throbber
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`BEFORE THE
`FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
`
`Calpine Energy Services, L.P.
`Calpine Construction Finance Company, L.P.
`Calpine Energy Solutions, LLC
`Calpine Gilroy Cogen, L.P.
`Calpine King City Cogen, LLC
`Calpine PowerAmerica – CA, LLC
`CES Marketing IX, LLC
`CES Marketing X, LLC
`Champion Energy, LLC
`Champion Energy Marketing LLC
`Champion Energy Services, LLC
`Creed Energy Center, LLC
`Delta Energy Center, LLC
`Geysers Power Company, LLC
`Gilroy Energy Center, LLC
`Goose Haven Energy Center, LLC
`Johanna Energy Center, LLC
`Los Esteros Critical Energy Facility, LLC
`Los Medanos Energy Center, LLC
`Metcalf Energy Center, LLC
`North American Power and Gas, LLC
`North American Power Business, LLC
`O.L.S. Energy-Agnews, Inc.
`Otay Mesa Energy Center, LLC
`Pastoria Energy Facility L.L.C.
`Pine Bluff Energy, LLC
`Power Contract Financing, L.L.C.
`Russell City Energy Company, LLC
`South Point Energy Center, LLC
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Docket No. ER10-2042-___
`Docket No. ER10-1942-___
`Docket No. ER17-696-___
`Docket No. ER10-1941-___
`Docket No. ER19-1127-___
`Docket No. ER10-1938-___
`Docket No. ER10-1934-___
`Docket No. ER10-1893-___
`Docket No. ER10-3051-___
`Docket No. ER10-2985-___
`Docket No. ER10-3049-___
`Docket No. ER10-1888-___
`Docket No. ER10-1885-___
`Docket No. ER10-1884-___
`Docket No. ER10-1883-___
`Docket No. ER10-1878-___
`Docket No. ER20-1699-___
`Docket No. ER10-1876-___
`Docket No. ER10-1875-___
`Docket No. ER10-1873-___
`Docket No. ER11-4369-___
`Docket No. ER16-2218-___
`Docket No. ER12-1987-___
`Docket No. ER10-1947-___
`Docket No. ER12-2645-___
`Docket No. ER10-1863-___
`Docket No. ER10-1862-___
`Docket No. ER12-2261-___
`Docket No. ER10-1865-___
`
`NOTIFICATION OF CHANGES IN STATUS
`
`Pursuant to Section 35.42 of the regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
`
`(the “Commission”),1 the above-captioned subsidiaries of Calpine Corporation (“Calpine”) with
`
`market-based rate authority (the “Indicated Calpine MBR Sellers”) hereby submit this notification
`
`
`18 C.F.R. § 35.42 (2021).
`
`1
`
`

`

`(this “Notification”) of four changes in status that occurred during the period July 1, 2021 through
`
`December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”). First, the Indicated Calpine MBR Sellers for which
`
`the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (“MISO”) market is a relevant market (the
`
`“Calpine MISO MBR Sellers”)2 notify the Commission that a generation facility owned by one of
`
`their affiliates in that market entered service during the Reporting Period. Second, the Indicated
`
`Calpine MBR Sellers for which the California Independent System Operator Corporation
`
`(“CAISO”) market is a relevant market (the “Calpine CAISO MBR Sellers”)3 notify the
`
`Commission that generation facilities owned by certain of their affiliates in that market entered
`
`service during the Reporting Period. Third, the Calpine CAISO MBR Sellers notify the
`
`Commission of the expiration during the Reporting Period of a long-term power purchase
`
`agreement (the “PG&E PPA”) under which 316.1 MW of generation capacity was committed to
`
`an unaffiliated third party, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG&E”). Fourth, the Indicated
`
`Calpine MBR Sellers for which the Western Area Power Administration-Lower Colorado
`
`(“WALC”) balancing authority area (“BAA”) is a relevant market (the “Calpine WALC MBR
`
`Sellers”)4 notify the Commission of certain limited deliveries within the WALC BAA during the
`
`
`2
`The Calpine MISO MBR Sellers include: Calpine Energy Services, L.P. (“CES”), Calpine
`Construction Finance Company, L.P. (“CCFC”), Calpine Energy Solutions, LLC (“Calpine Solutions”),
`Calpine PowerAmerica – CA, LLC (“PowerAmerica”), CES Marketing IX, LLC (“CES Marketing IX”),
`CES Marketing X, LLC (“CES Marketing X”), Champion Energy, LLC (“Champion Energy”), Champion
`Energy Marketing LLC (“Champion Marketing”), Champion Energy Services, LLC (“Champion
`Services”), North American Power and Gas, LLC (“NAPG”), North American Power Business, LLC
`(“NAPB”), Pine Bluff Energy, LLC, and Power Contract Financing, L.L.C. (“PCF”).
`3
`The Calpine CAISO MBR Sellers include: CES, CCFC, Calpine Solutions, Calpine Gilroy Cogen,
`L.P., Calpine King City Cogen, LLC, PowerAmerica, CES Marketing IX, CES Marketing X, Champion
`Energy, Champion Marketing, Champion Services, Creed Energy Center, LLC (“Creed”), Delta Energy
`Center, LLC, Geysers Power Company, LLC, Gilroy Energy Center, LLC (“Gilroy”), Goose Haven Energy
`Center, LLC (“Goose Haven”), Johanna Energy Center, LLC, Los Esteros Critical Energy Facility, LLC,
`Los Medanos Energy Center, LLC, Metcalf Energy Center, LLC, NAPG, NAPB, O.L.S. Energy-Agnews,
`Inc., Otay Mesa Energy Center, LLC, Pastoria Energy Facility L.L.C., PCF, and Russell City Energy
`Company, LLC.
`4
`The Calpine WALC MBR Sellers include: CES, CCFC, Calpine Solutions, PowerAmerica, CES
`
`2
`
`

`

`Reporting Period.5 As discussed below, the changes in status reported herein do not materially
`
`alter the facts upon which the Commission relied in granting market-based rate authorization to
`
`the Indicated Calpine MBR Sellers.
`
`I.
`
`COMMUNICATIONS
`
`Please address all correspondence, communications, pleadings, and other documents
`
`related to these proceedings to the following persons:
`
`Sarah G. Novosel
`Senior Vice President, Government
`Affairs, and Managing Counsel
`Calpine Corporation
`717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1000
`Houston, TX 77002
`(202) 744-6320
`snovosel@calpine.com
`
`Neil L. Levy
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`The McDermott Building
`500 North Capitol Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 756-8080
`(202) 756-8087 (facsimile)
`nlevy@mwe.com
`
`II.
`
`CHANGES IN STATUS
`A.
`
`New Generation Owned by Affiliates in the MISO Market
`
`During the Reporting Period, a generation facility in the MISO market owned by one of
`
`the Calpine MISO MBR Sellers’ affiliates entered service. As a result, the Calpine MISO MBR
`
`Sellers have an additional affiliate that owns or controls generation in the MISO market:
`
`
`
`Glacier Sands Wind Power, LLC, an exempt wholesale generator (“EWG”) that
`owns and operates an approximately 184.9 MW (nameplate rating) wind-powered
`generation facility in Mason County, Illinois.6
`
`
`Marketing IX, CES Marketing X, Champion Energy, Champion Marketing, Champion Services, NAPG,
`NAPB, PCF, and South Point Energy Center, LLC (“South Point”).
`5
`These deliveries were previously discussed in an updated market power analysis recently submitted
`by the Calpine WALC MBR Sellers and various other subsidiaries of Calpine. See Updated Market Power
`Analysis, Docket Nos. ER10-1862-033, et al. (filed Jan. 3, 2022) (the “Southwest Triennial”). The Calpine
`WALC MBR Sellers are also reporting these deliveries out of an abundance of caution in order to ensure
`full compliance with Section 35.42 of the Commission’s regulations, 18 C.F.R. § 35.42 (2021), and prior
`Commission orders concerning their market-based rate authorization.
`6
`Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-198-000
`(filed July 21, 2021); Rainbow Energy Center, LLC, Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale
`
`3
`
`

`

`Affiliation with the generation-owning entity described above does not represent a material
`
`departure from the characteristics upon which the Commission relied in granting market-based
`
`rate authorization to the Calpine MISO MBR Sellers. MISO administers organized energy,
`
`ancillary services, and capacity markets, and the Calpine MISO MBR Sellers are, therefore,
`
`entitled to “rely[] on Commission-approved market monitoring and mitigation to address potential
`
`horizontal market power” in the MISO market.7
`
`B.
`
`New Generation Owned by Affiliates in the CAISO Market
`
`During the Reporting Period, generation facilities in the CAISO market owned by certain
`
`of the Calpine CAISO MBR Sellers’ affiliates entered service. As a result, the Calpine CAISO
`
`MBR Sellers have additional affiliates that own or control generation in (or assumed to be in) the
`
`CAISO market:
`
`
`
`
`
`Edwards Sanborn Storage I, LLC, an EWG that owns an approximately 116 MW
`(nameplate rating) battery energy storage system in Kern County, California;8
`
`Edwards Sanborn Storage II, LLC, an EWG that owns an approximately 117 MW
`(nameplate rating) battery energy storage system in Kern County, California;9
`
`
`Generator Status, Docket Nos. EG21-194-000, et al. (Oct. 5, 2021) (unreported); Glacier Sands Wind
`Power, LLC, Docket No. ER21-2445-000 (Sept. 9, 2021) (unreported) (granting market-based rate
`authority).
`7
`18 C.F.R. § 35.37(c)(4) (2021). See also Refinements to Horizontal Market Power Analysis for
`Sellers in Certain Regional Transmission Org. & Indep. Sys. Operator Markets, Order No. 861, 168 FERC
`¶ 61,040 at P 7 (2019) (describing the proposed rule adopted in Order No. 861 as allowing sellers to “state
`that they are relying on [regional transmission organization/independent system operator] mitigation to
`address the potential for market power issues that they might have” ) on reh’g, Order No. 861-A, 170 FERC
`¶ 61,106 (2020).
`8
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-172-
`000 (filed June 21, 2021); Blythe Mesa Solar II, LLC, Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale
`Generator Status, Docket Nos. EG21-164-000, et al. (Sept. 15, 2021) (unreported) (“Blythe Mesa”);
`Edwards Sanborn Storage I, LLC, Docket Nos. ER21-1373-001, et al. (June 15, 2021) (unreported)
`(“Edwards Sanborn”) (granting market-based rate authority).
`9
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-178-
`000 (filed June 21, 2021); Blythe Mesa, Docket Nos. EG21-164-000, et al. (notice of effectiveness of EWG
`status); Edwards Sanborn, Docket Nos. ER21-1373-001, et al. (granting market-based rate authority).
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ES 1A Group 2 Opco, LLC, an EWG that is developing an approximately 429 MW
`(nameplate rating) combined solar-powered generation facility and battery energy
`storage system in Kern County, California;10
`
`ES 1A Group 3 Opco, LLC (Group 3 Opco), an EWG that is developing an
`approximately 260 MW (nameplate rating) combined solar-powered generation
`facility and battery energy storage system in Kern County, California;11
`
`Henrietta D Energy Storage LLC, which owns and operates an approximately
`10 MW (nameplate rating) lithium-ion battery energy storage facility located in
`Lemoore, California;12
`
`Orange County Energy Storage 2 LLC, which owns and operates an approximately
`9 MW (nameplate rating) lithium-ion battery energy storage facility located in
`Santa Ana, California;13
`
`Orange County Energy Storage 3 LLC, which owns and operates an approximately
`6 MW (nameplate rating) lithium-ion battery energy storage facility located in
`Santa Ana, California;14
`
`Sagebrush ESS, LLC, an EWG that owns an approximately 179 MW (nameplate
`rating) battery energy storage system in Kern County, California;15
`
`
`10
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-171-
`000 (filed June 21, 2021); Blythe Mesa, Docket Nos. EG21-164-000, et al. (notice of effectiveness of EWG
`status); Edwards Sanborn, Docket Nos. ER21-1373-001, et al. (granting market-based rate authority).
`11
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-173-
`000 (filed June 21, 2021); Blythe Mesa, Docket Nos. EG21-164-000, et al. (notice of effectiveness of EWG
`status); Edwards Sanborn, Docket Nos. ER21-1373-001, et al. (granting market-based rate authority).
`12
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-7-000
`(filed Oct. 16, 2020); HDSI, LLC, Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket
`Nos. EG21-2-000, et al. (Jan. 14, 2021) (unreported) (“HDSI”); Henrietta D Energy Storage LLC, Docket
`No. ER21-9-000 (Nov. 13, 2020) (unreported) (granting market-based rate authority).
`13
`Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-8-000 (filed
`Oct. 16, 2020); HDSI, Docket Nos. EG21-2-000, et al. (notice of effectiveness of EWG status); Orange
`County Energy Storage 2 LLC, Docket Nos. ER21-86-000, et al. (Dec. 7, 2020) (unreported) (“Orange
`County”) (granting market-based rate authority).
`14
`Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-9-000 (filed
`Oct. 16, 2020); HDSI, Docket Nos. EG21-2-000, et al. (notice of effectiveness of EWG status); Orange
`County, Docket Nos. ER21-86-000, et al. (granting market-based rate authority).
`15
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-236-
`000 (filed Aug. 27, 2021); Ford County Wind Farm LLC, Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale
`Generator Status, Docket Nos. EG21-211-000, et al. (Nov. 4, 2021) (unreported); Sagebrush ESS, LLC,
`Docket No. ER21-2782-000 (Oct. 20, 2021) (unreported) (granting market-based rate authority).
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Valley Center ESS, LLC, an EWG that owns a 139 MW (nameplate rating) battery
`energy storage system in Valley Center, San Diego County, California;16
`
`Clines Corners Wind Farm LLC (“Clines Corner”), which is developing and will
`own and operate an approximately 324 MW (nameplate rating) wind-powered
`generation facility in Guadalupe and Torrance Counties, New Mexico;17
`
`Duran Mesa LLC (“Duran Mesa”), which is developing and will own and operate
`an approximately 105 MW (nameplate rating) wind-powered generation facility in
`Torrance County, New Mexico;18
`
`Red Cloud Wind LLC (“Red Cloud”), which is developing and will own and
`operate an approximately 350 MW (nameplate rating) wind-powered generation
`facility in Lincoln and Torrance Counties, New Mexico;19 and
`
`Tecolote Wind LLC (“Tecolote”), which is developing and will own and operate
`an approximately 272 MW (nameplate rating) wind-powered generation facility in
`Guadalupe and Torrance Counties, New Mexico.20
`
`
`16
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-103-
`000 (filed Mar. 8, 2021); Tumbleweed Solar LLC, , Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator
`Status, Docket Nos. EG21-99-000, et al. (June 23, 2021) (unreported); Edwards Sanborn, Docket
`Nos. ER21-1373-001, et al. (granting market-based rate authority).
`17
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-123-
`000 (filed Apr. 14, 2021); West Medway II, LLC, Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator
`Status, Docket Nos. EG21-119-000, et al. (July 21, 2021) (unreported) (“West Medway II”); Tecolote,
`Docket Nos. ER21-2336-000, et al. (granting market-based rate authority). This facility is physically
`located in the Public Service Company of New Mexico (“PNM”) balancing authority area (“BAA”), but
`has been studied as residing in the CAISO market in light of firm transmission rights held by Clines Corner.
`18
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-124-
`000 (filed Apr. 14, 2021); West Medway II, Docket Nos. EG21-119-000, et al. (notice of effectiveness of
`EWG status); Tecolote, Docket Nos. ER21-2336-000, et al. (granting market-based rate authority). This
`facility is physically located in the PNM BAA, but has been studied as residing in the CAISO market in
`light of firm transmission rights held by Duran Mesa.
`19
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-125-
`000 (filed Apr. 14, 2021); West Medway II. Docket Nos. EG21-119-000, et al. (notice of effectiveness of
`EWG status); Tecolote, Docket Nos. ER21-2336-000, et al. (granting market-based rate authority). This
`facility is physically located in the PNM BAA, but has been studied as residing in the CAISO market in
`light of firm transmission rights held by Red Cloud.
`20
`See Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status, Docket No. EG21-126-
`000 (filed Apr. 14, 2021); West Medway II. Docket Nos. EG21-119-000, et al. (notice of effectiveness of
`EWG status); Tecolote, Docket Nos. ER21-2336-000, et al. (granting market-based rate authority). This
`facility is physically located in the PNM BAA, but has been studied as residing in the CAISO market in
`light of firm transmission rights held by Tecolote.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Affiliation with the generation-owning entities described above does not represent a
`
`material departure from the characteristics upon which the Commission relied in granting market-
`
`based rate authorization to the Calpine CAISO MBR Sellers. All of these facilities were accounted
`
`for in the indicative market power screens submitted in the Southwest Triennial, and those screens
`
`were passed.21
`
`C.
`
`Expiration of the PG&E PPA
`
`The PG&E PPA was a long-term agreement under which the output of the following
`
`facilities (collectively, the “Peaking Facilities”) was fully committed on a firm basis to an
`
`unaffiliated third party, PG&E, through December 31, 2021:22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the Gilroy Peaking Energy Center, an approximately 135 MW (summer rating)
`natural gas-fired generation facility in Santa Clara County, California that is owned
`and operated by Gilroy;
`
`the Riverview Energy Center, an approximately 46.1 MW (summer rating) natural
`gas-fired generation facility in Contra Costa County that is owned and operated by
`Gilroy;
`
`the Lambie Energy Center, an approximately 45 MW (summer rating) natural gas-
`fired generation facility in Solano County, California that is owned and operated
`by Gilroy;
`
`the Creed Energy Center, an approximately 45 MW (summer rating) natural gas-
`fired generation facility in Solano County, California that is owned and operated
`by Creed; and
`
`the Goose Haven Energy Center, an approximately 45 MW (summer rating) natural
`gas-fired generation facility in Solano County, California that is owned and
`operated by Goose Haven.
`
`
`21
`See Southwest Triennial, Attachment A, Affidavit of Julie R. Solomon, Exhs. GH-4, GH-5, GH-6,
`GH-7 (the “Solomon Affidavit”). See also id., Exhs. GH-8, GH-9 (screens for the PNM BAA).
`22
`The output of other facilities had previously been committed under the PG&E PPA through
`December 31, 2017.
`
`7
`
`

`

`The PG&E PPA expired on December 31, 2021, and, as a result, the output of the Peaking
`
`Facilities is no longer committed to PG&E.
`
`The relevant market is the CAISO market, where the Peaking Facilities are located. The
`
`Calpine CAISO MBR Sellers submitted indicative market power screens for the CAISO market in
`
`the Southwest Triennial.23 Those screens would still be passed if they were adjusted to account
`
`for the expiration of the PG&E PPA. Specifically, the Pivotal Supplier screen would still be passed
`
`if the aggregate capacity of the Peaking Facilities (316.1 MW) were added to “Seller’s
`
`Uncommitted Capacity” (Line Q), as the adjusted figure (6,687.1 MW) would still be less than the
`
`“Net Uncommitted Supply” (Line P) (33,692 MW).24 The Wholesale Market Share screen would
`
`likewise be passed for all seasons if this capacity were added to the “Seller’s Uncommitted
`
`Capacity” (Line R) figures for each season, as the market shares would range between 13.5 percent
`
`and 15.6 percent, below the 20 percent threshold.25
`
`D.
`
`Limited Deliveries within the WALC BAA
`
`In an October 26, 2011 order, the Commission found that, notwithstanding certain screen
`
`failures in the WALC BAA, subsidiaries of Calpine with market-based rate authorization had
`
`“rebutted the presumption of horizontal market power and satisfy the Commission’s horizontal
`
`market power standard for the grant of market-based rate authority.”26 Among other things, the
`
`
`23
`See Solomon Affidavit, Exhs. GH-4, GH-5.
`24
`See id., Exh. GH-4.
`25
`See id., Exh. GH-5. Specifically, the adjusted market shares would be (1) 13.9 percent
`(6,901.1 MW (6,585 MW plus 316.1 MW) divided by 49,679 MW) for the Winter season; (2) 13.5 percent
`(6,662.1 MW (6,346 MW plus 316.1 MW) divided by 49,204 MW) for the Spring season; (3) 15.6 percent
`(6,709.1 MW (6,393 MW plus 316.1 MW) divided by 43,135 MW) for the Summer season; and
`(4) 14.4percent (6,692.1 MW (6,376 MW plus 316.1 MW) divided by 46,405 MW) for the Fall season.
`26
`Calpine Energy Servs., L.P., 137 FERC ¶ 61,085 at P 22 (2011) (the “October 2011 Order”), on
`clarification, 145 FERC ¶ 61,191 (2013). See also Calpine Constr. Fin. Co., L.P., Docket Nos. ER10-
`2042-008, et al. (Dec. 9, 2014) (unreported) (relying on the reasoning of the October 2011 Order in
`
`8
`
`

`

`Commission relied on evidence demonstrating that, during the relevant study period, less than one
`
`percent of the energy generated by a generation facility in the WALC BAA owned by South Point
`
`(the “South Point Facility”) was sold in that BAA.27 The Commission stated that “should the
`
`Calpine [WALC MBR Sellers] or any of their affiliates make sales in the WALC [BAA], we would
`
`consider this a change in the circumstances” that would need to be reported through a change in
`
`status filing.28
`
`As discussed in greater detail in the Southwest Triennial, which is hereby incorporated by
`
`reference pursuant to Section 35.19 of the Commission’s regulations,29 there have been, since
`
`August 2021, occasions when power contractually sold outside the WALC BAA has been
`
`delivered within the WALC BAA, and such deliveries are expected to continue in the future.30
`
`Specifically, these deliveries occurred (and are expected to continue to occur) pursuant to a long-
`
`term tolling agreement (the “APS PPA”) between South Point and Arizona Public Service
`
`Company (“APS”). While sales under the APS PPA are made at specified points on the metered
`
`boundary of, and thus outside, the WALC BAA, APS has the right to request deliveries at
`
`alternative points, and South Point must make commercially reasonable efforts to accommodate
`
`such requests. On various occasions beginning in August 2021, APS has requested, and South
`
`Point has made, limited deliveries at points within the WALC BAA pursuant to the APS PPA. It
`
`
`accepting updated market power analysis for the Southwest region); Calpine Energy Servs., L.P., Docket
`Nos. ER10-2042-021, et al. (Nov. 2, 2016) (unreported) (same).
`27
`See October 2011 Order, 137 FERC ¶ 61,085 at P 24.
`28
`Id. (citing 18 C.F.R. § 35.42(a)).
`29
`18 C.F.R. § 35.19 (2021). See also Reporting Requirement for Changes in Status for Pub. Utils.
`with Market-Based Rate Auth., Order No. 652, 110 FERC ¶ 61,097 at P 34 (noting that “a market-based
`rate seller may incorporate by reference in its notice of change in status any filings regarding the change in
`status made pursuant to other reporting requirements”), on reh’g, 111 FERC ¶ 61,413 (2005).
`30
`See Southwest Triennial at 33-35.
`
`9
`
`

`

`is the Calpine WALC MBR Sellers’ understanding that, in all cases, APS has arranged for
`
`transmission of the electricity out of the WALC BAA, consistent with the fact that APS is a load-
`
`serving utility all of whose load is located outside the WALC BAA, and it is the Calpine WALC
`
`MBR Sellers’ expectation that this will continue to be the case in the future.
`
`As discussed in the Southwest Triennial and the affidavit of Julie R. Solomon attached
`
`thereto,31 South Point should not be considered to have made “sales in the WALC [BAA]”32 as a
`
`result of these limited deliveries within the WALC BAA pursuant to the APS PPA.33 Nonetheless,
`
`out of an abundance of caution, the Calpine WALC MBR Sellers are reporting that such deliveries
`
`have occurred and are expected to continue to occur in the future pursuant to the APS PPA.
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`
`For the reasons stated above, the Indicated Calpine MBR Sellers respectfully request that
`
`the Commission accept this notification of changes in status.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`Id., Attachment A, Julie R. Solomon (the “Solomon Affidavit”).
`October 2011 Order, 137 FERC ¶ 61,085 at P 24.
`See Southwest Triennial at 33-35; Solomon Affidavit at 4, 16.
`
`31
`32
`33
`
`10
`
`

`

`CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES, L.P.
`CALPINE CONSTRUCTION FINANCE COMPANY, L.P.
`CALPINE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC
`CALPINE GILROY COGEN, L.P.
`CALPINE KING CITY COGEN, LLC
`CALPINE POWERAMERICA – CA, LLC
`CES MARKETING IX, LLC
`CES MARKETING X, LLC
`CHAMPION ENERGY, LLC
`CHAMPION ENERGY MARKETING LLC
`CHAMPION ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
`CREED ENERGY CENTER, LLC
`DELTA ENERGY CENTER, LLC
`GEYSERS POWER COMPANY, LLC
`GILROY ENERGY CENTER, LLC
`GOOSE HAVEN ENERGY CENTER, LLC
`JOHANNA ENERGY CENTER, LLC
`LOS ESTEROS CRITICAL ENERGY FACILITY, LLC
`LOS MEDANOS ENERGY CENTER, LLC
`METCALF ENERGY CENTER, LLC
`NORTH AMERICAN POWER AND GAS, LLC
`NORTH AMERICAN POWER BUSINESS, LLC
`O.L.S. ENERGY-AGNEWS, INC.
`OTAY MESA ENERGY CENTER, LLC
`PASTORIA ENERGY FACILITY L.L.C.
`PINE BLUFF ENERGY, LLC
`POWER CONTRACT FINANCING, L.L.C.
`RUSSELL CITY ENERGY COMPANY, LLC
`SOUTH POINT ENERGY CENTER, LLC
`By:
` /s/ Neil L. Levy
`
`
`
`Neil L. Levy
`David G. Tewksbury
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`The McDermott Building
`500 North Capitol Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`
`
`Sarah G. Novosel
`Senior Vice President, Government
`Affairs, and Managing Counsel
`717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1000
`Houston, TX 77002
`
`Counsel for the Indicated Calpine MBR Sellers
`
`Dated: March 3, 2022
`
`11
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that I have caused the foregoing document to be served upon each person
`
`designated on the official service lists compiled by the Secretary of the Federal Energy Regulatory
`
`Commission in these proceedings.
`
`Dated in Washington, D.C., this 3rd day of March, 2022.
`
` /s/ Neil L. Levy
`Neil L. Levy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket