`Re: MVP Southgate CPCN extension
`
`My name is Kellie Walters. I can be reached at kpublic49@gmail.com or 440821
`5970. My mailing address is 131 Turvey Ct. Chapel Hill, NC 27514.
`
`I am writing to request the agency deny MVPâ(cid:128)(cid:153)s request to extend their
`Certificate for Public Convenience and Necessity.
`
`I have learned of the Southgate extension through fellow community members. It
`represents a good deal of harm to the NC community, and distracts from the need
`to invest in infrastructure for cleaner energy.
`
`FERC should deny MVPâ(cid:128)(cid:153)s extension request for the following reasons:
`(1) MVP has not demonstrated cause for extension for the Southgate project. They
`are relying on issues with MVP mainline and the support that the project has
`received from Federal officials. These are not the same project and FERC should
`treat them separately.
`(2) No reasonable progress has been made to date. When FERC granted MVP an
`extension of its mainline MVP project, MVP Southgate has had three years to make
`progress and work towards getting missing permits. They were originally denied
`permits, and have not reapplied for the NC Clean Water Act 401 permit nor the
`Clean Air Act permit for the Lambert Compressor Station.
`(3) Notably, the findings of the 2019 Environmental Impact Statement have
`changed. There is more available gas in the region thus making Southgate
`unnecessary. This should be reconsidered.
`(4) Most importantly, Southgate is not in the public interest. Key energy
`parties (Dominion, NextEra) intend to get out of the gas business. Moreover, the
`original plan was to use the natural gas for home heating and stoves. But now
`the plan is to use it for energy generation which introduces more pollution and
`emissions not accounted for in the environmental impact statement.
`
`Again I urge you to deny MVPâ(cid:128)(cid:153)s request to extend their Certificate for Public
`Convenience and Necessity.
`
`Thank you,
`Kellie Walters
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
