throbber
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
`
`PORTLAND REGIONAL OFFICE Oy,
`O, 2
`.. <@ py,
`DATE: June 20,2001 TIME: 10:00 /AM g
`WRITTEN BY: David Lord OF D2SI-PRO e
`
`PROJECT NAME/MNO. Yelm, P-10703
`
`SUBJECT DISCUSSED: Part 12 Report for Canal
`
`e o e ol o o ol o oo o o o o ol o ol ol e e oo 0 o 0 0 o o o e o o o oo o o e A o o o ol o o e
`
`g F Discussi
`
`A meeting was held in the D2SI-PRO offices on June 20, 2001. Attending for the
`licensee (City of Centralia) were Richard Southworth, Utility Director; Jan Stemkowski, City
`Engineer; Inara Scott, Attorney for Ater Wynne of Portland, Oregon; and the licensee’s Part
`12 Consultant, Gordon Denby, Principal, GeoEngineers of Redmond, Washington. Attending
`for the D2SI-PRO were Harry Hall, Regional Director; Pat Regan, Deputy Regional Director;
`and David Lord, Civil Engineer. The meeting was to discuss a schedule for completing the
`Part 12 Report which was due on May 29, 2001. Centralia’s time extension request was dated
`that day.
`
`Since that letter, the City had solicited a scope of work for the report which was faxed
`to the D2SI-PRO on June 18, 2001. During the meeting, D2SI-PRO staff indicated that the
`consultant should start with conservative assumptions before proceeding to install borings in
`the canal dike and conduct soil tests, and we encouraged a phased approach to the report. Mr.
`Denby reported that if conservative assumptions were assumed the dike would be unlikely to
`meet the required FS = 1.5. After a lengthy discussion, Mr. Denby proposed a Phase I
`approach of inspecting the entire canal to identify which areas have a dike and which are cut
`from native soils, to evaluate any problems with the dike including seepage and stability
`problems, and to begin the determination of which are the high hazard areas, i.e., which have
`any homes at risk. This information would be used with dambreak studies to identify which
`homes are at risk of more than 2 feet of inundation, and thus which dike sections are high
`hazard. The initial effort has to be to clear the 9.1 mile dike of vegetation so the inspectors
`can sce any potential problems.
`
`We agreed to meet aga.it}&ahnut the end of August to discuss the results of this effort
`which would include a preliminary map of the canal shoeing dike areas, inundation areas, and
`identification of problems, e.g., seepage points. At that time the D2SI-PRO would help
`determine which dike sections besides the identified high hazard sections should be considered
`
`FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:
`
`ce: OHL ,D281X,DEER ,DHAC ,RIMSX ,FilesX , Additional Pages 1 .
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket