throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 1 of 73
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 1:22-cv-00712
`
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`FOTOBOM MEDIA, INC.
`27702 Crown Valley Pkwy, D4 #283
`Ladera Ranch, CA 92694,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC
`1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
`Mountain View, CA 94043,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`In October 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a Section 2 case against
`
`Google alleging that Google has taken steps to thwart competition from “apps that link to general
`
`search engines, such as smart keyboards” because such apps are a competitive threat to Google’s
`
`general search monopoly. United States v. Google LLC, 20-cv-03010, ECF No. 1, ¶ 44 (D.D.C.
`
`Oct. 20, 2020). Fotobom Media, Inc. distributes a “smart keyboard” app. Fotobom is a direct
`
`victim of the conduct described in DOJ’s complaint.
`
`2.
`
`Fotobom developed and began distributing its smart keyboard app for mobile
`
`devices in 2015. Now called “Keyboard+,” Fotobom’s smart keyboard offers more functionality
`
`than traditional mobile keyboards that consumers use to type on their phones.
`
`3.
`
`Among other features, Keyboard+ brings the power of a search engine directly to
`
`the user’s fingertips. Keyboard+ offers users its own search results: it directs users to content
`
`(for example, links to buy movie tickets) precisely at the time that content will be useful to them
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 2 of 73
`
`
`
`(for example, when texting a friend to arrange a time to go see a movie) based on keywords in
`
`the user’s typing. Keyboard+ is also a “search access point.” A mobile user can run a search in
`
`the keyboard using a general search engine without needing to leave an app or open a browser.
`
`Keyboard+ displays its own links alongside the search engine’s results, so the user can compare
`
`results and pick the most relevant content. The result for users is maximal choice and efficiency.
`
`4.
`
`Fotobom also partners with carriers and phone manufacturers to incorporate this
`
`search functionality into messaging apps — including a six-year long ongoing relationship with
`
`Verizon to incorporate search functionality into the Verizon Messages app, which is installed on
`
`more than 100 million phones in the United States. When incorporated into messaging apps,
`
`Fotobom’s search software displays search results to users based on the content of the messages
`
`being sent and received, and regardless of the specific mobile keyboard that is being used. The
`
`ability to provide search results to users based on the content of their messages makes mobile
`
`messaging an important search access point.
`
`5.
`
`Fotobom generates revenue much like a search provider: by offering content
`
`providers the opportunity to bid on “keywords” to display their content to users. Content
`
`providers then pay an additional fee if a mobile user clicks through the content (such as a
`
`suggested website or user app) that Keyboard+ displays.
`
`6.
`
`Defendant Google LLC took notice of Fotobom’s innovative product. At
`
`Google’s invitation, Fotobom met with Google multiple times between 2016 and 2018. Soon
`
`after the first meeting in 2016, Google launched its own smart keyboard, Gboard. Later, in 2018,
`
`Google met with Fotobom again and suggested it was looking to acquire a company in the
`
`keyboard and messaging space. Google told Fotobom that “it’s not a matter of if we work
`
`together, it’s a matter of when,” and that, accordingly, Fotobom should share with Google as
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 3 of 73
`
`
`
`much as possible about its smart keyboard and company strategy. A few months after its
`
`meeting with Fotobom, Google acquired another keyboard app created by a company named
`
`Tenor, which allows users to search a “GIF” library directly from the keyboard.
`
`7.
`
`Following Google’s decision not to partner with or acquire Fotobom, Google
`
`began to interfere with Fotobom’s distribution of Keyboard+.
`
`8.
`
`For example, Fotobom reached an agreement in principle with América Móvil —
`
`one of the world’s largest wireless carriers — to preload Keyboard+ as the default keyboard app
`
`on millions of Android devices. América Móvil told Fotobom that it wanted to preload
`
`Keyboard+ as the default keyboard app “on as many phones as possible.” América Móvil and
`
`Fotobom expended significant time and effort on this relationship. But when Google discovered
`
`that América Móvil was planning to preload Fotobom’s keyboard, Google threatened América
`
`Móvil that it would be violating its agreement to preload Google’s own smart keyboard app —
`
`Gboard — as the default on América Móvil devices, and that Google would penalize América
`
`Móvil by withholding potentially several hundred million dollars in payments. Following that
`
`threat, América Móvil told Fotobom that it could not preload Keyboard+ as the default keyboard
`
`app on any of its Android devices.
`
`9.
`
`Google has similarly threatened other carriers and original equipment
`
`manufacturers (“OEMs”) that wanted to preload Keyboard+ on their devices.
`
`10.
`
`In its complaint against Google, DOJ alleges that “[a]s innovation has increased
`
`the number of search access points on mobile devices — including smart keyboards and voice
`
`assistants — Google has expanded its [agreements with carriers and manufacturers] to close off
`
`these avenues to search rivals.” United States v. Google LLC, 20-cv-03010, ECF No. 1, ¶ 80.
`
`“Google . . . uses its agreements to ensure that new search access points are not available to
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 4 of 73
`
`
`
`competitors. For example, Google developed a smart keyboard — a mobile app that can be used
`
`as an alternative for the standard-issued keyboards on smart phones — with the recognition that
`
`such keyboards might be ‘the next big search access point.’ Google relies on its preinstallation
`
`and default restrictions in its revenue sharing agreements as a ‘strategic defense’ against rival
`
`keyboards that might provide a ‘[b]ridge’ to rival general search engines.” Id. at ¶ 151; see also
`
`Colorado v. Google, 1:20-cv-03715, ECF No. 3, ¶¶ 103 et seq. (D.D.C. Dec. 17, 2020) (Section
`
`2 case filed by 35 states based in part on Google’s contracts that restrict independent distribution
`
`of search access points); European Press Release IP/18/4581, Antitrust: Commission Fines
`
`Google (July 18, 2018) (fining Google $5 billion for paying carriers and manufacturers not to
`
`preinstall rival search apps), https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_4581.
`
`11.
`
`Google has similarly paid mobile carriers like AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile
`
`more than $100 million to preload Google Messages as the default messaging app on their
`
`customers’ mobile phones. Google Messages uses the Rich Communications Services (“RCS”)
`
`messaging protocol that is controlled by Google and that Google is attempting to make the
`
`standard messaging protocol for all mobile devices. Beginning in 2022, Google Messages will
`
`be the default messenger app on each carrier’s Android devices, which will result in the end of
`
`popular independent messaging apps like Verizon Messages. Verizon has already begun to
`
`discontinue support for Verizon Messages despite the app’s popularity.
`
`12.
`
`On July 7, 2021, Attorneys General from 36 states and the District of Columbia
`
`filed a separate suit against Google alleging that Google uses its control over Android app
`
`distribution to charge a 30 percent supra-competitive commission for paid apps. See Utah et al.
`
`v. Google LLC, 3:21-cv-05227-JSC, ECF No. 1 (N.D. Cal. July 7, 2021). The States and District
`
`allege that Google extracts this supra-competitive commission, in part, by using its “considerable
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 5 of 73
`
`
`
`leverage over mobile device manufacturers and Android app developers.” Id. ¶ 7. Google uses
`
`Revenue Sharing Agreements (“RSAs”) with carriers and manufacturers as a “carrot” to restrict
`
`them from fostering competition in Android app distribution. See id. ¶ 20. Google uses other
`
`agreements as “sticks” to “require Android device manufacturers to preload Google Play Store
`
`on the default home screen, render it undeletable from the device, and ensure that no other
`
`preloaded app store has a more prominent placement than the Google Play Store.” Id. Google
`
`also “has taken the extraordinary step of attempting to buy off Samsung . . . by, among other
`
`things, offering incentives for Samsung to turn the Galaxy store into a mere ‘white label’ for the
`
`Google Play Store — meaning that Samsung would use the backend services of the Google Play
`
`Store, including Google Play Billing, while retaining its Samsung Galaxy Store branding.” Id.
`
`¶ 21. The case is related to a private multidistrict litigation currently proceeding before Judge
`
`Donato. See In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation, 3:21-md-02981-JD (N.D. Cal).
`
`13.
`
`Google’s conduct interferes with independent efforts to compete in two ways.
`
`First, Google enforces tying arrangements. The Android mobile operating system does not
`
`contain many of the features or apps necessary for manufacturers to offer a commercially viable
`
`Android device. Instead, Google offers “Google Mobile Services,” which is a bundle of
`
`Google’s most dominant apps, including Google’s app store (Google Play), the Google Search
`
`app, Google Chrome, Google Maps, and YouTube. Google Mobile Services also includes the
`
`Application Programming Interfaces (“APIs”) that are necessary for apps to function properly on
`
`a device. A carrier or OEM can preload Google’s dominant apps and APIs only if they preload
`
`other Google-controlled search access points, including Gboard. Google enforces this tie
`
`through the Google Mobile Services licensing agreements (sometimes called “Mobile
`
`Application Distribution Agreements”) and restrictive certification requirements. Effectively,
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 6 of 73
`
`
`
`OEMs and carriers must ensure that all default-search-access-points preloaded on a device direct
`
`search traffic to Google. As Google has stated, it uses “compatibility as a club to make [OEMs]
`
`do things [Google] want[s].” OEMs and carriers have no choice but to accede to the tie because,
`
`without the Google Play Store, Google’s Search app, Chrome, or Google Maps, their mobile
`
`devices would not be commercially viable.
`
`14.
`
`Second, Google has entered into exclusionary distribution agreements that require
`
`distributors, including mobile manufacturers and carriers, to set Google as the default search
`
`engine for all search access points installed on a device and to preload as defaults Google’s own
`
`search access points, like Chrome, Gboard, and Google Messages. Google’s agreements prevent
`
`carriers and manufacturers from preinstalling smart keyboards (and other apps with search-
`
`related features) produced by rivals such as Fotobom. Google pays for exclusivity by giving
`
`carriers and manufacturers a percentage of its general search monopoly revenues, which amounts
`
`to hundreds of millions of dollars each year.
`
`15.
`
`Google’s preventing of OEMs and carriers from doing business with search rivals
`
`and search access points like Keyboard+ ties up the most effective distribution channel for rival
`
`apps: being the default, or even just being preloaded, on the user’s device. Because the vast
`
`majority of users will not alter the default settings, users will continue to use the apps that come
`
`preloaded on their devices. That is why Google pays Apple $12 billion annually to be the default
`
`search engine for the Safari browser and for Apple not to use or preinstall rival search products.
`
`16.
`
`Prohibited from being able to preload its keyboard as the default on mobile
`
`devices, Fotobom must instead convince users to download and install its smart keyboard — a
`
`multi-step process that few users will undertake. The fact that Google allows Fotobom’s
`
`keyboard to be installed through the Google Play Store (a process that requires Google’s review
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 7 of 73
`
`
`
`and approval of the app), just not preloaded or made the default, confirms that there is no
`
`procompetitive justification for Google’s restrictions. Fotobom does not distribute its keyboard
`
`app through “sideloading” — a process through which the user downloads the app directly
`
`without using an app store and which Google claims is insecure. If Google will permit
`
`Keyboard+ to be used on Android devices, there is no legitimate reason to prohibit Keyboard+
`
`from being preloaded as the default keyboard. Rather, Google wants to cripple Fotobom and
`
`other rival search access points so they cannot threaten Google’s search monopoly, and so
`
`Google can dominate the market for Android mobile keyboard apps.
`
`17.
`
`Google’s practices are unlawful under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act.
`
`Fotobom seeks to recover the damages it has suffered because of Google’s antitrust violations, as
`
`well as equitable relief to enjoin Google from enforcing its anticompetitive agreements.
`
`PARTIES
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiff Fotobom Media, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its corporate
`
`headquarters and principal place of business in San Francisco, California.
`
`19.
`
`Defendant Google LLC is a limited liability company organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business in Mountain View,
`
`California. Google is owned by Alphabet Inc., a publicly traded company incorporated and
`
`existing under the laws of Delaware and headquartered in Mountain View, California
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`20.
`
`This action arises under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and
`
`2, and Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26, and California state law.
`
`21.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the federal claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331
`
`and 1337 and Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15. This Court has supplemental
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 8 of 73
`
`
`
`jurisdiction over the state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367, because those claims are so
`
`closely related to the federal claims that they form part of the same case or controversy.
`
`22.
`
`The Court has personal jurisdiction over Google because Google has caused
`
`“tortious injury in the District of Columbia by an act or omission outside the District of
`
`Columbia,” and because Google “regularly does or solicits business,” engages in “other
`
`persistent course[s] of conduct,” and “derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed,
`
`or services rendered, in the District of Columbia.” D.C. Code § 13-423(a)(4).
`
`23.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.
`
`§ 15, and 28 U.S.C. § 1391, because Google transacts business and is found within this District.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`I.
`
`FOTOBOM’S SMART KEYBOARD
`A.
`
`Fotobom’s Software and Related Services
`
`24.
`
`Fotobom is a small, innovative company that develops mobile apps and software
`
`that can reach users within their favorite messengers and most frequently used applications.
`
`Fotobom provides mobile users with suggestions of relevant content, websites, apps, and
`
`services that are useful to them — for example, Fotobom might suggest a link to purchase movie
`
`tickets when the user’s actions indicate he or she is trying to plan a movie night.
`
`25.
`
`One of Fotobom’s core products is a keyboard app, Keyboard+. Mobile devices
`
`are preloaded with at least one keyboard that allows a user to type on the phone. Fotobom has
`
`reimagined the standard mobile keyboard to offer enhanced features such as predictive text,
`
`shareable GIFs/Stickers, customized dictionaries, one-handed swipe typing, autocorrect, and
`
`more. Fotobom enriches a user’s mobile experience by providing faster, easier access to the
`
`content and features that people want — all delivered to the user at a contextually relevant time.
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 9 of 73
`
`
`
`26.
`
`Fotobom first launched its keyboard in August 2015. Fotobom’s initial offering
`
`focused on providing engaging media content that users could share in a messenger app, such as
`
`videos, stickers, and GIFs from its content partners, such as college sports teams. For example,
`
`Fotobom worked with a number of colleges to enable their fans to quickly and easily share sports
`
`highlight clips in their preferred messaging app via Fotobom’s keyboard.
`
`27.
`
`Since 2015, Fotobom has upgraded its keyboard to provide additional targeted
`
`user content — including links to relevant media, apps, information, and websites — based on
`
`keywords typed by the user and other contextual information. Fotobom has partnered with
`
`companies across various industries, including sports, movies, television, and music, to provide
`
`access to content that people enjoy seeing and sharing with one another. Most importantly, a
`
`user can access these features without leaving the app they are using. Fotobom’s keyboard can
`
`generate content whenever a user calls up their keyboard: such as while playing games,
`
`searching the web, messaging friends, or watching videos.
`
`28.
`
`Fotobom’s keyboard directs users to relevant content in several ways. Keyboard+
`
`can provide users links to media and websites based on keywords they are typing. Clicking on
`
`the provided link sends the user directly to that webpage, bypassing the need for the consumer to
`
`separately search for the information through a browser like Google Chrome or a search engine
`
`like Google Search. Similarly, a user exchanging text messages about biking somewhere in San
`
`Francisco may receive a link to a Yelp page regarding bike rentals in San Francisco without the
`
`need to switch to a different app or go through a general search engine.
`
`29.
`
`Fotobom’s keyboard can also redirect users to other types of content, including
`
`apps they already have installed on their devices. For example, if Uber’s ride-sharing app is
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 10 of 73
`
`
`
`installed on a user’s phone, when a user texts about needing to call an Uber, Keyboard+ will
`
`present an icon that will lead the user to the Uber app as shown below.
`
`Figure 1: How Fotobom Can Direct Users to the Uber App
`
`
`The software in Keyboard+ generates suggested content in much the same way as
`
`30.
`
`a search engine generates search results. Fotobom’s software analyzes what the user is typing in
`
`the keyboard app (or a messaging app) and uses server side technology to suggest appropriate
`
`content and actions to the user. The suggested content may include links to websites to purchase
`
`movie tickets, make restaurant reservations, etc. Keyboard+ also has the capability to open this
`
`content on Fotobom’s custom web browser.
`
`31.
`
`Beyond providing mobile users targeted content, Keyboard+ permits users to
`
`browse the internet directly from the keyboard. Specifically, Fotobom powers a web browser
`
`that can appear at the top of a user’s keyboard at the touch of a button. The web browser enables
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 11 of 73
`
`
`
`users to access information, make purchases, watch videos, quickly share links with friends, and
`
`more. The browser is useful because it allows users to interact with any website or general
`
`search engine without having to leave the app they are using.
`
`32.
`
`Because Fotobom’s keyboard appears anywhere a standard mobile keyboard
`
`appears, Keyboard+ has the capability to reach the user in any app he or she is using. As a
`
`result, Fotobom’s keyboard provides its partners an opportunity to redirect traffic to their
`
`websites or apps not just from within the user’s messaging app, but also from within other apps,
`
`including the web browser. As depicted in Figure 2 below, using Keyboard+ in a web browser
`
`or Google’s Search app allows Fotobom to deliver suggested search results to the user. The user
`
`can then compare Fotobom’s suggested results alongside the results of the search engine. Users
`
`have the choice of engaging with Fotobom’s suggested search result or simply ignoring it. The
`
`search results provided by Keyboard+ compete with the search results provided by Google.
`
`Figure 2: Step-by-Step How Fotobom Can Redirect Google Search Traffic
`
`33.
`
`The software that powers Keyboard+ also can be integrated into other apps, like a
`
`messenger app. Through integrations with other apps, Fotobom’s software currently reaches
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 12 of 73
`
`
`
`millions of daily active users. This past year alone, Fotobom drove over 10 billion sticker and
`
`GIF impressions for various content providers and also provided users with search results based
`
`on their messaging activity.
`
`34.
`
`Fotobom is able to generate revenue from Keyboard+ and its software in a variety
`
`of ways, including through driving app downloads, app engagement, impressions (that is, a
`
`charge each time suggested website or app is shown to a user), and click-throughs to websites,
`
`apps, products, and services. Fotobom’s revenue model is similar to the revenue model of a
`
`search engine.
`
`35.
`
`For example, the software in Fotobom’s keyboard can target customers who need
`
`ridesharing services who are texting a friend and using keywords like “taxi.” Fotobom can then
`
`suggest the Uber app to a user and receive a commission for driving Uber app installs, or rides
`
`placed on the app. In addition, content providers pay for placement around keywords in
`
`Keyboard+ that are relevant to their brand. A sports broadcaster like ESPN may bid against
`
`other sports content providers, like NBC and Hulu, to pair a link to its app with a keyword like
`
`“football.” A keyword can also connect a user to a website: the keyword “movie” might surface
`
`a Fandango link for movie tickets at a local venue based on a customer’s geolocation. Fandango
`
`would pay Fotobom for driving customers to their website. And, if that customer also purchases
`
`a ticket, Fandango would pay an additional fee for the successful transaction. Finally, Fotobom
`
`can promote a search engine of choice for all search inquiries that it drives through Keyboard+.
`
`36.
`
`Fotobom updates its targeted content suggestions in real-time from its servers in
`
`San Francisco. It periodically updates featured keywords so that users receive timely and
`
`targeted content that will be useful to them.
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 13 of 73
`
`
`
`37.
`
`There are two versions of Keyboard+: one compatible with Android and another
`
`“light” version that is compatible with “Android Go” devices that Fotobom developed for
`
`Android manufacturers. Android Go is a stripped-down version of Android designed to run on
`
`low-end and budget smartphones with 2 GB of RAM or less. Fotobom also offers a keyboard
`
`app called “YourMoji” that is also compatible with iOS and allows users to create and share
`
`personalized emoji and GIFs.
`
`B.
`
`38.
`
`Fotobom’s Keyboard App Competitors
`
`Several other companies offer “smart” keyboards — i.e., an app that can be used
`
`as an alternative for the standard-issue keyboard on smart phones. A number of smart keyboard
`
`apps offer users options for customization (e.g., fonts, colors, personalized themes), and many
`
`offer features like emoji, GIFs, autocorrect, predictive texting, and swipe typing. Examples
`
`include Gboard, GO Keyboard, SwiftKey, Tenor’s GIF Keyboard, PayKey, GIPHY, Kika
`
`keyboard, Ginger Keyboard, Grammarly Keyboard, Chrooma, and ai.type.
`
`39.
`
`Google acquired Tenor’s GIF Keyboard for an undisclosed sum in 2018, which,
`
`on information and belief, was more than $200 million.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`Facebook acquired GIPHY in 2020 for approximately $400 million.
`
`Some smart keyboards also offer, in addition to features such as GIFs and
`
`predictive texting, the added functionality of being able to connect users to a general search
`
`engine or other third-party content, like apps and websites. Such keyboards include Fotobom’s
`
`Keyboard+ and Fleksy’s keyboard.
`
`42.
`
`Until recently, Microsoft’s SwiftKey had a search bar built into the keyboard.
`
`Microsoft acquired SwiftKey in 2016 for $250 million and the feature allowed users to run
`
`searches on Bing and share the search results instantly with a link or a screenshot.
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 14 of 73
`
`
`
`43.
`
`In July 2021, Microsoft announced that it had removed search from SwiftKey,
`
`which prompted user confusion and complaints. Around the same time Microsoft removed its
`
`search toolbar, Microsoft started using Google’s Tenor as its GIF provider.
`
`44.
`
`In April 2022, Microsoft deleted the search feature from older versions of
`
`SwiftKey. This prompted more complaints from consumers who used older versions of the app
`
`because they considered the search bar an important feature. Deleting features from older
`
`versions of apps that have already been deployed is an unusual step that suggests Google had
`
`pressured Microsoft to do so. Ordinarily, software companies merely remove features from
`
`future versions and cease supporting the older app versions, which over time causes those
`
`features to not be used. Forceful deletion of deployed features is a larger undertaking.
`
`45.
`
`Google also has its own keyboard app, “Gboard,” which it launched in 2016.
`
`Gboard currently offers glide typing, voice, and multilingual typing, Google translate,
`
`handwriting, emoji search, and GIFs from its Tenor acquisition.
`
`46.
`
`Previously, Gboard also offered a popular search feature that integrated Google
`
`Search into the keyboard itself — much like Keyboard+. Indeed, when Google first launched
`
`Gboard, Google touted the keyboard as providing fast access to search. In a video posted to
`
`YouTube advertising Gboard, Google noted that many users must flip back-and-forth between a
`
`messaging app and a search engine to find information and then paste that information back into
`
`the messaging app. Google’s solution: “So we had a thought. What if you could search right
`
`from your keyboard?”1 Using a dedicated button on the keyboard, users could open a search
`
`field with three suggested queries offered. Users could then search the web with information
`
`
`1 Youtube, Gboard: now available for Android, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj_
`91ntoi50&t=59s.
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 15 of 73
`
`
`
`presented as a carousel of cards and immediately share/paste results into their current
`
`conversation. Around April 2020, Google removed this search feature from its keyboard on
`
`Android devices.
`
`47.
`
`Gboard users complained about this loss in useful functionality,2 but Google has
`
`not reinstated the app’s search functionality for Android devices. However, Gboard’s search
`
`functionality is still live for its iOS counterpart, and Google promotes Gboard on the Apple Store
`
`as “offering nearby stores/restaurants, videos/images, weather forecast, news, and sport scores.”
`
`C.
`
`48.
`
`Integration in Messaging Apps
`
`As described above, Fotobom’s Keyboard+ software can be integrated into other
`
`apps, like a messenger app. Fotobom has integrated into some of the most popular messaging
`
`apps in the U.S., enabling users to search for suggested apps, websites, and stickers/GIFs based
`
`on keywords in their typing. Among others, Fotobom’s software has been integrated into
`
`Verizon Messages which, through 2021, was preloaded as the default messaging app on
`
`Verizon’s Android devices.
`
`49.
`
`After removing search functionality from Gboard, Google announced a similar
`
`approach: it has integrated search functionality into its Android messenger app, “Messages.” On
`
`its website, Google promotes that Messages users have “Google at [their] fingertips,” with
`
`Google providing links to suggested content based on keywords in their typing. According to
`
`Google’s support page, “Messages can show you suggestions to get more info from the Google
`
`Assistant about movies, restaurants, and more.”
`
`
`2 See, e.g., Abner Li, Gboard beta removes built-in Google Search for some, 9to5Google (June
`24, 2020), https://9to5google.com/2020/06/24/Gboard-removes-google-search/ (including user
`comments such as: “This was literally the main feature of Gboard. Some people at Google
`really need to get fired.”).
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 16 of 73
`
`
`
`50.
`
`Over the past 15 years, Google has introduced more than a dozen messaging
`
`services spanning text, voice, and video calling. But none has been popular with consumers. For
`
`example, Google’s messaging apps Hangouts and Allo had limited usage, largely because Allo
`
`was not preloaded on any Android devices and Hangouts was preloaded only on a limited
`
`number of devices. Google ultimately discontinued these apps but it took many features from
`
`Allo and incorporated them into its Messages app.
`
`51.
`
`To ensure consumers use Messages, Google has entered into agreements with the
`
`largest U.S. carriers, Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T, which require these carriers to get rid of
`
`their own default messaging apps and preload Google Messages (formerly, Android Messages)
`
`as the default instead.3
`
`52.
`
`The carriers’ messaging apps have significant user bases. Verizon Messages, for
`
`example, has over 100 million installs and is one of the top used Android apps. According to the
`
`app analytics firm SimilarWeb, in March 2021, Verizon Messages was ranked as the 13th most
`
`used Android app in the U.S. Put into perspective, this means that Verizon’s messenger app had
`
`more active engagement than WhatsApp (ranked 15), Twitter (ranked 27), Netflix, and Spotify
`
`(ranked 16) amongst Android users in the U.S. Google recently began paying Verizon as much
`
`as, or even more than, $13 million per month to remove Verizon Messages as their default
`
`messenger app and replace it with Google Messages. Verizon Messages presently remains one
`
`of the top 25 Android apps in the U.S., but without the ability to be preloaded as the default
`
`messenger app, its user base has already begun to decline.
`
`
`3 See, e.g., Dieter Bohn, Verizon is also switching to Android Messages as default for RCS, The
`Verge (July 20, 2021), theverge.com/2021/7/20/22584443/verizon-android-messages-rcs.
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00712-APM Document 19 Filed 08/12/22 Page 17 of 73
`
`
`
`53.
`
`Apple also had a feature in iMessage that would underline various keywords, such
`
`as the names of musicians, restaurants, in an iMessage conversation. A user could tap on one of
`
`these keywords and pull up a page of information related to that keyword (i.e. it displayed
`
`Apple’s search results for that keyword). This page linked to various Apple services/apps —
`
`Apple Maps, Safari, iTunes, and a list of Apple’s suggestions for related websites. But this
`
`feature abruptly disappeared in 2019.
`
`II.
`
`THE RELEVANT MARKETS
`A.
`
`General Search Services
`1.
`
`General Search Services in the United States Is a Relevant Market
`
`54.
`
`In the early 1990s, the rapidly expanding number of internet sites created the need
`
`for an innovative way to search and index those sites. The solution was the emergence of so-
`
`called “search engines” that utilize different methods of gathering, organizing, and presenting
`
`information about different internet sites.
`
`55.
`
`Today, consumers use search engines to explore the internet for answers to a wide
`
`range of queries. General search services are unique because they offer consumers the
`
`convenience of a “one-stop shop” to access an extremely large and diverse volume of
`
`information across the internet — with Google Search being the prime example. Consumers use
`
`search engines to perform several types of searches, including naviga

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket