`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Luciana Pardo
`
`23234”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Carmen Miranda
`
`Bayamon,
`
`961”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Jacqueline Dawson
`
`Ramey, PA
`
`166710264”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Caroline James
`
`20036”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Koren Sherrick
`
`Tucson, AZ
`
`857506454”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Clifford Provost
`
`New York, NY
`
`100656431”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Linda Montayne
`
`Highland, IL
`
`622491920”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Peter Reardon
`
`Jurupa Valley, CA
`
`91752”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Charlotte Visarraga
`
`Bakersfield, CA
`
`93305”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Denise Bounous
`
`Hendersonville, NC
`
`28739”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Lester Scafidi
`
`Athol, MA
`
`1331”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Eric Voise
`
`Phoenix, AZ
`
`850446844”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Kevin Smith
`
`Havertown, PA
`
`190832028”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Lydia Saderman
`
`Forest Hills, NY
`
`113752901”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Susan Ponchot
`
`Sunrise, FL
`
`333515935”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Carla Wiebe Wiebe
`
`0”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`ARLENE CURINGA
`
`New York, NY
`
`100224839”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Mark D'Andrea
`
`Carlsbad, CA
`
`92009”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Ryan Hadley
`
`San Francisco, CA
`
`941233120”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand both dockets
`both in scope and in direct standards of review for projects under FERC's purview. For too long FERC has
`approved gas pipelines, LNG terminals, and hydropower dams for big developers with zero regard for
`the safety of communities, wildlife, and the planet.
`
`While these dockets are both important steps in the right direction, they are also insufficient to address
`all the harm to our climate and communities. FERC's decisions directly impact the lives of people
`throughout the country and for too long - as activists, state legislatures, local regulators and the courts
`have told FERC - real considerations of climate impact, GHG emissions, and environmental justice have
`been not just ignored, but specifically banned from FERC's decision-making process.
`
`Now we finally have a draft docket that begins to address these concerns, and instead of immediately
`implementing the changes and working with impacted communities to expand and refine their impact,
`FERC has bowed to political pressure and threatened to delay, defer or deny the whole enterprise.
`Instead of rolling back protections, such as greenhouse gas analysis and impacts on communities, I
`implore you to truly overhaul your permitting process to ensure that people come before polluters.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Jessica Freeman
`
`Hopewell, VA
`
`238604424”
`
`
`
`
`
`Re Docket PL21-3-000 & PL18-1-000
`
`
`
`"To the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
`
`On behalf of myself, my community, and the climate that we share, I write to support these two dockets
`as part of a long-overdue overhaul your permitting process. And encourage you to expand bo
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
