throbber
Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4 Filed 11/25/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1641
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4 Page1of 3 PagelD #: 1641Filed 11/25/24
`
`
`EXHIBIT M
`EXHIBIT M
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4 Filed 11/25/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1642
`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4
`Filed 11/25/24
`Page 2 of 3 PagelD #: 1642
`
`REMARKS
`
`This amendmentrespondsto the Track 1 office action mailed September 27, 2023.
`
`In
`
`the Track 1| office action, claims 1-20 were rejected under obviousness-type double patenting.
`
`After entry of this response, claims 1-20 are pending.
`
`McKesson Statement
`
`In view ofMcKesson Information Solutions v. Bridge Medical (Fed. Cir. 2007), the
`
`Applicant wishesto inform the Examinerthat the prosecution history of the following US
`
`Patent Applications may contain information relevant to the pending application:
`
`14/214644*, 14/320534, 14/335762, 14/611065, 14/641236, 14/321717, 14/321724,
`
`14/321733, 14/456683, 14/968703*, 14/614336, 14/458192, 14/458199*, 15/893514,
`
`15/435228, 15/878352*, 15/603400*, 15/406492*, 16/029483, 15/956741,
`
`16/681673, 16/748727, 16/750477, 16/934933*, 17/529111, 17/147305, 16/934392,
`
`17/216399, 17/973506, 17/968672, 17/973505, 17/443802, 17983311, 17/985832,
`
`17/654732*, 17/978894, 17/963170, 17/973507, 18/197070, 18/197071
`
`The Examineris encouraged to review the art made of record, office actions, and
`
`notices of allowance,if any, in the above-mentioned applications.
`
`In addition, applications marked with an asterisk (*) have been or are currently being
`
`challenged at the PTAB. The Examineris encouraged to review the record of each of these
`
`proceedings in the Patent Trial and Appeal Case Tracking System (P-TACTS).
`
`
`
`Concluding Remarks
`
`By respondingin the foregoing remarks only to particular positions asserted by the
`
`Examiner, the Applicants do not necessarily acquiesce in other positions that have not been
`
`explicitly addressed. In addition, the Applicants’ arguments for the patentability of a claim
`
`should not be understood as implying that no other reasonsfor the patentability of that claim
`
`exist.
`
`In light of the above amendments and remarks, the Applicants respectfully request
`
`that the Examiner reconsider this application with a view towards allowance. The Examiner
`
`104402-5074-US
`
`7
`
`Response to Track 1 Office Action
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4 Filed 11/25/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1643
`Case 1:24-cv-00733-MN Document 28-4
`Filed 11/25/24
`Page 3 of 3 PagelD #: 1643
`
`is invited to call the undersigned attorney at (650) 843-4000,if a telephone call could help
`
`resolve any remaining items.
`
`Date: November 15, 2023
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Douglas J. Crisman/
`Douglas J. Crisman
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUSLLP
`1400 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`(650) 843-4000
`
`39,951
`(Reg. No.)
`
`104402-5074-US
`
`8
`
`Response to Track 1 Office Action
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket