throbber
Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 228-3 Filed 01/03/25 Page 1 of 6 PageID
`#: 6040
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 228-3 Filed 01/03/25 Page 2 of 6 PageID
`#: 6041
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 23-758 (JLH)
`
`)
`
`)))))))))))))
`
`ORCA SECURITY LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff and
` Counterclaim-Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`WIZ, INC.,
`
`Defendant and
` Counterclaim-Plaintiff.
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
`STAY PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, subject to the approval of
`
`the Court, that:
`
`WHEREAS, Orca Security Ltd. (“Orca”) has alleged that Wiz, Inc. (“Wiz”) infringes
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 11,663,031, 11,664,032, 11,693,685, 11,726,809, 11,740,926, and 11,775,326
`
`(collectively, the “Orca Asserted Patents”);
`
`WHEREAS, Wiz has alleged that Orca infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 11,722,554,
`
`11,929,896, 11,936,693, 12,001,549 and 12,003,529;
`
`WHEREAS, Wiz filed petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) with the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board (“PTAB”) against the ’031, ’032, and ’685 patents on May 24, 2024; against the
`
`’809 patent on July 1, 2024; against the ’926 patent on July 31, 2024; and against the ’326 patent
`
`on August 7, 2024 (collectively, the “Wiz IPRs”);
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 228-3 Filed 01/03/25 Page 3 of 6 PageID
`#: 6042
`
`WHEREAS, the PTAB instituted IPRs of the ’031, ’032, and ’685 patents on December
`
`9, 2024, and institution decisions on Wiz’s petitions for IPRs of the ’809, ’926, and ’326 patents
`
`are expected by January 21, February 18, and February 19, 2025, respectively;
`
`WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred and agree that a stay of this case is appropriate
`
`under the present circumstances;
`
`WHEREAS, each party wishes to preserve its ability to seek to lift the stay at any time,
`
`recognizing the Court’s inherent authority to act on any such motion at its discretion;
`
`WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to toll discovery obligations, which does not impact
`
`this Court’s current Rule 16 Order, pending a ruling on this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order;
`
`NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the
`
`Court, that:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`The Scheduling Order (D.I. 33, D.I. 90) and all outstanding deadlines are vacated;
`
`This case is stayed as to all claims asserted by either party through final written
`
`decision in each of the Wiz IPRs, except as provided in paragraph 3 below. The parties shall
`
`jointly notify the Court within five (5) business days of the final written decision in each IPR.
`
`And, within 10 business days of the issuance of a final written decision in the last of the IPRs to
`
`resolve, the parties shall meet and confer and jointly file a status report explaining how they
`
`propose proceeding in light of the PTAB’s decisions.
`
`3.
`
`If institution is denied on one or more of Wiz’s petitions for IPRs of the ’809,
`
`’926, and ’326 patents, then within 10 days of the last institution decision on those patents, the
`
`parties shall meet and confer and jointly file a status report explaining how they propose
`
`proceeding in light of the PTAB’s decisions. If the parties cannot agree on how to proceed when
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 228-3 Filed 01/03/25 Page 4 of 6 PageID
`#: 6043
`
`either of the above-discussed status reports is submitted, they shall request a conference with the
`
`Court.
`
`4.
`
`Pending further Order of this Court, all discovery obligations are stayed, and no
`
`party shall take any action the sole purpose of which is to advance this litigation other than (i) to
`
`amend the pleadings to assert new causes of action, (ii) moving to lift the stay, or (iii) in relation
`
`to the IPR proceedings and/or moving to lift the stay, provided however, that the parties may
`
`pursue procedures to facilitate the disclosure of information produced in this case in the Wiz
`
`IPRs without violating the stay. With regard to any discovery requests that are pending as of the
`
`date of this stipulation and order, subject to any Court Order entered after or when the stay is
`
`lifted, the responding party shall have thirty (30) days to respond from the date the stay is lifted;
`
`5.
`
`After conferring with opposing counsel, any party may move to lift the stay at any
`
`time, recognizing the Court’s inherent authority to act on any such motion at its discretion; and
`
`6.
`
`Any damages for the claims and counterclaims in this action shall continue to
`
`accrue during the stay to the full extent permitted by law. This paragraph is not intended to
`
`provide for an accrual of damages other than that provided by law.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 228-3 Filed 01/03/25 Page 5 of 6 PageID
`#: 6044
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT &TUNNELL LLP
`
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`
`/s/
`___________________________________
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Rodger D. Smith II (#3778)
`Cameron P. Clark (#6647)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@morrisnichols.com
`rsmith@morrisnichols.com
`cclark@morrisnichols.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and
`Counterclaim-Defendant Orca Security Ltd.
`
`/s/
`
`Frederick L. Cottrell, III (#2555)
`Kelly E. Farnan (#4395)
`Christine D. Haynes (#4697) One Rodney
`Square920 North King StreetWilmington, DE
`19801
`(302)
`651-7700cottrell@rlf.comfarnan@rlf.comhayn
`es@rlf.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant and
`Counterclaim-Plaintiff Wiz, Inc
`
`Dated: December 26, 2024
`
`SO ORDERED, this ___ day of December, 2024.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 228-3 Filed 01/03/25 Page 6 of 6 PageID
`#: 6045
`
`Summary report:
`Litera Compare for Word 11.5.0.74 Document comparison done on
`1/3/2025 11:44:42 AM
`
`Style name: Default Style
`Intelligent Table Comparison: Active
`Original filename: Exhibit C_Orca's Proposal.docx
`Modified filename: Exhibit B_Wiz's Proposal.docx
`Changes:
`Add
`Delete
`Move From
`Move To
`Table Insert
`Table Delete
`Table moves to
`Table moves from
`Embedded Graphics (Visio, ChemDraw, Images etc.)
`Embedded Excel
`Format changes
`Total Changes:
`
`1
`3
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket