throbber
Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 61-1 Filed 05/14/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1571
`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 61-1 Filed 05/14/24 Page 1 of 3 PagelD #: 1571
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 61-1 Filed 05/14/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1572
`
`140 Scott Drive
`Menlo Park, California 94025
`Tel: +1.650.328.4600 Fax: +1.650.463.2600
`www.lw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`March 29, 2024
`
`VIA EMAIL:
`Jordan Jaffe
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, Suite 3300
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`jjaffe@wsgr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Dear Mr. Jaffe:
`
`FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES
`Austin
`Milan
`Beijing
`Munich
`Boston
`New York
`Brussels
`Orange County
`Century City
`Paris
`Chicago
`Riyadh
`Dubai
`San Diego
`Düsseldorf
`San Francisco
`Frankfurt
`Seoul
`Hamburg
`Silicon Valley
`Hong Kong
`Singapore
`Houston
`Tel Aviv
`London
`Tokyo
`Los Angeles
`Washington, D.C.
`Madrid
`
`
`
`Re: Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz, Inc., C.A. No. 23-758-JLH
`
`We write in regards to Wiz’s deficient document production and responses to Orca’s First
`Set of Requests for Production and Interrogatories. As an initial matter, the majority of Wiz’s
`responses—for 61 RFPs and four interrogatories—merely include objections and an agreement to
`meet and confer at an unspecified time. See March 22, 2024 Wiz’s Objections and Responses to
`Orca’s First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-83) at RFP Nos. 10-31, 35-39, 41, 43-48, 50-
`59, 62-66, 68, 70-72, 75-76, 78-83; March 22, 2024 Wiz’s Objections and Responses to Orca’s
`First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-16) at Interrogatory Nos. 7, 14-16. We request that Wiz be
`prepared to discuss each of these RFPs and interrogatories at the parties’ forthcoming meet and
`confer on April 4, 2024.
`
`Next, Wiz states for some RFPs that Wiz intends to collect and produce certain categories
`of documents. See RFP Responses 1-9, 32-34, 40, 42, 49, 60-61, 67, 69, 73-74, 77. Wiz has not,
`however, produced any documents and does not state when such document productions will be
`made. While Orca disagrees with Wiz’s unilateral narrowing of the scope of these RFPs, including
`as discussed below, please confirm that Wiz will produce at least the scope of responsive
`documents it has agreed to for these requests no later than April 4, 2024.
`
`Likewise, Wiz’s responses to Interrogatory Nos. 1-3, 6, and 11 state that responses “may
`be determined by examining, auditing, compiling, abstracting, or summarizing Wiz’s business
`records” and that “[s]uch information may be found in Wiz’s forthcoming productions.” Putting
`aside whether Rule 33(d) is appropriate, Wiz’s responses to these interrogatories are entirely
`deficient because Wiz does not “specify[] the records that must be reviewed, in sufficient detail to
`enable the interrogating party to locate and identify them as readily as the responding party could.”
`Fed R. Civ. P. 33(d)(1). Please confirm that Wiz will provide supplemental responses to these
`interrogatories no later than April 4, 2024.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 61-1 Filed 05/14/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1573
`March 29, 2024
`Page 2
`
`
`
`Furthermore, although Wiz has not yet produced any documents, its responses to Orca’s
`interrogatories and requests for production indicate that Wiz intends to improperly limit its
`document search in at least two manners. First, Wiz responds to several of Orca’s Requests for
`Production and Interrogatories by stating it will only search for documents after May 30, 2023
`through the filing of the Complaint. See RFP Responses 1-9, 32-34, 40, 42, 49, 60-61, 67, 69, 73-
`74, 77 and General Objection 4; Interrogatory Responses 1-3, 6, 11. These self-imposed time
`constraints are improper. Rule 4(e) of Delaware’s Default Standard for Discovery permits
`discovery by default up to six years before filing of the Complaint, and Orca’s requests expressly
`seek documents from January 1, 2019 onward. See February 21, 2024 Orca’s First Set of Requests
`for Production (Nos. 1-83) at Instruction 13; Collabo Innovations, Inc. v. Omnivision Techs., Inc.,
`No. 16-CV-197-JFB-SRF, D.I. 214 at 7-8, report and recommendation adopted, 2018 WL
`11025810, at *2 (D. Del. Aug. 8, 2018) (granting motion to compel post-suit discovery as relevant
`to establishing direct and indirect infringement claims). Furthermore, while Orca acknowledges
`that the earliest issuance date of the Asserted Patents is May 30, 2023, each Asserted Patent claims
`priority to a provisional application filed in 2019, and discovery prior to May 30, 2023 is
`particularly relevant to Wiz’s willful infringement, royalties, demand for the patented features, and
`validity, among various other issues. See, e.g., Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. v. Dexcom, Inc., C.A.
`No. 21-977 (KAJ) at 31 (D. Del. 2023) (“As a finding of willfulness requires an examination of
`the totality of the circumstances of the case, conduct that occurred prior to the issuance of a patent
`may support a finding of willfulness.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Perfect Web Techs.,
`Inc. v. Infousa, Inc., 587 F.3d 1324, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (admitting pre-issuance evidence to
`show that invention satisfied long-felt and unmet need); see also RFP Responses 1-9, 32-34, 40,
`42, 49, 60-61, 67, 69, 73-74, 77 and General Objection 4; Interrogatory Responses 1-3, 6, 11. And
`given that the requested discovery relates to information that is relatively recent, Orca expects that
`pre-issuance discovery will not impose undue burden. If Wiz disagrees, we expect that it will
`provide a full explanation of any burden to collect and produce documents from 2019 to the present
`at the parties’ meet and confer. Second, Wiz states it will not produce any documents or respond
`to any interrogatories that seek information related to “Related Patents.” See RFP Responses 49,
`73, 77 and General Objection 16; Interrogatory Responses, General Objection 16. That is
`improper, particularly considering Wiz’s own discovery requests seek broad discovery for Orca’s
`“Related Patents.” See February 14, 2024 Wiz’s First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-60)
`at RFP Nos. 1-10, 14-15, 18-22, 26-27, 29, 34-41. Please confirm that Wiz will collect and produce
`documents for “Related Patents” as requested in RFP Nos. 49, 50, 62, 72, 73, 75, 76, and 77.
`
`The foregoing particular deficiencies in Wiz’s discovery responses are exemplary, and
`made without limitation to additional deficiencies that we may identify as our investigation
`continues.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Blake Davis
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket