throbber

`
`May 24, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`Governor Kate Brown
`254 State Capitol
`Salem, Oregon 97301
`
`Dear Governor Brown:
`
`
`Thank you for your February 18, 2021, letter regarding the Jordan Cove Energy
`Project (Docket Nos. CP17-494-000 and CP17-495-000) and your request that we
`provide meaningful consultation with Oregon’s federally recognized tribes for this
`project. Your letter has been placed in the docket for this proceeding.
`
` I
`
` appreciate and share your concerns regarding the importance of consultations
`with federally recognized tribes of Oregon. I can assure you that the Commission takes
`very seriously its consultation efforts and trust responsibilities.
`
`Early in the pre-filing environmental review of this project, Commission staff
`engaged the Oregon Indian tribes to gain an understanding of the tribal concerns. Prior to
`the Commission’s project authorization, Commission staff consulted in-person on
`multiple occasions with representatives of the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower
`Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians; the Coquille Indian Tribe; the Confederated Tribes of
`Grande Ronde; the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians; and the Klamath
`Tribes. Commission staff also reached out and held numerous telephone conversations
`with the tribes. The Commission’s administrative record contains the records of these
`meetings, as well as comment letters from the tribes, all of which were considered by
`Commission staff during the environmental impact statement preparation.
`
`The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 Programmatic
`Agreement (Agreement) for the Jordan Cove Energy Project was prepared and executed
`in compliance with all relevant regulations. The Agreement was signed by the
`Commission staff, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the Oregon State
`Historic Preservation Office. It clarifies the framework and protocols the parties will
`follow to ensure meaningful consultations with the federally recognized tribes to
`complete the identification of historic properties and the assessment and resolution of
`adverse effects resulting from the construction and operation of the Jordan Cove Energy
`Project and the Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline Project. In drafting the agreement, the
`signatories fully considered comments provided by the tribes and, to the extent possible,
`revised the Agreement to incorporate them.
`
`888 First Street, NE #11-A | Washington, DC 20426 | 202.502.8000
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`It is the Commission’s practice, consistent with the NHPA and the Advisory
`Council on Historic Preservation’s implementing regulation, to invite tribes to be
`signatories to programmatic agreements when a project crosses reservation lands. In this
`proceeding, the proposed project did not cross reservation lands. So while the tribes were
`not invited to be signatories to the Agreement, they were invited to be consulting parties.
`The project does, however, cross federal lands, so the relevant federal land managing
`agencies – the Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Forest Service and the Army Corps
`of Engineers – were invited to be signatories. During the implementation of the
`Agreement, the Commission and other signatories are required to consult further with the
`Oregon Indian tribes. I assure you the Commission will continue to respond to tribal
`concerns, solicit tribal input and afford tribes additional opportunities to comment.
`
`If I can be of any further assistance in this or any other Commission matter, please
`let me know.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`Richard Glick
`Chairman
`
`
`
`888 First Street, NE #11-A | Washington, DC 20426 | 202.502.8000
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket