throbber
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
`MIR ANWAR, JEREMY KRELL, and
`ROBERT HOROWITZ,
`Plaintiffs,
`v.
`QUIP NYC INC., SIMON ENEVER,
`WILLIAM MAY, and GEORGE
`WELLS,
`Defendants.
`Civil Action No. 2025-0258-MTZ
`
`PLAINTIFFS, MIR ANWAR, JEREMY KRELL, AND ROBERT
`HOROWITZ’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LIMITED SURREPLY
` Pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 7, Plaintiffs Mir Anwar, Jeremy Krell,
`and Robert Horowitz (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), hereby move this Court for leave
`to file the proposed Limited Surreply Addressing Certain Statements Contained in
`Defendants’ Reply Brief (the “Limited Surreply”), attached hereto as Exhibit A. In
`support of this motion, Plaintiffs respectfully show the Court as follows:
`WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, Plaintiffs’ counsel and Defendants’ counsel met
`and conferred regarding certain representations made in a single paragraph and
`accompanying footnote found between pages 9 and 10 of Defendants’ Reply Brief in
`Further Support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint;
`WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel requested that Defendants join in a stipulation
`granting Plaintiffs leave to file the Limited Surreply addressing those representations,
`and sent Defendants’ counsel an initial draft (since revised) of the Limited Surreply via
`email on May 30, 2025.
`-1-
`EFiled: Jun 11 2025 03:07PM EDT
`Transaction ID 76442218
`Case No. 2025-0258-MTZ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on June 10, 2025, Defendants’ counsel informed Plaintiffs’
`counsel that Defendants do not consent to Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file the
`Limited Surreply, contending that the issues in the Limited Surreply could instead be
`addressed at oral argument.
`WHEREAS, neither Plaintiffs’ counsel nor Defendants’ counsel have
`“contact[ed] the Court to schedule any requested oral argument” as required under
`this Court’s March 28, 2025 Order Governing Briefing on Defendants’ Motion to
`Dismiss;
`WHEREAS, no oral argument is scheduled or likely forthcoming on
`Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss;
`WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ request leave to file the proposed 2.5-page Limited
`Surreply attached hereto, addressing only the challenged representations contained
`in the subject paragraph and footnote;
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs’ request that the Court enter the proposed order
`below, granting leave for Plaintiffs to file the Limited Surreply.
`Respectfully submitted this 11th day of June, 2025.
`Words: 393/3,000 FREEMAN MATHIS & GARY, LLP
` /s/ Daniel M. Young
`OF COUNSEL: Daniel M. Young
` Delaware Bar No. 4945
`Jill R. Dunn* 1521 West Concord Pike, Suite 301
`Cameron N. Regnery* Wilmington, Delaware 19803
`100 Galleria Parkway, Suite 1600 (T): 856-866-8921
`Atlanta, Georgia 30339 Daniel.Young@fmglaw.com
`(T): 770-818-0000 (F): 833-330-3669 Counsel for Plaintiffs
`JDunn@fmglaw.com
`Cameron.Regnery@fmglaw.com
`(* pro hac vice applications forthcoming)
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket