`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ALLIANCE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`PAYRANGE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C. A. No.: 24-733-MN
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`At Wilmington, this ______ day of _____________________, 2024, having considered
`
`Plaintiff Alliance Laundry Systems LLC’s (“Alliance”) Partial Motion to Dismiss PayRange’s
`
`Amended Counterclaims and any pleadings and argument in connection therewith;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Alliance’s Partial Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as
`
`follows:
`
`(1)
`
`Count I of Defendant PayRange Inc.’s (“PayRange”) Amended Answer and
`
`Counterclaims is dismissed as to U.S. Patent No. 11,966,920 (“the ’920 Patent”) because claims
`
`1, 4, 9, 10, 12-15, 17, and 19-20 of the ’920 Patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for claiming
`
`ineligible subject matter.
`
`(2)
`
`Count II of PayRange’s Answer and Counterclaims is dismissed as to U.S. Patent
`
`No. 11,972,423 (“the ’423 Patent”) because claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8-15, 17, 19, and 20 of the ’423
`
`Patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for claiming ineligible subject matter.
`
`(3)
`
`Count III of PayRange’s Answer and Counterclaims is dismissed as to U.S. Patent
`
`11,481,772 (the “’772 Patent”) because claim 11 of the ’772 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`101 for claiming ineligible subject matter.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 21-1 Filed 10/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1474
`
`_______________________________
`The Honorable Maryellen Noreika
`United States District Court Judge
`
`2
`
`