`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`PAYRANGE, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`CSC SERVICEWORKS, INC.,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`) C.A. No. 23-278-MN
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
` [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`At Wilmington, this _____ day of ______________________, 2023, having considered
`
`Defendant CSC ServiceWorks, Inc.’s (“CSC”) Motion to Dismiss and the papers submitted in
`
`connection therewith;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that CSC’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; to wit:
`
`(1) Counts I and IV of Plaintiff PayRange Inc.’s (“PayRange”) Complaint are dismissed
`
`as to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,856,045 and 11,481,772 (the “’045 Patent” and the “’772 Patent”)
`
`because those patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for claiming ineligible subject matter;
`
`(2) Counts II, III, and IV of PayRange’s Complaint are dismissed as to U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`10,438,208 (the “’208 Patent”), 10,891,608 (the “’608 Patent”), and the ‘772 Patent because
`
`PayRange has failed to allege prior knowledge of those patents, as required for claims of indirect
`
`and willfulness infringement; and
`
`(3) PayRange’s claim for injunctive relief is dismissed because PayRange failed to plead
`
`irreparable harm.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________________________
`The Honorable Maryellen Noreika
`United States District Court Judge
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
