throbber
EFiled: Mar 11 2022 02:ITPMEERT
`Transaction ID 67387010 (i
`arr}
`Case No. 2022-0238-
`eeWeOFDE.
`
`|
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`EFiled: Mar 11 2022 02:17PM EST
`Transaction ID 67387010
`Case No. 2022-0238-
`
`

`

`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`€ AO 132 (Rey. 12/03) Exemplification CertificateRiadebiaielda
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`District of
`North Carolina
`
`Western
`
`
`
`EXEMPLIFICATION CERTIFICATE
`
`3
`L
`Frank G Johns
`Clerk of this United States District Court,
`esee
`keeperof the records andseal, certify that the attached documents:
`Docket 3:17cv00131
`Document No. 126 - Jury Verdict - entered on 7/31/2019
`Document No. 129 - Clerk's Judgment- entered on 8/6/2019
`
`are true copies ofrecords of this Court.
`In testimony whereof I sign my name and affix the seal of this Court,
`
`____Charlotte,NGNC
`
`in this District, at
`
`A019—fF2se7bate|Bank®.a _9GDedura
`
`
`
`Clerk
`
`(By) Deputy Clerk
`
`, a Judicial Officer of this Court,
`Robert J. Conrad
`l,
`, named above,
`is and was on thedate noted,
`Frank G Johns
`certify that
`Clerk of this Court, duly appointed and sworn, and keeper of the records and seal, and that this certificate, and
`the attestation of the record, are in accordance with the laws of the United State
`
`
`Date
`
`
`
`____YritedstatesDistrictJddgeStatesDistrictkh
`
`
`
`
`
`TijieOO
`
`, Clerk of this United States District Court,
`Frank G Johns
`L,
`Robert J. Conrad
`,
`keeperoftheseal, certify that the Honorable
`Judge
`named above, is and was on the date noted a Judicial Officer of this Court, duly appointed, sworn and qualified,
`and that I am well acquainted with the Judge’s official signature and knowand certify the above signature
`to be that of the Judge.
`Western District North Carolina
`In testimony whereof I sign my name,and affix the seal of this Court at
`Charlotte, NC
`in this State, on
`Date
`
` (By) Deputy Clerk
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jan 30 2020 11:05AM EST
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`; Tatton ID'6 eyoaos-*
`
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`- ——_——.-________——-pnITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT———
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH coho
`CHARLOTTE DIVISION
`3:17-cv-131-RJC-DCK
`)
`)
`
`PRASSAS CAPITAL, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`FILED
`CHARLOTTE, NC
`JUL 31 2019
`us
`WESTERooSTRICTOFNe
`
`VERDICT FORMee Certified to be a true and
`varieoftheorginal
`U.S. District Court
`Krank G. Johns, ae
`eputyClerk
`
`
`
`
`|
`I:
`|
`
`a|
`
`|
`
`v.
`BLUE SPHERE CORPORATION,
`Defendant.
`
`;
`)
`)
`
`Answerthe following questions as instructed:
`
`bee
`
`Distdct
`
`Prassas Capital’s Breach of Contract Claim Against Blue Sphere
`
`1. Did PlaintiffPrassas Capital substantially perform its obligations under
`
`the Engagement Agreement with Defendant Blue Sphere?
`yesXK
`
`NO
`
`If YES, proceed to Question 2. IfNo, skip to Question 6.
`
`2. Were all the conditions precedent in the Agreement(s) satisfied so as to
`
`entitle Prassas Capital to a Financing Feefor either the NC Project or
`
`the RI Project?
`YES
`Z : __
`
`NO
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document 126 Filed 07/31/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jan 30 2020 11:05AM EST
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`SS pat, beg eee pelle:lan 30-2020.105An
`Transaction ID 64672495
`|
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`— — IfYESproceedtoQuestion8-IfNO;skiptoQuestion6. ————— — —
`
`3. Was the Engagement Agreement modified by subsequent agreement
`
`through an exchangeof emails asit relates to the Financing Feefor the
`
`NC Project Transaction?
`
`YES.
`
`NO
`
`/
`
`Proceed to Question 4.
`
`4. Did Prassas Capital waive its right to any part of its paymentfor the
`
`NC Project?
`
`YES
`
`NO / ‘
`
`|
`
`If YES, skip to Question 6B. IfNO, proceed to Question 5A.
`
`5. A. What additional amount, if any, beyond the $300,000 already paid
`
`by Blue Sphere to Prassas Capital, is Plaintiff entitled to recover on for
`
`the North Carolina Project?
`
`$ | UO (oD |co (NC Project) |
`(Write out amount in words)Or e ani\\\c a) tneehundred Cor
`Hrousana Six hundred Cicky- ore doles 4 Fyhed cents,
`
`B. What additional amount, if any, beyond the $533,333 already paid
`
`by Blue Sphere to Prassas Capital, is Plaintiff entitled to recover on for
`
`the Rhode Island Project?
`
`2
`
`ae
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document 126 Filed 07/31/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jan 30 2020 11:05AM EST
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`
`co] stripes] peeeeecectery epeeFedsJan 30.2020 44:05AM
`Transaction ID 64672495
`
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
` 7 oe @I2,661tetProjend— 7 ”
`
`(Write out amount
`in words) Si K Ly dred hwelve.Hrasand x
`hurived
`sixty
`Severn do
`Proceed to Question 6.
`
`Defendant Blue Sphere’s Counterclaim for Breach of Contract Against Prassas
`Capital
`
`6. Did Prassas Capital materially breach the Engagement Agreement by
`
`failing to provide the services required by the Engagement Agreement?
`
`YES
`
`NO
`
`
`
`xX —__—
`
`If YES, proceed to Question 7. IfNO, skip the remaining questions and
`
`sign and date the form.
`
`7. Did Blue Sphere waive, or is Blue Sphere estopped from claiming, any
`
`nonperformanceof the Engagement Agreement by Prassas Capital?
`
`YES
`
`NO
`
`If YES, skip the remaining questions and sign and date the form. IfNO,
`
`proceed to Question 8.
`
`8. Is Prassas Capital required to reimburse Blue Sphere all or part of the
`
`$833,333 previously paid to Prassas Capital?
`
`\
`
`YES
`
`NO
`
`fo
`
`tee
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document126 Filed 07/31/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jan 30 2020 11:05AM EST
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`Tap corerrromenateresearanenrrensy ERTS eg
`a
`
`gate UI Filed: -Jan.30.2020 411.:05AN
`~’ Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`
`=
`
`|E|
`
`.
`
`
`
`“—~ TFNO,slap theremainingquestionandsignanddatetheform.HfYES
`
`how much money must Prassas Capitalreimburse Blue Sphere?
`
`$
`
`(Write out amount in words)
`
`You may now end your deliberations. The Foreperson should sign and date this
`Verdict Form and notify the Marshal that you have reacheda verdict.
`
`Signed, this the Ah day ofJuly 2019.
`
`
`
`4
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document 126 Filed 07/31/19 Page 4o0f 4
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jan 30 2020 11:05AM EST
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`Transaction ID 64672495
`
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`United States District Court
`Western District of North Carolina
`
`Charlotte Division
`
`JUDGMENT IN CASE
`
`3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`) )
`
`)
`)
`
`Prassas Capital, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`vs.
`
`Blue Sphere Corporation,
`Defendant(s).
`
`DECISION BY COURT.This action having comebefore the Court by Trial and a decision
`having been rendered;
`
`IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGEDthat Judgmentis hereby entered in accordance with the
`Jury Verdict entered on July 31, 2019.
`
`August 6, 2019
`
`
`
`Frank G. Johns, Clerk
`United States District Court
`
`Se
`“
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document 129 Filed 08/06/19 Page 1of1
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jan 30 2020 11:05AM EST
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
`
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`PRASSASCAPITAL, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Ve
`
`BLUE SPHERE CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No.
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF JUDGMENT CREDITOR’S ATTORNEY
`PURSUANTTO 10 DEL.C. §4783(a)
`
`STATE OF DELAWARE
`
`NEW CASTLE COUNTY
`
`: 8
`
`BE IT REMEMBEREDthat on this 29" day of January, 2020, personally
`
`appeared before me, the Subscriber, a Notary Public for the State and County
`
`aforesaid, NEAL J. LEVITSKY,who,after being duly sworn according to law, did
`
`depose and saythat:
`
`1.
`
`I am the attorney ofrecord for plaintiff and judgment creditor Prassas
`
`Capital, LLC (“Judgment Creditor’), in this action.
`
`2.
`
`Myoffice is located at Fox Rothschild LLP, 919 N. MarketStreet, Suite
`
`300, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.
`
`By
`
`Judgment Creditor’s last-known post office address is 3809 E Marble
`
`Peak PL, Tuscon, Arizona 85718.
`
`Active\107215665.v1-1/29/20
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jan 30 2020 11:05AM EST
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`Defendant andjudgmentdebtor is Blue Sphere Corporation (“Judgm
`
`Transaction ID 64672495
`
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`4.
`
`Debtor”).
`
`5.
`
`Judgment Debtor’s last-known postoffice address is 301 McCullough
`
`Drive, 4" Floor, Charlotte, North Carolina 28262.
`
`6.
`
`On August 6, 2019, the United States District Court for the Western
`
`District of North Carolina Charlotte Division (“North Carolina District Court”)
`
`entered a judgment in favor of Judgment Creditor against Judgment Debtor for
`
`$1,953,318.52.
`
`7.
`
`The foregoing judgmententered in the North Carolina District Court is
`
`valid, enforceable and remainsunsatisfied.
`
`8.
`
`There is now due, over and aboveall legal set-offs, the principal amount
`
`of $1,953,318.52 plus $50.00 for Court costs.
`
`SWORN to and SUBSCRIBEDbefore me, the day and yearaforesaid.
`
`NEAL J. LEVITSKY, ESQUIRE (#2092)
`
`OTARY PUBLIC
`Commission Expires:
`
`/-F%- 202
`
`My Commission Expires January 9, 2021
`
`BARBARAJ. MILLER
`NOTARY PUBLIC
`STATE OF DELAWARE
`
`Active\107215665.v1-1/29/20
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jan 30 2020 11:05AM EST
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`Transaction ID 64672495
`
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`ay Fox Rothschild ue
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`919 North Market Street, Suite 300
`P.O. Box 2323
`
`Wilmington, DE 19899-2323
`Tel (302) 654-7444 Fax (302) 656-8920
`www.foxrothschild.com
`
`NEALJ. LEVITSKY
`Direct No: 302.622.4200
`Email: nlevitsky@FoxRothschild.com
`
`January 29, 2020
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
`Prothonotary’s Office
`Superior Court of the State of Delaware
`Leonard L. Williams Justice Center
`500 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`
`Re:
`
`Prassas Capital, LLC v. Blue Sphere Corporation, United States
`District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Charlotte
`Division; C.A. No. 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCKSSE
`
`Dear Sir/Madam:
`
`Enclosedforfiling, pursuant to the Uniform EnforcementofForeign Judgments Act,
`10 Del. C. §§ 4781-4787, are the following documents:
`
`1. Affidavit of Neal J. Levitsky, pursuant to 10 Del. C. § 4783(a),listing the names
`and last-known post office addresses of the Judgment Debtor and Judgment
`Creditor;
`
`2. A certified copy of the United States District Court for the Western District of
`_ North Carolina Charlotte Division judgmentin the amount of $1,953,318.52.
`
`Colorado
`California
`Nevada
`New Jersey
`
`Delaware
`New York
`
`Florida
`District of Columbia
`North Carolina
`Pennsylvania
`
`Georgia
`South Carolina
`
`Illinois
`Texas
`
`Minnesota
`Washington
`
`A Pennsylvania Limited Liability Partnership
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jan 30 2020 11:05AM EST
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`Transaction ID 64672495
`
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`cy Fox Rothschild up
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`January 29, 2020
`Page 2
`
`Please record these documents, mail notice to the Judgment Debtorand file the Final
`
`Judgment. We understandthat no execution on the foreign judgment filed herewith
`shall issue until twenty (20) days after the foreign judgmentisfiled.
`
`
`
`Respectfully yours,
`
`Enclosures
`
`107216092.v1
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jan 30 2020 11:05AM EST
`Transaction ID 64672495
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT 2
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
`CHARLOTTE DIVISION
`3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK
`
`
` )
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`PRASSAS CAPITAL, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`BLUE SPHERE CORPORATION,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend
`
`Judgment. (Doc. No. 130.)
`
`I.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`This action arose out of a contract dispute between two entities, Plaintiff
`
`Prassas Capital, LLC (“PC”) and Defendant Blue Sphere Corporation (“BSC”), both
`
`of whom asserted claims for breach of contract. PC and BSC entered into an
`
`Engagement Agreement (the “Agreement”) under which PC agreed to provide
`
`financial advisory services to BSC in connection with BSC’s waste-to-energy projects
`
`located in the United States. In return, BSC agreed to pay PC a financing fee upon
`
`the first closing of financing with any source. Ultimately, BSC obtained financing for
`
`two projects, one in North Carolina (the “NC Project”) and one in Rhode Island (the
`
`“RI Project”). PC brought this action to recover its financing fee for both of these
`
`projects.
`
`Following a jury trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of PC, finding that
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document 151 Filed 02/06/20 Page 1 of 5
`
`

`

`PC was entitled to recover from BSC damages in the total amount of $1,953,318.52,
`
`consisting of $1,340,651.52 for the NC Project and $612,667 for the RI Project. (Doc.
`
`No. 126.) The jury also found in favor of PC on BSC’s breach of contract counterclaim.
`
`The Court thereafter entered judgment in accordance with the jury’s verdict. (Doc.
`
`No. 129.)
`
`II.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`PC moves to amend the judgment to include pre- and post-judgment interest.
`
`BSC does not oppose the motion with respect to post-judgment interest. Therefore,
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, the Court grants PC’s motion as to post-judgment
`
`interest, which shall accrue at the statutory rate of 1.94% per annum from August 7,
`
`2019 until satisfaction in full.
`
`With respect to prejudgment interest, PC contends that under Ariz. Rev. Stat.
`
`§ 44-1201, it is entitled to prejudgment interest from the date the financing fees
`
`became due under the Agreement. BSC does not dispute the application of Arizona
`
`law or PC’s calculations of prejudgment interest but contends that prejudgment
`
`interest should not be awarded because PC did not make a demand for a sum certain.
`
`BSC further contends that even if prejudgment interest is awarded, it should be
`
`calculated from the date the complaint was filed.
`
`Under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1201A, prejudgment interest on any indebtedness
`
`shall be at a rate of 10% per annum. Indebtedness refers to an amount of money that
`
`is owed, even if litigation and a judgment are necessary to collect the debt. Ariz. State
`
`Univ. Bd. of Regents v. Ariz. State Ret. Sys., 396 P.3d 623, 625–26 (Ariz. Ct. App.
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document 151 Filed 02/06/20 Page 2 of 5
`
`2
`
`

`

`2017). Therefore, section 44-1201A applies to PC’s claim.
`
`Prejudgment interest on a liquidated claim is a matter of right. Metzler v. BCI
`
`Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of L.A., 329 P.3d 1043, 1046 (Ariz. 2014). “[A] claim is
`
`liquidated if the plaintiffs provide a basis for precisely calculating the amounts
`
`claimed.” Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young, 917 P.2d 222, 237 (Ariz. 1996). “Thus, if
`
`one accepts the evidence and can calculate exactly the amount of damages without
`
`relying on the opinion or discretion of a judge or jury, the claim is liquidated.”
`
`Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Cendejas, 205 P.3d 1128, 1135 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009); see also
`
`Precision Heavy Haul, Inc. v. Trail King Indus., 228 P.3d 895, 898 (Ariz. Ct. App.
`
`2010) (“[A]lthough a jury may have to make factual findings in a plaintiff’s favor in
`
`order to determine the amount of damages, as long as the evidence furnish data
`
`which, if believed, makes it possible to compute the amount with exactness, the claim
`
`is liquidated.” (quotation marks omitted)).
`
`Here, the Agreement required BSC to pay PC a financing fee equal to 6% of
`
`the traditional equity raised. Thus, the amount can be determined with exactness,
`
`and PC’s claim is liquidated. As such, PC is entitled to prejudgment interest as a
`
`matter of right.
`
`“As a general rule, the trial judge should calculate prejudgment interest from
`
`the date the claim becomes due.” Gemstar Ltd., 917 P.2d at 237; Precision Heavy
`
`Haul, Inc., 228 P.3d at 899 (“Interest generally is calculated from the date the claim
`
`becomes due or a party becomes obligated to pay.” (quotation marks omitted)). Only
`
`in the case of unconditional money debts (those with no definite time for payment)
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document 151 Filed 02/06/20 Page 3 of 5
`
`3
`
`

`

`does prejudgment interest accrue from the date plaintiff makes a demand. Gemstar
`
`Ltd., 917 P.2d at 238.
`
`Here, there was a definite time for payment. The Agreement specified that
`
`BSC was to pay PC a financing fee upon the first closing of financing with any source.
`
`Thus, PC was not required to make a demand, and prejudgment interest accrues from
`
`the date PC’s claim became due.
`
`BSC closed on financing for the NC Project on January 30, 2015 pursuant to
`
`which $27,344,192 of traditional equity was committed to the NC Project. (Pl.’s Trial
`
`Ex. 19 at BSC_000195; Pl.’s Trial Ex. 29.) Accordingly, on January 30, 2015, BSC
`
`became obligated to pay PC a financing fee equal to 6% of $27,344,192. BSC made a
`
`partial payment on this financing fee, and the jury awarded the remaining
`
`$1,340,651.52 to PC. Therefore, PC is entitled to prejudgment interest on
`
`$1,340,651.52 at a rate of 10% per annum from January 30, 2015 to August 6, 2019
`
`(the date of the judgment). This amounts to $605,680.65 in prejudgment interest on
`
`the jury’s award for the NC Project.
`
`BSC closed on financing for the RI Project on April 8, 2015 pursuant to which
`
`$19,100,000 of traditional equity was committed to the RI Project. (See Pl.’s Trial Ex.
`
`20 at BSC_000055; Pl.’s Trial Ex. 30.) Accordingly, on April 8, 2015, BSC became
`
`obligated to pay PC a financing fee equal to 6% of $19,100,000. BSC made a partial
`
`payment on this financing fee, and the jury awarded the remaining $612,667 to PC.
`
`Therefore, PC is entitled to prejudgment interest on $612,667 at a rate of 10% per
`
`annum from April 8, 2015 to August 6, 2019. This amounts to $265,377.13 in
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document 151 Filed 02/06/20 Page 4 of 5
`
`4
`
`

`

`prejudgment interest on the jury’s award for the RI Project.
`
` In sum, the Court grants PC’s motion to amend the judgment to include
`
`prejudgment interest in the total amount of $871,057.78.
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Judgment, (Doc. No. 130), is GRANTED;
`
`and
`
`2.
`
`The Judgment, (Doc. No. 129), shall be AMENDED to include
`
`prejudgment interest in the amount of $871,057.78 and post-judgment
`
`interest at the rate of 1.94% per annum from August 7, 2019 until
`
`satisfaction in full.
`
`
`
`
`
`Signed: February 6, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document 151 Filed 02/06/20 Page 5 of 5
`
`5
`
`

`

`United States District Court
`Western District of North Carolina
`Charlotte Division
`
`AMENDED JUDGMENT IN CASE
`
`3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK
`
`Prassas Capital, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`vs.
`
`Blue Sphere Corporation,
`Defendant(s).
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` DECISION BY COURT. This action having come before the Court by Jury Trial and a decision
`having been rendered and Motion to Amend Judgment.
`
`IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is hereby entered in accordance with the
`Jury Verdict entered July 31, 2019 and Order Amending Judgment entered on 2/6/2020.
`
`IT IS ORDERED that prejudgment interest in the amount of $871,057.78 and post-judgment
`interest at the rate of 1.94% pre annum from August 7, 2019 until satisfaction in full, is entered
`in accordance with Order Amending Judgment (doc. 151).
`
`February 6, 2020
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00131-RJC-DCK Document 152 Filed 02/06/20 Page 1 of 1
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT 3
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sheriff's Office
` State of Delaware
`New Castle County
`800 N. French Street, 5th Floor
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`Scott T. Phillips
`Sheriff
`302-395-8450, Fax: 302-395-8460
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Court Case # N20J-00626
`Sheriff # 20-001767
`
`
`Fi Fa Garnishment
`All Rights
`
`
`3/9/2020
`
`PRASSAS CAPITAL LLC
`vs
`BLUE SPHERE CORPORATION
`
`
`Entity - RHODE ISLAND ENERGY PARTNERS LLC
`
`On 3/6/2020 at 10:09 AM a copy of the within writ together with a copy of the Fi Fa
`Garnishment were served upon Litigation Management Representative, a representative for the
`registered agent 251 LITTLE FALLS DRIVE WILMINGTON, DE 19808 .
`
`
`
`Fees Paid: $30.00
`
`Per: Deputy Sheriff, Jermaine Richardson
`
`SO ANS;
`
`
`
` SHERIFF
`
`
`
`PER Lelitia Gasby
`
`
`
`
`EFiled: Mar 09 2020 10:07AM EDT
`Transaction ID 64803028
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sheriff's Office
` State of Delaware
`New Castle County
`800 N. French Street, 5th Floor
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`Scott T. Phillips
`Sheriff
`302-395-8450, Fax: 302-395-8460
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Court Case # N20J-00626
`Sheriff # 20-001767
`
`
`Fi Fa Garnishment
`All Rights
`
`
`3/9/2020
`
`PRASSAS CAPITAL LLC
`vs
`BLUE SPHERE CORPORATION
`
`
`Entity - CONCORD ENERGY PARTNERS LLC
`
`On 3/6/2020 at 10:09 AM a copy of the within writ together with a copy of the Fi Fa
`Garnishment were served upon Litigation Management Representative, a representative for the
`registered agent 251 LITTLE FALLS DRIVE WILMINGTON, DE 19808 .
`
`
`
`Fees Paid: $30.00
`
`Per: Deputy Sheriff, Jermaine Richardson
`
`SO ANS;
`
`
`
` SHERIFF
`
`
`
`PER Lelitia Gasby
`
`
`
`
`EFiled: Mar 09 2020 10:07AM EDT
`Transaction ID 64803030
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`
`PRASSAS CAPITAL, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`BLUE SPHERE CORPORATION,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No.: N20J-00626
`
`
`Execution No.: _______________
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`PRAECIPE
`
`
`
`TO: Prothonotary
`
`PLEASE ISSUE the attached Writs Of Attachment to the Sheriff of New
`
`Castle County, with instructions to lay the attachment in the hands of Corporation
`
`Service Company as Registered Agent for both Rhode Island Energy Partners,
`
`LLC and Concord Energy Partners, LLC. Corporation Service Company is located
`
`at:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Corporation Service Company
`251 Little Falls Drive
`Wilmington, DE 19808
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`due and owing to Blue Sphere Corporation to satisfy the judgment which Prassas
`
`To Attach: All funds coming into the possession of:
`
`
`Rhode Island Energy Partners, LLC and
`
`
`Concord Energy Partners, LLC
`
`Capital, LLC holds against it and which is described in the attached Writ of
`
`Attachment.
`
`
`
`
`Active\107982464.v1-2/21/20
`
`
`
`EFiled: Feb 21 2020 02:35PM EST
`Transaction ID 64749236
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Neal J. Levitsky
`Neal J. Levitsky, Esquire (No. 2092)
`Katelyn M. Crawford (No. 6591)
`919 North Market Street, Suite 300
`Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2323
`Tel: (302) 654-7444
`Fax: (302) 656-8920
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff,
`Prassas Capital, LLC
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 21, 2020
`
`
`Active\107982464.v1-2/21/20
`
`

`

`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
`
`
`PRASSAS CAPITAL, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`BLUE SPHERE CORPORATION,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No.: N20J-00626
`
`
`Execution No.: _______________
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`WRIT OF ATTACHMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`TO: The Sheriff of New Castle County for the State of Delaware
`
`YOU ARE COMMANDED
`
`(i)
`
`to serve these Writs of Attachment on:
`
`
`
`- and –
`
`Rhode Island Energy Partners, LLC
`c/o Registered Agent, Corporation Service Company
`251 Little Falls Drive
`Wilmington, DE 19808
`
`
`
`Concord Energy Partners, LLC
`c/o Registered Agent, Corporation Service Company
`251 Little Falls Drive
`Wilmington, DE 19808
`
`to attach any and all funds, moneys, commissions, rights,
`
`
`
`
`
`(ii)
`
`credits and/or distributions to satisfy a debt owed to the above-named Plaintiff by
`
`the Defendant in the amount of $1,953,318.52 according to the above-captioned
`
`judgment of the Superior Court of the State of Delaware (“Superior Court”).
`
`
`Active\107982464.v1-2/21/20
`
`
`
`EFiled: Feb 21 2020 02:35PM EST
`Transaction ID 64749236
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`TO THE DEFENDANT ATTACHED PARTIES:
`
`The Superior Court requires you to: (i) deliver to Rhode Island Energy
`
`Partners, LLC and Concord Energy Partners, LLC, a copy of this writ; (ii) inform
`
`Neal J. Levitsky, Esquire of Fox Rothschild LLP, 919 N. Market Street, Suite 300,
`
`Wilmington Delaware 19801, of all money, distributions, commissions and/or
`
`other funds belonging to Defendants which you currently possess and/or anticipate
`
`receiving. As the Attached Parties, you are to retain the funds stated by you in
`
`response to the above. You are to send the amounts withheld directly to the
`
`Plaintiff or his legal representative and not to the Court. All such funds, money,
`
`etc… must be held for the benefit of the Judgment/Creditor and may not be
`
`disbursed to the Judgment/Debtors except upon order of the Court. You must do
`
`so within 20 days after service of this Writ upon you, not counting the day that you
`
`received this Writ. Your failure to respond may result in a default judgment
`
`against you for the amounts the Defendant owes as shown below. The amounts the
`
`Defendant owes are:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Debt:
`Prejudgment Interest at:
`Postjudgment Interest at:
`Costs:
`Prothonotary:
`Filing Fees:
`Sheriff Filing & Execution Fees:
`Garnishee Fees:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$1,953,318.52
`1.94% from August 7, 2019
`Legal Rate
`
`$50.00
`
`$30.00
`
`
`Active\107982464.v1-2/21/20
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Prothonotary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Issued: ____________________, 2020
`
`Return this Writ on or before
`
`By Attorney:
`
`Neal J. Levitsky, Esquire (No. 2092)
`Katelyn Crawford, Esquire (No. 6591)
`FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
`919 North Market Street, Suite 300
`Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2323
`Tel: (302) 654-7444
`Fax: (302) 656-8920
`nlevitsky@foxrothschild.com
`kcrawford@foxrothschild.com
`
`
`
`Active\107982464.v1-2/21/20
`
`

`

`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
`
`ShilndsBey?ObDanas4732
`ENRRAINE
`
`C.A. No.: N20J-00626
`
`Execution No.:
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`PRASSAS CAPITAL, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Vv.
`
`)
`)
`BLUE SPHERE CORPORATION, |)
`)
`)
`
`Defendant.
`
`PRAECIPE
`
`TO:
`
`Prothonotary
`
`PLEASE ISSUE the attached Writs Of Attachment to the Sheriff of New
`
`Castle County, with instructions to lay the attachment in the hands of Corporation
`
`Service Company as Registered Agent for both Rhode Island Energy Partners,
`
`LLC and Concord Energy Partners, LLC. Corporation Service Companyis located
`™
`ms
`
`at:
`
`Corporation Service Company
`251 Little Falls Drive
`Wilmington, DE 19808
`
`To Attach: All funds coming into the possessionof:
`Rhode Island Energy Partners, LLC and
`Concord Energy Partners, LLC
`
`ps

`oD
`ma
`Pt =
`nN
`_ of
`- 5
`RS
`>
`Ro
`=
`.
`
`~
`
`due and owing to Blue Sphere Corporation to satisfy the judgment which Prassas
`
`Capital, LLC holds against
`
`it and which is described in the attached Writ of
`
`Attachment.
`
`Active\107982464.v1-2/21/20 QeEIEI55cn76050950
`
`
`
`AMT:__*© 39,©i,
`
`WRIT iSSUED
`FEB 2.7
`
`2020
`
`
`
`EFiled: Feb 26 2020 12:26PM EST
`Transaction ID 64763171
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
`
`EFiled: Feb 26 2020 12:26PME¥
`Transaction ID 64763171
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`/s/ Neal J. Levitsky
`Neal J. Levitsky, Esquire (No. 2092)
`Katelyn M. Crawford (No. 6591)
`919 North Market Street, Suite 300
`Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2323
`Tel: (302) 654-7444
`Fax: (302) 656-8920
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff,
`Prassas Capital, LLC
`
`Dated: February 21, 2020
`
`Active: 10798 2464.¥ 1-2/2 1/20
`
`
`
`EFiled: Feb 26 2020 12:26PM EST
`Transaction ID 64763171
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT 4
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`
`
`

`

`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
`
`Transaction ID 66692038
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`i
`ae
`
` Te
`
`_
`
`cs
`-
`o of
`>
`
`;
`
`7
`
`
`
`) )
`
`))
`
`) C.A. No. N20J-00626
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`PRASSAS CAPITAL, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`BLUE SPHERE CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`may
`ORDER GRANTING PRASSAS CAPITAL LLC’S MOTION FOR RULE
`2
`TO SHOW CAUSE AND DENYING INTERESTED THIRD PARTIES
`CONCORD ENERGY PARTNERS, LLC AND RHODE ISLAND ENERGY
`PARTNERS, LLC’S JOINT MOTION TO STAY
`
`This cause having come before the Court on an Action to Enforce Judgment
`
`and having heard and considered this Motion for Rule to Show Cause against
`
`Interested Third Parties Concord Energy Partners, LLC (“CEP”) and Rhode Island
`
`Energy Partners, LLC (“RIEP”) and the Interested Third Parties’ Joint Motion to
`
`Staythis action,
`
`WHEREASit appearing that on August 6, 2019, after a jurytrial, the District
`
`Court for the Western District of North Carolina entered judgment for Prassas
`
`Capital, LLC (‘Plaintiff’) against Defendant Blue Sphere Corporation in the
`
`principal amount of $1,953,318.52;!
`
`‘ See Foreign Judgment Complaint, D.1. 1.
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jun 16 2021 12:12PM EDT
`Transaction ID 66692038
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`

`

`WHEREASon November 19, 2019, Plaintiff recorded its judgmentin Ne...
`
`Transaction ID 66692038
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`
`
`York;
`
`WHEREAS on January 30, 2020, Plaintiff recorded its judgment
`
`in
`
`Delaware’ and filed a praecipe with the Prothonotary requesting that it direct the
`
`Sheriff of NewCastle Countyto serve writs of attachment on CEP and RIEP;3
`
`WHEREASon February 27, 2020, writs fieri facias were issued and served
`
`upon CEP and RIEP* with returns of service filed on March 9, 2020;5
`
`WHEREASonFebruary5, 2021, CEP and RIEP commenced aninterpleader
`
`action in New York regarding Plaintiff's November 19, 2019, filing ofjudgment;
`
`WHEREAS on March 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed this Motion for Rule to Show
`
`Cause under 10 De/. C. § 3509 to compel CEP and RIEP to answer or otherwise
`
`plead in responseto the writs frerifacias served upon them;°
`
`WHEREASonApril 9, 2021, CEP and RIEPfiled a Joint Motion to Stay the
`
`Delaware action;’
`
`* See Foreign Judgment Complaint. D.1. 1.
`* See Praecipe, D.I. 2.
`* Writs [ssued. II. 4.
`* See Sheriff's Return, D.I. 5; Sheriffs Return, D.1. 6.
`* See Motion for Rule to Show Cause, D.I, 10.
`,
`* See Interested Third Parties Concord Energy Partners, LLC and Rhode tsland Energy Partner’s [.LC
`Joint Motion to Stay, D.L. 21.
`
`EFiled: Jun 16 2021 12:12PM EDT
`Transaction ID 66692038
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`

`

`Transaction ID 66692038
`
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`parties to supplementthe record with additional submissions that concluded briefing
`
`on May 19, 2021;8
`
`WHEREASCEPand RIEP argue that this Court should consider its Motion
`
`to Stay undertheforum non conveniens analysisset forth in AfeWane:?
`
`WHEREASPlaintiff argues that this Court should instead consider the
`
`Motionto Stay underthe traditionalforwm non conveniensanalysis set forth in Cryo-
`
`Maid,’” arguing alternatively that even under McWane, CEP and RIEP fail
`
`to
`
`demonstrate that the November 2019 filing in New York constitutes an “action”
`
`under Delaware law:
`
`WHEREASthe Court considered the respective and distinct arguments for
`
`the applicability of the forum non conveniens doctrines found under McWane and
`
`Cryo-Maid,;
`
`* See Interested Third Parties’ L.ctter, D.L. 25: Plaintiff's Letter, D.1. 26.
`” See Kennedy v. Barboza, 2016 WL 6276903, at *3 (Del. Super. Oct. 26, 2016) (“The Afe Hane doctrine
`is a three-part analysis. First. this Court must look to whetherthere is a pending action in another
`jurisdiction at the time the Delaware action wasfiled. Second, the Court will compare the pending action
`with the Delaware one to determine whether the pendingaction involves the same parties and identical or
`functionally similar claims. Finally, the Court will determine whetherthe court in the first-filed actionis
`‘capable of delivering prompt and complete justice.) (citing MeWane Cust ron Pipe Corp. v.
`MeDowell-Wellman Eng'g Co. 263 A.2d 281, 283 (Del. 1970)).
`" See Gen. Foods Corp. v. Crvo-Maid, Inc., 198 A.2d 681, 684 (Del. 1964) (stating that a court should
`considerfive factors: “(1) The relative ease ofaccess to proof; (2) the availability of compulsory process
`for witnesses; (3) the possibility of the viewofthe premises. if appropriate, {| (4) all other practical
`problems that would make the trial ofthe case easy, expeditious and inexpensive[:]” and (5) “whether or
`not the controversyis dependent uponthe application of Delaware law which the courts of this State more
`properly should decide than those of anotherjurisdiction.”).
`
`3
`
`EFiled: Jun 16 2021 12:12PM EDT
`Transaction ID 66692038
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`

`

`Transaction ID 66692038
`
`Case No. N20J-00626
`
`York filing constitutes an “action” required under McWane;
`
`WHEREASthe Court agrees with Plaintiffs submissions and authoritythat
`
`the filing of the judgment in New York does not constitute an “action”!! to warrant
`
`the relief requested by CEP and RIEP;"
`
`WHEREASthe New York interpleader,
`
`the only “action” sought to be
`
`litigated in New York. wasfiled after the Delaware action;
`
`WHEREASa Motion to Stay based on forum non conveniens grounds is
`
`“rarely granted because Delaware

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket