`
`April 16, 2024
`
`
`
`Re:
`
`
`PayRange, Inc. v. CSC ServiceWorks, Inc.
`C.A. No. 23-278 (MN)
`
`
`VIA CM/ECF & HAND DELIVERY
`The Honorable Maryellen Noreika
`United States District Court
`844 North King Street
`Unit 19, Room 4324
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`
`
`
`
`Dear Judge Noreika,
`
`We write regarding Defendant CSC ServiceWorks, Inc.’s (“CSC”) Motion to Stay Pending
`
`Inter Partes Review. See D.I. 52-55. On February 26, 2024, the Court denied CSC’s Motion to
`Stay without prejudice as premature, holding that CSC could renew its Motion after the PTAB
`decided whether to institute review of CSC’s IPR Petition as to U.S. Patent No. 11,481,772 (“the
`‘772 patent”). D.I. 61. During the March 27, 2024 hearing regarding CSC’s Motion to Dismiss,
`the Court instructed CSC to apprise it of that decision when it is issued. See D.I. 74 at 16:17-17:1.
`
`As per the Court’s instructions, CSC writes to inform the Court that on April 12, 2024, the
`
`PTAB granted institution of CSC’s IPR petition challenging claim 11 of the ’772 patent, which is
`the sole asserted claim of that patent in this lawsuit. A true and correct copy of the institution
`decision has been attached hereto as Exhibit A. In light of the PTAB’s decision, CSC has filed a
`Renewed Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review concurrently with this notice letter.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ John C. Phillips, Jr.
`
`John C. Phillips, Jr. (#110)
`
`All Counsel of Record (via CM/ECF & Email)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cc:
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
