throbber
Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 69 Filed 03/19/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1437
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 23-278-MN
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`)))))))))
`
`PAYRANGE INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CSC SERVICEWORKS, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff, PayRange Inc.
`
`(“PayRange”), and Defendant, CSC ServiceWorks, Inc. (“CSC”), by and through their respective
`
`counsel of record and subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
`
`1.
`
`PayRange filed a First Amended Complaint on May 19, 2023 alleging, inter alia,
`
`that CSC infringes United States Patent Nos. 8,856,045, 10,438,208; 10,891,608; and 11,481,772
`
`(“the Asserted Patents”). D. I. 12. In its First Amended Complaint, PayRange alleged that CSC’s
`
`CSCPay Mobile and CSC Go products infringe certain claims of the Asserted Patents. Id., ¶39-94.
`
`CSC filed a Partial Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint on June 2, 2023. D.I. 14. That
`
`Motion is pending, and CSC has not filed an Answer to the First Amended Complaint.
`
`2.
`
`On January 29, 2024, counsel for PayRange informed counsel for CSC that
`
`PayRange had reached a settlement with KioSoft Technologies, LLC (“KioSoft”), CSC’s vendor
`
`for the accused CSCPay Mobile product. Pursuant to this settlement, on January 30, 2024,
`
`PayRange served Second Amended Infringement Contentions withdrawing its infringement
`
`allegations as to the CSCPay Mobile product. See D.I. 51.
`
`3.
`
`PayRange’s claims for infringement of the Asserted Patents against CSC by the
`
`CSCPay Mobile product as set forth in PayRange’s First Amended Complaint, which includes the
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00278-MN Document 69 Filed 03/19/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1438
`
`claims against the CSCPay Mobile product, a white label product developed and adapted by KioSoft
`
`for CSC, are dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs, expenses, and
`
`attorneys’ fees with respect to CSCPay Mobile. All claims and defenses not specifically addressed
`
`in this stipulation are not impacted by this stipulation.
`
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`PHILLIPS, MCLAUGHLIN & HALL, P.A.
`
`/s/ Bindu A. Palapura
`David E. Moore (#3983)
`Bindu A. Palapura (#5370)
`Andrew M. Moshos (#6685)
`Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
`1313 N. Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 984-6000
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`amoshos@potteranderson.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Dated: March 19, 2024
`11383577/23372.00001
`
`/s/ John C. Phillips
`John C. Phillips (#110)
`Megan C. Haney (#5016)
`1200 North Broom Street
`Wilmington, DE 19806
`(302) 655-4200
`jcp@pmhdelaw.com
`mch@pmhdelaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`19th
`IT IS SO ORDERED this __________ day of March, 2024.
`
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket