SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PURSUANT TO RULE 3(A)
`OF THE RULES OF THE COURT OF CHANCERY
`
`The information contained herein is for the use by the Court for statistical and administrative purposes. Nothing
`in this document shall be deemed binding for purposes of the merits of the case.
`
`1. Case caption: Roman Lavrenov, derivatively on behalf of Rivian Automotive, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Robert
`Scaringe, Claire McDonough, Pamela Thomas-Graham, Karen Boone, Sanford Schwartz, Rose Marcario, Jay
`Flatley, Peter Krawiec, and John Krafcik, Defendants, and Rivian Automotive, Inc., Nominal Defendant.
`
`2. Date filed: March 29, 2024
`
`3. Name and address of plaintiff(s): Seth D. Rigrodsky (#3147), Gina M. Serra (#5387), Herbert W. Mondros
`(#3308), Rigrodsky Law, P.A., 300 Delaware Avenue, Suite 210, Wilmington, DE 19801, (302) 295-5310
`
`4. Short statement and nature of claim(s) asserted: Stockholder derivative action.
`
`5. Substantive field of law involved (check one):
`____Administrative law
`____Labor law
`____Commercial law
`____Real Property
`____Constitutional law
`____348 Deed Restriction
`_X__Corporation law
`____Zoning
` ____Trade secrets/trade mark/or other intellectual property
`
`
`
`____Trusts, Wills and Estates
`____Consent trust petitions
`____Partition
`____Rapid Arbitration (Rules 96,97)
` ___ Other
`
`6. Identify any related cases, including any Register of Wills matter. This question is intended to promote
`jurisdiction efficiency by assigning cases involving similar parties or issues to a single judicial officer. By signing
`this form, an attorney represents that the attorney has done reasonable diligence sufficient to respond to this
`question. Kathleen Miller v. Robert J. Scaringe, et al., C.A. No. 2024-0127-MTZ and Evaristo Sarabia v. Robert
`J. Scaringe, et al., C.A. No. 2024-0288-MTZ
`
`7. State all bases for the court’s exercise of subject matter jurisdiction by citing to the relevant statute. Specify if
`8 Del. C. § 111, 6 Del. C. § 17-111, or 6 Del. C. § 18-111. State if the case seeks monetary relief, even if
`secondarily or in the alternative, under a merger agreement, asset purchase agreement, or equity purchase
`agreement. 10 Del. C. § 3114 and 10 Del. C. § 3111
`
`8. If the complaint initiates a summary proceeding under Sections 8 Del. C. §§ 145(k), 205, 211(c), 220, or
`comparable statutes, check here ____. (If #8 is checked, you must either (i) file a motion to expedite with a
`proposed form of order identifying the schedule requested or (ii) submit a letter stating that you do not seek an
`expedited schedule and the reason(s)—e.g., you have filed to preserve standing and do not seek immediate relief.)
`
`9. If the complaint is accompanied by a request for a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, a
`status quo order, or expedited proceedings other than in a summary proceeding, check here ___. (If #9 is checked,
`a motion to expedite must accompany the transaction with a proposed form of order identifying the schedule
`requested.)
`
`10. If counsel believes that the case should not be assigned to a Master in the first instance, check here and
`attach a statement of good cause. ____
`
`/s/ Seth D. Rigrodsky (#3147)
`Signature of Plaintiff(s)
`
`3/29/24
`
`EFiled: Mar 29 2024 07:48PM EDT
`Transaction ID 72642690
`Case No. 2024-0330-
`
`