throbber
Case 1:21-cv-02302-TJK Document 1 Filed 08/30/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
`
`
`JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.,
`425 Third Street SW, Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20024,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`Defendant.
`
`____________________________________)
`
`U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
`AND HUMAN SERVICES,
`
`200 Independence Avenue SW
`
`Washington, DC 20201,
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. brings this action against Defendant U.S. Department of
`
`Health and Human Services to compel compliance with the Freedom of Information Act, 5
`
`U.S.C. § 552. As grounds therefor, Plaintiff alleges as follows:
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`
`
`1.
`
`The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B)
`
`and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e).
`
`PARTIES
`
`3.
`
`Judicial Watch, Inc. is a not-for-profit, educational organization incorporated
`
`under the laws of the District of Columbia and headquartered at 425 Third Street SW, Suite 800,
`
`Washington, DC 20024. Plaintiff seeks to promote transparency, accountability, and integrity in
`
`government and fidelity to the rule of law. As part of its mission, Plaintiff regularly requests
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-02302-TJK Document 1 Filed 08/30/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`records from federal agencies, analyzes the responses it receives, and disseminates its findings to
`
`the American public to inform them about “what their government is up to.”
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Defendant U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is an agency of the
`
`U.S. Government and is headquartered at 200 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC
`
`20201. Defendant has possession, custody, and control of records to which Plaintiff seeks
`
`access.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`
`
`5.
`
`On June 8, 2021, Plaintiff sent a FOIA request to the National Institutes of Health
`
`(“NIH”), a component of Defendant U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, seeking
`
`access to:
`
`All emails sent to and from Director Francis Collins related to “gain of function”,
`“hydroxychloroquine”, “HCQ”, and/or “Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
`
`
`The timeframe of the request was identified as October 1, 2019 to June 8, 2021. The request was
`
`submitted via the agency’s online portal.
`
`
`
`By an email dated June 8, 2021, NIH acknowledged receipt of the request and
`
`6.
`
`advised Plaintiff that the request had been designated as FOIA request #56471.
`
`
`
`7.
`
`As of the date of this Complaint, NIH has failed to: (i) determine whether to
`
`comply with the request; (ii) notify Plaintiff of any such determination or the reasons therefor;
`
`(iii) advise Plaintiff of the right to appeal any adverse determination; or (iv) produce the
`
`requested records or otherwise demonstrate that the requested records are exempt from
`
`production.
`
`COUNT I
`(Violation of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552)
`
`Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 7 as if fully stated herein.
`
`8.
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-02302-TJK Document 1 Filed 08/30/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`Defendant is in violation of FOIA.
`
`10.
`
`Plaintiff is being irreparably harmed by Defendant’s violation of FOIA, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff will continue to be irreparably harmed unless Defendant is compelled to comply with
`
`the law.
`
`
`
`
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
`
`12.
`
`To trigger FOIA’s administrative exhaustion requirement, Defendant was
`
`required to make a final determination on Plaintiff’s request by July 8, 2021. Because Defendant
`
`failed to make a final determination on Plaintiff’s request within the time limits set by FOIA,
`
`Plaintiff is deemed to have exhausted its administrative appeal remedies.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court: (1) order Defendant to
`
`conduct a search for any and all records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request and demonstrate
`
`that it employed search methods reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of records responsive
`
`to Plaintiff’s FOIA request; (2) order Defendant to produce, by a date certain, any and all non-
`
`exempt records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request and a Vaughn index of any responsive
`
`records withheld under claim of exemption; (3) enjoin Defendant from continuing to withhold
`
`any and all non-exempt records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request; (4) grant Plaintiff an
`
`award of attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred in this action pursuant to
`
`5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E); and (5) grant Plaintiff such other relief as the Court deems just and
`
`proper.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-02302-TJK Document 1 Filed 08/30/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 30, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Lauren M. Burke
`LAUREN M. BURKE
`DC Bar No. 1028811
`JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
`425 Third Street SW, Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20024
`Tel:
`(202) 646-5172
`Email: lburke@judicialwatch.org
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket