`
`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4 Page1of 3 PagelD #: 1641Filed 11/25/24
`
`
`EXHIBIT M
`EXHIBIT M
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4 Filed 11/25/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1642
`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4
`Filed 11/25/24
`Page 2 of 3 PagelD #: 1642
`
`REMARKS
`
`This amendmentrespondsto the Track 1 office action mailed September 27, 2023.
`
`In
`
`the Track 1| office action, claims 1-20 were rejected under obviousness-type double patenting.
`
`After entry of this response, claims 1-20 are pending.
`
`McKesson Statement
`
`In view ofMcKesson Information Solutions v. Bridge Medical (Fed. Cir. 2007), the
`
`Applicant wishesto inform the Examinerthat the prosecution history of the following US
`
`Patent Applications may contain information relevant to the pending application:
`
`14/214644*, 14/320534, 14/335762, 14/611065, 14/641236, 14/321717, 14/321724,
`
`14/321733, 14/456683, 14/968703*, 14/614336, 14/458192, 14/458199*, 15/893514,
`
`15/435228, 15/878352*, 15/603400*, 15/406492*, 16/029483, 15/956741,
`
`16/681673, 16/748727, 16/750477, 16/934933*, 17/529111, 17/147305, 16/934392,
`
`17/216399, 17/973506, 17/968672, 17/973505, 17/443802, 17983311, 17/985832,
`
`17/654732*, 17/978894, 17/963170, 17/973507, 18/197070, 18/197071
`
`The Examineris encouraged to review the art made of record, office actions, and
`
`notices of allowance,if any, in the above-mentioned applications.
`
`In addition, applications marked with an asterisk (*) have been or are currently being
`
`challenged at the PTAB. The Examineris encouraged to review the record of each of these
`
`proceedings in the Patent Trial and Appeal Case Tracking System (P-TACTS).
`
`
`
`Concluding Remarks
`
`By respondingin the foregoing remarks only to particular positions asserted by the
`
`Examiner, the Applicants do not necessarily acquiesce in other positions that have not been
`
`explicitly addressed. In addition, the Applicants’ arguments for the patentability of a claim
`
`should not be understood as implying that no other reasonsfor the patentability of that claim
`
`exist.
`
`In light of the above amendments and remarks, the Applicants respectfully request
`
`that the Examiner reconsider this application with a view towards allowance. The Examiner
`
`104402-5074-US
`
`7
`
`Response to Track 1 Office Action
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4 Filed 11/25/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1643
`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4
`Filed 11/25/24
`Page 3 of 3 PagelD #: 1643
`
`is invited to call the undersigned attorney at (650) 843-4000,if a telephone call could help
`
`resolve any remaining items.
`
`Date: November 15, 2023
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Douglas J. Crisman/
`Douglas J. Crisman
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUSLLP
`1400 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`(650) 843-4000
`
`39,951
`(Reg. No.)
`
`104402-5074-US
`
`8
`
`Response to Track 1 Office Action
`
`