throbber
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`BEFORE THE
`FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
`
`
`
`
`Northern Natural Gas Company )
`
`Docket No. RP22-1033-000
`
`
`
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION
`TO SUSPEND THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE,
`WAIVE ANSWER PERIOD AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED ACTION
`
`
`To: The Honorable Andrew Satten
`
`Acting Chief Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable Patricia M. French
`Presiding Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`Pursuant
`
`to Rule 212 of
`
`the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
`
`(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.212 (2022), Northern
`
`Natural Gas Company ("Northern") on behalf of all of the Participants in this proceeding,1
`
`respectfully requests that the Chief Administrative Law Judge, in consultation with the
`
`Presiding Administrative Law Judge, (i) suspend the procedural schedule in this
`
`proceeding with the understanding that the Participants shall submit a status report to the
`
`Chief and Presiding Judges if a settlement agreement has not been filed by June 30, 2023,
`
`(ii) waive the answering period to this Motion provided by Rule 213, 18 C.F.R. §385.213
`
`(2022), and (iii) expeditiously grant the motion so that the Participants may avoid the
`
`significant time and expense associated with meeting a series of rapidly approaching
`
`
`1 Northern provided a draft of this Motion to all Participants in this proceeding, and none has expressed opposition to
`the requests set forth herein.
`
`

`

`procedural deadlines. Granting this Motion will allow the Participants to draft and file
`
`definitive documents memorializing the settlement that all Participants have agreed to in
`
`principle, together with any associated documents.
`
`
`
`This proceeding began when Northern filed a general section 4 rate case on July 1,
`
`2022. The Participants in these proceedings have engaged in extensive settlement
`
`discussions which included multiple settlement conferences, numerous telephone
`
`conference calls, the exchange of settlement offers and counter-offers, and countless other
`
`communications to iron out the differences among the varied interests involved in this case.
`
`Despite the many diverse interests and strongly held opinions, the Participants reached an
`
`agreement in principle to settle the case on May 12, 2023. This Motion is an important step
`
`towards promptly finalizing and filing definitive settlement documents that will benefit all
`
`the Participants.
`
`
`
`In light of the agreement in principle, the Participants request that the Chief Judge,
`
`in consultation with the Presiding Judge, suspend the procedural schedule with provision
`
`for a status report, as suggested above, so that the Participants can focus their time and
`
`resources on finalizing and filing a definitive offer of settlement. Good cause exists to grant
`
`this motion because it will (i) avoid the great time and expense of protracted litigation of a
`
`complex case involving numerus participants, (ii) provide benefits to the Participants much
`
`more quickly than litigation, and (iii) allow the Participants to focus their time and
`
`resources on finalizing a definitive offer of settlement.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Northern circulated a draft of this Motion to all Participants in this proceeding. No
`
`Participant has indicated that it opposes the request to suspend the procedural schedule. In
`
`light of the lack of opposition to this Motion, Northern requests, on behalf of all
`
`Participants, that the Chief Judge, in consultation with the Presiding Judge, act as soon as
`
`possible to waive the answering period to this Motion and issue an order suspending the
`
`procedural schedule, thereby allowing the Participants to focus their efforts on finalizing
`
`an offer of settlement.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`
`
`The Participants request that (i) the procedural schedule be suspended with a
`
`requirement to report to the Chief Administrative Law Judge and the Presiding
`
`Administrative Law Judge or to file an offer of settlement by June 30, 2023, (ii) the
`
`answering period for this motion be waived in light of the fact that all Participants either
`
`support or do not oppose the Motion, and (iii) the Motion be granted expeditiously.
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Monique L. Watson
`Monique L. Watson
`Karen Bruni
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20036-1795
`mwatson@steptoe.com
`kbruni@steptoe.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel for Northern Natural Gas
`Company
`
`
`Kirk Lavengood
`Vice President, General Counsel
`& Regulatory Affairs
`J. Gregory Porter
`Assistant General Counsel
`Britany S. Shotkoski
`Senior Attorney
`Northern Natural Gas Company
`1111 South 103rd Street
`Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000
`kirk.lavengood@nngco.com
`greg.porter@nngco.com
`britany.shotkoski@nngco.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing document on
`
`each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary for this
`
`proceeding.
`
`Dated at Washington, D.C. this 15th day of May 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Karen Bruni
`Karen Bruni
`Steptoe & Johnson LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 429-6454
`kbruni@steptoe.com
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket