throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EFiled: Jun 20 2024 03:45PMERT YO
`Case No.Multi-Case
`ioLy
`Transaction ID 73445620
`(Afee =}
`
`OrAS
`
`EXHIBIT B
`EXHIBIT B
`
`EFiled: Jun 20 2024 03:45PM EDT
`Transaction ID 73445620
`Case No. Multi-Case
`
`

`

`SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
`
`Together with its predecessor firms, Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP has been in operation for
`over forty years. In addition to prosecuting cases in California federal and state courts, the firm
`has been actively involved in securities, antitrust, unfair competition, and employment class
`actions throughout the United States. Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe has served as Lead Counsel
`or Co-Lead Counsel in class actions and shareholder derivative actions that have produced
`recoveries valued at over $850 million.
`
`! Tucker v. Scrushy, No. CV-02-5212 (AEH) (Ala. Cir., Jefferson Cty.). Co-Lead Counsel
`in shareholder derivative action on behalf of HealthSouth Corporation alleging breaches
`of fiduciary duty and insider trading arising from a restatement of financial results.
`Plaintiffs won partial summary judgment against former Chief Executive Officer Richard
`Scrushy for restitution of $47.8 million. Plaintiffs also settled HealthSouth’s claims
`against additional directors and officers for $100 million and against its investment
`banker for an additional $133 million. At trial against Mr. Scrushy on additional claims,
`Plaintiffs obtained a $2.9 billion judgment, which was later upheld by the Alabama
`Supreme Court.
`
`!
`
`In re Google AdWords Litigation, No. 5:08-CV-03369-EJD (N.D. Cal.). Lead Counsel
`for nationwide class of advertisers alleging Google placed their ads on low-quality parked
`domains and error pages in violation of California’s false advertising laws. We obtained a
`$22.5 million settlement on behalf of over one million class members, which was finally
`approved in the Northern District of California.
`
`! Ciapessoni et al. v. United States, No. 1:15-cv-00938-LAS (Fed. Cl.). Co-Counsel for
`nationwide class of raisin growers alleging that the federal government’s practice of
`setting aside a portion of their raisin crop constituted an unconstitutional taking of private
`property for public use in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. We
`obtained an $85.8 million settlement on behalf of over 6,000 raisin growers who opted-in
`to the class, which was finally approved by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
`
`! Poertner v. The Gillette Company, No. 12-CV-803 (M.D. Fla.). Co-Lead Counsel in
`nationwide consumer class action alleging false and misleading advertising of certain
`Duracell batteries regarding the batteries’ longevity, in violation of various state laws.
`We obtained a settlement valued at approximately $50 million on behalf of
`approximately 7.26 million class members.
`
`!
`
`In re The Home Depot, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, No. 1:15-CV-2999-
`TWT (N.D. Ga.). Co-Lead Counsel in shareholder derivative action alleging breaches of
`fiduciary duty against certain officers and directors concerning The Home Depot 2014
`data breach. We successfully resolved the litigation through settlement by causing The
`Home Depot to enact comprehensive corporate governance reforms and structural
`improvements to its data security protocols.
`
`! Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Derivative Litigation, No. 753-VCS (Del. Ch.).
`As co-counsel, we helped obtain a $205 million settlement in a shareholder derivative
`
`Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP
`
`1
`
`sjk.law
`
`

`

`action brought on behalf of Marsh & McLennan Companies (“MMC”). The complaint
`alleged that MMC, the world’s largest insurance broker, failed to adequately disclose that
`it was paid commissions to steer insurance business to favored companies. When the
`practices were revealed, MMC paid huge fines, to the detriment of its shareholders.
`
`In re Banc of California Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, No. 8:19-cv-00621-
`DMG-DFM (C.D. Cal.). Co-lead counsel in shareholder derivative action alleging breach
`of fiduciary duty against officers and directors based on alleged false disclosures and
`conflicts of interest. Plaintiffs obtained a settlement improving whistleblower procedures.
`
`In re Mattel, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Demand Refusal Litigation, No. 2021-0782-
`MTZ (Del. Ch.). Co-lead counsel in shareholder derivative action alleging breach of
`fiduciary duty against officers and directors arising out of a financial restatement.
`Plaintiffs obtained a $7 million cash settlement and governance reforms.
`
`!
`
`!
`
`! 3M Transparent Tape Cases, No. 4:00-2810-CW (N.D. Cal.). Co-Lead Counsel in
`nationwide antitrust class action on behalf of purchasers of 3M transparent tape. Plaintiffs
`claimed that 3M maintained an unlawful monopoly in the market for invisible and
`transparent tape designed to restrict the availability of lower-priced comparable products
`to consumers and maintain supracompetitive prices for its own retail products. We
`obtained a settlement valued at approximately $42 million.
`
`! Bonneville Pacific Corporation Securities Litigation, No. 2:92-C-0181-DS (D. Utah).
`Co-Lead Counsel in securities class action involving fraudulent financial statements by a
`power cogeneration company. We obtained settlements totaling $26 million for the class,
`which recovered 100% of its damages, in one of the largest securities fraud cases in Utah
`history. We also obtained an important decision from the Utah Supreme Court holding
`that plaintiffs need not plead or prove reliance under the Utah Uniform Securities Act.
`
`! Qwest Communications International, Inc. Derivative Litigation, No. 02-CV-8188
`(Colo. Dist. Ct., Denver). Co-Lead Counsel in shareholder derivative action alleging
`breaches of fiduciary duty and insider trading arising out of the telecommunications
`company’s earnings restatement. We obtained a $25 million settlement on the company’s
`behalf.
`
`! Pfeiffer v. Toll, No. 4140-VCL (Del. Ch.). Primary counsel in shareholder derivative
`action alleging breaches of fiduciary duty and insider trading arising out of missed
`earnings projections. We recovered a $16.25 million settlement on the company’s behalf
`and obtained a key legal ruling rejecting the argument that Delaware’s leading insider
`trading precedent should be overruled. Pfeiffer v. Toll, 989 A.2d 683 (Del. Ch. 2010).
`
`! In re MacBook Keyb. Litig., No. 5:18-cv-02813 (N.D. Cal.). Member of the Executive
`Committee on behalf of a certified class of Apple customers with defective MacBook
`keyboards. We obtained a $50 million settlement for over 15 million class computers.
`
`! In re Altria Group, Inc. Derivative Litig., No. 3:20-cv-00772 (E.D. Va.). Co-counsel in
`shareholder derivative action alleging breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with
`
`Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP
`
`2
`
`sjk.law
`
`

`

`Altria’s acquisition of JUUL Labs. Plaintiffs obtained a settlement providing for a $117
`million funding commitment by Altria for youth prevention programs, appointment of an
`independent monitor to oversee the spending, and corporate governance reforms.
`
`! Public School Teachers’ Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago v. Gary Guthart, et
`al., Case No. CIV-526930 (San Mateo County Superior Court). Co-counsel in shareholder
`derivative action alleging breaches of fiduciary duty and insider trading against officers
`and directors. Plaintiff obtained a settlement including a return to the company of cash and
`options by certain officers and directors, and corporate governance reforms.
`
`Current Court-Appointed Leadership Positions
`
`!
`
`In re Wag Hotels, Inc. Pet Safety Litigation, No. 4:24-cv-01162-JST (N.D. Cal.). Co-
`Interim Class Counsel in consumer class action involving allegedly false and misleading
`advertising of pet boarding, daycare, and grooming services.
`
`! Fisher v. United States, No. 13-CV-608-MMS (Fed. Cl.). Lead Counsel in shareholder
`derivative action on behalf of Fannie Mae alleging unconstitutional taking of private
`property against U.S. government based on net worth sweep of all profits.
`
`!
`
`!
`
`!
`
`!
`
`In re Myriad Genetics, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, No. 2021-0686-SG (Del.
`Ch.). Co-Lead Counsel in shareholder derivative action alleging breaches of fiduciary
`duty against certain of Myriad Genetics, Inc.’s officers and directors.
`
`In re Spruce Power Holding Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation, No. 23-cv-
`289-MN (D. Del.). Co-Lead Counsel in shareholder derivative action alleging breaches of
`fiduciary duty and additional claims against certain of Spruce Power Holding
`Corporation’s officers and directors.
`
`In re Lordstown Motors Corp. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, No. 2021-1049-LWW
`(Del. Ch.). Co-Lead Counsel in shareholder derivative action alleging breaches of
`fiduciary duty and additional claims against certain of Lordstown Motors Corp.’s officers
`and directors.
`
`In re RenovaCare Derivative Litigation, No. 21-cv-20569 (D.N.J.). Co-Lead Counsel in
`shareholder derivative action alleging breaches of fiduciary duty against certain of
`RenovaCare, Inc.’s officers and directors.
`
`! Doe et al. v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc. et al., No. 3:23-cv-00501-AMO (N.D. Cal.). Liaison
`counsel in privacy class action against GoodRx, Criteo, Meta Platforms, and Google for
`the unauthorized use of over 20 million consumers’ personal health information.
`Responsible for class certification, expert discovery, and third-party discovery.
`
`!
`
`In re LastPass Data Security Incident Litigation, No. 22-cv-12047-PBS (D. Mass.), No.
`22-cv- 12047 (D. Mass.). Member of the Executive Committee and Chair of Third-Party
`Discovery Committee in data breach class action involving the breach of 33 million
`users’ password vaults.
`
`Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP
`
`3
`
`sjk.law
`
`

`

`! Skurauskis et al. v. NationsBenefits Holdings, LLC et al., No. 23-CV-60830-RAR (S.D.
`Fla.). Member of the Executive Committee in data breach class action concerning 3
`million health insurance subscribers’ personal and health records.
`
`!
`
`!
`
`In re HealthEC LLC Data Breach Litigation, No. 2:24-cv-00026-JKS-ESK (D.N.J.)
`Member of Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in data breach class action involving 4.5
`million patients’ health records.
`
`In re Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Data Breach Litigation, No. 3:23-cv-04089-SI
`(N.D. Cal.). Member of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in data breach class action
`concerning breach of personally identifiable information held by the Orrick law firm.
`
`! Paul v. Plank, No. RDB-18-2239 (D. Md.). Member of Executive Committee in
`shareholder derivative action alleging breaches of fiduciary duty and related claims
`against certain of Under Armour, Inc.’s officers and directors.
`
`! Hasson v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, No. 2:23-05039-JMY (E.D. Pa.).
`Member of Executive Committee in data breach class action concerning 36 million
`customer account records.
`
`Attorneys
`
`Robert C. Schubert received a B.S. degree from the New York State School of Industrial and
`Labor Relations at Cornell University in 1966, where he graduated first in his class. He received
`his J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1969, after which he taught law at Columbia
`University and Golden Gate University. He has actively practiced law at both the trial and
`appellate levels. He specializes in complex litigation, particularly securities and antitrust class
`actions and shareholder derivative suits. He is a member of the state and federal bars of
`California, Massachusetts, and New York. Since 1971, he has also arbitrated numerous disputes
`for the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. He is the author of several published articles
`and lectures on class actions at the University of California Hastings College of the Law. Mr.
`Schubert was selected to Super Lawyers from 2007-2009 and 2013-2023.
`
`Willem F. Jonckheer received his B.A. degree from Colgate University in 1990. He was
`awarded his J.D. degree in 1995 from the University of San Francisco School of Law, where he
`served as an article editor on the USF Maritime Law Journal and participated in the Philip C.
`Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition. Mr. Jonckheer was a law intern with the
`Pacific Stock Exchange, where he researched regulatory issues affecting national securities
`exchanges, and the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, where he worked on enforcement
`cases. Mr. Jonckheer was a member of the Board of Trustees of Live Oak School, an
`independent K-8 school in San Francisco, where he served as Chairman of the Audit Committee,
`and as a member of select committees on Head of School compensation and school bylaws. Mr.
`Jonckheer is a member of the Northern California Chapter of the Netherland-America
`Foundation, an organization dedicated to bilateral cultural exchange between the Netherlands
`and the United States. He was admitted to the State Bar of California in 1995.
`
`
`Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP
`
`4
`
`sjk.law
`
`

`

`Dustin L. Schubert received his B.A. from the University of California, Berkeley in 2003. He
`was awarded his J.D. degree in 2007 from Vanderbilt University Law School. Mr. Schubert was
`admitted to the State Bar of California in 2007. He previously interned with the San Francisco
`Superior Court for the Hon. A. James Robertson II and for Bay Area Legal Aid. Mr. Schubert
`was selected to Super Lawyers Rising Stars for 2017 and to Super Lawyers for 2021-2024.
`
`Amber L. Schubert received her J.D. cum laude from the University of San Francisco School of
`Law in 2011, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the USF Law Review. Ms. Schubert
`authored a comment titled Replacement Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court: The Use of
`Temporary Justices to Resolve the Recusal Conundrum, 46 U.S.F. L. Rev. 215 (2011), and was
`awarded Best Oral Argument in the Moot Court Program. Prior to law school, Ms. Schubert
`worked as the Online Editor for the Center for American Progress in Washington, DC and served
`as the Online Media Manager for the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston, MA. She
`has also served as part of the National Advance Staff for the Kerry-Edwards campaign and
`former Vice President Al Gore. She received her B.A. from the University of California,
`Berkeley in 2003. Ms. Schubert was selected to Super Lawyers Rising Stars for 2021. She is
`also an active member of the LGBTQ community.
`
`Daniel L.M. Pulgram received his J.D. cum laude from American University Washington
`College of Law in 2023. A lover of litigation, he was active in the highly competitive mock trial
`honor society at American and competed nationwide. Mr. Pulgram externed with the Honorable
`Chief District Judge Barbra M.G. Lynn in the Northern District of Texas and interned with the
`Atlanta Legal Aid Society. He wants to use the law as a tool to hold the powerful accountable.
`Mr. Pulgram graduated from Kenyon College with a B.S. in Political Science in 2016.
`
`Gregory T. Stuart received his J.D. from the University of California at Davis School of Law in
`2005. In 2002, Mr. Stuart was awarded a B.S. in Business Administration, cum laude, with a
`minor in Philosophy, from Humboldt State University. He participates in most aspects of the
`firm’s practice but has over a decade of focused experience in document discovery, representing
`both producing and receiving parties during that time.
`
`Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP
`
`5
`
`sjk.law
`
`

`

`Multi-Case Filing Detail: The document above has been filed
`and/or served into multiple cases, see the details below including
`the case number and name.
`
`Transaction Details
`
`Court: DE Court of Chancery Civil Action Document Type: Exhibits
`Document Title: Exhibit B - Schubert
`Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP Firm Resume
`Submitted Date & Time: Jun 20 2024 3:45PM
`
`Transaction ID: 73445620
`
`Case Details
`
`Case Number
`
`2024-0127-MTZ
`
`2024-0288-MTZ
`2024-0330-MTZ
`
`Case Name
`STAYED - 4/12/2024 - CONF ORD -
`Briefs/Exhib./Related Papers/MTD - Kathleen Miller v.
`Robert J. Scaringe
`Evaristo Sarabia v. Robert J. Scaringe, et al.
`Roman Lavrenov v. Robert Scaringe
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket