throbber
Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 862
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`PAYRANGE INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CSC SERVICEWORKS, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3))
`
`C.A. No. 1:23-CV-00278 (MN)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:38)(cid:43)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:56)(cid:47)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:42)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:53)
`
`This ____________ day of ________________, 2023, the Court having conducted an
`27th
`
`
`July
`
`initial Rule 16(b) scheduling conference pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(b), and the parties having
`
`determined after discussion that the matter cannot be resolved at this juncture by settlement,
`
`voluntary mediation, or binding arbitration;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Rule 26(a)(l) Initial Disclosures and E-Discovery Default Standard. Unless
`
`otherwise agreed to by the parties, the parties shall make their initial disclosures pursuant to
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(l) by (cid:36)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:25)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:22). If they have not already done so,
`
`the parties are to review the Court’s Default Standard for Discovery, Including Discovery of
`
`Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”), which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see
`
`Other Resources, Default Standard for Discovery) and is incorporated herein by reference.
`
`2.
`
`Joinder of Other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. All motions to join other
`
`parties, and to amend or supplement the pleadings, shall be filed on or before (cid:41)(cid:72)(cid:69)(cid:85)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:27)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23).
`
`Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any motion to join a party or motion to amend the
`
`pleadings shall be made pursuant to the procedures set forth in Paragraphs 8(g) and 9.
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 2 of 16 PageID #: 863
`
`3.
`
`Application to Court for Protective Order. Should counsel find it will be
`
`necessary to apply to the Court for a protective order specifying terms and conditions for the
`
`disclosure of confidential information, counsel should confer and attempt to reach an agreement
`
`on a proposed form of order and submit it to the Court by (cid:36)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:22). Should counsel be
`
`unable to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order, counsel must follow the provisions
`
`of Paragraph 8(g) below.
`
`Any proposed protective order must include the following paragraph:
`
`Other Proceedings. By entering this order and limiting the
`disclosure of information in this case, the Court does not intend to
`preclude another court from finding that information may be
`relevant and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or
`party subject to this order who becomes subject to a motion to
`disclose another party’s information designated “confidential” [the
`parties should list any other level of designation, such as “highly
`confidential,” which may be provided for in the protective order]
`pursuant to this order shall promptly notify that party of the motion
`so that the party may have an opportunity to appear and be heard on
`whether that information should be disclosed.
`
`4.
`
`Papers Filed Under Seal. In accordance with section G of the Revised
`
`Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means, a redacted
`
`version of any sealed document shall be filed electronically within seven (7) days of the filing of
`
`the sealed document.
`
`5.
`
`Courtesy Copies. The parties shall provide to the Court two (2) courtesy copies
`
`of all briefs and any other document filed in support of any briefs (i.e., appendices, exhibits,
`
`declarations, affidavits etc.). This provision also applies to papers filed under seal. All courtesy
`
`copies shall be double-sided.
`
`6.
`
`ADR Process. This matter is NOT referred to a magistrate judge to
`
`explore the possibility of alternative dispute resolution.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 3 of 16 PageID #: 864
`
`7.(cid:3)
`
`Disclosures. Absent agreement among the parties, and approval of the Court: By(cid:3)
`
`(cid:36)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:15) Plaintiff shall identify the accused product(s), including accused methods and
`
`systems, and their damages model, as well as the asserted patent(s) that the accused product(s)
`
`allegedly infringe(s). Plaintiff shall also produce the file history for each asserted patent.
`
`(a)(cid:3)
`
`By (cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3) (cid:21)(cid:28)(cid:15)(cid:3) (cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:22), Defendant shall produce core technical(cid:3)
`
`documents related to the accused product(s), sufficient to show how the accused product(s)
`
`work(s), including but not limited to non-publicly available operation manuals, product literature,
`
`schematics, and specifications. Defendant shall also produce sales figures for the accused
`
`product(s).
`
`(b)(cid:3)
`
`By (cid:50)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:22), Plaintiff shall produce an initial claim chart relating
`
`each known accused product to the asserted claims each such product allegedly infringes.
`
`(c)(cid:3)
`
`By (cid:39)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3) (cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:15)(cid:3) (cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:22), Defendant shall produce its initial invalidity
`
`contentions for each asserted claim, as well as the known related invalidating references.
`
`(d)
`
`(e)
`
`(f)
`
`By (cid:45)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:25)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23), Plaintiff shall provide final infringement contentions.
`
`By (cid:45)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:26)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23), Defendant shall provide final invalidity contentions;
`
`By (cid:36)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23), the parties will meet and confer to discuss a reduction
`
`of asserted claims and prior art references. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, they may
`
`seek a conference with the Court.
`
`8.
`
`Discovery. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to by parties, the
`
`limitations on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules shall be strictly observed.
`
`(a)
`
`Fact Discovery Cut Off. All fact discovery in this case shall be initiated
`
`so that it will be completed on or before (cid:45)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:24)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23).
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 4 of 16 PageID #: 865
`
`(b)
`
`Document Production. Document production shall be substantially
`
`complete by (cid:41)(cid:72)(cid:69)(cid:85)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:20)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23).
`
`(c)
`
`Requests for Admission. Requests for admission shall not be limited in
`
`number.
`
`(d)
`
`Interrogatories.
`
`i.
`
`A maximum of 25
`
`interrogatories,
`
`including contention
`
`interrogatories, are permitted for each side.
`
`ii.
`
`The Court encourages the parties to serve and respond to
`
`contention interrogatories early in the case. In the absence of agreement among the parties,
`
`contention interrogatories, if filed, shall first be addressed by the party with the burden of proof.
`
`The adequacy of all interrogatory answers shall be judged by the level of detail each party
`
`provides (i.e., the more detail a party provides, the more detail a party shall receive).
`
`(e)
`
`Depositions.
`
`i.
`
`Limitation on Hours for Deposition Discovery. Each side is
`
`limited to a total of (cid:20)(cid:19) depositions and a total of (cid:26)(cid:19) hours of taking testimony by deposition upon
`
`oral examination.
`
`ii.
`
`Location of Depositions. Any party or representative (officer,
`
`director, or managing agent) of a party filing a civil action in this district court must ordinarily
`
`be required, upon request, to submit to a deposition at a place designated within this district.
`
`Exceptions to this general rule may be made by order of the Court. A defendant who becomes a
`
`counterclaimant, cross-claimant, or third-party plaintiff shall be considered as having filed an
`
`action in this Court for the purpose of this provision.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 5 of 16 PageID #: 866
`
`(f)
`
`Disclosure of Expert Testimony.
`
`i.
`
`Expert Reports. For the party who has the initial burden of proof
`
`on the subject matter, the initial Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) disclosure of expert
`
`testimony is due on or before (cid:39)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23). The supplemental disclosure to contradict or
`
`rebut evidence on the same matter identified by another party is due on or before (cid:45)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:23)(cid:15)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:24). Reply expert reports from the party with the initial burden of proof are due on or before
`
`(cid:41)(cid:72)(cid:69)(cid:85)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:24). No other expert reports will be permitted without either the consent of all
`
`parties or leave of the Court. Along with the submissions of the expert reports, the parties shall
`
`advise of the dates and times of their experts’ availability for deposition.
`
`ii.
`
`Expert Report Supplementation. The parties agree they (cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:3)permit
`
`expert declarations to be filed in connection with motions briefing (including case- dispositive
`
`motions). Any opinions set forth in supplemental expert declarations must have been previously
`
`disclosed in an expert report on the issue subject to the motion.
`
`iii.
`
`Objections to Expert Testimony. To the extent any objection to
`
`expert testimony is made pursuant to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702, it
`
`shall be made by motion no later than the deadline for dispositive motions set forth herein, unless
`
`otherwise ordered by the Court. Briefing on such motions is subject to the page limits set out in
`
`connection with briefing of case dispositive motions.
`
`iv.
`
`Expert Discovery Cut-Off. All expert discovery in this case shall
`
`be initiated so that it will be completed on or before (cid:41)(cid:72)(cid:69)(cid:85)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:27)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:24).
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 6 of 16 PageID #: 867
`
`(g)
`
`Discovery Matters and Disputes Relating to Protective Orders.
`
`i.
`
`Any discovery motion filed without first complying with the
`
`following procedures will be denied without prejudice to renew pursuant to these procedures.
`
`ii.
`
`Should counsel find, after a reasonable effort pursuant to Local
`
`Rule 7.1.1 that they are unable to resolve a discovery matter or a dispute relating to a protective
`
`order, the parties involved in the discovery matter or protective order dispute shall contact the
`
`Court’s Judicial Administrator to schedule an argument.
`
`iii.
`
`On a date to be set by separate order, generally not less than four
`
`(4) days prior to the conference, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to
`
`exceed three (3) pages, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. On a date
`
`to be set by separate order, but generally not less than three (3) days prior to the conference, any
`
`party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, outlining
`
`that party’s reasons for its opposition.
`
`iv.
`
`The parties shall provide to the Court two (2) courtesy copies of
`
`its discovery letter and any other document filed in support of any letter (i.e., appendices,
`
`exhibits, declarations, affidavits etc.). This provision also applies to papers filed under seal. All
`
`courtesy copies shall be double-sided.
`
`v.
`
`Should the Court find further briefing necessary upon conclusion
`
`of the conference, the Court will order it. Alternatively, the Court may choose to resolve the
`
`dispute prior to the conference and will, in that event, cancel the conference.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 7 of 16 PageID #: 868
`
`9.
`
`Motions to Amend / Motions to Strike.
`
`(a)
`
`Any motion to amend (including a motion for leave to amend) a pleading
`
`or any motion to strike any pleading or other document shall be made pursuant to the discovery
`
`dispute procedure set forth in Paragraph 8(g) above.
`
`(b)
`
`Any such motion shall attach the proposed amended pleading as well as a
`
`“redline” comparison to the prior pleading or attach the document to be stricken.
`
`10.
`
`Technology Tutorials. Although technology tutorials are not required by the
`
`Court, they are appreciated and, if any party chooses to file such a tutorial, it shall be submitted
`
`on or before the date that the Joint Claim Construction Brief is filed.
`
`11.
`
`Claim Construction Issue Identification. On (cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:20)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23), the parties shall
`
`exchange a list of those claim term(s)/phrase(s) that they believe need construction and their
`
`proposed claim construction of those term(s)/phrase(s). This document will not be filed with the
`
`Court. Subsequent to exchanging that list, the parties will meet and confer to prepare a Joint
`
`Claim Construction Chart to be submitted by (cid:45)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3) (cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:15)(cid:3) (cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23). The parties’ Joint Claim
`
`Construction Chart should identify for the Court the term(s)/phrase(s) of the claim(s) in issue,
`
`and should include each party’s proposed construction of the disputed claim language with
`
`citation(s) only to the intrinsic evidence in support of their respective proposed constructions.
`
`Intrinsic evidence (including copies of the patent(s) at issue) shall NOT be attached to the joint
`
`claim construction chart and, instead, the parties shall include a joint appendix with the joint
`
`claim construction brief, and the joint appendix shall include a copy of the patent(s) at issue and
`
`portions of all relevant intrinsic evidence that would have otherwise been included with the joint
`
`claim construction chart, as well as any additional evidence cited in the parties’ briefing.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 8 of 16 PageID #: 869
`
`12.(cid:3)
`
`Claim Construction Briefing. The Plaintiff shall serve, but not file, their opening(cid:3)
`
`brief, not to exceed 20 pages, on (cid:36)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:27)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23). The Defendant shall serve, but not file, its
`
`answering brief, not to exceed 30 pages, on (cid:36)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23). The Plaintiff shall serve, but not
`
`file, its reply brief, not to exceed 20 pages, on (cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23). The Defendant shall serve,
`
`but not file, its sur-reply brief, not to exceed 10 pages, on (cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23). No later than
`
`(cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23), the parties shall file a Joint Claim Construction Brief. The parties shall
`
`copy and paste their unfiled briefs into one brief, with their positions on each claim term in
`
`sequential order, in substantially the form below. If the joint brief as submitted is more than 80
`
`pages, the parties must certify that the page limits (or equivalent word counts) in the Scheduling
`
`Order have been complied with and provide a brief explanation (e.g., formatting issues, listing
`
`of agreed-upon terms) as to why the brief is longer than 80 pages.
`
`(cid:45)(cid:50)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:47)(cid:36)(cid:44)(cid:48)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:53)(cid:56)(cid:38)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:53)(cid:44)(cid:40)(cid:41)(cid:3)
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`Agreed-Upon Constructions
`
`Disputed Constructions
`
`[TERM 1]
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff’s Opening Position
`
`Defendant’s Answering Position
`
`Plaintiff’s Reply Position
`
`Defendant’s Sur-Reply Position
`
`[TERM 2]
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff’s Opening Position
`
`Defendant’s Answering Position
`
`Plaintiff’s Reply Position
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 9 of 16 PageID #: 870
`
`4.(cid:3)
`
`Defendant’s Sur-Reply Position
`
`The parties need not include any general summaries of the law relating to claim construction. If
`
`there are any materials that would be submitted in an index, the parties shall submit them in a
`
`Joint Appendix.
`Hearing on Claim Construction. Beginning at 10:00 a.m. on October 24, 2024,
`13.(cid:3)
`the Court will(cid:3) hear argument on claim construction. The parties need not include any general
`summaries of the law relating to claim construction in their presentations to the Court. The
`parties shall notify the Court, by joint letter submission, no later than the date on which their
`joint claim construction brief is filed: (i) whether they request leave to present testimony at
`the hearing; and (ii) the amount of time they are requesting be allocated to them for the
`hearing.
`
`Provided that the parties comply with all portions of this Scheduling Order, and any other
`
`orders of the Court, the parties should anticipate that the Court will issue its claim construction
`
`order within sixty (60) days of the conclusion of the claim construction hearing. If the Court is
`
`unable to meet this goal, it will advise the parties no later than sixty (60) days after the conclusion
`
`of the claim construction hearing.
`
`14.(cid:3)
`
`Supplementation. Absent agreement among the parties, and approval of the(cid:3)
`
`Court, no later than (cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:92)(cid:3) (cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:15)(cid:3) (cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23), the Plaintiff must finally supplement, inter alia, the
`
`identification of all accused products, and no later than (cid:45)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:25)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:23), Defendant must finally
`
`supplement the identification of all invalidity references.
`
`15.
`
`Case Dispositive Motions.
`
`(a)
`
`All case dispositive motions, an opening brief, and affidavits, if any, in
`
`support of the motion shall be served and filed on or before (cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:26)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:24). Briefing will be
`
`presented pursuant to the Court’s Local Rules in accordance with the briefing schedule in the
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 10 of 16 PageID #: 871
`
`appended chart. No case dispositive motion under Rule 56 may be filed more than ten (10) days
`
`before the above date without leave of the Court.
`
`(b)
`
`Concise Statement of Facts Requirement. Any motion for summary
`
`judgment shall be accompanied by a separate concise statement, not to exceed six (6) pages,
`
`which details each material fact which the moving party contends is essential for the Court’s
`
`resolution of the summary judgment motion (not the entire case) and as to which the moving
`
`party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried. Each fact shall be set forth in a separate
`
`numbered paragraph and shall be supported by specific citation(s) to the record.
`
`Any party opposing the motion shall include with its opposing papers a response
`
`to the moving party’s concise statement, not to exceed six (6) pages, which admits or disputes
`
`the facts set forth in the moving party’s concise statement on a paragraph-by-paragraph basis.
`
`To the extent a fact is disputed, the basis of the dispute shall be supported by specific citation(s)
`
`to the record. Failure to respond to a fact presented in the moving party’s concise statement of
`
`facts shall indicate that fact is not in dispute for purposes of summary judgment. The party
`
`opposing the motion may also include with its opposing papers a separate concise statement, not
`
`to exceed four (4) pages, which sets forth material facts as to which the opposing party contends
`
`there is a genuine issue to be tried. Each fact asserted by the opposing party shall also be set
`
`forth in a separate numbered paragraph and shall be supported by specific citation(s) to the
`
`record.
`
`The moving party shall include with its reply papers a response to the opposing
`
`party’s concise statement of facts, not to exceed four (4) pages, on a paragraph-by-paragraph
`
`basis. Failure to respond to a fact presented in the opposing party’s concise statement of facts
`
`shall indicate that fact remains in dispute for purposes of summary judgment.
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 11 of 16 PageID #: 872
`
`(c)(cid:3)
`
`Page limits combined with Daubert motion page limits. Each party is(cid:3)
`
`permitted to file as many case dispositive motions as desired provided, however, that each SIDE
`
`will be limited to a combined total of 40 pages for all opening briefs, a combined total of 40
`
`pages for all answering briefs, and a combined total of 20 pages for all reply briefs regardless of
`
`the number of case dispositive motions that are filed. In the event that a party files, in addition
`
`to a case dispositive motion, a Daubert motion to exclude or preclude all or any portion of an
`
`expert’s testimony, the total amount of pages permitted for all case dispositive and Daubert
`
`motions shall be increased to 50 pages for all opening briefs, 50 pages for all answering briefs,
`
`and 25 pages for all reply briefs for each SIDE.1
`
`16.(cid:3)
`
`Applications by Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any application to(cid:3)
`
`the Court shall be by written motion. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement
`
`required by Local Rule 7.1.1.
`
`17.(cid:3) Motions in Limine. Motions in limine shall not be separately filed. All in limine(cid:3)
`
`requests and responses thereto shall be set forth in the proposed pretrial order. Each SIDE shall
`
`be limited to three (3) in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. The in limine
`
`request and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each in limine request may be
`
`supported by a maximum of three (3) pages of argument, may be opposed by a maximum of three
`
`(3)(cid:3)pages of argument, and the side making the in limine request may add a maximum of one (l)(cid:3)
`
`additional page in reply in support of its request. If more than one party is supporting or opposing
`
`an in limine request, such support or opposition shall be combined in a single three (3) page
`
`1 The parties must work together to ensure that the Court receives no more than a total of 250
`pages (i.e., 50 + 50 + 25 regarding one side’s motions, and 50 + 50 + 25 regarding the other
`side’s motions) of briefing on all case dispositive motions and Daubert motions that are covered
`by this scheduling order and any other scheduling order entered in any related case that is
`proceeding on a consolidated or coordinated pretrial schedule.
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 12 of 16 PageID #: 873
`
`submission (and, if the moving party, a single one (1) page reply), unless otherwise ordered by
`
`the Court. No separate briefing shall be submitted on in limine requests, unless otherwise
`
`permitted by the Court.
`
`18.(cid:3)
`
`September 15, 2025
`Pretrial Conference. On (cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)___________, the Court will hold a pretrial(cid:3)
`
`conference in Court with counsel beginning at ___________. Unless otherwise ordered by the
`4: 30 p.m.
`
`Court, the parties should assume that filing the pretrial order satisfies the pretrial disclosure
`
`requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). The parties shall file with the Court the
`
`joint proposed final pretrial order in compliance with Local Rule 16.3(c) and the Court’s
`
`Preferences and Procedures for Civil Cases not later than seven (7) days before the pretrial
`
`conference. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties shall comply with the timeframes
`
`set forth in Local Rule 16.3(d)(1)-(3) for the preparation of the joint proposed final pretrial order.
`
`The parties shall provide the Court two (2) double-sided courtesy copies of the joint
`
`proposed final pretrial order and all attachments. The proposed final pretrial order shall contain
`
`a table of contents and the paragraphs shall be numbered.
`
`19.(cid:3)
`
`Jury Instructions, Voir Dire, and Special Verdict Forms. Where a case is to be(cid:3)
`
`tried to a jury, pursuant to Local Rules 47.1(a)(2) and 51.1 the parties should file (i) proposed
`
`voir dire, (ii) preliminary jury instructions, (iii) final jury instructions, and (iv) special verdict
`
`forms seven (7) days before the final pretrial conference. This submission shall be
`
`accompanied by a courtesy copy containing electronic files of these documents, in Microsoft
`
`Word format, which may be submitted by e-mail to mn_civil@ded.uscourts.gov.
`
`Trial. This matter is scheduled for an eight-day* jury trial beginning at 9:30 a.m.
`20.(cid:3)
`September 22, 2025
`on (cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:66), with the subsequent trial days beginning at 9:00 a.m. Until the case is
`
`submitted to the jury for deliberations, the jury will be excused each day at 4:30 p.m. The trial
`
`* Although the Court is setting aside eight (8) days for this jury trial, the actual number of trial
` days will be determined closer to trial.
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 13 of 16 PageID #: 874
`
`will be timed, as counsel will be allocated a total number of hours in which to present their
`
`respective cases.
`
`21.
`
`Judgment on Verdict and Post-Trial Status Report. Within seven (7) days after a
`
`jury returns a verdict in any portion of a jury trial, the parties shall jointly submit a form of order
`
`to enter judgment on the verdict. At the same time, the parties shall submit a joint status report,
`
`indicating among other things how the case should proceed and listing any post-trial motions
`
`each party intends to file.
`
`22.
`
`Post-Trial Motions. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, all SIDES are limited
`
`to a maximum of 20 pages of opening briefs, 20 pages of answering briefs, and 10 pages of reply
`
`briefs relating to any post-trial motions filed by that side, no matter how many such motions are
`
`filed.
`
`
`The Honorable Maryellen Noreika Thhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhe Hononnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn rable Maryellen Noreika
`United States District Judge
`U it d St t Di t i t J d
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 14 of 16 PageID #: 875
`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 14 of 16 PagelD #: 875
`
`
`
`Chart of Relevant Deadlines
`
`EwenCeline
`
`Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures (§ 1)
`
`Application to Court for protective order (§ 3)
`
`August 30, 2023
`
`Plaintiff to identify accused method(s) and/or products, damages
`model, asserted patents, and producefile histories (§ 7)
`
`PURE AES
`
`Defendantto produce core technical documents andsales figures
`of accused methods(s) and/or products (J 7a)
`
`September 29, 2023
`
`Plaintiff to produce an initial infringement claim chart (§ 7b)
`
`October 30, 2023
`
`Defendantto produceits initial invalidity contentions (§ 7c) and
`initial non-infringement contentions
`
`December 20, 2023
`
`Plaintiff to produceits initial validity contentions
`
`January 22, 2024
`
`Document production substantially complete (4 8b)
`
`February 21, 2024
`
`Joinder of other parties and amendmentof pleadings (§ 2)
`
`February 28, 2024
`
`Exchangelist of claim terms and proposed constructions (§ 11)
`
`March 21, 2024
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding reduction of asserted
`claims and references ({ 7f)
`
`Plaintiffto provide final infringement contentions and
`identification of accused products (¥ 7d)
`
`Defendant to provide final invalidity contentions and
`identification of invalidity references ({ 7e)
`
`Parties to exchangefinal validity and noninfringement
`contentions
`
`April 11, 2024
`
`May 10, 2024
`
`June 6, 2024
`
`June 27, 2024
`
`Submit joint claim construction chart (¥ 11)
`
`July 11, 2024
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 15 of 16 PageID #: 876
`
`Fact discovery cut off (¶ 8a)
`
`Serve Plaintiff’ opening claim construction brief (20 pages) (¶
`12)
`
`Serve Defendant’s answering claim construction brief (30 pages)
`(¶ 12)
`
`July 25, 2024
`
`August 8, 2024
`
`August 22, 2024
`
`Serve Plaintiff’ reply claim construction brief (20 pages) (¶ 12)
`
`September 5, 2024
`
`Serve Defendant’s sur-reply claim construction brief (10 pages)
`(¶ 12)
`
`September 12, 2024
`
`File joint claim construction brief (¶ 12); joint letter re: live
`testimony and amount of time for the claim construction hearing
`(¶ 13); technology tutorials (¶ 10)
`
`September 19, 2024
`
`Claim construction hearing (¶ 13)
`
`October 24, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.
`
`Opening expert reports (¶ 8.f.i)
`
`Responsive expert reports (¶ 8.f.i)
`
`Reply expert reports (¶ 8.f.i)
`
`End of expert discovery period (¶ 8.f.iv)
`
`Case dispositive motions and opening briefs therefor (¶ 15(a));
`Daubert motions and opening briefs therefor (¶ 8.f.iii)
`
`December 12, 2024
`
`January 14, 2025
`
`February 4, 2025
`
`February 28, 2025
`
`March 27, 2025
`
`Responsive brief(s) for dispositive motions and Daubert motions
`(¶ 15(a); Local Rule 7.1.2(b))
`
`April 29, 2025
`
`Reply brief for dispositive motions and Daubert motions (¶
`15(a); Local Rule 7.1.2(b))
`
`May 20, 2025
`
`Jury instructions, voir dire, and special verdict forms (¶ 19)
`
`September 5, 2025
`
`Joint proposed pretrial order (¶ 18; Local Rule 16.3(c))
`
`September 5, 2025
`
`Pretrial conference (¶ 18)
`
`September 15, 2025 at 4:30 p.m.
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 24 Filed 07/27/23 Page 16 of 16 PageID #: 877
`
`Jury trial (¶ 20) (estimated eight days*)
`
`September 22, 2025
`
`Judgment on verdict and post-trial status report (¶ 21)
`
`Seven (7) days after verdict
`
`* Although the Court is setting aside eight (8) days for this jury trial, the actual number of
`trial days will be determiner closer to trial.
`
`16
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket