T
`
`Exhibit No. S0A- 1 b
`
`FERC Docket Nos. 1S08-348-004, et al.; RCA Dockst Nos. P-08-009, et al.
`Pagse 1 of 3
`
`In The Matter Of: BF Pipelines [(Alaska)l Inc., et al., Dkt ¥ IS09=-248=-004, et al.
`
`December 13, 2011
`
`Page 4446
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICH
`FEDERRAIL EHERAGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
`BF Pipalinma (Alaskal Inc. Dockat Mo. IS09-348-004
`BF Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. Docket Heo. IS09-355-004
`BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. Docket HNa. I[EL0-Z204-=002
`BF Plpelines (Alaska)l Imc. Docket Ho. IS10-431-000
`ConpeoPhillips Transpoctation Docket Ho. IS09=-384-004
`Alaska Inc.
`ConopoPhillips Tramaportation Docket He. IS10=-205=-003
`Rlaska Inc.
`ConocoFhillips Teranaportation Doecket Ne. ISLO0-4T76-001
`Riaska Ine.
`Exxondebll Plpeline Company Dockat Mo, IS505-351-004
`ExxonMobil Pipeline Company Docket Ho. [S08-177=00%
`ExxonMobil Pipeline Company pocket Ho. IS10=200-002
`ExxonMobil Pipeline Company Docket Heo, [S510-547-000
`Unocal Fipeline Company Docket Ho. ISO09=17&-004
`Unocal Pipelina Company Dacket Mo. IS10-52-001
`Urosal Plpeline Company Docket Ho. ORLO-3-001
`Omocal Pipeline Company Docket Ma. IS10=-490-000
`Unocal Fipaline Company Docket Mo. IS11-3-000
`Eoch Rlaska Plpeline Company, Docket Ho. IS10-54-001
`L.L.G.
`¥och hRlaaka Pipeline Company, Docket Mo. IS510-456-000
`L.L.C.
`STATE OF ALASKR
`REGULATORY COMMISSION OF ALASHEA
`ConocoPhillips Transportation Dockets P-08-9; et al.
`Alaska Ine, (Conaalldated)
`ExxonMobll Plpeline Company
`Unacal Bipeline Company
`Koch Alaska Plpeline Company, L.L.C.
`FEDERAL EXEROY REGULATORY COMMISSION
`[ L ljfiF—EJEfif
`s o _jEjE""“*q;
`Dais l2e mind =
`Bte Aderinead
`
`202-347-3700 Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc. 800-336-6646
`
`31 B3 -55de -4 b 202140 Je T e 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit No. SOA-
`FERC Dockst Nos. 1500-348-004, ot al.; RCA Docket Nos. P-08-009, et al,
`Page 2of 3
`
`In The Matter Of: BP Plpelines (Alaska)l Inc., et al., Dkt # I505=348-004, et al.
`
`December 13, 2011
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`15
`17
`18
`1%
`0
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`25
`
`be staffed exactly the way it's done today.
`
`the assumption.
`
`A.
`
`Page 4460
`That's
`That's all I'm asking.
`
`Okay. And I can answer that if you chose
`
`to degrade the pipeline reliability to below 59
`
`percent,
`
`Q.
`
`you could make that assumption.
`
`All right, sir. BAnd as I said, others
`
`will make the decision on whether that would cause a
`
`degradation.
`
`I'm just trying to get the hypothetical
`
`answered.
`
`the RGV
`
`millien.
`
`not?
`A.
`Q.
`system,
`A.
`Q.
`hybrid,
`A.
`control
`control
`and the
`
`Now, we'wve talked about -- let's look at
`control system. You have it in here as 57
`
`That was replaced as part of SIPPS, was it
`
`Can you refer me to the ==
`
`Page 56 of 89 on ATC-223 shows RGV control
`$7 million.
`
`That's correct.
`
`So if, for example, SIFPS were added into
`that savings would come out?
`
`Yes. The assumption was that the RGV
`system would be taken care of by the new
`system, and subsequent to this presentation
`
`development of the AFE, it was determined that
`
`the best engineering practice and best integrity and
`
`safety practice, a separate SIPPS system would be
`
`T T T
`
`202-347-3700
`
`800-336-6646
`31 53c91H-$5de-4fbi-h2te-21 4820 THEC
`
`Inc.
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit Mo. S0A-
`FERC Docket Moa. 1509-348-004, ot al.; RCA Docket Nos. P-08-004, et al.
`Page 3of3
`
`In The Matter Of: BP Plpelines (Alaska) Inc., et al., Dkt & IS09-348-004, et al.
`
`December 13, 2011
`
`i
`11
`
`12
`
`iq
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`1%
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 446l
`reguired for both hybrid and electrification.
`
`0. Mow, we've talked about a number of the
`things that were included. Let me ask you about
`something that was not included. When you were
`calculating your major maintenance savings, you did
`not include anything in the base amount for major
`
`maintenance of the new equipment under
`
`electrification?
`
`A. That was calculated separately as part of
`Q&M .
`
`0. But it is not -- there's nothing in major
`
`maintenance for major maintenance of any of the new
`equipment being added by electrification?
`
`A. No. For at the pump -- excuse me, I
`didn't mean to say no. At the pump stations, the
`spreadsheet showed that for each system and subsystem
`what the inertia case would be and then whether that
`was alleviated in part or in whole by either the
`hybrid or the electrification option.
`
`S0 for instance, for electrification,
`there were systems that were remaining at the pump
`station which continued to require maintenance. But
`in the case of the major maintenance of new equipment
`installed by the electrification project, that wasn't
`
`the purpose of that exercise in avoided major
`
`202-347-3700 Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc. B00-336-6646
`
`31 S3cH 13500 -4T-biTe- 1 4 5a2e T 8B 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`