throbber
EFiled: Sep 06 2018 01:34P
`Transaction ID 62417330
`Case No. 2018-0141-JTL
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`EFiled: Sep 06 2018 01:34PM EDT
`Transaction ID 62417330
`Case No. 2018-0141-JTL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`June 15, 2016
`
`VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`Datum Corporation
`6009 Business Boulevard
`Sarasota, FL 34240
`Attention: Thomas Frost
`E-mail:
`tomf@datumcorporation.com
`
`Re:
`
`Closing Statements
`
`Dear Tom:
`
`Reference is made to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated March 17, 2016 (the “Purchase Agreement”)
`by and among Datum Corporation (the “Company”), Datum Technologies LLC (“Buyer”) and Thomas
`Frost (the “Shareholder”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings givento
`such terms in the Purchase Agreement.
`
`Pursuant to Section 2.5(b) of the Purchase Agreement, please find attached as Exhibit A hereto (i) a
`balance sheet of the Company as of the Closing (ii) the Working Capital of the Company as of the
`Closing and (ili) the Indebtedness of the Company immediately prior to the Closing, constituting the
`Closing Statements pursuant to Section 2.5(b)(i) of the Purchase Agreement.
`
`is a downward
`Based upon the items set forth on Exhibit A, the Post-Closing Purchase Price Adjustment
`adjustment and Buyeris entitled to receive $529,924.70 byrelease ofall funds from the Working Capital
`Escrow Fund and $129,924.70 directly from the Shareholder. Pursuant to Section 2.5(b)(ii) of the
`Purchase Agreement, the Company hasthirty (30) days after receipt of the Closing Statementsset forth
`on Exhibit A to dispute any elements of or amountsreflected in the Closing Statements.
`
`Please execute the Working Capital Certificate attached hereto as Exhibit B for delivery to the Escrow
`Agent pursuant to Section 2.5(c)(ii) of the Purchase Agreement and Section 4 of the Escrow Agreement
`dated March 17, 2016 by and among the Company, Buyer and BOKF, NA.
`
`If you have any questions regarding any ofthe foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact Mary
`Chowning at (617) 763-6125,
`
`
`+
`Sincerely,LO Lf .
`
`Alfonzo
`Technologies LLC
`
`“Rafael
`Datum
`
`CC:
`
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`Exchange Place
`Boston, MA 02109
`Attention:
`jherzog(@goodwinprocter.com and phanoian@yoodwinprocter.com
`
`

`

`Exhibit A
`
`

`

`11:01 PM
`OGN2HE
`Accrual Basis
`
`Datum Corporation
`Closing Balance Sheet - March 17, 2016
`
`ASSETS
`Current Assets
`Checking/Savings
`Insignia Bank Regular Checking
`Insignia Bank Money Market
`BMO Harris Bank Checking
`Total Checking/Savings
`Accounts Receivable
`Accounts Recaivable
`Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
`Accounts Recelvable - Other
`Total Accounts Receivable
`Total Accounts Recelvabie
`Other Current Assets
`Eart Transition Cost-current
`Total Total Inventory
`Prepaid Expenses
`Prepald insurance
`Due From - Alto Velo
`Tota) Other Current Ancets
`Total Current Assets
`Fixed Assets
`Land
`Accumulated Depreciation
`Buildings and tmprovements
`Furniture and Equipment
`Leased Assets - MTSA Clients
`Hardware Purchases
`Software Purchases
`Total Leased Assets - MTSA Clients
`Leased Equipment (Cap Lease)
`Purchases - Hardware
`Software
`Tools
`Vehicles
`Total Fixed Assets
`Other Assets
`Eari Transition Cost
`Loan Fees
`Software for Leases
`Accumulated Amortization
`Loan to Tom Frost
`Security Deposits
`Total Other Assets
`TOTAL ASSETS
`LIABILITIES & EQUITY
`Liabilities
`Current Liabilities
`Accounts Payable
`Accounts Payable
`Total Accounts Payable
`
`Datum Corporation
`Balance Sheet
`As of March 17, 2016
`
`(A)
`
`Mar 17, 16EE
`
`172,794.63
`6,037.42
`9,737.96
`
`188,570 04
`
`(874,750.80)
`2,200,722,92
`1,325,972 12
`1,325,972 12
`
`72,411.00
`283,550.48
`25,454.68
`20,195.69
`10,704.45
`412,316.30
`4,926,858.43
`
`800,000.00
`{1,542,028 90)
`825,440.74
`68,789.64
`
`212,547.66
`53,954.81
`266,502.47
`137,216.60
`1.121,677.99
`59,625.78
`13,157.54
`
`336,918.50
`2,087,300.33
`
`274,267 56
`54,173.28
`51,637 00
`(62,393.49)
`282,100.00
`2,700.00
`
`602,484.35a
`4,616,643.11=
`
`
`309,848.96
`309,848.96
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`

`

`en
`
`
`
`syuaUIWOD
`
`\euid
`
`SI/LT/E
`
`Pawunysy
`
`9102/9t/€
`
`dso>wnjeq03pdpunyay
`
`
`
`Jasqueguj
`
`Bpiq10)wiv
`
`SS‘E82
`
`t26'4
`
`561‘0z
`
`CENZL
`
`90S'LT
`
`LT/EJeSyyeuagpdg
`
`
`
`LS9°20L'T
`
`
`
`
`
`et2'00e'7
`
`{IS2'P2a)
`TAG'STET
`
`
`£88°8S2'T
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Aupiqet]1503UOHIsUeL)(129
`
`
`
`Wawdinba10}IurjpiqsaaoM4
`
`
`
`
`
`WwWJ31JUO}0}passejsasuopog
`
`SEP'6LY
`
`(soo'zzT}
`
`€42'9SE
`
`aAlasadY/YU|
`
`
`
`¥(s9z‘EZT)siqappegjeuonppy
`
`
`
`Jasyuegu|
`
`{96707}
`
`(ezg"2)
`
`
`
`
`
`(2ee'ez}aqueunsuypredasg
`
`
`
`
`
`(s87‘6T)spunypaysodapun
`
`
`
`
`
`(6¢0's)sasuadxapredaid
`
`
`
`
`
`ETOZBPTOZU!{JOValSqUNoo2eaosO]ANPaoUaayIg=v
`
`Gvs"G0E
`
`867'6LE
`
`TUUEle
`
`2ty'6zt
`
`160'0ET
`
`vote
`
`106"2t
`
`£5¢'SS9
`
`
`
`
`vOrtz8'T
`
`
`
`
`{eps'vs)}
`
`
`
`OTZL*TESjeiie)Buponyi8N
`
`
`
`
`
`SE0'S8T'ZajqeaiazaysjunoIIy
`
`
`
`(zsT‘92r)sjgaqpeg
`
`
`
`7ZL'06EAsoquanu]
`
`
`
`
`
`6¢0'Ssasuadxypiedaid
`
`
`
`
`
`LEED?adueunsujpiedaig
`
`
`
`
`
`$8t‘6tSpunypaysodapun
`
`
`
`4S-$09uolysued[123
`
`
`
`sqyauaqpredaid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LLU107EsyasseJuanspaysalpy
`
`
`
`
`
`988'r9Eajqededsqunoa.y
`
`
`
`
`
`O87‘TSZspieoypaip
`
`602'veT1]48YIO
`
`(2N2928OidF(josAed
`
`
`
`sjensazeJ3ayIO.
`
`
`
`
`
`$]S09UOIISUeI]|ABQ
`
`
`
`QTOZ‘ZTYIJEW-UONeyNa/eDjeydeDsupOM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`uojeiodso)winjeg
`
`
`
`}yOidpawayap/$3509JOesUODpansy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`02072sysodapsawojsn>
`
`
`
`€29°988$S31201dUlYOM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`89S'699°TSaMNQeYJUALINparsnipy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`syassepapnyjax3
`
`Bujsorpyepled@enpyunoury
`
`~~
`
`jeuly
`
`
`
`ooo’oasyodieypeudepBupomy
`
`
`
`
`
`juaunsn(pyjeude>dupyory
`
`S3}0N
`
`
`

`

`Datum Corporation
`Cash True Up & Post Closing Activity
`
`Amount
`
`Comments
`
`Book cash balance at 3-17-16
`
`188,570
`
`See Closing Balance Sheet
`
`Cash pd to TF
`Items pd by Datum Technologies
`Amount Due From Datum Corporation
`
`(200,000)
`(39,057)
`(50,487)
`
`Check #2971 pd on 4-4-16
`Alto Velo & TF expenses pd post closing
`
`

`

`Exhibit
`
`
`
`

`

`Joint Instructions to Escrow Agent
`
`June [e], 2016
`
`BOKFinancial
`Corporate Trust Department
`5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 1201
`Dallas, TX 75225
`Attn: Kathy McQuiston
`
`SENT VIA EMAIL: kmcquiston@bokf.com
`
`Dear Ms. McQuiston:
`
`to the Escrow Agreement by and among Datum
`These instructions are given to you pursuant
`Technologies LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Buyer”), Datum Corporation, a Florida
`corporation (“Seller” and,
`together with Buyer, each,
`individually a “Party” and, collectively,
`the
`“Parties”), and BOKF, NA (“Escrow Agent”), dated March 17, 2016 (the “Escrow Agreement”),
`
`Subject to the terms set forth below, you are instructed to disburse to Buyerthe full amount of the Escrow
`Fund in accordance with the Payment Instructions provided by the Buyer on Exhibit A of the Escrow
`Agreement.
`
`The total amountto be disbursed to the Buyer may be sent in one paymentto the Buyer. Forclarification,
`the account to which the funds should be sentare as follows:
`
`PaymentInstructions to Buyer:
`
`Bank: Opus Bank
`ABA No.: 122239270
`A/C: Opus Bank
`A/C No.: 18301-888
`Ref: Datum Technologies LLC
`
`This document constitutes the “Working Capital Certificate” issued in accordance with Section 4 of the
`Escrow Agreement.
`
`[Remainder ofPage intentionally Left Blank]
`
`

`

`Buyer and Seiler jointly execute these instructions agreeing to the terms hereof.
`
`BUYER:
`
`SELLER:
`
`DATUM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`a Delaware limited liability company
`
`DATUM CORPORATION,
`
`a Florida corporation By:
`Title: Chief Executive Office Name: ThomasFrost
`
`Name: Rafael Alfdnzo
`
`By:
`
`Title: Chief Executive Officer
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT 2
`
`

`

`415 EDWARDS DRIVE
`SARASOTA, FLORIDA 34243
`
`July 29, 2016
`
`Via Electronic Mail and First Class Mail
`Datum Technologies, LLC
`6009 Business Bowlevard
`Sarasota, Florida 34240
`Attn: Rafael Alfonzo. CEO
`
`Re:
`
`Dispute Notice
`
`Dear Mr. Alfonzo:
`
`Reference is made to that certain asset purchase agreement, dated March 17, 2016, (the “Purchase Agreement”)
`by and among Datum Technologies. I.LC (the “Buyer™), Datum Corporation (the Company”) and myself(the
`“Sharcholder’). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the
`Purchase Agreement.
`
`I received a copy of the Buyer's letter, dated June 15, 2016 (the “Letter”), whereby the Buyer delivered the
`Closing Statements pursuant to Section 2.5(b)(i) of the Purchase Agreement. As acknowledged in your email,
`dated June 20, 2016, to me. however, the Closing Statements delivered on June 15, 2016 did uf contain a
`complete copy of the Company’s Balance Sheet and such Closing Statements were provided in accordance with
`your email. As material clements of the proposed Closing Statements remained open and unsatisfied beyond the
`90-day deadline set forth in Section 2.5(b)(i). the Company and the Shareholder previously advised Buyer on or
`about June 23. 2016 that the Letter was incomplete and, as such, without recourse for the Buyer. The Company
`and the Shareholder also note that
`insofar as the Company had refused to provide the Shareholder and the
`Company with copies ofcertain books and records of the Company to which the Company and Shareholder are
`legally entitled, including, but not limited to, certain excluded assets of the Company that are identified under
`Section 2.1(b)(iv) of the Purchase Agreement which were provided to the Buyer as a courtesy at the time of
`closing ofthe transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement dispite the failures on the part of the Buyer
`to have its own books and records set up at the time of closing of the Purchase Agreement and the audited
`financial statements of the Buyer’s parent, Quatrefoil Capital LLC (the “LLC”), and its Subsidiaries (as defined in
`the LLC Agreement, whichincludes the Buyer) required to be delivered in accordance with Section 2.12(a) of the
`ILC Agreement(as defined herein), these withheld documents had precluded the Company and Shareholder from
`undertaking a complete and independent review of the proposed adjustments set forth in the Letter.
`
`Without waiving the foregoing objections and defenses as to timeliness and completeness of the Letter or the right
`to challenge any fact or argument raised by Buyer under the Letter, pursuant to Section 2.5 of the Purchase
`Agreement, or any other forum, the Company and Shareholder agreed to attempt, in good faith, to review the
`contents of the Letter and remit a Dispute Notice.
`in accordance with Section 2.5(b)ii) of the Purchase
`Agreement, by July 30. 2016, which is the deadline offered by the Buyer and accepted by the Companyand
`Shareholder. This communication constitutes the Dispute Notice in accordance with the Purchase Agreement.
`
`Allowance of Doubtful Accounts
`
`The Company and Shareholder dispute the increase of the allowance of doubtful accounts from $426,152 to
`$874,751 since the proposed increase is not
`in accordance with GAAP. The Company has never had an
`allowance for doubtful accounts on its financial statements and the amount of doubtful accounts agreed upon
`between the Company and Buyer at the time of the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase
`
`Page |
`
`1
`
`

`

`Agreement was the subject of negotiation between the parties prior to the closing of the transaction. According to
`GAAP, the allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate, made to reduce accounts reccivable to the value that
`will be realized. Estimates must be reasonably based using relevant information known or knowable at the time of
`issuance of the financial statements, or in this case, the execution of the Purchase Agreement. Under GAAP,
`Buyer cannot take information which was acquired after the execution of the Purchase Agreement and not
`available at the time of its execution and adjust an estimate agreed upon bythe parties at its sole discretion. In
`accordance with GAAP, an estimate is restated only when it has been made in error(¢.g.. contrary to available
`relevant information). Buyer has not provided any evidence to demonstrate that the method used by the Company
`to estimate the allowance for bad debts was an error in accordance with GAAP and as such the allowance for
`doubtful accounts must be $426,152, the amount agreed upon between the parties.
`
`Earl Transaction
`
`The Company and Shareholder dispute the addition of a current asset and a current liability in the amount of
`$72,411 and $129,422. respectively, relating to the Earl Entreprises transaction. The proposed accounting is not
`in accordance with GAAP. Buyer, contrary to GAAP, created an asset and liability based on a contractual benefit
`and obligation related to the agreement to pay certain employees over a 90 day period. The Buyer's accounting is
`not in accordance with GAAP as to the creation of an asset or ithe recording of a liability. As such, both the asset
`and theliability must be removed from the proposed working capital adjustment.
`
`Other Accruals
`
`The Companyand Shareholder dispute the creation of a liability in the amount of $87.164 related to overpayment
`for equipmentsince this line item does not meet the definition of a liability under GAAP.
`In general, GAAP
`defines a liability as a probable future sacrifice of an economic benefit, arising from a present obligation and
`resulting from past transactions. The Buyer has failed to provide any documentation supporting or showing that
`this adjustmentsatisfies the definition ofa liability in accordance with GAAP,that the customer has made a claim
`as to such adjustment, or that the customer has been made aware that such adjustment has been provided to them
`through the issuance of a statement or other written document provided to the customer by Buyer. Whileit is the
`Company's and Sharehoider’s understanding that such credit has been discussed with the customer, the customer
`has not made any claim for such amount and there is no evidence thai such a claim is probable.
`
`Notably, under Section 2.05(b)(iii) of that certain Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Agreement
`(the “LLC Agreement”), dated March 17. 2016, of the LLC, the LLC shail not and shall restrict its Subsidiaries
`(as defined in the LLC Agreement, which includes the Buyer) from execuling. amending or modifying and
`material contract or any agreement with payments to or by the LLC or its Subsidiaries in excess of $50,000,
`individually, or in the aggregate, without prior approval of the Board (as defined in the LLC Agreement). As a
`memberof the Board, | can confirm that the Board was never presented with a claim by the customer or proposed
`modification to any agreement with the customer and, consequently, can confirm the Board never approved same.
`Consequently, this purportedliability must be removed from the proposed working capital adjustment.
`
`Based onthe foregoing, and as set forth more fully in Exhibit_A annexed hereto, the Post-Closing Purchase Price
`is an upward adjustment and the Company and Shareholderare entitled to receive $470,109.00 byrelease ofall
`funds from the Working Capital Escrow Fund and $70,109.00 directly from the Buyer.
`If Buyer, the Company
`and Shareholder cannot resolve the disputed items within thirty (30) days after the deliveryof this Dispute Notice,
`the dispute shall be submitted to the Accountants,
`
`These amountsset forth in this Dispute Notice and annexed exhibit do not include all amounts due and payable by
`Buyer to the Company and Shareholder for the Buyer’s defaults, penalties, interest and other amounts that are duc
`and payable as set forth in that certain letter, dated July 18, 2016, from Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP.
`counsel te the Company and Shareholder, to Goodwin Proctor LLP, counsel to the Buyer.
`
`Page | 2
`
`

`

`This Dispute Notice is without prejudice to anyrights, remedies, powers or privileges available to the Company
`and Shareholder under the Purchase Agreement, the LLC Agreement, or any other transaction document, or
`applicable law, all of which rights and remedies are hereby expressly reserved without further notice to the Buyer,
`all as Shareholder and the Company deem appropriate or necessary in each of their sole and absolute discretion.
`
`Please call or email Stephen A. Cohen at Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP with any questions or comments
`on the contents set forth in this Dispute Notice.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Thomas Frost
`
`DATUM CORPORATION
`>
`
`Name: Thomas Frost
`Title: Chief Executive Officer
`
`Enclosure
`
`cc;
`
`Stephen A. Cohen, Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP
`
`Page| 3
`
`

`

`Exhibit A
`
`

`

`Datum Technologies LLC
`Working Capital Calculation, as adjusted pursuant to Dispute Notice
`July 29, 2016
`
`3/17/2016
`
`2,200,723
`(426,152)
`1,774,571
`
`283,550
`
`7,922
`20,196
`
`0 0
`
`17,506
`2,103,745
`
`309,849
`379,298
`113,122
`0
`
`130,091
`
`0 0
`
`Accounts Receivable
`Bad Debts
`
`Inventory
`Prepaid Expenses
`Prepaid Insurance
`Undeposited Funds
`Earl Transition Cost
`Prepaid Benefits
`Adjusted Current Assets
`
`Accounts Payable
`Credit Cards
`
`OtherLiabilities
`
`Earl Transition Costs
`Payroll & PTO accrual
`Other Accruals
`
`Accrued Contract Costs
`
`Customer Deposits
`17,901
`Work In Progress
`___655,257
`Adjusted currentliabilities
`1,605,518
`
`Net Working Capital
`
`Excluded Assets
`
`Prepaid Insurance
`Undeposited Funds
`Prepaid Expenses
`Additional Bad Debts
`
`Final Working Capital Adjustment
`
`498,227
`
`(20,196)
`
`(7,922)
`
`(28,118)
`
`470,109
`
`Amount to be released from Escrow to Selier
`Amountpayable by Buyerto Seller
`
`$ 400,000.00
`$ 70,109.00
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT 3
`
`

`

`“pmSICHENZIA
`Mm m‘ ROSS
`- FRIEDMAN
`FERENCE”
`
`Via Electronic Mail
`Datum Technologies, LLC
`6009 Business Boulevard
`Sarasota, Florida 34240
`Attn: Rafael Alfonzo, CEO
`
`June 23, 2016
`
`Re:
`
`Request for Additional Information for Working Capital Adjustment
`
`Dear Mr. Alfonzo:
`
`As you are aware, this firm represents Datum Corporation (the “Company”) and Thomas Frost
`(the “Shareholder”). Reference is made to that certain asset purchase agreement, dated March 17, 2016,
`(the “Purchase Agreement”) by and among Datum Technologies, LLC (the “Buyer”), the Company and
`the Shareholder. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning asset forth
`in the Purchase Agreement.
`
`The Shareholder has received a copy of your letter, dated June 15, 2016 (the “Letter”), whereby
`the Buyer delivered the Closing Statements pursuant to Section 2.5(b)(i) of the Purchase Agreement. As
`acknowledged in your email dated June 20, 2016, however, the Closing Statements delivered on June 15,
`2016 did not contain a complete copy of the Company’s Balance Sheet.
`In addition, your letter did not
`contain a statement of the Indebtedness of the Company immediately prior to the Closing as required in
`accordance with Section 2.5(b)(i)(C), which foregoing deficiencies have not been cured to date. Finally,
`the Closing Statements contain a number of adjustments that were not reflected in the Estimated
`Statements provided by the Company at Closing. As material elements of the proposed Closing
`Statements remain open and unsatisfied beyond the 90-day deadline set forth in Section 2.5(b)(i), the
`Company and the Shareholder deem the letter delivered incomplete and, as such, without recourse for
`Buyer.
`In particular,
`the Company and the Shareholder note that, with respect to the purported
`adjustments, the material deficiencies, together with the lack of any supporting detail for the proposed
`Closing Statements, preclude the Company and the Shareholder from undertaking any meaningful and
`independent review such that the Company and Shareholder could timely remit a Dispute Notice, if
`necessary, if the letter was complete and timely.
`
`Without waiving any objections as to the timeliness and completeness of the Letter or any claim
`or defense that the Buyer’s contractua! right to remit the Letter pursuant to Section 2.5 had expired on
`June 15, 2016, all and any rights being expressly reserved, in good faith the Company and Shareholder
`will
`review the purported adjustments. To that end, the Company and Shareholder request that Buyer
`provide the following:(i) a complete statement of the Indebtedness of the Company immediately prior to
`the Closing as required in accordance with Section 2.5(b)(i)(C), (ii) responses to the initial information
`request set forth on Schedule A annexed hereto and (iii) notwithstanding the request set forth in
`subsection (ii) above, full access to the books and records of the Buyer, the personnel of, and work papers
`prepared by, Buyer, Buyer’s accountants and/or other representatives relating to the Closing Statements
`and to suchhistorical financial information of the Company that was used in computingall of the line
`items referred to in the Closing Statements. Of course, such access should be scheduled with reasonable
`notice so as to avoid interfering with the normal business operations of Buyer. The foregoing requests
`will allow the Company and Shareholder to independently review and verify the accuracy and
`completeness of the Closing Statements and address any other issues that the Company and the
`Shareholder deem appropriate for purposes of preparing a Dispute Notice, if any, in accordance with
`Section 2.5(b)(ii), including but not limited to, the scope of items for which Buyer made adjustments and
`Buyer’s compliance with GAAPin preparing the Closing Statements.
`
`61 Broadway | New York, NY | 10006
`T (212) 930 9700 | F (212) 930 9725 | www.srff.com
`
`

`

`Subject to same non-waiverand reservation ofrights, the Company and Shareholder request that
`Buyer produce the requested documents and provide access to inspect the books and records of Buyer
`(collectively, the “Letter Detail”) within thirty (30) days, or as soon as practicable to Buyer (with
`reasonable written notice to the Company and Shareholder), whichever is later.
`Furthermore,
`the
`Company and Shareholder hereby request an additional forty-five (45) days from receipt of the Letter
`Detail by the Company and Shareholderto provide a Dispute Notice,if any.
`
`On a related note, it has come to our attention that, on June 22, 2016, you indicated to the
`Buyer’s board ofdirectors that the Buyer anticipates receiving $500,000.00 from the Shareholder in or
`around August 2016. For the reasons set forth above, this contention is both unsubstantiated and
`premature. Further, as Shareholder also is a director of the Buyer, we would encourage youto adviseall
`of the directors that your referenceto this line item should not be construed to be an obligation on the part
`of Shareholder to pay Buyer this or any other sum; rather, the line item reflects a demand madeby the
`Buyer for an adjustment, which will be reviewed and considered by the Company and Shareholder.
`In
`this regard, the parties can direct necessary time and resources only to the Letter, Letter Detail, and
`Dispute Notice, if any.
`
`Please call or email us with any questions.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Stephen A. Cohen
`
`(Za
`
`ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF DATUM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`
`Name:
`Title:
`
`ce:
`
`Encl.
`
`Datum Corporation
`Thomas Frost
`Jon Herzog, Goodwin Proctor LLP
`Peter Hanoian, Goodwin Proctor LLP
`
`

`

`Schedule A
`
`Reconciliation of Estimated balance to Final balance identifying each item resulting in a net change in
`Accounts Receivable of approximately $16,000.
`Reconciliation of Final balance to the Accounts Receivable Detailed Aging Trial Balance or other report
`identifying the outstanding balance by customer, by invoice, by length of time outstanding.
`Accounts Receivable Detailed Aging Trial Balance or other report identifying the outstanding balance by
`customer, by invoice, by length oftime outstanding as of 3/17/2016, 3/31/2016, 4/30/2016, 5/31/2016, and
`6/15/2016.
`Post-transaction closing journal entries posted by Buyer to correct opening balance of Accounts
`Receivable, along with supporting documentation.
`Reconciliation of Estimated balance to Final balance identifying each item resulting in a net change in
`Allowance For Bad Debts of approximately $449,000;
`Accounting schedules and supporting workpapers, spreadsheets, calculations, analysis or other documents
`supporting, establishing the basis, or estimation that, the Buyer’s determination that the Allowance For Bad
`Debts balance should be $875,000 at 3/17/2016.
`Post-transaction closing journal entries posted by Buyer to correct opening balance of Allowance For Bad
`Debts, along with supporting documentation.
`Schedule identifying the write-off of outstanding invoices or account balances made post-closing through
`6/15/2016.
`Reconciliation of Estimated balance to Final balance identifying each item resulting in a net change in
`Inventory of approximately $107,000.
`. Reconciliation of Final balance to the Inventory report identifying inventory by item description, quantity,
`price per unit and extended cost.
`. Post-transaction closing journal entries posted by Buyer to correct opening balance of Inventory, along with
`supporting documentation.
`. Schedule identifying the write-off or write down of specific inventory items made post-closing through
`6/15/2016.
`. Reconciliation of Estimated balance to Final balance identifying each item resulting in a net change in
`Credit Cards liability of approximately $107,000.
`. Schedule of credit card balances as of 3/17/2015 along with credit card statements or other supporting
`documentation.
`. Post-transaction closing journal entries posted by Buyer to correct opening balance of Credit Cards, along
`with supporting documentation.
`. Schedule of Earl Transition — Short-Term and Long-Term, Assets and Liabilities: for both Estimated and
`Final, which sets forth the accounting transactions, calculations or other details for the items that make-up
`the respective account balances at the respective dates,
`including cash payments, accounts payable
`transaction entries, journal entries, with supporting documentation such as vendor invoices, computations,
`etc.; and documentation supporting the classification of the item as long-term or short-term.
`. Post-transaction closing journal entries posted by Buyerto correct opening balance of the above referenced
`accounts, along with supporting documentation.
`. Schedule showing the calculation for accrued payroll and PTO as of 3/17/2016 along with supporting
`documentation.
`Copy of the company’s PTO policy that wasin effect pre-closing.
`Post-transaction closing journal entries posted by Buyerto correct opening balance of the above referenced
`accounts, along with supporting documentation.
`Schedule of Other Accruals which sets forth the accounting transactions, calculations or other details for
`the items that make-up the account balance including cash payments, accounts payable transaction entries,
`journal entries, with supporting documentation such as vendor invoices, computations, etc.
`. Post-transaction closing journal entries posted by Buyerto correct opening balance of the abovereferenced
`accounts, along with supporting documentation.
`. Trial balance as of March 17, 2016.
`. Balance Sheet at March 17, 2016 and Income Statementfor the year-to-date period then ended.
`. Financial statements for the two most recent annual periods.
`. Accounting due diligence reports provided by third party CPA firm or other financial advisor.
`
`19.
`20.
`
`21.
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT 4
`
`

`

`[
`
`\
`
`G O O DW 1 N
`
`Jordan D. Weiss
`
`+1212 459.7227
`jweiss@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`
`Counselors at Law
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`T: 212.813.8800
`F: 212.355.3333
`
`June 30, 2016
`
`Stephen A. Cohen
`Sichenzia, Ross, Friedman and Ference LLP
`61 Broadway
`New York, NY 10006
`
`Re:
`
`June 23, 2016 Request for Additional Information for Working Capital
`Adjustment
`
`Dear Mr. Cohen,
`
`We represent Datum Technologies LLC (“Buyer”) and we write in response to your June 23,
`2016 Request for Additional Information for Working Capital Adjustment (the “Letter”).!
`Although stylized as a request, your Letter seems in fact to set forth the legal position of
`Shareholder and the Company (together “Company”) that because a single page of Buyer’s
`Closing Statements was inadvertently not transmitted to the Company until the mistake was
`realized only five days later, that the Companyis relieved from all Working Capital obligations
`under the APA, even though the missing page is only of marginal relevance to Buyer’s position
`on the necessary Working Capital adjustment. Wedisagree.
`
`On June 15, 2016 Buyer transmitted to the Company its position on the necessary Working
`Capital adjustment. Although a single page of the balance sheet was inadvertently omitted from
`the June 15, 2016 transmission,
`the only information on that page that relates to Buyer’s
`Working Capital Adjustment is a breakdown of the Company’s credit card debt at Closing—the
`sum of which was in any event included in Buyer’s June 15 transmission.
`In so far, even if
`Buyer’s error was a breach of the APA—which it was not—it was an immaterial one and
`therefore does not relieve the Companyofits obligations under the APA. Tellingly, your Letter
`does not cite any authority for the contrary position.
`
`The remainder of yourletter is largely dedicated to demanding information from Buyer, which
`
`Reference is made to the March 17, 2016 Asset Purchase Agreement (the “APA”) entered into by and among
`Datum Corporation, Datum Technologies LLC (together “Buyer”) and Thomas Frost (“Seller” or “the
`Company”). Capitalized terms not defined herein derive their meaning from the APA.
`
`

`

`[4 GOODWIN
`
`Stephen A. Cohen
`June 30, 2016
`Page 2
`
`the Companyis not entitled to under the APA. You suggest that if you receive the requested
`information, the Companywill review the “purported adjustments” in “good faith”, but you also
`state that the Company is not waiving “any objections as to the timeliness and completeness of
`the June 15 Letter or any claim or defense that the Buyer’s contractual right to remit the June 15
`Letter pursuant to Section 2.5 had expired on June 15, 2016....” We find these statements to be
`irreconcilable. Moreover, we note that the Company has no right under the APA to the
`information it demands and that much ofit does not appear to even be relevant to an accounting
`analysis of Buyer’s calculation of Closing Working Capital. Nevertheless, the Company has the
`audacity to demand an extra 45 days to review that information.
`
`The Company cannot have its cake and eat it too. Buyer will not provide the Company with
`substantial information to which it has no contractual right, only so that the Company can, upon
`realizing that Buyer’s calculation is correct, revert to the argument that it nevertheless does not
`owe Buyerany adjustment because Buyer’s clerical error relieves the Companyofits obligations
`under the APA. If the Company wishesto test its legal position in Court—an expensive, and in
`our view wasteful notion—it is free to do so. On the other hand, if the Company wishesto avoid
`litigation, and engage in a good faith analysis of Buyer’s position, then the Company must make
`clear, in writing, that it waives its argument that any failure (real or perceived) of Buyer to meet
`the deadline set forth in Section 2.5 of the APA limits Buyer’s rights to a Working Capital
`Adjustment under the APA. If the Company does so, Buyer will provide the information listed
`on Annex A to this letter, and provide the Seller with an extra five days, from June 15, 2016, to
`provide Buyer with any Dispute Notice under the APA.
`
`Finally, in your Letter you claim that on June 22, 2016 Buyerindicated to the Board of Directors
`that it expected to receive $500,000 from the Shareholder around August 2016. You suggestthat
`such a statement was inappropriate and demandclarification. Setting aside whether your claim
`is accurate, we do not believe that any clarification is necessary or appropriate. Shareholder, as
`you know, has a seat on the Board.
`If Shareholder believes that Buyer’s statements are
`“unsubstantiated and premature” or has any other opinion on the subject, Shareholder is free to
`voice them in any mannerconsistent with the governing documents andhis fiduciary duties.
`
`I look forward to your prompt response, which should be returned to the undersigned.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Gordan D. Weise
`
`Jordan D. Weiss
`
`Enc.
`
`

`

`Annex A
`
`Accounts Receivable Detailed Aging Trial Balance or other report identifying the outstanding balance by
`customerby length of time outstanding as of 3/17/2016.
`Schedule and analysis supporting the Buyer's determination of the Allowance For Bad Debts balance of
`$875,000 at 3/17/2016.
`Schedule identifying the write-off of outstanding invoices or account balances made post-closing through
`6/15/2016. None
`Inventory report identifying inventory by item description, quantity, price per unit and extended cost.
`Schedule identifying the write-off or write down of specific inventory items made post-closing through
`6/15/2016. None
`Schedule of credit card balances as of 3/17/2015 along with credit card statements or other supporting
`documentation.
`Schedule of Earl Transition - Short-Term and Long-Term, Assets and Liabilities along with details of
`supporting calculations.
`Schedule showingthe calculation for accrued payroll and PTO asof 3/17/2016.
`Copy of the company's PTO policy that was in effect pre-closing.
`Schedule of Other Accruals including calculations or other details for the items that make-up the account
`balance.
`Bal

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket