`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 1:22-cv-00712
`
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`FOTOBOM MEDIA, INC.
`27702 Crown Valley Pkwy, D4 #283
`Ladera Ranch, CA 92694,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC
`1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
`Mountain View, CA 94043,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`In October 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a Section 2 case against
`
`Google alleging that Google has taken steps to thwart competition from “apps that link to general
`
`search engines, such as smart keyboards” because such apps are a competitive threat to Google’s
`
`general search monopoly. United States v. Google LLC, 20-cv-03010, ECF No. 1, ¶ 44 (D.D.C.
`
`Oct. 20, 2020). Fotobom Media, Inc. distributes a “smart keyboard” app. Fotobom is a direct
`
`victim of the conduct described in DOJ’s complaint.
`
`2.
`
`Fotobom developed and began distributing its smart keyboard app for mobile
`
`devices in 2015. Now called “Keyboard+,” Fotobom’s smart keyboard offers more functionality
`
`than traditional mobile keyboards that consumers use to type on their phones.
`
`3.
`
`Among other features, Keyboard+ brings the power of a search engine directly to
`
`the user’s fingertips. Keyboard+ offers users its own search results: it directs users to content
`
`(for example, links to buy movie tickets) precisely at the time that content will be useful to them
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 2 of 73
`
`
`
`(for example, when texting a friend to arrange a time to go see a movie) based on keywords in
`
`the user’s typing. Keyboard+ is also a “search access point.” A mobile user can run a search in
`
`the keyboard using a general search engine without needing to leave an app or open a browser.
`
`Keyboard+ displays its own links alongside the search engine’s results, so the user can compare
`
`results and pick the most relevant content. The result for users is maximal choice and efficiency.
`
`4.
`
`Fotobom also partners with carriers and phone manufacturers to incorporate this
`
`search functionality into messaging apps — including a six-year long ongoing relationship with
`
`Verizon to incorporate search functionality into the Verizon Messages app, which is installed on
`
`more than 100 million phones in the United States. When incorporated into messaging apps,
`
`Fotobom’s search software displays search results to users based on the content of the messages
`
`being sent and received, and regardless of the specific mobile keyboard that is being used. The
`
`ability to provide search results to users based on the content of their messages makes mobile
`
`messaging an important search access point.
`
`5.
`
`Fotobom generates revenue much like a search provider: by offering content
`
`providers the opportunity to bid on “keywords” to display their content to users. Content
`
`providers then pay an additional fee if a mobile user clicks through the content (such as a
`
`suggested website or user app) that Keyboard+ displays.
`
`6.
`
`Defendant Google LLC took notice of Fotobom’s innovative product. At
`
`Google’s invitation, Fotobom met with Google multiple times between 2016 and 2018. Soon
`
`after the first meeting in 2016, Google launched its own smart keyboard, Gboard. Later, in 2018,
`
`Google met with Fotobom again and suggested it was looking to acquire a company in the
`
`keyboard and messaging space. Google told Fotobom that “it’s not a matter of if we work
`
`together, it’s a matter of when,” and that, accordingly, Fotobom should share with Google as
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 3 of 73
`
`
`
`much as possible about its smart keyboard and company strategy. A few months after its
`
`meeting with Fotobom, Google acquired another keyboard app created by a company named
`
`Tenor, which allows users to search a “GIF” library directly from the keyboard.
`
`7.
`
`Following Google’s decision not to partner with or acquire Fotobom, Google
`
`began to interfere with Fotobom’s distribution of Keyboard+.
`
`8.
`
`For example, Fotobom reached an agreement in principle with América Móvil —
`
`one of the world’s largest wireless carriers — to preload Keyboard+ as the default keyboard app
`
`on millions of Android devices. América Móvil told Fotobom that it wanted to preload
`
`Keyboard+ as the default keyboard app “on as many phones as possible.” América Móvil and
`
`Fotobom expended significant time and effort on this relationship. But when Google discovered
`
`that América Móvil was planning to preload Fotobom’s keyboard, Google threatened América
`
`Móvil that it would be violating its agreement to preload Google’s own smart keyboard app —
`
`Gboard — as the default on América Móvil devices, and that Google would penalize América
`
`Móvil by withholding potentially several hundred million dollars in payments. Following that
`
`threat, América Móvil told Fotobom that it could not preload Keyboard+ as the default keyboard
`
`app on any of its Android devices.
`
`9.
`
`Google has similarly threatened other carriers and original equipment
`
`manufacturers (“OEMs”) that wanted to preload Keyboard+ on their devices.
`
`10.
`
`In its complaint against Google, DOJ alleges that “[a]s innovation has increased
`
`the number of search access points on mobile devices — including smart keyboards and voice
`
`assistants — Google has expanded its [agreements with carriers and manufacturers] to close off
`
`these avenues to search rivals.” United States v. Google LLC, 20-cv-03010, ECF No. 1, ¶ 80.
`
`“Google . . . uses its agreements to ensure that new search access points are not available to
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 4 of 73
`
`
`
`competitors. For example, Google developed a smart keyboard — a mobile app that can be used
`
`as an alternative for the standard-issued keyboards on smart phones — with the recognition that
`
`such keyboards might be ‘the next big search access point.’ Google relies on its preinstallation
`
`and default restrictions in its revenue sharing agreements as a ‘strategic defense’ against rival
`
`keyboards that might provide a ‘[b]ridge’ to rival general search engines.” Id. at ¶ 151; see also
`
`Colorado v. Google, 1:20-cv-03715, ECF No. 3, ¶¶ 103 et seq. (D.D.C. Dec. 17, 2020) (Section
`
`2 case filed by 35 states based in part on Google’s contracts that restrict independent distribution
`
`of search access points); European Press Release IP/18/4581, Antitrust: Commission Fines
`
`Google (July 18, 2018) (fining Google $5 billion for paying carriers and manufacturers not to
`
`preinstall rival search apps), https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_4581.
`
`11.
`
`Google has similarly paid mobile carriers like AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile
`
`more than $100 million to preload Google Messages as the default messaging app on their
`
`customers’ mobile phones. Google Messages uses the Rich Communications Services (“RCS”)
`
`messaging protocol that is controlled by Google and that Google is attempting to make the
`
`standard messaging protocol for all mobile devices. Beginning in 2022, Google Messages will
`
`be the default messenger app on each carrier’s Android devices, which will result in the end of
`
`popular independent messaging apps like Verizon Messages. Verizon has already begun to
`
`discontinue support for Verizon Messages despite the app’s popularity.
`
`12.
`
`On July 7, 2021, Attorneys General from 36 states and the District of Columbia
`
`filed a separate suit against Google alleging that Google uses its control over Android app
`
`distribution to charge a 30 percent supra-competitive commission for paid apps. See Utah et al.
`
`v. Google LLC, 3:21-cv-05227-JSC, ECF No. 1 (N.D. Cal. July 7, 2021). The States and District
`
`allege that Google extracts this supra-competitive commission, in part, by using its “considerable
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 5 of 73
`
`
`
`leverage over mobile device manufacturers and Android app developers.” Id. ¶ 7. Google uses
`
`Revenue Sharing Agreements (“RSAs”) with carriers and manufacturers as a “carrot” to restrict
`
`them from fostering competition in Android app distribution. See id. ¶ 20. Google uses other
`
`agreements as “sticks” to “require Android device manufacturers to preload Google Play Store
`
`on the default home screen, render it undeletable from the device, and ensure that no other
`
`preloaded app store has a more prominent placement than the Google Play Store.” Id. Google
`
`also “has taken the extraordinary step of attempting to buy off Samsung . . . by, among other
`
`things, offering incentives for Samsung to turn the Galaxy store into a mere ‘white label’ for the
`
`Google Play Store — meaning that Samsung would use the backend services of the Google Play
`
`Store, including Google Play Billing, while retaining its Samsung Galaxy Store branding.” Id.
`
`¶ 21. The case is related to a private multidistrict litigation currently proceeding before Judge
`
`Donato. See In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation, 3:21-md-02981-JD (N.D. Cal).
`
`13.
`
`Google’s conduct interferes with independent efforts to compete in two ways.
`
`First, Google enforces tying arrangements. The Android mobile operating system does not
`
`contain many of the features or apps necessary for manufacturers to offer a commercially viable
`
`Android device. Instead, Google offers “Google Mobile Services,” which is a bundle of
`
`Google’s most dominant apps, including Google’s app store (Google Play), the Google Search
`
`app, Google Chrome, Google Maps, and YouTube. Google Mobile Services also includes the
`
`Application Programming Interfaces (“APIs”) that are necessary for apps to function properly on
`
`a device. A carrier or OEM can preload Google’s dominant apps and APIs only if they preload
`
`other Google-controlled search access points, including Gboard. Google enforces this tie
`
`through the Google Mobile Services licensing agreements (sometimes called “Mobile
`
`Application Distribution Agreements”) and restrictive certification requirements. Effectively,
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 6 of 73
`
`
`
`OEMs and carriers must ensure that all default-search-access-points preloaded on a device direct
`
`search traffic to Google. As Google has stated, it uses “compatibility as a club to make [OEMs]
`
`do things [Google] want[s].” OEMs and carriers have no choice but to accede to the tie because,
`
`without the Google Play Store, Google’s Search app, Chrome, or Google Maps, their mobile
`
`devices would not be commercially viable.
`
`14.
`
`Second, Google has entered into exclusionary distribution agreements that require
`
`distributors, including mobile manufacturers and carriers, to set Google as the default search
`
`engine for all search access points installed on a device and to preload as defaults Google’s own
`
`search access points, like Chrome, Gboard, and Google Messages. Google’s agreements prevent
`
`carriers and manufacturers from preinstalling smart keyboards (and other apps with search-
`
`related features) produced by rivals such as Fotobom. Google pays for exclusivity by giving
`
`carriers and manufacturers a percentage of its general search monopoly revenues, which amounts
`
`to hundreds of millions of dollars each year.
`
`15.
`
`Google’s preventing of OEMs and carriers from doing business with search rivals
`
`and search access points like Keyboard+ ties up the most effective distribution channel for rival
`
`apps: being the default, or even just being preloaded, on the user’s device. Because the vast
`
`majority of users will not alter the default settings, users will continue to use the apps that come
`
`preloaded on their devices. That is why Google pays Apple $12 billion annually to be the default
`
`search engine for the Safari browser and for Apple not to use or preinstall rival search products.
`
`16.
`
`Prohibited from being able to preload its keyboard as the default on mobile
`
`devices, Fotobom must instead convince users to download and install its smart keyboard — a
`
`multi-step process that few users will undertake. The fact that Google allows Fotobom’s
`
`keyboard to be installed through the Google Play Store (a process that requires Google’s review
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 7 of 73
`
`
`
`and approval of the app), just not preloaded or made the default, confirms that there is no
`
`procompetitive justification for Google’s restrictions. Fotobom does not distribute its keyboard
`
`app through “sideloading” — a process through which the user downloads the app directly
`
`without using an app store and which Google claims is insecure. If Google will permit
`
`Keyboard+ to be used on Android devices, there is no legitimate reason to prohibit Keyboard+
`
`from being preloaded as the default keyboard. Rather, Google wants to cripple Fotobom and
`
`other rival search access points so they cannot threaten Google’s search monopoly, and so
`
`Google can dominate the market for Android mobile keyboard apps.
`
`17.
`
`Google’s practices are unlawful under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act.
`
`Fotobom seeks to recover the damages it has suffered because of Google’s antitrust violations, as
`
`well as equitable relief to enjoin Google from enforcing its anticompetitive agreements.
`
`PARTIES
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiff Fotobom Media, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its corporate
`
`headquarters and principal place of business in San Francisco, California.
`
`19.
`
`Defendant Google LLC is a limited liability company organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business in Mountain View,
`
`California. Google is owned by Alphabet Inc., a publicly traded company incorporated and
`
`existing under the laws of Delaware and headquartered in Mountain View, California
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`20.
`
`This action arises under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and
`
`2, and Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26, and California state law.
`
`21.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the federal claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331
`
`and 1337 and Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15. This Court has supplemental
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 8 of 73
`
`
`
`jurisdiction over the state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367, because those claims are so
`
`closely related to the federal claims that they form part of the same case or controversy.
`
`22.
`
`The Court has personal jurisdiction over Google because Google has caused
`
`“tortious injury in the District of Columbia by an act or omission outside the District of
`
`Columbia,” and because Google “regularly does or solicits business,” engages in “other
`
`persistent course[s] of conduct,” and “derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed,
`
`or services rendered, in the District of Columbia.” D.C. Code § 13-423(a)(4).
`
`23.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.
`
`§ 15, and 28 U.S.C. § 1391, because Google transacts business and is found within this District.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`I.
`
`FOTOBOM’S SMART KEYBOARD
`A.
`
`Fotobom’s Software and Related Services
`
`24.
`
`Fotobom is a small, innovative company that develops mobile apps and software
`
`that can reach users within their favorite messengers and most frequently used applications.
`
`Fotobom provides mobile users with suggestions of relevant content, websites, apps, and
`
`services that are useful to them — for example, Fotobom might suggest a link to purchase movie
`
`tickets when the user’s actions indicate he or she is trying to plan a movie night.
`
`25.
`
`One of Fotobom’s core products is a keyboard app, Keyboard+. Mobile devices
`
`are preloaded with at least one keyboard that allows a user to type on the phone. Fotobom has
`
`reimagined the standard mobile keyboard to offer enhanced features such as predictive text,
`
`shareable GIFs/Stickers, customized dictionaries, one-handed swipe typing, autocorrect, and
`
`more. Fotobom enriches a user’s mobile experience by providing faster, easier access to the
`
`content and features that people want — all delivered to the user at a contextually relevant time.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 9 of 73
`
`
`
`26.
`
`Fotobom first launched its keyboard in August 2015. Fotobom’s initial offering
`
`focused on providing engaging media content that users could share in a messenger app, such as
`
`videos, stickers, and GIFs from its content partners, such as college sports teams. For example,
`
`Fotobom worked with a number of colleges to enable their fans to quickly and easily share sports
`
`highlight clips in their preferred messaging app via Fotobom’s keyboard.
`
`27.
`
`Since 2015, Fotobom has upgraded its keyboard to provide additional targeted
`
`user content — including links to relevant media, apps, information, and websites — based on
`
`keywords typed by the user and other contextual information. Fotobom has partnered with
`
`companies across various industries, including sports, movies, television, and music, to provide
`
`access to content that people enjoy seeing and sharing with one another. Most importantly, a
`
`user can access these features without leaving the app they are using. Fotobom’s keyboard can
`
`generate content whenever a user calls up their keyboard: such as while playing games,
`
`searching the web, messaging friends, or watching videos.
`
`28.
`
`Fotobom’s keyboard directs users to relevant content in several ways. Keyboard+
`
`can provide users links to media and websites based on keywords they are typing. Clicking on
`
`the provided link sends the user directly to that webpage, bypassing the need for the consumer to
`
`separately search for the information through a browser like Google Chrome or a search engine
`
`like Google Search. Similarly, a user exchanging text messages about biking somewhere in San
`
`Francisco may receive a link to a Yelp page regarding bike rentals in San Francisco without the
`
`need to switch to a different app or go through a general search engine.
`
`29.
`
`Fotobom’s keyboard can also redirect users to other types of content, including
`
`apps they already have installed on their devices. For example, if Uber’s ride-sharing app is
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 10 of 73
`
`
`
`installed on a user’s phone, when a user texts about needing to call an Uber, Keyboard+ will
`
`present an icon that will lead the user to the Uber app as shown below.
`
`Figure 1: How Fotobom Can Direct Users to the Uber App
`
`
`The software in Keyboard+ generates suggested content in much the same way as
`
`30.
`
`a search engine generates search results. Fotobom’s software analyzes what the user is typing in
`
`the keyboard app (or a messaging app) and uses server side technology to suggest appropriate
`
`content and actions to the user. The suggested content may include links to websites to purchase
`
`movie tickets, make restaurant reservations, etc. Keyboard+ also has the capability to open this
`
`content on Fotobom’s custom web browser.
`
`31.
`
`Beyond providing mobile users targeted content, Keyboard+ permits users to
`
`browse the internet directly from the keyboard. Specifically, Fotobom powers a web browser
`
`that can appear at the top of a user’s keyboard at the touch of a button. The web browser enables
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 11 of 73
`
`
`
`users to access information, make purchases, watch videos, quickly share links with friends, and
`
`more. The browser is useful because it allows users to interact with any website or general
`
`search engine without having to leave the app they are using.
`
`32.
`
`Because Fotobom’s keyboard appears anywhere a standard mobile keyboard
`
`appears, Keyboard+ has the capability to reach the user in any app he or she is using. As a
`
`result, Fotobom’s keyboard provides its partners an opportunity to redirect traffic to their
`
`websites or apps not just from within the user’s messaging app, but also from within other apps,
`
`including the web browser. As depicted in Figure 2 below, using Keyboard+ in a web browser
`
`or Google’s Search app allows Fotobom to deliver suggested search results to the user. The user
`
`can then compare Fotobom’s suggested results alongside the results of the search engine. Users
`
`have the choice of engaging with Fotobom’s suggested search result or simply ignoring it. The
`
`search results provided by Keyboard+ compete with the search results provided by Google.
`
`Figure 2: Step-by-Step How Fotobom Can Redirect Google Search Traffic
`
`33.
`
`The software that powers Keyboard+ also can be integrated into other apps, like a
`
`messenger app. Through integrations with other apps, Fotobom’s software currently reaches
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 12 of 73
`
`
`
`millions of daily active users. This past year alone, Fotobom drove over 10 billion sticker and
`
`GIF impressions for various content providers and also provided users with search results based
`
`on their messaging activity.
`
`34.
`
`Fotobom is able to generate revenue from Keyboard+ and its software in a variety
`
`of ways, including through driving app downloads, app engagement, impressions (that is, a
`
`charge each time suggested website or app is shown to a user), and click-throughs to websites,
`
`apps, products, and services. Fotobom’s revenue model is similar to the revenue model of a
`
`search engine.
`
`35.
`
`For example, the software in Fotobom’s keyboard can target customers who need
`
`ridesharing services who are texting a friend and using keywords like “taxi.” Fotobom can then
`
`suggest the Uber app to a user and receive a commission for driving Uber app installs, or rides
`
`placed on the app. In addition, content providers pay for placement around keywords in
`
`Keyboard+ that are relevant to their brand. A sports broadcaster like ESPN may bid against
`
`other sports content providers, like NBC and Hulu, to pair a link to its app with a keyword like
`
`“football.” A keyword can also connect a user to a website: the keyword “movie” might surface
`
`a Fandango link for movie tickets at a local venue based on a customer’s geolocation. Fandango
`
`would pay Fotobom for driving customers to their website. And, if that customer also purchases
`
`a ticket, Fandango would pay an additional fee for the successful transaction. Finally, Fotobom
`
`can promote a search engine of choice for all search inquiries that it drives through Keyboard+.
`
`36.
`
`Fotobom updates its targeted content suggestions in real-time from its servers in
`
`San Francisco. It periodically updates featured keywords so that users receive timely and
`
`targeted content that will be useful to them.
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 13 of 73
`
`
`
`37.
`
`There are two versions of Keyboard+: one compatible with Android and another
`
`“light” version that is compatible with “Android Go” devices that Fotobom developed for
`
`Android manufacturers. Android Go is a stripped-down version of Android designed to run on
`
`low-end and budget smartphones with 2 GB of RAM or less. Fotobom also offers a keyboard
`
`app called “YourMoji” that is also compatible with iOS and allows users to create and share
`
`personalized emoji and GIFs.
`
`B.
`
`38.
`
`Fotobom’s Keyboard App Competitors
`
`Several other companies offer “smart” keyboards — i.e., an app that can be used
`
`as an alternative for the standard-issue keyboard on smart phones. A number of smart keyboard
`
`apps offer users options for customization (e.g., fonts, colors, personalized themes), and many
`
`offer features like emoji, GIFs, autocorrect, predictive texting, and swipe typing. Examples
`
`include Gboard, GO Keyboard, SwiftKey, Tenor’s GIF Keyboard, PayKey, GIPHY, Kika
`
`keyboard, Ginger Keyboard, Grammarly Keyboard, Chrooma, and ai.type.
`
`39.
`
`Google acquired Tenor’s GIF Keyboard for an undisclosed sum in 2018, which,
`
`on information and belief, was more than $200 million.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`Facebook acquired GIPHY in 2020 for approximately $400 million.
`
`Some smart keyboards also offer, in addition to features such as GIFs and
`
`predictive texting, the added functionality of being able to connect users to a general search
`
`engine or other third-party content, like apps and websites. Such keyboards include Fotobom’s
`
`Keyboard+ and Fleksy’s keyboard.
`
`42.
`
`Until recently, Microsoft’s SwiftKey had a search bar built into the keyboard.
`
`Microsoft acquired SwiftKey in 2016 for $250 million and the feature allowed users to run
`
`searches on Bing and share the search results instantly with a link or a screenshot.
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 14 of 73
`
`
`
`43.
`
`In July 2021, Microsoft announced that it had removed search from SwiftKey,
`
`which prompted user confusion and complaints. Around the same time Microsoft removed its
`
`search toolbar, Microsoft started using Google’s Tenor as its GIF provider.
`
`44.
`
`In April 2022, Microsoft deleted the search feature from older versions of
`
`SwiftKey. This prompted more complaints from consumers who used older versions of the app
`
`because they considered the search bar an important feature. Deleting features from older
`
`versions of apps that have already been deployed is an unusual step that suggests Google had
`
`pressured Microsoft to do so. Ordinarily, software companies merely remove features from
`
`future versions and cease supporting the older app versions, which over time causes those
`
`features to not be used. Forceful deletion of deployed features is a larger undertaking.
`
`45.
`
`Google also has its own keyboard app, “Gboard,” which it launched in 2016.
`
`Gboard currently offers glide typing, voice, and multilingual typing, Google translate,
`
`handwriting, emoji search, and GIFs from its Tenor acquisition.
`
`46.
`
`Previously, Gboard also offered a popular search feature that integrated Google
`
`Search into the keyboard itself — much like Keyboard+. Indeed, when Google first launched
`
`Gboard, Google touted the keyboard as providing fast access to search. In a video posted to
`
`YouTube advertising Gboard, Google noted that many users must flip back-and-forth between a
`
`messaging app and a search engine to find information and then paste that information back into
`
`the messaging app. Google’s solution: “So we had a thought. What if you could search right
`
`from your keyboard?”1 Using a dedicated button on the keyboard, users could open a search
`
`field with three suggested queries offered. Users could then search the web with information
`
`
`1 Youtube, Gboard: now available for Android, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj_
`91ntoi50&t=59s.
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 15 of 73
`
`
`
`presented as a carousel of cards and immediately share/paste results into their current
`
`conversation. Around April 2020, Google removed this search feature from its keyboard on
`
`Android devices.
`
`47.
`
`Gboard users complained about this loss in useful functionality,2 but Google has
`
`not reinstated the app’s search functionality for Android devices. However, Gboard’s search
`
`functionality is still live for its iOS counterpart, and Google promotes Gboard on the Apple Store
`
`as “offering nearby stores/restaurants, videos/images, weather forecast, news, and sport scores.”
`
`C.
`
`48.
`
`Integration in Messaging Apps
`
`As described above, Fotobom’s Keyboard+ software can be integrated into other
`
`apps, like a messenger app. Fotobom has integrated into some of the most popular messaging
`
`apps in the U.S., enabling users to search for suggested apps, websites, and stickers/GIFs based
`
`on keywords in their typing. Among others, Fotobom’s software has been integrated into
`
`Verizon Messages which, through 2021, was preloaded as the default messaging app on
`
`Verizon’s Android devices.
`
`49.
`
`After removing search functionality from Gboard, Google announced a similar
`
`approach: it has integrated search functionality into its Android messenger app, “Messages.” On
`
`its website, Google promotes that Messages users have “Google at [their] fingertips,” with
`
`Google providing links to suggested content based on keywords in their typing. According to
`
`Google’s support page, “Messages can show you suggestions to get more info from the Google
`
`Assistant about movies, restaurants, and more.”
`
`
`2 See, e.g., Abner Li, Gboard beta removes built-in Google Search for some, 9to5Google (June
`24, 2020), https://9to5google.com/2020/06/24/Gboard-removes-google-search/ (including user
`comments such as: “This was literally the main feature of Gboard. Some people at Google
`really need to get fired.”).
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 16 of 73
`
`
`
`50.
`
`Over the past 15 years, Google has introduced more than a dozen messaging
`
`services spanning text, voice, and video calling. But none has been popular with consumers. For
`
`example, Google’s messaging apps Hangouts and Allo had limited usage, largely because Allo
`
`was not preloaded on any Android devices and Hangouts was preloaded only on a limited
`
`number of devices. Google ultimately discontinued these apps but it took many features from
`
`Allo and incorporated them into its Messages app.
`
`51.
`
`To ensure consumers use Messages, Google has entered into agreements with the
`
`largest U.S. carriers, Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T, which require these carriers to get rid of
`
`their own default messaging apps and preload Google Messages (formerly, Android Messages)
`
`as the default instead.3
`
`52.
`
`The carriers’ messaging apps have significant user bases. Verizon Messages, for
`
`example, has over 100 million installs and is one of the top used Android apps. According to the
`
`app analytics firm SimilarWeb, in March 2021, Verizon Messages was ranked as the 13th most
`
`used Android app in the U.S. Put into perspective, this means that Verizon’s messenger app had
`
`more active engagement than WhatsApp (ranked 15), Twitter (ranked 27), Netflix, and Spotify
`
`(ranked 16) amongst Android users in the U.S. Google recently began paying Verizon as much
`
`as, or even more than, $13 million per month to remove Verizon Messages as their default
`
`messenger app and replace it with Google Messages. Verizon Messages presently remains one
`
`of the top 25 Android apps in the U.S., but without the ability to be preloaded as the default
`
`messenger app, its user base has already begun to decline.
`
`
`3 See, e.g., Dieter Bohn, Verizon is also switching to Android Messages as default for RCS, The
`Verge (July 20, 2021), theverge.com/2021/7/20/22584443/verizon-android-messages-rcs.
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 17 of 73
`
`
`
`53.
`
`Apple also had a feature in iMessage that would underline various keywords, such
`
`as the names of musicians, restaurants, in an iMessage conversation. A user could tap on one of
`
`these keywords and pull up a page of information related to that keyword (i.e. it displayed
`
`Apple’s search results for that keyword). This page linked to various Apple services/apps —
`
`Apple Maps, Safari, iTunes, and a list of Apple’s suggestions for related websites. But this
`
`feature abruptly disappeared in 2019.
`
`II.
`
`THE RELEVANT MARKETS
`A.
`
`General Search Services
`1.
`
`General Search Services in the United States Is a Relevant Market
`
`54.
`
`In the early 1990s, the rapidly expanding number of internet sites created the need
`
`for an innovative way to search and index those sites. The solution was the emergence of so-
`
`called “search engines” that utilize different methods of gathering, organizing, and presenting
`
`information about different internet sites.
`
`55.
`
`Today, consumers use search engines to explore the internet for answers to a wide
`
`range of queries. General search services are unique because they offer consumers the
`
`convenience of a “one-stop shop” to access an extremely large and diverse volume of
`
`information across the internet — with Google Search being the prime example. Consumers use
`
`search engines to perform several types of searches, including naviga