Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 1 of 12 PageID
`#: 6070
`
`EXHIBIT D
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 2 of 12 PageID
`#: 6071
`
`Davidson, Callie
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Blake,
`
`Jaffe, Jordan
`Wednesday, January 1, 2025 8:56 AM
`Blake.Davis@lw.com; Zang, Lisa; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com
`Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz
`RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order
`Cancelling Deadline
`
`Happy new year. We do not agree these changes are necessary or appropriate for the reasons we have already
`discussed. We will be filing our motion to stay using the draft form of stay attached to my 12/30 email, subject to a final
`review. We currently plan to file on Friday. We will present Orca’s proposed form of a stay as attached to your 12/30
`email. The Court can decide which version is appropriate.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Jordan R. Jaffe | Partner | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, Suite 3300 | San Francisco, CA 94105
`415.498.0556 | jjaffe@wsgr.com | LinkedIn
`
`From: Blake.Davis@lw.com <Blake.Davis@lw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 8:35 AM
`To: Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>; Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`EXT - blake.davis@lw.com
`
`Jordan,
`
`Regarding “(i) to amend the pleadings to assert new causes of action,” that is a compromise to Wiz’s removal of
`paragraph 5. Wiz is requesting this stay, and has asked that the case be stayed now, including to delay ongoing discovery
`such as Wiz’s substantial completion of the document productions that Orca has been pursuing for months. Wiz’s past
`and future productions include confidential and AEO information subject to the protective order in this matter and may
`include information that pertains to additional civil causes of action. And, as Wiz knows, the deadline to amend
`pleadings has not passed. In the absence of Wiz’s agreement to toll relevant statutes of limitations as Orca proposed in
`original paragraph 5, there is no reason for Wiz to dispute including a mechanism for the parties to raise new claims.
`
`The stipulation is clear how those new claims would work. Paragraph 2 of the draft states “This case is stayed as to all
`claims asserted by either party.” Thus, new claims (and any response or motion to dismiss) would be stayed by the plain
`language of the stipulation, in the same way that Wiz’s claims are stayed.
`
`As to “except as provided in paragraph 3 below,” our edit clarifies two things: (1) the stipulation to stay does not
`automatically continue through final written decisions in each of the Wiz IPRs if institution is denied on one or more
`IPRs, and (2) filing a status report and requesting a conference is not a violation of the stay. Our original draft made
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 3 of 12 PageID
`#: 6072
`those conditions express, which we understood was not in dispute in view of your email stating Wiz’s edits to paragraph
`2 were only intended to clarify the paragraphs.
`
`Best,
`Blake
`
`Blake R. Davis
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street
`Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
`Direct Dial: +1.415.395.8033
`Email: blake.davis@lw.com
`https://www.lw.com
`
`From: Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>
`Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 7:11 PM
`To: Davis, Blake (Bay Area) <Blake.Davis@lw.com>; Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; #C-M ORCA SECURITY - WIZ - LW TEAM
`<orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com>
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`Blake,
`
`This seems new: “than (i) to amend the pleadings to assert new causes of action.” That wasn’t include in prior drafts
`from Orca and it is unclear how that would even work. E.g., would a party answer in response to new causes of action?
`Move to dismiss? And if so, how is the litigation actually stayed? It’s also unclear why Wiz would agree to that as part of
`a stay pending IPRs either, especially when it is agreeing to stay its own pending counterclaims that are not subject to
`any IPR proceedings.
`
`This addition to paragraph also seems unnecessary and unclear. The “except” clause refers to a paragraph that does not
`modify the stay by its own terms—the Court must act to lift/modify the stay as appropriate. So it is unclear how that
`paragraph is an exception to the stay in and of itself. And Paragraph 3 remains regardless, so it’s already stated that the
`parties can file a status report based on the 3 other IPR institution decisions.
`
`We’re available to discuss if helpful.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Jordan R. Jaffe | Partner | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, Suite 3300 | San Francisco, CA 94105
`415.498.0556 | jjaffe@wsgr.com | LinkedIn
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 4 of 12 PageID
`#: 6073
`
`From: Blake.Davis@lw.com <Blake.Davis@lw.com>
`Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 6:54 PM
`To: Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>; Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`EXT - blake.davis@lw.com
`
`Jordan,
`
`We do not have yet have sign off from Orca, but in an effort to move things forward we’ve accepted you changes and
`made two additional edits in the attached. Please let us know if Wiz agrees to these edits.
`
`Best,
`Blake
`
`Blake R. Davis
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street
`Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
`Direct Dial: +1.415.395.8033
`Email: blake.davis@lw.com
`https://www.lw.com
`
`From: Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>
`Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 3:37 PM
`To: Davis, Blake (Bay Area) <Blake.Davis@lw.com>; Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; #C-M ORCA SECURITY - WIZ - LW TEAM
`<orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com>
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`Blake,
`
`Please see attached. On what is now Paragraph 2, the goal for the edits was for clarity—it is mostly moving things
`around.
`
`Let us know if we have agreement on the attached and we can get on file.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Jordan R. Jaffe | Partner | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, Suite 3300 | San Francisco, CA 94105
`415.498.0556 | jjaffe@wsgr.com | LinkedIn
`
`From: Blake.Davis@lw.com <Blake.Davis@lw.com>
`Sent: Friday, December 27, 2024 9:54 AM
`To: Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>; Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 5 of 12 PageID
`#: 6074
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`EXT - blake.davis@lw.com
`
`Jordan,
`
`So that we can discuss with Orca, can you please let us know if Wiz agrees on paragraphs 1-4 and 6, and that paragraph
`5 is the only potential dispute?
`
`Best,
`Blake
`
`Blake R. Davis
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street
`Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
`Direct Dial: +1.415.395.8033
`Email: blake.davis@lw.com
`https://www.lw.com
`
`From: Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>
`Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2024 7:09 PM
`To: Davis, Blake (Bay Area) <Blake.Davis@lw.com>; Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; #C-M ORCA SECURITY - WIZ - LW TEAM
`<orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com>
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`Blake,
`
`Subject to further review and client input, we may be able to work with you on Paragraphs 3 and 6.
`
`Wiz will not agree to Paragraph 5. There are only two relevant options here: (1) Either Orca knows of a claim (or claims)
`it wants tolled, and is refusing to tell Wiz what they are; or (2) Orca does not know of such a claim at the moment, which
`is what you all stated during our last meet and confer. In option 2, the statute of limitations is not running on a claim
`you’re unaware of, subject to the law on inquiry notice and the like.
`
`To the extent that Orca contends its unknown or unidentified claims are equitably tolled as a matter of law, it is free to
`make such an argument after a stay is lifted without Paragraph 5 included. The parties can then litigate it at that time.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Jordan R. Jaffe | Partner | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, Suite 3300 | San Francisco, CA 94105
`415.498.0556 | jjaffe@wsgr.com | LinkedIn
`
`From: Blake.Davis@lw.com <Blake.Davis@lw.com>
`Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2024 3:37 PM
`To: Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>; Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 6 of 12 PageID
`#: 6075
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`EXT - blake.davis@lw.com
`
`Jordan,
`
`Happy holidays. To address your questions:
`
`Regarding paragraph 3, Orca intends to move for a protective order in the IPRs allowing Orca to submit confidential
`and/or AEO information in the IPRs. We sent a draft protective order to the folks from WSGR that have appeared in the
`IPRs on Monday. I’m attaching that email here for reference. While we hope there won’t be any issues that would
`require the district court’s involvement in issues relating to the submission of confidential or AEO information in the
`IPRs, we want to ensure that if disputes over such information arise, there is a mechanism in place for the district court
`to evaluate them notwithstanding a stay.
`
`Regarding paragraph 5, there is no reason for Wiz to object to this. The tolling contemplated by this provision is the
`same as that provided as a matter of law in circumstances like those the parties face here, with civil causes of action
`equitably tolled for the duration of a stay. See, e.g., Ramirez v. County of Nassau, 345 F.R.D. 397, 404 (E.D.N.Y. 2024)
`(“[w]here parties are ordered or agree by stipulation to suspend proceedings during the pendency of legal proceedings,
`the time during which a party is prevented from obtaining legal relief is not counted for purposes of statutes of
`limitations.”) (collecting cases). Likewise, paragraph 6 is not intended to provide for an accrual of damages other than
`that provided by law.
`
`Best,
`Blake
`
`Blake R. Davis
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street
`Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
`Direct Dial: +1.415.395.8033
`Email: blake.davis@lw.com
`https://www.lw.com
`
`From: Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>
`Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2024 10:58 AM
`To: Davis, Blake (Bay Area) <Blake.Davis@lw.com>; Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; #C-M ORCA SECURITY - WIZ - LW TEAM
`<orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com>
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`Hi Blake,
`
`Happy holidays to you and the team. Thanks for the sending over this draft. A few immediate questions/comments,
`subject to a more detailed review and discussions with our client:
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 7 of 12 PageID
`#: 6076
`- What does this intend to refer to in Paragraph No. 3: “provided however, that the parties may pursue
`procedures to facilitate the disclosure of information produced in this case in the Wiz IPRs without violating the
`stay.”
`- Wiz will not agree to Paragraph 5 for the reasons we discussed during our last meet and confer. If you’re aware
`of any Court adopting such a provision over the objection of another party in a motion to stay pending IPR,
`please let us know and we can consider it.
`Re Paragraph 6: Does this intend to provide for a more or different accrual of damages during the stay other
`than is provided by law?
`
`-
`
`Best regards,
`
`Jordan R. Jaffe | Partner | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, Suite 3300 | San Francisco, CA 94105
`415.498.0556 | jjaffe@wsgr.com | LinkedIn
`
`From: Blake.Davis@lw.com <Blake.Davis@lw.com>
`Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2024 9:41 AM
`To: Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>; Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`EXT - blake.davis@lw.com
`
`Lisa,
`
`We’ve conferred with Orca and attached is a proposal for a stipulated stay per our discussion last week, including
`addressing the items we raised on the meet and confer. Please let us know if Wiz agrees to the attached or if you would
`like to have another meet and confer to discuss.
`
`Best,
`Blake
`
`Blake R. Davis
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street
`Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
`Direct Dial: +1.415.395.8033
`Email: blake.davis@lw.com
`https://www.lw.com
`
`From: Davis, Blake (Bay Area) <Blake.Davis@lw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2024 8:08 AM
`To: Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>; Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; #C-M ORCA SECURITY - WIZ - LW TEAM
`<orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com>
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`Hi Lisa,
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 8 of 12 PageID
`#: 6077
`
`As we mentioned on our meet and confer, we had not yet had an opportunity to discuss with our client. We are still
`conferring with Orca and expect we’ll be able to provide our position this week, as well as to address the inaccuracies in
`your summary below.
`
`Happy holidays to you and your team.
`
`Best,
`Blake
`
`Blake R. Davis
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street
`Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
`Direct Dial: +1.415.395.8033
`Email: blake.davis@lw.com
`https://www.lw.com
`
`From: Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>
`Sent: Monday, December 23, 2024 3:47 PM
`To: Davis, Blake (Bay Area) <Blake.Davis@lw.com>; Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; #C-M ORCA SECURITY - WIZ - LW TEAM
`<orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com>
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`Orca Counsel,
`
`We write to follow up on our meet and confer last Wednesday, December 18, 2024. During that call, you stated that
`there was a potential path by which Orca agrees to a stay pending resolution of Wiz’s IPRs, subject to client sign
`off/input. You further stated that to the extent your client agreed, Orca would revert with its proposed form of
`stipulation by early next week. We have not heard from you. Given the holiday this week, we are following up now.
`
`Orca also noted that Orca would condition its agreement to a stay on certain items, including tolling of the statute of
`limitations for some unknown claims for both sides. When asked what claims Orca wanted to be tolled, Orca counsel
`answered “I don’t know.” The other express conditions Orca discussed were regarding what happens if the other 3 IPRs
`are not instituted, and accrual of damages during a stay.
`
`We have not heard from you regarding Orca’s position. Please provide Orca’s proposed form of stipulation or,
`alternatively, confirm Orca’s position on Wiz’s motion so that we can raise this with the Court promptly.
`
`Best regards,
`Lisa
`
`From: Zang, Lisa <lzang@wsgr.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 2:34 PM
`To: Blake.Davis@lw.com; Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com;
`RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 9 of 12 PageID
`#: 6078
`
`Blake,
`
`Thanks. 1 p.m. PT tomorrow works for us. I’ll circulate a Zoom invite.
`
`Best,
`Lisa
`
`From: Blake.Davis@lw.com <Blake.Davis@lw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 2:16 PM
`To: Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>; JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com; RSmith@morrisnichols.com;
`cclark@morrisnichols.com; orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com
`Cc: Farnan@RLF.com; Cottrell@RLF.com; haynes@rlf.com; WSGR - Orca Wiz <WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`EXT - blake.davis@lw.com
`
`Jordan,
`
`We’re available to meet and confer tomorrow from 9-10am pacific or 1-3pm pacific, or Thursday from 9am-12pm. Let us
`know what works for you.
`
`Best,
`Blake
`
`Blake R. Davis
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street
`Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
`Direct Dial: +1.415.395.8033
`Email: blake.davis@lw.com
`https://www.lw.com
`
`From: Jaffe, Jordan <jjaffe@wsgr.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 10:24 AM
`To: JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com; RSmith@morrisnichols.com; cclark@morrisnichols.com; #C-M ORCA SECURITY -
`WIZ - LW TEAM <orcasecuritywiz.lwteam@lw.com>
`Cc: farnan@rlf.com; Cottrell, Fred <Cottrell@RLF.com>; Haynes, Christine D. <haynes@rlf.com>; WSGR - Orca Wiz
`<WSGR-Orca-Wiz@wsgr.com>
`Subject: FW: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`Orca counsel,
`
`Per the below, please let us know when you’re available to meet and confer regarding Wiz’s anticipated motion to stay
`in accordance with the Court’s discovery procedures.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Jordan R. Jaffe | Partner | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, Suite 3300 | San Francisco, CA 94105
`415.498.0556 | jjaffe@wsgr.com | LinkedIn
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 10 of 12 PageID
`#: 6079
`
`From: ded_nefreply@ded.uscourts.gov <ded_nefreply@ded.uscourts.gov>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 10:08 AM
`To: ded_ecf@ded.uscourts.gov
`Subject: Activity in Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc. Order Cancelling Deadline
`
`EXT - ded_nefreply@ded.uscourts.gov
`
`This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail
`because the mail box is unattended.
`***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and
`parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if
`receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges,
`download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the
`free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
`
`U.S. District Court
`
`District of Delaware
`
`Notice of Electronic Filing
`
`The following transaction was entered on 12/17/2024 at 1:07 PM EST and filed on 12/17/2024
`Case Name:
`Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc.
`Case Number:
`1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF
`Filer:
`Document Number:223(No document attached)
`
`Docket Text:
`ORAL ORDER: Having reviewed the parties' respective letters regarding institution of IPRs
`(D.I. [218], [220]), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the December 23, 2024 Markman Hearing is
`CONTINUED. Defendant's anticipated motion to stay should be raised in accordance with the
`Court's discovery dispute procedures. The Court will promptly reschedule the Markman
`Hearing if it determines that the stay should not be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
`that parties shall file a joint status report on or before January 22, 2025. Ordered by Judge
`Jennifer L. Hall on 12/17/2024. (ceg)
`
`1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld Jbbefiling@mnat.com, jblumenfeld@mnat.com, mnat_IP_eFiling@morrisnichols.com
`
`Frederick L. Cottrell, III cottrell@rlf.com, PStewart@RLF.com
`
`Rodger Dallery Smith, II rdsefiling@mnat.com, mnat_IP_eFiling@morrisnichols.com, rsmith@mnat.com
`
`Kelly E. Farnan farnan@rlf.com, linda-loveless-5548@ecf.pacerpro.com, loveless@rlf.com
`
`Christine Dealy Haynes haynes@rlf.com, bouchard@rlf.com
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 11 of 12 PageID
`#: 6080
`Jordan R. Jaffe jjaffe@wsgr.com, jordan-jaffe-8590@ecf.pacerpro.com
`
`Lisa D. Zang lzang@wsgr.com, alexandra.bautista@wsgr.com
`
`Cameron Paul Clark cclark@mnat.com
`
`Alex Miller alex.miller@wsgr.com, rpezzimenti@wsgr.com
`
`Callie Davidson ccdavidson@wsgr.com
`
`Praatika Prasad pprasad@wsgr.com
`
`1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Filer will deliver document by other means to:
`
`This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the
`intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly
`prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the
`original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
`_________________________________
`
`This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the
`intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission
`is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies including any
`attachments.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP or any of its affiliates may monitor electronic communications sent or received by our networks
`in order to protect our business and verify compliance with our policies and relevant legal requirements. Any personal
`information contained or referred to within this electronic communication will be processed in accordance with the
`firm's privacy notices and Global Privacy Standards available at www.lw.com.
`
`This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the
`intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly
`prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the
`original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
`
`This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the
`intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly
`prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the
`original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
`
`This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the
`intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly
`prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the
`original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
`
`This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 230-4 Filed 01/13/25 Page 12 of 12 PageID
`#: 6081
`intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly
`prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the
`original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
`
`This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the
`intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly
`prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the
`original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
`
`11
`
`