throbber
Case 1:22-cv-02078 Document 1 Filed 07/14/22 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
`
`
`WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT
`7288 Hanover Green Dr.
`Mechanicsville, VA 23111
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`Civ. No.
`
`Complaint for Declaratory and
`Injunctive Relief
`
`
`THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
`HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
`200 Independence Way, S.W.
`Washington DC 20201,
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. This is an action under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552,
`
`seeking the release of records related to the National Institute of Health’s (NIH)
`
`procurement of dogs to be used in experiments.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`2. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter pursuant to 5
`
`U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B).
`
`3. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B).
`
`Parties
`
`4. Plaintiff White Coat Waste Project, Inc. (WCW) is a bipartisan taxpayer
`
`watchdog organization pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code,
`
`with its headquarters located at 7288 Hanover Green Drive, Mechanicsville, VA,
`
`23111. WCW’s mission is to unite animal-lovers and liberty-lovers to find, expose and
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-02078 Document 1 Filed 07/14/22 Page 2 of 4
`
`defund wasteful taxpayer-funded animal experiments. WCW is the requester of the
`
`information at issue in this case.
`
`5. Defendant Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is an agency of
`
`the United States.
`
`6. The National Institute of Health (NIH) is a component of DHHS.
`
`7. The Office of Research Services, Research Facilities (ORS-ORF) is a component
`
`of NIH.
`
`8. DHHS, NIH, and ORS-ORF have possession, custody, and control of the
`
`records WCW seeks.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`WCW’s FOIA Case No. 57941
`
`9. On February 24, 2022, WCW submitted a FOIA request to ORS-ORF seeking
`
`“copies of
`
`the
`
`following documents related
`
`to NIH’s
`
`federal contract
`
`75N98020D00014:
`
`• Procurement and shipping records for all dogs obtained under the contract
`
`(including, but not limited to invoices, certificates of veterinary inspection,
`
`other health certificates, shipping manifests, routing and contact sheets, and
`
`CDC notifications);
`
`• Acquisition and disposition records for the dogs obtained under the contract;
`
`• Photos and videos of the shipments and/or dogs received; and
`
`• IACUC-approved protocols assigned to the dogs.
`
`10. The online portal assigned WCW request case number 57941.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-02078 Document 1 Filed 07/14/22 Page 3 of 4
`
`11. On February 28, 2022, the agency acknowledged receipt of the request.
`
`12. On February 28, 2022, a Government Information Specialist emailed WCW
`
`requesting a date range and asking if WCW would agree to redaction of “names of
`
`NIH employees, contractors as well as the building and room numbers.”
`
`13. WCW provided a date range and agreed to the redactions on the same day.
`
`14. On March 31, 2022, the same Government Information Specialist emailed
`
`WCW asking if WCW would agree to redaction of “the names and addresses of the
`
`companies that suppl[y] the animals.”
`
`15. WCW agree to those redactions on the same day.
`
`16. To date, WCW has not received any further response or production, or any
`
`denial letter, related to this request.
`
`17. As of the filing of this Complaint, WCW has not received a final determination
`
`and response regarding NIH FOIA Case No. 57941.
`
`18. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(C)(i), WCW is deemed to have exhausted its
`
`administrative remedies with regard NIH FOIA Case No. 58229 because the agency
`
`has failed to comply with the statutory time limit.
`
`19. ORS-ORF (through the NIH and DHHS) continues to wrongfully withhold the
`
`requested records from WCW.
`
`
`
`Count I: Violation of FOIA
`
`20. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations in each of the
`
`preceding paragraphs of this Complaint.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-02078 Document 1 Filed 07/14/22 Page 4 of 4
`
`21. DHHS has wrongfully withheld agency records requested by WCW.
`
`22. WCW has exhausted applicable administrative remedies with respect to
`
`DHHS’s wrongful withholding of the requested records.
`
`23. WCW and the public have been and will continue to be irreparably harmed
`
`until DHHS is ordered to comply with WCW’s FOIA requests.
`
`24. WCW is entitled to injunctive relief with respect to the release and disclosure
`
`of the requested documents.
`
`Request for Relief
`
`WHEREFORE, WCW respectfully requests that this Court:
`
`(1) Declare DHHS’s failure to comply with FOIA to be unlawful;
`
`(2) Enjoin DHHS from continuing to withhold the public records responsive to
`
`WCW’s FOIA request and otherwise order DHHS to produce the requested
`
`public records without further delay;
`
`(3) Grant WCW an award of attorney fees and other litigation costs reasonably
`
`incurred in this action, to the extent permitted by law; and
`
`(4) Grant WCW such other and further relief which the Court deems proper.
`
`
`Date: July 14, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Matthew Strugar __________________
`Matthew Strugar (D.C. Bar No. 1010198)
`Law Office of Matthew Strugar
`3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2910
`Los Angeles, CA 90010
`323-696-2299
`matthew@matthewstrugar.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket