`FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
`
`Epsilon Trading, LLC, Chevron Products Company, and
`Valero Marketing and Supply Company
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`BP Products North America Inc., Trafigura Trading
`LLC, and TPCU Inc.
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`TransMontaigne Product Services LLC
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`CITGO Petroleum Corporation
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`Southwest Airlines Co. and United Aviation Fuels
`Corporation
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`Phillips 66 Company
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`American Airlines, Inc.
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`Metroplex Energy Inc.
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`Gunvor USA LLC
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`Docket Nos. OR18-7-002
`
`OR18-12-002
`
`OR18-17-002
`
`OR18-21-002
`
`OR19-1-001
`
`OR19-4-001
`
`OR19-16-001
`
`OR19-20-000
`
`OR19-27-000
`
`
`
`Docket No. OR18-7-002, et al.
`
`Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`Sheetz, Inc.
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`Apex Oil Company, Inc., and FutureFuel Chemical
`Company
` v.
`Colonial Pipeline Company
`
`2
`
`OR19-36-000
`
`OR20-7-000
`
`OR20-9-000
`
`NOTICE GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
`
`(May 10, 2022)
`
`On May 3, 2022, participants in the above-captioned proceedings (Movants)1 filed
`a motion for an extension of time to file exceptions to the Partial Initial Decision (Parts 5-
`10) (Second Partial Initial Decision) issued on April 27, 2022.2 Under Rule 711(a) of the
`Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure,3 briefs on exceptions are currently due
`May 27, 2022, and briefs opposing exceptions are currently due June 16, 2022. Movants
`request that the dates for briefs on and opposing exceptions be extended to June 20 and
`August 1, 2022, respectively.
`
`1 Movants include BP Products North America, Inc.; Chevron Products Company;
`Metroplex Energy, Inc.; Phillips 66 Company; TPCU Inc.; Trafigura Trading LLC; Valero
`Marketing and Supply Company; American Airlines, Inc., Epsilon Trading, LLC;
`Southwest Airlines Co.; United Aviation Fuels Corporation; CITGO Petroleum
`Corporation; Saratoga RP East LLC; Gunvor USA LLC; Pilot Travel Centers LLC;
`Sheetz, Inc.; Apex Oil Company, Inc.; FutureFuel Chemical Company; Colonial Pipeline
`Company; and Commission Trial Staff.
`
`2 Epsilon Trading, LLC v. Colonial Pipeline Co., 179 FERC ¶ 63,008 (2022).
`Movants also request that the Chief Administrative Law Judge extend the page limits for
`briefs on and opposing exceptions. On May 4, 2022, the Deputy Chief Administrative
`Law Judge issued an order granting the request to extend the page limits and waived the
`answer period as to that request. Epsilon Trading, LLC v. Colonial Pipeline Co., Docket
`No. OR18-7-003, at 3 (May 4, 2022).
`
`3 18 C.F.R. § 385.711(a) (2021).
`
`
`
`Docket No. OR18-7-002, et al.
`
`3
`
`Movants state that additional time is needed because the Second Partial Initial
`Decision represents the first review of Colonial Pipeline Company’s cost-based index
`rates since the Commission adopted trended original cost ratemaking for oil pipelines in
`1985. Citing the extensive record to be addressed, Movants submit that extending the
`briefing deadlines under Rule 711(a) is reasonable to allow the participants to prepare
`briefs that will most effectively assist the Commission in its review of the Second Partial
`Initial Decision. Movants state that the motion was circulated to all participants and that
`no participant indicated opposition to the motion.
`
`Upon consideration, notice is hereby granted that Movants’ motion is granted and
`the filing dates are hereby extended to and including June 20, 2022, for briefs on
`exceptions, and extended to and including August 1, 2022, for briefs opposing
`exceptions.
`
`Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
`Deputy Secretary.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
