specifying terms and conditions for the
`
`disclosure of confidential information, counsel should confer and attempt to reach an agreement
`
`on a proposed form of order and submit it to the Court by August 30, 2023. Should counsel be
`
`unable to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order, counsel must follow the provisions
`
`of Paragraph 8(g) below.
`
`Any proposed protective order must include the following paragraph:
`
`Other Proceedings. By entering this order and limiting the
`disclosure of information in this case, the Court does not intend to
`preclude another court from finding that information may be
`relevant and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or
`party subject to this order who becomes subject to a motion to
`disclose another party’s information designated “confidential” [the
`parties should list any other level of designation, such as “highly
`confidential,” which may be provided for in the protective order]
`pursuant to this order shall promptly notify that party of the motion
`so that the party may have an opportunity to appear and be heard on
`whether that information should be disclosed.
`
`4.
`
`Papers Filed Under Seal. In accordance with section G of the Revised
`
`Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means, a redacted
`
`version of any sealed document shall be filed electronically within seven (7) days of the filing of
`
`the sealed document.
`
`5.
`
`Courtesy Copies. The parties shall provide to the Court two (2) courtesy copies
`
`of all briefs and any other document filed in support of any briefs (i.e., appendices, exhibits,
`
`declarations, affidavits etc.). This provision also applies to papers filed under seal. All courtesy
`
`copies shall be double-sided.
`
`6.
`
`ADR Process. This matter is referred to a magistrate judge to explore the
`
`possibility of alternative dispute resolution.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 3 of 16 PageID #: 848
`
`7.
`
`Disclosures. Absent agreement among the parties, and approval of the Court: By
`
`August 30, 2023, Plaintiff shall identify the accused product(s), including accused methods and
`
`systems, and their damages model, as well as the asserted patent(s) that the accused product(s)
`
`allegedly infringe(s). Plaintiff shall also produce the file history for each asserted patent.
`
`(a)
`
`By September 29, 2023, Defendant shall produce core technical
`
`documents related to the accused product(s), sufficient to show how the accused product(s)
`
`work(s), including but not limited to non-publicly available operation manuals, product literature,
`
`schematics, and specifications. Defendant shall also produce sales figures for the accused
`
`product(s).
`
`(b)
`
`By October 30, 2023, Plaintiff shall produce an initial claim chart relating
`
`each known accused product to the asserted claims each such product allegedly infringes.
`
`(c)
`
`By December 20, 2023, Defendant shall produce its initial invalidity
`
`contentions for each asserted claim, as well as the known related invalidating references.
`
`(d)
`
`(e)
`
`(f)
`
`By June 6, 2024, Plaintiff shall provide final infringement contentions.
`
`By June 27, 2024, Defendant shall provide final invalidity contentions;
`
`By April 11, 2024, the parties will meet and confer to discuss a reduction
`
`of asserted claims and prior art references. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, they may
`
`seek a conference with the Court.
`
`8.
`
`Discovery. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to by parties, the
`
`limitations on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules shall be strictly observed.
`
`(a)
`
`Fact Discovery Cut Off. All fact discovery in this case shall be initiated
`
`so that it will be completed on or before July 25, 2024.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 4 of 16 PageID #: 849
`
`(b)
`
`Document Production. Document production shall be substantially
`
`complete by February 21, 2024.
`
`(c)
`
`Requests for Admission. Requests for admission shall not be limited in
`
`number.
`
`(d)
`
`Interrogatories.
`
`i.
`
`A maximum of 25
`
`interrogatories,
`
`including contention
`
`interrogatories, are permitted for each side.
`
`ii.
`
`The Court encourages the parties to serve and respond to
`
`contention interrogatories early in the case. In the absence of agreement among the parties,
`
`contention interrogatories, if filed, shall first be addressed by the party with the burden of proof.
`
`The adequacy of all interrogatory answers shall be judged by the level of detail each party
`
`provides (i.e., the more detail a party provides, the more detail a party shall receive).
`
`(e)
`
`Depositions.
`
`i.
`
`Limitation on Hours for Deposition Discovery. Each side is
`
`limited to a total of 10 depositions and a total of 70 hours of taking testimony by deposition upon
`
`oral examination.
`
`ii.
`
`Location of Depositions. Any party or representative (officer,
`
`director, or managing agent) of a party filing a civil action in this district court must ordinarily
`
`be required, upon request, to submit to a deposition at a place designated within this district.
`
`Exceptions to this general rule may be made by order of the Court. A defendant who becomes a
`
`counterclaimant, cross-claimant, or third-party plaintiff shall be considered as having filed an
`
`action in this Court for the purpose of this provision.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 5 of 16 PageID #: 850
`
`(f)
`
`Disclosure of Expert Testimony.
`
`i.
`
`Expert Reports. For the party who has the initial burden of proof
`
`on the subject matter, the initial Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) disclosure of expert
`
`testimony is due on or before December 12, 2024. The supplemental disclosure to contradict or
`
`rebut evidence on the same matter identified by another party is due on or before January 14,
`
`2025. Reply expert reports from the party with the initial burden of proof are due on or before
`
`February 4, 2025. No other expert reports will be permitted without either the consent of all
`
`parties or leave of the Court. Along with the submissions of the expert reports, the parties shall
`
`advise of the dates and times of their experts’ availability for deposition.
`
`ii.
`
`Expert Report Supplementation. The parties agree they will permit
`
`expert declarations to be filed in connection with motions briefing (including case- dispositive
`
`motions). Any opinions set forth in supplemental expert declarations must have been previously
`
`disclosed in an expert report on the issue subject to the motion.
`
`iii.
`
`Objections to Expert Testimony. To the extent any objection to
`
`expert testimony is made pursuant to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702, it
`
`shall be made by motion no later than the deadline for dispositive motions set forth herein, unless
`
`otherwise ordered by the Court. Briefing on such motions is subject to the page limits set out in
`
`connection with briefing of case dispositive motions.
`
`iv.
`
`Expert Discovery Cut-Off. All expert discovery in this case shall
`
`be initiated so that it will be completed on or before February 28, 2025.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 6 of 16 PageID #: 851
`
`(g)
`
`Discovery Matters and Disputes Relating to Protective Orders.
`
`i.
`
`Any discovery motion filed without first complying with the
`
`following procedures will be denied without prejudice to renew pursuant to these procedures.
`
`ii.
`
`Should counsel find, after a reasonable effort pursuant to Local
`
`Rule 7.1.1 that they are unable to resolve a discovery matter or a dispute relating to a protective
`
`order, the parties involved in the discovery matter or protective order dispute shall contact the
`
`Court’s Judicial Administrator to schedule an argument.
`
`iii.
`
`On a date to be set by separate order, generally not less than four
`
`(4) days prior to the conference, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to
`
`exceed three (3) pages, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. On a date
`
`to be set by separate order, but generally not less than three (3) days prior to the conference, any
`
`party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, outlining
`
`that party’s reasons for its opposition.
`
`iv.
`
`The parties shall provide to the Court two (2) courtesy copies of
`
`its discovery letter and any other document filed in support of any letter (i.e., appendices,
`
`exhibits, declarations, affidavits etc.). This provision also applies to papers filed under seal. All
`
`courtesy copies shall be double-sided.
`
`v.
`
`Should the Court find further briefing necessary upon conclusion
`
`of the conference, the Court will order it. Alternatively, the Court may choose to resolve the
`
`dispute prior to the conference and will, in that event, cancel the conference.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 7 of 16 PageID #: 852
`
`9.
`
`Motions to Amend / Motions to Strike.
`
`(a)
`
`Any motion to amend (including a motion for leave to amend) a pleading
`
`or any motion to strike any pleading or other document shall be made pursuant to the discovery
`
`dispute procedure set forth in Paragraph 8(g) above.
`
`(b)
`
`Any such motion shall attach the proposed amended pleading as well as a
`
`“redline” comparison to the prior pleading or attach the document to be stricken.
`
`10.
`
`Technology Tutorials. Although technology tutorials are not required by the
`
`Court, they are appreciated and, if any party chooses to file such a tutorial, it shall be submitted
`
`on or before the date that the Joint Claim Construction Brief is filed.
`
`11.
`
`Claim Construction Issue Identification. On March 21, 2024, the parties shall
`
`exchange a list of those claim term(s)/phrase(s) that they believe need construction and their
`
`proposed claim construction of those term(s)/phrase(s). This document will not be filed with the
`
`Court. Subsequent to exchanging that list, the parties will meet and confer to prepare a Joint
`
`Claim Construction Chart to be submitted by July 11, 2024. The parties’ Joint Claim
`
`Construction Chart should identify for the Court the term(s)/phrase(s) of the claim(s) in issue,
`
`and should include each party’s proposed construction of the disputed claim language with
`
`citation(s) only to the intrinsic evidence in support of their respective proposed constructions.
`
`Intrinsic evidence (including copies of the patent(s) at issue) shall NOT be attached to the joint
`
`claim construction chart and, instead, the parties shall include a joint appendix with the joint
`
`claim construction brief, and the joint appendix shall include a copy of the patent(s) at issue and
`
`portions of all relevant intrinsic evidence that would have otherwise been included with the joint
`
`claim construction chart, as well as any additional evidence cited in the parties’ briefing.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 8 of 16 PageID #: 853
`
`12.
`
`Claim Construction Briefing. The Plaintiff shall serve, but not file, their opening
`
`brief, not to exceed 20 pages, on August 8, 2024. The Defendant shall serve, but not file, its
`
`answering brief, not to exceed 30 pages, on August 22, 2024. The Plaintiff shall serve, but not
`
`file, its reply brief, not to exceed 20 pages, on September 5, 2024. The Defendant shall serve,
`
`but not file, its sur-reply brief, not to exceed 10 pages, on September 12, 2024. No later than
`
`September 19, 2024, the parties shall file a Joint Claim Construction Brief. The parties shall
`
`copy and paste their unfiled briefs into one brief, with their positions on each claim term in
`
`sequential order, in substantially the form below. If the joint brief as submitted is more than 80
`
`pages, the parties must certify that the page limits (or equivalent word counts) in the Scheduling
`
`Order have been complied with and provide a brief explanation (e.g., formatting issues, listing
`
`of agreed-upon terms) as to why the brief is longer than 80 pages.
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`Agreed-Upon Constructions
`
`Disputed Constructions
`
`[TERM 1]
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff’s Opening Position
`
`Defendant’s Answering Position
`
`Plaintiff’s Reply Position
`
`Defendant’s Sur-Reply Position
`
`[TERM 2]
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff’s Opening Position
`
`Defendant’s Answering Position
`
`Plaintiff’s Reply Position
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 9 of 16 PageID #: 854
`
`4.
`
`Defendant’s Sur-Reply Position
`
`The parties need not include any general summaries of the law relating to claim construction. If
`
`there are any materials that would be submitted in an index, the parties shall submit them in a
`
`Joint Appendix.
`
`13.
`
`Hearing on Claim Construction. Beginning on ______________, the Court will
`
`hear argument on claim construction. The parties need not include any general summaries of the
`
`law relating to claim construction in their presentations to the Court. The parties shall notify the
`
`Court, by joint letter submission, no later than the date on which their joint claim construction
`
`brief is filed: (i) whether they request leave to present testimony at the hearing; and (ii) the
`
`amount of time they are requesting be allocated to them for the hearing.
`
`Provided that the parties comply with all portions of this Scheduling Order, and any other
`
`orders of the Court, the parties should anticipate that the Court will issue its claim construction
`
`order within sixty (60) days of the conclusion of the claim construction hearing. If the Court is
`
`unable to meet this goal, it will advise the parties no later than sixty (60) days after the conclusion
`
`of the claim construction hearing.
`
`14.
`
`Supplementation. Absent agreement among the parties, and approval of the
`
`Court, no later than May 10, 2024, the Plaintiff must finally supplement, inter alia, the
`
`identification of all accused products, and no later than June 6, 2024, Defendant must finally
`
`supplement the identification of all invalidity references.
`
`15.
`
`Case Dispositive Motions.
`
`(a)
`
`All case dispositive motions, an opening brief, and affidavits, if any, in
`
`support of the motion shall be served and filed on or before March 27, 2025. Briefing will be
`
`presented pursuant to the Court’s Local Rules in accordance with the briefing schedule in the
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 10 of 16 PageID #: 855
`
`appended chart. No case dispositive motion under Rule 56 may be filed more than ten (10) days
`
`before the above date without leave of the Court.
`
`(b)
`
`Concise Statement of Facts Requirement. Any motion for summary
`
`judgment shall be accompanied by a separate concise statement, not to exceed six (6) pages,
`
`which details each material fact which the moving party contends is essential for the Court’s
`
`resolution of the summary judgment motion (not the entire case) and as to which the moving
`
`party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried. Each fact shall be set forth in a separate
`
`numbered paragraph and shall be supported by specific citation(s) to the record.
`
`Any party opposing the motion shall include with its opposing papers a response
`
`to the moving party’s concise statement, not to exceed six (6) pages, which admits or disputes
`
`the facts set forth in the moving party’s concise statement on a paragraph-by-paragraph basis.
`
`To the extent a fact is disputed, the basis of the dispute shall be supported by specific citation(s)
`
`to the record. Failure to respond to a fact presented in the moving party’s concise statement of
`
`facts shall indicate that fact is not in dispute for purposes of summary judgment. The party
`
`opposing the motion may also include with its opposing papers a separate concise statement, not
`
`to exceed four (4) pages, which sets forth material facts as to which the opposing party contends
`
`there is a genuine issue to be tried. Each fact asserted by the opposing party shall also be set
`
`forth in a separate numbered paragraph and shall be supported by specific citation(s) to the
`
`record.
`
`The moving party shall include with its reply papers a response to the opposing
`
`party’s concise statement of facts, not to exceed four (4) pages, on a paragraph-by-paragraph
`
`basis. Failure to respond to a fact presented in the opposing party’s concise statement of facts
`
`shall indicate that fact remains in dispute for purposes of summary judgment.
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 11 of 16 PageID #: 856
`
`(c)
`
`Page limits combined with Daubert motion page limits. Each party is
`
`permitted to file as many case dispositive motions as desired provided, however, that each SIDE
`
`will be limited to a combined total of 40 pages for all opening briefs, a combined total of 40
`
`pages for all answering briefs, and a combined total of 20 pages for all reply briefs regardless of
`
`the number of case dispositive motions that are filed. In the event that a party files, in addition
`
`to a case dispositive motion, a Daubert motion to exclude or preclude all or any portion of an
`
`expert’s testimony, the total amount of pages permitted for all case dispositive and Daubert
`
`motions shall be increased to 50 pages for all opening briefs, 50 pages for all answering briefs,
`
`and 25 pages for all reply briefs for each SIDE.1
`
`16.
`
`Applications by Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any application to
`
`the Court shall be by written motion. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement
`
`required by Local Rule 7.1.1.
`
`17. Motions in Limine. Motions in limine shall not be separately filed. All in limine
`
`requests and responses thereto shall be set forth in the proposed pretrial order. Each SIDE shall
`
`be limited to three (3) in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. The in limine
`
`request and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each in limine request may be
`
`supported by a maximum of three (3) pages of argument, may be opposed by a maximum of three
`
`(3) pages of argument, and the side making the in limine request may add a maximum of one (l)
`
`additional page in reply in support of its request. If more than one party is supporting or opposing
`
`an in limine request, such support or opposition shall be combined in a single three (3) page
`
`
`1 The parties must work together to ensure that the Court receives no more than a total of 250
`pages (i.e., 50 + 50 + 25 regarding one side’s motions, and 50 + 50 + 25 regarding the other
`side’s motions) of briefing on all case dispositive motions and Daubert motions that are covered
`by this scheduling order and any other scheduling order entered in any related case that is
`proceeding on a consolidated or coordinated pretrial schedule.
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 12 of 16 PageID #: 857
`
`submission (and, if the moving party, a single one (1) page reply), unless otherwise ordered by
`
`the Court. No separate briefing shall be submitted on in limine requests, unless otherwise
`
`permitted by the Court.
`
`18.
`
`Pretrial Conference. On ________________, the Court will hold a pretrial
`
`conference in Court with counsel beginning at ___________. Unless otherwise ordered by the
`
`Court, the parties should assume that filing the pretrial order satisfies the pretrial disclosure
`
`requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). The parties shall file with the Court the
`
`joint proposed final pretrial order in compliance with Local Rule 16.3(c) and the Court’s
`
`Preferences and Procedures for Civil Cases not later than seven (7) days before the pretrial
`
`conference. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties shall comply with the timeframes
`
`set forth in Local Rule 16.3(d)(1)-(3) for the preparation of the joint proposed final pretrial order.
`
`The parties shall provide the Court two (2) double-sided courtesy copies of the joint
`
`proposed final pretrial order and all attachments. The proposed final pretrial order shall contain
`
`a table of contents and the paragraphs shall be numbered.
`
`19.
`
`Jury Instructions, Voir Dire, and Special Verdict Forms. Where a case is to be
`
`tried to a jury, pursuant to Local Rules 47.1(a)(2) and 51.1 the parties should file (i) proposed
`
`voir dire, (ii) preliminary jury instructions, (iii) final jury instructions, and (iv) special verdict
`
`forms seven (7) business days before the final pretrial conference. This submission shall be
`
`accompanied by a courtesy copy containing electronic files of these documents, in Microsoft
`
`Word format, which may be submitted by e-mail to mn_civil@ded.uscourts.gov.
`
`20.
`
`Trial. This matter is scheduled for an eight-day jury trial beginning at 9:30 a.m.
`
`on ______________, with the subsequent trial days beginning at 9:00 a.m. Until the case is
`
`submitted to the jury for deliberations, the jury will be excused each day at 4:30 p.m. The trial
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 13 of 16 PageID #: 858
`
`will be timed, as counsel will be allocated a total number of hours in which to present their
`
`respective cases.
`
`21.
`
`Judgment on Verdict and Post-Trial Status Report. Within seven (7) days after a
`
`jury returns a verdict in any portion of a jury trial, the parties shall jointly submit a form of order
`
`to enter judgment on the verdict. At the same time, the parties shall submit a joint status report,
`
`indicating among other things how the case should proceed and listing any post-trial motions
`
`each party intends to file.
`
`22.
`
`Post-Trial Motions. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, all SIDES are limited
`
`to a maximum of 20 pages of opening briefs, 20 pages of answering briefs, and 10 pages of reply
`
`briefs relating to any post-trial motions filed by that side, no matter how many such motions are
`
`filed.
`
`SO ORDERED this _____ day of ______________, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable Maryellen Noreika
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 14 of 16 PageID #: 859
`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 14 of 16 PagelD #: 859
`
`Chart of Relevant Deadlines
`
`ooEwentCetin
`
`
`
`Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures (§ 1)
`
`August 16, 2023
`
`Application to Court for protective order ( 3)
`
`Plaintiff to identify accused method(s) and/or products, damages
`model, asserted patents, and producefile histories (§ 7)
`
`HuaALANS
`
`Defendant to produce core technical documents andsales figures
`of accused methods(s) and/or products (§ 7a)
`
`September 29, 2023
`
`Plaintiff to produce an initial infringement claim chart (§ 7b)
`
`October 30, 2023
`
`Defendantto produceits initial invalidity contentions ({ 7c) and
`initial non-infringement contentions
`
`December20, 2023
`
`Plaintiff to produceits initial validity contentions
`
`January 22, 2024
`
`Document production substantially complete (4 8b)
`
`February 21, 2024
`
`Joinder of other parties and amendmentof pleadings ( 2)
`
`February 28, 2024
`
`Exchangelist of claim terms and proposedconstructions (§ 11)
`
`March 21, 2024
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding reduction ofasserted
`claims and references (§ 7f)
`
`Plaintiffto provide final infringement contentions and
`identification of accused products (§ 7d)
`
`April 11, 2024
`
`May 10, 2024
`
`Defendant to provide final invalidity contentions and
`June 6, 2024
`identification of invalidity references (§ 7e)
`
`
`June 27, 2024
`
`Parties to exchangefinal validity and noninfringement
`contentions
`
`Submit joint claim construction chart (¥ 11)
`
`July 11, 2024
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 15 of 16 PageID #: 860
`
`Fact discovery cut off (¶ 8a)
`
`Serve Plaintiff’ opening claim construction brief (20 pages) (¶
`12)
`
`Serve Defendant’s answering claim construction brief (30 pages)
`(¶ 12)
`
`July 25, 2024
`
`August 8, 2024
`
`August 22, 2024
`
`Serve Plaintiff’ reply claim construction brief (20 pages) (¶ 12)
`
`September 5, 2024
`
`Serve Defendant’s sur-reply claim construction brief (10 pages)
`(¶ 12)
`
`September 12, 2024
`
`File joint claim construction brief (¶ 12); joint letter re: live
`testimony and amount of time for the claim construction hearing
`(¶ 13); technology tutorials (¶ 10)
`
`September 19, 2024
`
`Claim construction hearing (¶ 13)
`
`October/November, 2024
`
`Opening expert reports (¶ 8.f.i)
`
`Responsive expert reports (¶ 8.f.i)
`
`Reply expert reports (¶ 8.f.i)
`
`End of expert discovery period (¶ 8.f.iv)
`
`Case dispositive motions and opening briefs therefor (¶ 15(a));
`Daubert motions and opening briefs therefor (¶ 8.f.iii)
`
`December 12, 2024
`
`January 14, 2025
`
`February 4, 2025
`
`February 28, 2025
`
`March 27, 2025
`
`Responsive brief(s) for dispositive motions and Daubert motions
`(¶ 15(a); Local Rule 7.1.2(b))
`
`April 29, 2025
`
`Reply brief for dispositive motions and Daubert motions (¶
`15(a); Local Rule 7.1.2(b))
`
`May 20, 2025
`
`Jury instructions, voir dire, and special verdict forms (¶ 19)
`
`September 5, 2025
`
`Joint proposed pretrial order (¶ 18; Local Rule 16.3(c))
`
`September 5, 2025
`
`Pretrial conference (¶ 18)
`
`October __, 2025
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 23 Filed 07/26/23 Page 16 of 16 PageID #: 861
`
`Jury trial (¶ 20) (estimated eight days)
`
`October __, 2025
`
`Judgment on verdict and post-trial status report (¶ 21)
`
`Seven (7) days after verdict
`
`
`
`16
`
`