throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00430 Document 1 Filed 02/16/22 Page 1 of 7
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
`
`NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC.
`1111 North Capitol Street, NE
`Washington, DC 20002
`
`and
`
`JINGNAN HUO
`c/o National Public Radio, Inc.
`1111 North Capitol Street, NE
`Washington, DC 20002
`
`Case No:
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF )
`HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`)
`200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
`)
`Washington, DC 20201
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF FOR
`VIOLATION OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
`
`Plaintiffs National Public Radio, Inc. and Jingnan Huo (collectively, “NPR”), by their
`
`undersigned attorneys, allege as follows:
`
`Background
`
`1.
`
`NPR brings this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C.
`
`§ 552, et seq., to enjoin the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”), a Cabinet-
`
`level department of the Federal executive branch, from improperly withholding records
`
`responsive to NPR’s FOIA request submitted on August 18, 2020 (the “Request”).
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00430 Document 1 Filed 02/16/22 Page 2 of 7
`
`2.
`
`NPR’s Request seeks records related to HHS’s dealings with TeleTracking, Inc., a
`
`vendor awarded several multi-million dollar contracts to collect and coordinate COVID-19 data.
`
`NPR’s reporting has raised questions about irregularities in how those contracts were awarded.
`
`3.
`
`The Freedom of Information Act “focuses on the citizens’ right to be informed
`
`about ‘what their government is up to,’” by requiring the release of “[o]fficial information that
`
`sheds light on an agency’s performance of its statutory duties.” DOJ v. Reporters Comm. for
`
`Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 750, 773 (1989) (citation omitted). “[D]isclosure, not
`
`secrecy, is the dominant objective” of FOIA. Dept’t of Interior v. Klamath Water Users
`
`Protective Ass’n, 532 U.S. 1, 8 (2001) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). NPR
`
`plays a critical role in providing information to citizens about “what their government is up to.”
`
`Indeed, the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press is meant to enable journalists
`
`to play an “essential role in our democracy,” to “bare the secrets of government and inform the
`
`people.” New York Times. Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713, 717 (1971) (Black, J. concurring).
`
`4.
`
`Through its FOIA Request, NPR seeks to fulfill its journalistic function and to shine
`
`a public light on the operations of HHS and its managing of COVID-19 data.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`5.
`
`This Court has both subject matter jurisdiction over this action and personal
`
`jurisdiction over the parties pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B). This Court also has jurisdiction
`
`over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 2201(a) and 2202. Venue lies in this district
`
`under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B).
`
`Parties
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiff National Public Radio, Inc. is a non-profit multimedia organization and the
`
`leading provider of non-commercial news, information, and entertainment programming to the
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00430 Document 1 Filed 02/16/22 Page 3 of 7
`
`American public. NPR’s fact-based, independent journalism helps the public stay on top of
`
`breaking news, follow the most critical stories of the day, and track complex issues over the long
`
`term. NPR reaches approximately 53 million people on broadcast radio, podcasts, NPR apps,
`
`NPR.org and YouTube video content per month. NPR distributes its radio broadcasts through
`
`more than 1,000 non-commercial, independently operated radio stations, licensed to more than
`
`250 NPR members and numerous other NPR-affiliated entities.
`
`7.
`
`Plaintiff Jingnan Huo is a resident of Virginia, and an award-winning journalist who
`
`works as an assistant producer on NPR’s investigations team. Ms. Huo has reported on black lung
`
`disease’s resurgence, as well as air monitoring data to see if lockdowns during the coronavirus
`
`pandemic have made the air cleaner. She has a Master’s degree from Northwestern University’s
`
`Medill School of Journalism.
`
`8.
`
`Defendant U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) is a Cabinet-level
`
`department of the Executive branch of the Federal government that was created to protect the
`
`health of all Americans. Accordingly, HHS is an agency subject to FOIA. Upon information
`
`and belief, HHS has possession and control of the records sought by the Request.
`
`Facts
`
`9.
`
`On August 18, 2020, NPR submitted a FOIA Request seeking records related to the
`
`agency’s interactions with TeleTracking Technologies, Inc., a government vendor tasked with
`
`managing COVID-19 data. Specifically, the Request sought: 1) White Papers or Full Proposals
`
`submitted to HHS under the Broad Agency Announcement, BAA-19-ASPR NEXT-SOL-
`
`75A50119R0044, Area of Interest 4: “Real-Time Healthcare System Capacity Reporting”; 2)
`
`written evaluation reports created in response to White Papers or Full Proposals under Area of
`
`Interest 4; 3) any white paper submitted by TeleTracking to HHS between Aug. 1, 2019 and
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00430 Document 1 Filed 02/16/22 Page 4 of 7
`
`Aug. 1, 2020; 4) the Non-Disclosure Agreement signed by TeleTracking relating to BAA-19-
`
`ASPR NEXT-SOL-75A50119R0044; 5) the contract signed by TeleTracking ASPR-BARDA,
`
`Contract No. 75A50120C0042; 6) emails referring to “TeleTracking” from Feb. 1, 2020 to Aug.
`
`18, 2020, to, from, or copying the following HHS or CDC officials: Bryan Shuy, Jose Arrieta,
`
`Jim Parker, Dr. Deborah Birx, Robert Redfield, Cameron Hernandez; 7) emails referring to
`
`“TeleTracking” from June 1, 2020 to Aug. 18, 2020, to, from, or copying the following HHS
`
`officials: Michael Caputo, Katherine McKeogh. Attached as Exhibit A is a copy of the Request.
`
`10. Although HHS acknowledged receipt of NPR’s Request on August 20, 2020, it did
`
`not provide a final response until three months later, on November 19, 2020 (the “Response”).
`
`In its Response, HHS declared that to date, the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and
`
`Response (ASPR) and the Assistant Secretary for Administration (ASA) had located 31 pages of
`
`responsive records; HHS determined two pages were to be withheld in their entirety under
`
`Exemptions (b)(4) (the exemption for trade secrets and privileged commercial or financial
`
`information) and (b)(5) (the deliberative process privilege) of the FOIA; and seven pages were to
`
`be withheld in part under Exemptions (b)(4) (the exemption for trade secrets and privileged
`
`commercial or financial information) and (b)(6) (the personal privacy privilege). Attached as
`
`Exhibit B is a copy of the acknowledgement of the Request and attached as Exhibit C is a copy
`
`of the final Response letter.
`
`11. NPR appealed this decision on December 8, 2020 (the “Appeal”). Attached as
`
`Exhibit D is a copy of the Appeal letter.
`
`12.
`
`In its Appeal, NPR noted that HHS conducted an inadequate search for records.
`
`HHS returned no records relating to white papers, proposals, or written evaluation; it returned no
`
`records relating to TeleTracking’s own white paper submissions; and it returned no records
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00430 Document 1 Filed 02/16/22 Page 5 of 7
`
`relating to TeleTracking’s non-disclosure agreement. Ex. D at 3-4. In addition, HHS conducted
`
`an inadequate email search, producing only a fragment of one email. Ex. D at 4-5. HHS merely
`
`asserts that ASPR and ASA conducted a search, but HHS does not provide information on what
`
`databases it searched, what search terms it used, or what files it searched.
`
`13. NPR also noted that HHS improperly redacted information under Exemptions 4 and
`
`5. The TeleTracking contract cannot be considered a “trade secret” or “commercial” information
`
`because TeleTracking is not engaged in the production of “trade commodities.” Nor is the
`
`information in the contract “confidential” — TeleTracking’s own website contains a page
`
`dedicated to 16 case studies describing the company’s COVID-19 work. Ex. D at 6. The
`
`deliberative process privilege would not apply because the TeleTracking contract was executed
`
`on April 10, 2020, and any discussions of TeleTracking after that would be post-decisional and
`
`disqualified from the privilege. Ex. D at 7. TeleTracking’s contract was recently renewed for
`
`another year. Attached as Exhibit F is an article from the Pittsburgh Business Times disclosing
`
`the renewal. The public should be able to view the contract of a company acting as the federal
`
`government’s main conduit for COVID-19 data.
`
`14. HHS finally responded on June 29, 2021, estimating that it would require another
`
`12 months or more to process NPR’s appeal. HHS responded later that same day that it was
`
`taking another look at the appeal. Attached as Exhibit E is a copy of the Response to Appeal.
`
`15. To date, NPR has not heard anything further from HHS.
`
`16. As of the filing of this Complaint, over a year has elapsed since NPR made its
`
`Request to HHS, and filed its Appeal. TeleTracking has been awarded another year on its
`
`contract, making the need for transparency more relevant. Because the agency has failed to
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00430 Document 1 Filed 02/16/22 Page 6 of 7
`
`respond to NPR’s Appeal within 20 working days, Plaintiffs are deemed to have exhausted their
`
`administrative remedies under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(C)(i).
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`
`COUNT I
`(Improper denial of FOIA Request)
`
`17. Plaintiffs repeat and re-allege paragraphs 1-16.
`
`18. NPR properly submitted a FOIA request for documents from HHS—namely, copies
`
`of records related to the agency’s interactions with TeleTracking Technologies, Inc., a
`
`government vendor tasked with managing COVID-19 data.
`
`19. Defendant HHS is an agency subject to FOIA. Defendant’s response violated FOIA
`
`in several ways:
`
`(1) Defendant conducted an inadequate search, failing to locate records in several
`
`categories that were specifically noted in NPR’s Request.
`
`(2) Defendant improperly withheld two pages of documents under Exemptions (b)(4)
`
`and (b)(5) of the FOIA.
`
`(3) Defendant improperly redacted seven pages of documents under Exemptions
`
`(b)(4) and (b)(6).
`
`20. Plaintiffs timely appealed and Defendant did not respond to Plaintiffs’ appeal.
`
`21. NPR has a statutory right to receive a timely determination on its Appeal from
`
`HHS.
`
`22. As a result of the actions complained of herein, NPR’s access to the requested
`
`government records has been improperly delayed, in violation of the FOIA.
`
`23. Accordingly, NPR is entitled to injunctive and declaratory relief with respect to the
`
`immediate issuance of a determination on and processing of its Request.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00430 Document 1 Filed 02/16/22 Page 7 of 7
`
`Requested Relief
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court:
`
`(1)
`
`Order Defendant to immediately and fully process NPR’s December 8, 2020
`
`Appeal and disclose all non-exempt documents immediately to Plaintiffs;
`
`(2)
`
`Issue a declaration that NPR is entitled to immediate processing and disclosure of
`
`the requested records;
`
`(3)
`
`Retain jurisdiction of this action to ensure no agency records are wrongfully
`
`withheld;
`
`(4)
`
`(5)
`
`Award Plaintiffs their costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees in this action; and
`
`Grant such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`Dated: February 16, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Courtney T. DeThomas
`
`Courtney DeThomas (D.C. Bar. No. 888304075)
`DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
`1301 K Street NW; Suite 500 East
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3317
`202-973-4200
`courtneydethomas@dwt.com
`Abigail Zeitlin (D.C. Bar No. 888314368)
` (D.D.C. attorney admission application to be filed)
`DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
`865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2400
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`213-633-8614
`abigailzeitlin@dwt.com
`Thomas R. Burke (pro hac vice application to be filed)
`DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
`505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`415-276-6500
`thomasburke@dwt.com
`Counsel for Plaintiffs
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket