throbber

`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`BEFORE THE
`FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Docket No. RM21-17-000
`
`
`18 CFR Part 35
`
`Building for the Future Through
`Electric Regional Transmission
`Planning and Cost Allocation
`and Generator Interconnection
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMMENTS OF THE PRYSMIAN GROUP
`
`
`
`
`The Prysmian Group (Prysmian) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Federal Energy
`Regulatory Commission’s April 21, 2022 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NOPR”) in the above-captioned
`proceeding. As a worldwide leader in developing, manufacturing, and installing the cables and conductors
`for power transmission and with 20 factories located in the United States, we are both a large industrial user
`of electricity and a technology provider to transmission service providers. As an industrial user, energy costs
`make up a substantial portion of our operating expenses. As such, we applaud the consideration of advanced
`transmission technologies such as dynamic line rating and power flow control in regional transmission
`planning as these technologies can serve to cost effectively enable more capacity from existing transmission
`lines. The NOPR requests comment on additional transmission technologies that should be considered in
`regional transmission planning. As a leader in transmission technologies we are continually investing to
`develop solutions that allow transmission lines to operate more efficiently and reliably. Prysmian would
`encourage consideration of two additional transmission technologies. First, we encourage consideration of
`the reconductoring of existing transmission lines where higher capacity advanced conductors can replace
`existing legacy conductors. Instead of building new lines, reconductoring existing structures with advanced
`conductors with heat dissipating coatings can typically double the capacity of older lines. Reconductoring
`has been performed for decades and with the advent of advanced conductors with heat dissipating coatings,
`existing structures can typically be reused with little to no modification. We encourage reconductoring to be
`considered as an option in all regional planning. Secondly, we encourage consideration of the process of
`retrofitting heat dissipating coatings on existing transmission lines. These durable coatings can be applied
`robotically to installed lines and act to both reduce solar heating and to increase the heat emitted from the
`conductor. Static, ambient adjusted, or dynamic line ratings can be increased by as much as 25%. This
`increase in capacity is relatively easy to model, requiring modification to only two variables in line rating
`calculations. It also leads to more accurate line ratings because assumed rating variables are replaced by
`tested values. Prysmian’s trade name for a heat dissipating coating is E3X® and has been used on dozens of
`utility projects to increase capacity of transmission lines. Prysmian encourages that in additional to dynamic
`line rating and power flow controls, advanced conductors for reconductoring and heat dissipating coatings
`also be considered to cost effectively and quickly increase capacity of the existing grid.
`
`

`

`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`Joseph Coffey
`Director of Transmission
`Prysmian Group
`4 Tesseneer Drive
`Highland Heights, KY 41076
`Joseph.coffey@prysmiangroup.com
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket