throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wyman Project
`FERC No. 2329-ME
`
`
`March 1, 2019
`
`
`
`
`Mr. David Capka, P.E., Director
`Division of Dam Safety and Inspections
`Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
`Office of Energy Projects
`888 First Street, N.E., Room 6N-01
`Washington, D.C. 20426
`
`Via eFiling and Hard Copy
`
`Subject: Wyman Project, FERC No. 2329-ME; NATDAM #ME-00089;
`Request for Approval of Part 12 Independent Consultant
`
`Dear Mr. Capka:
`
`Brookfield White Pine Hydro LLC (BWPH), licensee for the Wyman Project (FERC No. 2329-ME)
`requests the Commission’s approval for Dr. R. Craig Findlay, Ph. D., P.E., G.E. of Findlay Engineering
`(FEI) to serve as the Independent Consultant for the 11th Part 12 Dam Safety Inspection of the Wyman
`Project in 2019.
`
`As requested by the Commission’s January 9, 2019 letter, three copies of this letter and Dr. Findlay’s
`resume are enclosed. The fourth copy will be sent to the Commission’s New York Regional Office.
`
`If you have any questions or comments please contact:
`
`Stephen Hofacker, P.E. at 207-343-3213 or stephen.hofacker@brookfieldrenewable.com or
`Chris Karam, P.E. at 207-755-5632 or chris.karam@brookfieldrenewable.com
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`Kelly Maloney
`Manager, Compliance – Northeast
`
`Attachment
`
`Cc:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`N. Stevens, J. Seyfried, C. Karam, S. Hofacker, S. Michaud, J. Rancourt, D. Watson; BWPH
`
`C. Findlay; FEI
`
`J. Spain, H. Kamara; FERC-NYRO
`
`BWPH File: 2329|01
`
`

`

` R
`
` Craig Findlay, Ph.D., P.E., G.E.
`Phone:
` 207-846-1465
`Fax:
` 207-846-3434
`Email:
` cfindlay@findlayengineering.com
`Web Page: www.findlayengineering.com
`
`
`Education
`- B.S., Civil Engineering, 1976,
`University of New Hampshire
`- M.S., Civil Engineering, 1981,
`University of New Hampshire
`- Ph.D., Engineering, 1991,
`University of New Hampshire
`
`70 OLD FIELD ROAD, YARMOUTH, ME 04096
`
`
`Professional Affiliations
`- Member, American Society of Civil Engineers
`- Life Member, US Society for Dams (USSD)
`- Member, Association of Dams Safety Officials
`(ASDSO)
` - Affiliate Member Advisory Committee, Asso-
`ciation of State Dam Safety Officials (ASDSO)
`- Co-Editor, ASDSO Journal of Dam Safety
`- Current Member, ASCE Task Committee on
`Guidelines for Instrumentation and Measurements
`for Monitoring Dam Performance.
`- Past Member, Subcommittee on Guidelines, Inter-
`agency Committee on Dam Safety (ICODS).
`
`Independent Consultant and Principal, Findlay Engineering, Inc.
`Director of Geotechnical Engineering, Duke Engineering & Services, Inc. (formerly
`Northrop, Devine & Tarbell, Inc.)
`Manager of Geotechnical, Civil and Solid Waste Engineering, ABB- Environmental
`Services (during completion of Ph.D. Dissertation)
`Principal Engineer, Findlay Geotechnical Consulting, Inc. (geotechnical engineering
`consultant during Ph.D. research)
`Senior Geotechnical Engineer, E. C. Jordan Company and Jordan Gorrill Associates, Inc.
`Assistant Roadway Foundation Engineer, New Hampshire Department of Transportation
`
`
`Professional Licensing/Registration
`- Professional Civil Engineer: Alabama, California,
`Georgia, Idaho, Maine, Maryland, Montana, New
`Hampshire, New York, South Carolina, Oregon,
`Vermont, Washington, Wyoming.
`- Professional Geotechnical Engineer: California
`- Current NCEES Record.
`
`Employment History
`1998 to Present:
`1991 to 1998:
`
`
`
`
`1990 to 1991:
`
`
`
`
`1988 to 1991:
`
`
`
`
`1981 to 1988:
`
`1977 to 1981:
`
`
`Summary of Experience
`Dr. Findlay's 40 years in the dam safety, water resources and geotechnical engineering profession includes a broad
`variety of consulting and project engineering experience, more than 33 years of which have included involvement
`with dams and hydroelectric projects. He has served as technical lead or lead geotechnical engineer on hundreds of
`dam related projects, and serves on ongoing and past Boards of Consultants and Review Panels. Dr. Findlay has
`worked on several hydroelectric greenfield design and remediation projects which have given him broad experience
`with water resources projects including earth dam and embankment design and instrumentation; powerhouse,
`spillway and headworks foundations; stability, liquefaction and deformation analysis; seepage and piping
`assessments; finite element analysis of stresses in embankments, gravity dams, arch dams and radial gates; finite
`element analysis of earthquake response of embankments, gravity dams, and arch dams; unlined canal design; water
`retaining structure remediations; cement-bentonite cutoffs and slurry walls; grouting; anchor design; and dam safety
`inspections. Dr. Findlay has been an Independent Consultant on over 250 FERC Part 12 and other dam inspections,
`and/or a Potential Failure Modes Analysis Facilitator for clients including AER-NY Gen, LLC, Alabama Power,
`Algonquin Power, AEP, Avista Corporation, Brookfield Renewable Power, California Department of Water
`Resources, Central Nebraska PPID, Central Vermont Public Service, City of Danville Virginia, Duke Power, Eagle
`Creek, Entergy, EGE Fortuna, SA (Panama), Eugene Power & Electric Board, Florida Power & Light, Georgia
`Power, Green Mountain Power, Henwood Energy Services, Inc., Idaho Power Company, Louisiana Hydroelectric,
`Manitoba Hydro, NAE Mass, Nebraska Public Power District, Niagara Mohawk, Northern Lights, Inc., PacifiCorp,
`Pacific Gas & Electric, PowerSouth, Reliant Energy, South Carolina Electric & Gas, Southern California Edison,
`Synergics Energy Services, Vista Irrigation District and WE Energies. He has also conducted numerous dam
`structural stability analyses for gravity, slab and buttress, embankment and/or arch dams for many of the above
`clients. Craig has presented and published several technical papers on seismic analysis of dams, dam seepage, dam
`remediation, dam stability, grouting, reservoir erosion and in situ soil property measurement for technical societies
`including USCOLD, ASDSO, ASCE, ICOG, the Canadian Geotechnical Society, American Society of Testing and
`Materials (ASTM) and the Transportation Research Board. These papers are listed at the end of this resume.
`
`

`

`SAMPLING OF RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Buzzards Roost Emergency Spillway Project – Dr.
`Findlay is serving on a Board of Consultants required by
`the FERC for review of a remediation of an emergency
`spillway to mitigate the potential for headcutting. He is
`serving on the Board along with Messers John Northrop
`and and Gene Gemperline. The project is anticipated to
`be constructed by 2020, with Board review until 2021.
`
`Klamath River Renewal Project Board of Consultants –
`Dr. Findlay is serving on the Board of Consultant
`required by
`the FERC
`to review various aspects
`including methods, timing and downstream dam safety
`for the proposed removal of four dams on the Klamath
`River in Oregon and California. These include Iron Gate
`dam, Copco 1 Dam, Copco 2 Dam and J.C. Boyle Dam.
`Other Board members include Dan Hertel, MaryLouise
`Keefe, Steve Coombs, James Borg, and Ted Chant. The
`project is proposed to be completed by 2020, with
`potential Board review until 2025.
`
`Cabin Creek Pumped Storage Board of Consultants -
`Dr. Findlay is a current member of the Cabin Creek
`Board of Consultants required for the project by the
`FERC along with Larry Nuss and Dan Hertel for raising
`of the upper reservoir of the Cabin Creek Pumped
`Storage Project which is located near Georgetown
`Colorado in the Rocky Mountains. The project is owned
`and operated by Xcel Energy and regulated by the
`Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Construction is
`to be completed in 2019, with Board review until the end
`of 2020.
`
`Chilhowee Dam Board of Consultants - Dr. Findlay was
`a member of the Chilhowee Dam Board of Consultants
`required by the FERC along with John France and Alex
`Grenoble for the North Embankment Project, working
`with Brookfield Renewable Energy Group with regard to
`diagnosis and potential treatment of a seepage/piping
`issue at one of the dam’s embankments. The project is
`regulated
`by
`the Federal Energy Regulatory
`Commission. The Board was formed in 2015 as a result
`of several cloudy seepage incidents over several years.
`The embankment is a thin sloping core rockfill that was
`originally constructed by Alcoa. The project included an
`instrumented controlled deep drawdown to identify the
`elevation of the seepage defect, found to be at the
`interface of
`the embankment and a non-overflow
`concrete
`section. A
`forensic
`excavation
`and
`reconstruction of the defected area, including extensive
`use of secant piles to allow a box excavation below
`reservoir level to bedrock. The embankment has been
`reconstructed and the seepage eliminated. A final Board
`meeting was held in 2018 after a year of post-
`
`R. CRAIG FINDLAY, Ph.D., P.E., G.E.
`Page 2
`
`remediation operation.
`
`
`Prairie Du Sac Board of Consultants – Dr. Findlay is
`currently a member of the Board of Consultants required
`by the FERC with Larry Von Thune and John Northrop
`convened for Wisconsin Power & Light’s Prairie du Sac
`Dam. The dam is a slab-and-buttress structure founded
`on deep alluvial soils, and is regulated by the Federal
`Energy Regulatory Commission. The dam is a timber
`pile supported slab and buttress structure. Degradation
`of the gravel foundation on the downstream side has
`lowered the tailwater level significantly, leaving the tops
`of some of the piles exposed to air, and deterioration.
`The work has involved advice and review of a request
`for proposals to retain a design and construction team for
`remediation. Dr. Findlay is currently serving on the
`Board during design and the upcoming construction
`work. The design involves an innovated and complex
`underpinning using micropiles to support grade beams
`that will support the buttresses and piers. Construction is
`to begin in 2018, and to conclude about 2022, at which
`time the Board’s work will be completed.
`
`Logan Martin Board of Consultants - Dr. Findlay is a
`member of the Logan Martin Dam Board of Consultants
`required by the FERC for the Deep Foundation Grouting
`Project, working with Alabama Power Company with
`regard
`to ongoing
`treatment of karstic foundation
`seepage issues and the related ongoing grouting program.
` The project
`is regulated by
`the Federal Energy
`Regulatory Commission. Since 1968, the project has
`been a proving ground for state of the art grouting
`methodology and an on-site grout plant. Dr. Findlay
`joined the board of two other members in 2013 (Dr.
`Brian Greene and Dr. Donald A. Bruce), and was
`previously a FERC Independent Consultant for the
`project. The BOC work has included oversight on a
`unique
`columnar grouting program
`to mitigate
`embankment collapse potential in 2015 (paper reviewing
`the project presented at the 2015 ASDSO Conference
`paper for which Dr. Findlay is the lead author. Dr.
`Findlay also made a presentation regarding the project at
`the 2017 ASCE Grouting, Deep Mixing & Diaphragm
`Walls Conference in Honolulu, HI. Ongoing work
`includes investigation and treatment of other areas of the
`dam which will include BOC participation. Work is
`ongoing for the foreseeable future.
`
`Vermilion Dam Board of Consultants – Dr. Findlay has
`consulted with Southern California Edison (SCE) on
`Vermilion dam since 2002 as the Board of Consultants
`regarding the safety of this dam, which is located in the
`Sierra Mountains of California, about 60 miles northeast
`
`

`

`
`
`of Fresno California. Although the dam is regulated by
`the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, this board is
`not driven by a regulatory agency but exists at the
`discretion of the owner in view of the history of seepage
`at the dam. Also, in his capacity on the project, he has
`conducted seismic stability post-earthquake analysis and
`finite element seepage analysis on the dam. Part of his
`work includes conducting annual inspections of this 165
`foot high 4,268 foot long zoned embankment dam. The
`dam is founded on thick glacial moraine and outwash
`soils requiring an extensive drainage system which
`requires continual maintenance and supplementation.
`Currently, Dr. Findlay is advising SCE with regard to
`newly proposed drainage improvements downstream of
`the maximum section of the dam as well as assessments
`of the service spillway chute and the resistance to head
`cutting of an emergency spillway cut in soil. Prior to
`being on the Board, Dr. Findlay conducted three Part 12
`Inspections on
`the dam, dating back
`to 1994.
`Involvement has included assisting SCE in developing
`responses to new seepage areas and improvements in
`surveillance and monitoring of the dam and downstream
`seepage areas. Work is ongoing.
`
`Army Corps of Engineers, Independent External Peer
`Review Panel – During 2011, Dr. Findlay served on the
`independent external peer review panel responsible for
`reviewing the Dam Safety Modification Study for Rough
`River Dam, Kentucky for the USACE Planning Center of
`Expertise as a subcontractor to Noblis. He was one of
`nine panel multi-discipline members, and he provided
`geotechnical and dam safety technical expertise for this
`project.
`
`Army Corps of Engineers, Independent External Peer
`Review Panel - During 2010, Dr. Findlay was selected to
`participate in the independent external peer review panel
`to
`review
`the East Branch Dam, Elk County
`Pennsylvania Dam Safety Modification Study for
`the USACE Flood Risk Management Planning Center of
`Expertise as a subcontractor to Battelle. He was one of
`three panel members of a multidiscipline team for this
`work and he provided geotechnical and dam safety
`technical expertise for this project..
`
`Powell Lake Dam Review Board – In 2013, Dr. Findlay
`assisted Brookfield Renewable Energy Group on an
`advisory board with respect to seismic analysis and
`rehabilitation of their Powell Lake Dam in Powell River,
`British Columbia, about 70 miles northwest of the city of
`Vancouver. The dam retains a reservoir with storage
`estimated to be 45.36 square miles.
`
`Hawks Nest Post-Tension Anchorage Review Board –
`From 2012
`through 2014, Dr. Findlay assisted
`Brookfield Renewable Power as a technical advisor with
`
`R. CRAIG FINDLAY, Ph.D., P.E., G.E.
`Page 3
`
`regard to a grouting and post-tension anchorage project
`completed in 2014. Work included advising on revised
`grouting methods to resolve problems water proofing
`anchor holes and other technical issues as they arose in
`the field. Hawks Nest Dam is located on the New River,
`in West Virginia.
`
`Flint River Karst – In 2014-2016, Dr Findlay was
`retained by Georgia Power to participate in consultation
`with regard to seepage issues related to the karst
`foundation of this dam, located in southern Georgia.
`This work was triggered by the development of a
`sinkhole on the upstream slope of the dam in 2014. The
`work has included participation in a special potential
`failure modes assessment with the Part 12 Independent
`for the project, the owner, and the FERC, with potential
`rehabilitation consultation pending. In 2016, Dr. Findlay
`was selected to perform the Part 12 Inspection for the
`project.
`
`Klamath River Part 12 – In 2009 and again in 2014, Dr.
`Findlay conducted the FERC Five-Year Part 12D
`Independent Consultant
`Inspection of PacifiCorp
`Energy’s Klamath River Project, including J. C. Boyle
`Dam in Oregon and Copco 1 Dam and Iron Gate Dam in
`California. Iron Gate
`is a 173 foot high zoned
`embankment with a side channel spillway; J.C. Boyle is
`a 68 foot high concrete gravity and embankment dam
`with a Tainter Gate Spillway, and Copco 1 Dam is a 115
`foot high thick concrete arch topped with a Tainter gate
`spillway.
`
`Part 12 Inspection of Fairfield Pumped Storage
`Development- In 2015-2016, Dr. Findlay completed the
`Part 12 Inspection and PFMA review for South Carolina
`Electric & Gas’s Parr Shoals Project, which includes the
`Fairfield Pumped Storage Development and the Parr
`Shoals Development, the latter of which forms the lower
`reservoir for the pumped storage project. In 2014, is
`separate work prior to the Part 12 Inspection, Dr. Findlay
`performed a third party independent review of the
`extensive instrumentation of the Fairfield Development.
`
`Risk Assessment for Lundy Lake and Florence Lake
`Projects - In early 2016, Dr. Findlay participated in a
`special risk assessment workshop at the request of
`Southern California Edison for these two dams. Dr.
`Findlay has participated in Past Part 12 Inspections of
`the two dams, as well as various geotechnical issued
`related to the dams over his involvement with the
`projects since about 1995. The risk workshop included
`participation of the FERC and the California DSOD.
`
`Risk assessment of Vermilion and Shaver Lake Dams –
`In the fall of 2014, Dr. Findlay participated in a special
`risk assessment workshop at the request of Southern
`
`

`

`
`
`California Edison for these two dams. Dr. Findlay has
`participated in Past Part 12 Inspections of the two dams,
`as well as various geotechnical issued related to the dams
`over his involvement with the projects since about 1995.
`The risk workshop included participation of the FERC
`and the California DSOD.
`
`Fairfield Pumped Storage Special Independent Review
`of Surveillance and Monitoring – in 2014, Dr. Findlay
`was retained by South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G)
`to conduct an independent review of seepage and
`monitoring of Dams A, B, C and D of Fairfield Dam,
`part of the Fairfield Pumped Storage Development, Parr
`Hydroelectric Project. This work included a review of
`project data provided by the Licensee and a site visit. In
`addition to walking the Dam A through D embankments
`and downstream areas,
`the
`site visit
`included
`observations on the sides of the intake and walking under
`the above ground portions of the penstocks for the
`project downstream of the intake. Observations at Dike
`215 and Berm 99, which are saddle dikes on the Fairfield
`Reservoir (Lake Monticello), were also made. The
`independent review led to recommendations regarding
`relief well and seepage weir monitoring, treatment and
`monitoring of a boil area, and enhanced monitoring of
`the adjoining areas of a large intake structure that had
`experienced some erosion and undermining issues on the
`downstream side.
`
`Silver Lake assessment of conduit and potential for
`head cutting of auxiliary spillway- In 2014, Dr. Findlay
`conducted a Part 12 Inspection of the Silver Lake
`Project, including assessment of the potential for head
`cutting of an unlined emergency spillway and inspection
`and rehabilitation of an eighty year old segmented
`concrete conduit through a an embankment.
`
`Mathis Dam Slab and Buttress Analysis – Dr. Findlay
`conducted a linear elastic finite element analysis of this
`Ambursen-style slab and buttress dam using
`the
`computer program SAP-2000,
`licensed
`to FEI by
`Computers and Structures, Inc. The model included the
`left abutment, an unconstructed powerhouse incorporated
`into the bottom of the left abutment and half of the
`spillway section. The analysis considered normal, PMF
`and seismic loading cases. The dam is located in a
`moderate seismic area and a response spectra approach
`proved adequate as evaluated by the computed stress
`levels in the structure. A separate finite element model
`was constructed to model the corbels under seismic
`loading. The dam was found to be adequate except
`under PMF loading, where the downstream ogee slabs
`were found to need to be structurally connected to the
`buttresses to mitigate the potential for uplift during
`significant spill.
`
`
`R. CRAIG FINDLAY, Ph.D., P.E., G.E.
`Page 4
`
`Vermilion Auxiliary Spillway – Dr. Findlay analyzed the
`potential for headcutting of an unlined emergency
`spillway for Southern California Edison’s Vermillion
`Dam, located in the Sierra Mountains of California,
`about 90 miles from Fresno. The analysis included
`assessment of geologic conditions by subsurface
`investigation and documentation from original design.
`HEC-RAS was used to estimate flow velocities through
`the channel at various spill levels up to PMF. A tractive
`force analysis was made to estimate the stability of the
`channel and the ability of an underlying glacial till
`deposit to limit headcutting should the spillway ever
`experience a spill.
`
`Wallace Dam –Dr. Findlay conducted the 2014 Part 12
`Inspection and PFMA review for the Wallace Dam
`Pumped Storage Project for Georgia Power Company.
`
`Spokane River- In 2014, Dr. Findlay Conducted the Part
`12 Inspection of the Spokane River Project, located in
`Washington and Idaho, for Avista Corporation, the
`owner and operator. The project includes several gravity
`dams
`and
`an
`arch
`section
`comprising
`three
`developments.
`
`Lewis River Project, Washington – Dr. Findlay
`conducted the 2012 Part 12 Inspection of the Lewis
`River Project, located on the Lewis River in the Cascade
`Mountains south western Washington State. The project
`includes the 412 foot high Swift No. 1 embankment dam,
`323 foot high Yale embankment dam and the 314 foot
`high Merwin gravity arch dam. The work included
`advising on implications of a new PMF and revised site
`specific seismicity in this subduction zone affected
`region.
`
`2012-2013 EWEB Part 12 Inspections, Oregon – Dr.
`Findlay conducted the 2012 Part 12 Inspection of Eugene
`Water and Electric Board’s Leaburg-Walterville Project
`with nine miles of canal and the Carmen Smith Project,
`including the 235 foot high Smith embankment dam.
`The projects are located east of Eugene Oregon. Dr
`Findlay continues to assist EWEB in an advisory role
`with regard to seismic hazard assessments for the
`projects and structural analyses. He also conducted the
`inspection of the Leaburg-Walterville Project in 2017,
`and continues to assist with regard to remedial measured
`for the canals.
`
`2014 Summary of Work – FERC Part 12 Inspection
`included projects for PacifiCorp (Klamath River and
`Pioneer Projects in Oregon, California and Utah),
`Brookfield Renewable Power (Louisiana Hydro Project,
`Stewarts Bridge, Upper Raquette River and Carry Falls
`Projects in Louisiana and New York State), Green
`Mountain Power (Silver Lake Project in Vermont), City
`
`

`

`
`
`of Danville Virginia (Pinnacles Project), WE Energies
`(White Rapids and Chalk Hill Projects), and Algonquin
`Power (SquaPan Project). Other Inspections for Southern
`California Edison (Vermilion Dam, California). South
`Carolina Electric and Gas (Fairfield Project in South
`Carolina). Seismic and Structural Stability Analyses for:
`Georgia Power (Mathis Dam FEM Response Spectrum –
`slab and buttress dam). Boards of Consultants/Advisory
`Boards for Alabama Power, Southern California Edison,
`and Brookfield Renewable Energy. Participated in two
`Risk Assessment Workshops for Southern California
`Edison.
`
`2013 Summary of Work – FERC Part 12 Inspection
`included projects for PacifiCorp, Duke Energy, Alabama
`Power, Georgia Power, Power South, Brookfield
`Renewable Power, AEP, WE Energies, and Nebraska
`Public Power District. Other Inspections for Southern
`California Edison. Seismic and Structural Stability
`Analyses
`for: PacifiCorp
`(seismic/deformation –
`embankment; gravity analysis, intake section), Georgia
`Power (FEM Response Spectrum – slab and buttress
`dam; gravity analysis, gravity arch dam). Boards of
`Consultants/Advisory Boards
`for Alabama Power,
`Southern California Edison, and Brookfield Renewable
`Energy.
`
`2008-2010 Noxon Rapids Hydroelectric Development
`embankment Seepage Issue – Noxon Rapids dam is
`located near Noxon, Montana. It is a 260 foot high
`concrete gravity spillway and intake with two flanking
`earthfill embankments constructed in 1960. The size of
`the reservoir formed by the dam is 7,940 acres, and is
`approximately 38 miles in length and 1.3 miles wide at
`the maximum width. Total storage is of the order of
`400,000 acre-feet, including approximately 75,000 acre-
`feet of useable storage.
` The
`left or southwest
`embankment and reservoir overlie a lacustrian clayey silt
`layer underlain by a clean, pervious gravel (referred to as
`Noxon Gravel) and bedrock. Upon first filling in 1960,
`sink holes through the lacustrian clayey silt developed
`upstream of the dam which allowed full reservoir head to
`enter the Noxon Gravel and caused the phreatic surface
`under the left embankment and downstream river bank to
`rise substantially. The Noxon Gravel did not meet
`reverse filter criteria for the lacustrian layer. The result
`of the pressurization of the Noxon Gravel was serious
`slope movements and seepage downstream of the
`southwest embankment. In response, from 1960 through
`1969, Avista conducted extensive clay blanketing of the
`reservoir bottom to seal the leakage into the Noxon
`Gravel. This blanketing proved to be successful and the
`slope movement and seepage were eliminated. In 2008,
`a
`non-turbid
`seep was
`suddenly
`discovered
`approximately 100 yards downstream of
`the
`left
`embankment, in the area of the 1960s seepage and
`
`R. CRAIG FINDLAY, Ph.D., P.E., G.E.
`Page 5
`
`stability problems. Avista retained Dr. R Craig Findlay
`in the assessment of the new seepage outbreak. The
`history of seepage and slope stability problems at the
`location of a suddenly appearing seep raised concerns
`with regard to the possibility of the past problems
`redeveloping. The approach taken to understand and
`address this problem was to compile the history of the
`area, conduct field investigations, and develop good
`geologic
`sections
`to understand
`the
`subsurface
`conditions. Field exploration at the seepage location
`identified an old buried conduit across an old buried
`access road. The conduit was hydraulically connected to
`a sand deposit downstream of the dam that seasonally
`surcharged with snow melt water. The work was the
`subject of an ASDSO annual conference paper presented
`in 2011.
`
`Cross Channel Analysis of Ambursen-Type Slab and
`Buttress Dam, Mathis Project, Georgia Power
`Company – In 2013-2014, Dr. Findlay is conducting a
`3D finite element stress analysis of the slab and buttress
`spillway section of Mathis Dam, located on the Tallulah
`River at River Mile 354, in Rabun County, about 8 miles
`southwest of Clayton, Georgia. The dam is a concrete
`slab-and-buttress structure (Ambursen-type structure, but
`not constructed by Ambursen) 730 feet long and about
`115 feet high. Response spectra were developed for the
`analysis in the three orthogonal directions. Nine bays of
`the spillway, an abandoned powerhouse section (three
`bays), and the left abutment (nine bays) of the dam were
`modeled using the program SAP2000, and seismic
`loading was applied in the cross channel, channel
`parallel and vertical directions. Currently, the model is
`being refined by Dr. Findlay to take a closer look at the
`corbels and a transition buttress, to include time history
`analysis.
`
`Upper and Middle Dam Remedial Measures,
`Androscoggin River Drainage, Brookfield Renewable
`Power (formerly FPL Energy-Maine Hydro LLC) –
`From 2005 and ongoing through 2015, Dr. Findlay has
`participated as a geotechnical consultant and member of
`the advisory/review board for replacement of
`the
`spillways and remediation of the embankments for Upper
`and Middle Dams located in the Western Mountains of
`Maine. The Upper Dam portion of the project is
`currently under construction. The dams are owned and
`operated by FPL Energy and regulated by the FERC.
`The rehabilitation work is under review of the Federal
`Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Currently, Dr
`Findlay is a member of the review board advising
`Brookfield with regard to design and construction of the
`replacement of the spillways and remediation of the
`embankments of both of the dams. A joint venture of a
`contractor and consultant prepared the design for the
`work, and Dr. Findlay has participated in numerous
`
`

`

`
`
`review meetings as well as facilitated a special
`construction Potential Failure Modes Analyses for the
`work. The embankments were constructed in the early
`1900’s and in recent years were identified to have
`seepage, artesian pressure and slope stability problems
`that the FERC had directed the owner to remediate. The
`FERC had also directed the owner to assess if the
`embankments had any seismic stability/liquefaction
`issues. In 2006, Dr. Findlay planned an extensive
`geotechnical
`investigations conducted by Findlay
`Engineering, Inc. to assess subsurface conditions for
`planning the remediations. Engineering evaluation
`included assessment of existing slope stability, seismic
`and liquefaction stability, and design analyses of several
`potential
`remedial approaches.
` The
`subsurface
`investigations determined
`that
`sections of
`the
`embankments are founded on pervious alluvial soils
`underlain by relatively impervious, dense glacial till.
`The pervious alluvial soils were assessed
`to be
`responsible for the artesian conditions identified at the
`toe of the embankments in at least one locations. To
`remediate the embankments, a 500 foot long sheet pile
`cutoff wall was installed at one embankment, and a
`downstream filter berm is planned at the other. The
`sheet pile approach was used where the alluvial layer
`was at a low elevation, to avoid the need to have a
`prolonged drawdown of the storage reservoir retained by
`the embankment or expensive dewatering measures
`which would otherwise been needed
`for other
`remediation approaches which would have required
`excavation of the downstream toe or slope. At other
`locations where the alluvial soils are at a higher elevation
`and would only be a problem with regard to embankment
`stability during extreme flood scenarios, a filter berm has
`been proposed for the future remediation currently under
`design. At present (2015), the sheet pile cutoff has been
`installed, and the rehabilitation of the spillway is under
`construction.
`
`Henshaw Dam Part 12 and Seismic Analysis – Dr.
`Findlay was the Part 12 Independent Consultant for the
`2011 Inspection of Henshaw Dam, owned by the Vista
`Irrigation District, northeast of San Diego, California.
`The dam is a hydraulic fill embankment that was
`buttressed in the 1980s to improve seismic stability. The
`dam straddles a brachiated splay of the Elsinore Fault.
`At the request of the FERC, Dr. Findlay conducted an
`updated deformation analysis, which was done using
`scaled time histories selected based on matching with
`response spectra for the project region. The analysis
`used
`the Newmark Sliding Block method, as
`implemented using the GeoSlope International suite of
`finite
`element
`and
`limit
`equilibrium programs
`(SIGMA/W, QUAKE/W and SLOPE/W). The dam is
`located in a zone of high seismicity, and the analysis
`work also had to consider the potential of fault offset
`
`R. CRAIG FINDLAY, Ph.D., P.E., G.E.
`Page 6
`
`across the dam as well as evaluation of the adequacy of
`filter compatibility of the zoned embankment materials
`using modern (USACOE) criteria.
`
`Borel Canal Deformation Analysis – Borel Canal is a
`power canal that takes water from an outlet through the
`USACE Lake Isabella Auxiliary Dam, located east of
`Bakersfield, California, on the Kern River. The canal is
`owned and operated by Southern California Edison to
`convey water to the Borel Powerhouse. In the early to
`mid-2000’s, the USACE recognized that the Kern Valley
`Fault, which runs through the right abutment of the
`Isabella Auxiliary dam and a section of the Borel Canal,
`was potentially active and capable of being the source of
`a significant earthquake (M7). This resulted in an
`assessment of significantly increased seismicity for the
`dam and the side hill cut-and-fill canal. The canal has
`many side hill embankment sections that needed to be re-
`assessed for seismic deformation at the request of the
`FERC in 2011. SCE retained Dr. Findlay in 2011 to
`conduct deformation analyses at five cross sections along
`the canal route. This was done using scaled time
`histories selected based on matching with response
`spectra for the project region. The analysis used the
`Newmark Sliding Block method, as implemented using
`the GeoSlope International suite of finite element and
`limit equilibrium programs (SIGMA/W, QUAKE/W and
`SLOPE/W). Work also included consultation with
`regard to potential offset of the canal within one of its
`tunnel sections.
`
`Swinging Bridge Dam Part 12 Inspection - Dr. Findlay
`was the P

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket