throbber
.,
`
`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 1 of 25
`FILED BY Fr; D.C.
`
`VASSILIOS KUKORINIS V WALMART, INC.
`CASE 1: 19-cv-20592-JEM -MARTINEZ/OTAZO-
`
`SEP 2 5 2020
`ANGELA E. NOBLE
`CLERK U.S. DIST. CT.
`S. 0 . Of FLA.· MIAMI
`
`Page 1 of 13
`09/22/2020
`
`DECLARATION OF VASSILIOS KUKORINIS PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE IN
`SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION OF THE SETTLEMENT, and reasons for
`denning the service award "price".
`
`Your Honors
`
`Up to this moment I have no personal knowledge of the matters stated in the motion for
`preliminary approval of the settlement, and the Plaintiffs' attorneys have not discussed,
`explained, or asked my opinion or approval.
`
`According to RETAINER AGREEMENT when I employed the law firm of Morgan &
`Morgan, my Duties as Client and a Class Representative, among others, were to be generally
`knowledgeable with respect to the subject matter and progress of the lawsuit, and represent the
`interests of all members of the class, as I would consider my own interests.
`
`Also # 8 Scope of Services Morgan & Morgan's Duties, were to Keep Client reasonably
`informed of the status of this matter.
`
`Unfortunately the Plaintiffs attorneys fail to keep this promise, and as a result I learned
`recently about
`the "successful" PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
`SETTLEMENT - and everything else happened that last 8 months in this case carrying my
`name - from online search, when I googled "Kukorinis V. Walmart".
`
`The last contact -by e-mail- I had with plaintiff's attorney Mr. John A. Yanchunis (Bar No.
`324681), was Jan 2P1 2020, complaining about Wahn.art's delay to provide the National
`sales data, as agreed at Nov 19th mediation meeting.
`
`Today-eight months later- after purchasing and downloading the PDFs of the Case No. 1: 19-
`CV-20592-MARTINEZ/OTAZO-REYES, surprisingly I discovered that all the developments
`took place after January 2020, happened without the Class Action Representative being
`informed, participated or updated, especially for the decision and the terms of the settlement.
`
`Therefor I thank the parties, but I am refusing to accept the agreed Service Award money,
`because I don't want to participate to this fiasco/cover up and betrayal to all class action
`members, orchestrated without my knowledge.
`
`This letter/declaration is not reviewed, polished or corrected by an attorney, and since English
`it's not my first language, please excuse the plethora of grammatical and syntax errors, while I
`am trying to explain and express my thoughts. I am furious and disappointed because this
`attempt to stop the lasting Defendant's deceptive and unfair acts or practices, not only failed,
`additionally the victims/class members feel that is an insult to our intelligence and common
`sense.
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 2 of 25
`
`Page 2 of 13
`
`When MORGAN & MORGAN drafted the initial complaint, I protested to the attorneys by e(cid:173)
`mail, pointing out that looks extremely "poor" and not mentioning -besides the low-fake
`price/unit scheme for the reduced products- the many other different ways WALMART
`misleading, deceiving and overcharging customers by manipulating prices, promote fake
`"specials", false advertised tags, and scanning gimmicks. I asked them to get advantage of the
`countless digital and printed material/evidences I provided. I requested an in-person meeting
`(and turned down) in order to explain to them, how all these deceptions work, without the fraud
`been suspected or noticed by the customers, or the city's, state's, and government watch dogs.
`
`Mr Yanchunis replied that "didn't want to risk for a judge to view it as sensationalism"
`(whatever that means), and "the complaint is not intended to capture all the evidences, that is
`the purpose of the trial". And that was the plan when he responds to defendant's Motion to
`Dismiss.
`
`"Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury of all claims in this Class Action Complaint".
`
`But today I found out that Jury Trial, will never take place.
`
`I believe it's important to mention that 3 years ago, when I started this quest at West Palm
`Beach, I was referred to another big shot Class Action Attorney, who considered the Law suit,
`as a Monster case, and he was going to quit his Big Law firm in, order to exclusively work on
`Walmart's class action. After collecting from me for 8 months the evidences I gathered, and
`stalling to file the complaint, I (suspected he was sleeping with the enemy) have to let him go
`and move to West Coast in search for a better lawyer. That was the reason I postponed my
`retirement, and I moved to Tampa to keep an eye to the new Law Firm (I was referred) and the
`progress of the case. Unfortunately, no better luck, since I have been again ignored, misled and
`denied even
`to a "Client to La
`er
`live meetin " before Covid 19
`andemic .
`
`For first time I met the attorneys on November 18th• 2018 in California to be present to pt
`attempted mediation. I was impressed how all participants (with the exception of mediator)
`declared that were bad in mathematics, and I was wondering how they are going to interpret
`analyze the sales data prepared by an expert, develop damages models, and determine
`statistically the amount potentially at issue overcharged, in this Litigation. The mediator Mis
`Yoshida suggested, instead of limiting the scope of that information to Florida sales, Walmart
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 3 of 25
`
`Page 3 of 13
`
`could provide nationwide sales data for the class period, and we should try to settle the whole
`"package".
`
`While I was waiting for months for Wal.mart to responds with the numbers, suddenly, I am
`reading on Internet, that I "vigorously prosecuted this case for the benefit of all class
`Members by filing Litigation, reviewing, pleading, conferring with my Counsel , and
`providing input at mediation and crafting AND APPROVING the SETTLEMENT!!!
`
`For the record, I do understand one thing or two about math. I traveled around the world
`since 80s as Ocean Going Ships Marine Captain, and then (no GPS) we relied to advance
`mathematics to calculate the cargos and determine the ships position using astronomical
`navigation. I also served as reserved officer in the NA VY as commander. Later, back to old
`country, I worked as (top) TV investigating reporter, and guess what was one of the most
`successful stories I investigated and exposed.
`A French multinational supermarket company (like Wal.mart), "invaded" the country and very
`soon controlled 85 % of the retail industry, erasing all the antagonism. Their secret? Bribing
`officials, aggressive advertising, so the media never bother them, and massive price
`manipulations and customer deception. Rarely somebody suspected how magically the prices
`changes from the shelve to cash register, and always UP. That is the (only) way to become a
`leader (so fast) in a so competitive market.
`When you overcharge from 20 - 300%, on top of the Gross margin profit, you can afford to
`pay for aggressive marketing/advertising, bribing consumers watch dogs, and raise 4 times up
`the amount of annual salary to Wal.mart's store managers in order to make them accomplishes
`(since they get commission of the extra profits).
`With a little Google research, everybody will discover the hundreds of million "invested"
`from Walmart in bribes to officials in countries like Mexico, India etc. As for the practices of
`price manipulation schemes, and inferior product baptized "premium" in Costa Rica, England,
`even to China also are well publicized. The differences with the USA are, that at the above
`countries' authorities, "Caught them many times red handed".
`Except for N.Y and California, where the AG. Offices investigated, convicted and fined them
`with multimillion dollar slaps, the majority of the states prefer not to poke the bear, all thought
`sometimes, Weights and Measures inspect retail locations with automated point-of-sale
`systems to verify if prices charged to consumers are the same as those posted, advertised,
`or quoted price (as the Law require).
`For unknown reasons I don't believe that happening to Wal.mart's stores, at the State of Florida.
`How do I Know that (you may ask)?
`Due to personal serious brain injury 4 years ago, and until I recover (partially) I started
`keeping electronically notes, photos and video to all the places I visited for shopping. Surprise
`surprise, soon I discovered by comparing my notes that Walmart raped me financially every
`time. At the beginning I thought was just the specific store. So, I captured with the cellphone all
`the crazy/unbelievable rip offs, created a Blog and send it as a complain to Arkansas Home
`office Customer Service, and e-mailed a link to every executive board member, as a wake-up
`call. Classically they ignored me, so I decided to investigate how much the cancer have spread.
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 4 of 25
`
`4 of13
`Three years past, and I visited hundreds ofWalmart stores, multi times all over Florida. I
`never been in any store more than 10 minutes, without to register hundreds (to each store), well
`documented evidences of various schemes/practices, which targeted middle and low class
`customers wallet, that don't have the luxury of time in order to spend an extra hour,
`to protest at long Customer Service Desk lines, for been lied, insulted, and cheated by
`overpaying. The attorneys call it OVERCHARGING, but the Thesaurus has dozens of
`synonyms like extortion, defraud, stiff, soak, surcharge, Gaz ump, fleece, plume, pluck,
`rob, hook, gouge, rip off, etc.
`Verb= Make or seek to make an excessive or unfair profit, especially illegally.
`Profiteer, racketeer, abuse, exploit, scalp, and simply put it "make someone pay through
`the nose".
`Ok all that are theory, let's talk evidences.
`At the "Amended Class Action Complaint" one of the overcharges, described as follow.
`_ On April 19, 2018, Plaintiff purchased a spiral ham at a Walmart store in Delray Beach,
`Florida. The yellow sales label stated a ham weighed 11.61 pounds at a unit price o/$0.64 per
`pound, but the total price on the yellow label stated $16.45. As alleged, Walmart received an
`extra $9.02 -the difference between $16.45 and $7.43- on the sale because the unit price
`
`re ected that the ham should have on! cost $7.43 ----
`
`This is accurate description but it's not the whole story. When the cashier scanned the yellow -
`reduced-tag at the register, the monitor (and the "system ") charge me magically the initial
`/Full Price. More than $25. I pointed out the "phenomenon", and the cashier voided and re(cid:173)
`scanned it. This time the monitor shows $16.45 Of course, still is not adds up since,
`
`11 pounds X $ 0.64/LB should be about $7 not$ 16 (120% more). I requested to cancel it,
`and cashier called the manager. I explained the situation and he very rudely, respond "you are
`not going to get this ham for $7''. He used his phone calculator to persuade me that I was
`wrong, but the result proved him wrong. Finally, he admits that something is not adding up,
`and blame "The Computer (from Arkansas Home Office) does it, and the store just scan the
`product and print the yellow tag. But he assured me (sarcastically), he will put the Ham in the
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 5 of 25
`
`Page 5 of 13
`
`refrigerator at his office, and when "Tim" (assumed the Regional manager) come in the
`afternoon, he will show it to him, and get an explanation.
`
`Gentlemen & Ladies, 2 days later, I visited again the Store and the same exactly Ham, same
`tag, was again at the store shelves, along with another hundreds similar products overcharged
`up to 200%. ( and it was just a neighborhood Store).
`
`I bought it again and ( recorder the procedure). Unfortunately, the photos of all overcharged
`products (like this) added to the amended complaint, never entered as evidences in the docket,
`so everybody could understand, that the $1.67 that the attorneys agreed as Averaee
`Overchaa:;e, it's a convenient myth. Not reality. Let's do 1st grade math.
`
`The max.settlement amount is $ 9.5 million. If Walmart in US. runs 5000+ stores, and
`multiply by 5 (year's class action period), times 365 days = 9.5 million. So if we divide this
`number by $1.67 - the celling settlement amount, (minus 3 million for attorney+ expenses)
`covers less than a half overcharged item per dav, per each store.
`
`dare to call the settlement fair, reasonable, and adequate?
`
`Are they serious? They
`
`How about the third component of the Settlement. Is for those Class Members who purchased
`Weighted Goods during the Class Period, retained proofs of purchase or other documentation
`AND retained proof of the packaging to demonstrate the amount of overpayment!!!
`
`"This benefit (attorneys insist) is crucial because it permits Settlement Class Members to
`recover all amounts, they were overcharged during the Class Period". Another insult to
`victim's intelligence, if they insist that (besides me) consumers the last 5 years kept the
`dirty& stinky full of bacteria packaging of meat and fish, just in case one day they ll need
`it!!!
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 6 of 25
`
`At Walmart's Restrooms, mainly at stores located in low income areas, there are plenty of
`sighs with the follow threats.
`
`Page 6 of 13
`
`"Shoplifting is stealing, and shoplifters apprehended. Even if it's their first offence will
`punished with a lengthy prison term and a substantial monetary fine, plus a record will haunt
`them for the rest of your life".
`
`Of course, is in English and Spanish only, since everybody knows that French or Italian or
`Greek speaking customers they don't steal.
`
`But if shoplifting is stealing, "customer lifting" or overcharging, or gouge, or Rip off ( and
`all other synonyms), shouldn't punished in a similar way?
`
`Why when the store gets caught red hand, and you (the customer) have a proof to demonstrate
`the amount of (systematically) overcharged, at best case scenario you get only the difference,
`without any consequence for the store. Why states like Michigan have the "Michigan's
`Scanner Law" where, the seller will refund you the difference between the amount charged
`and the price displayed, plus a "bonus" of ten times the difference.
`
`Or in Canada (since we have a lot of snow birds, and they will never be compensated fairly
`with this settlement ), "if the scanned price of an item is higher than the price shown on the
`shelve or advertised by the store, for instance, the customer is entitled to receive any item $10
`or less for free. Why our legislators care only for the seller's interests and created the 812.015
`anti-theft law to be applied only to customers. "Violators may receive a penalty of monetary
`fines, jail or prison time, and/or the suspension of your driver's license even for a piece of gum.
`
`"Altering or removing a label, universal product code (UPC), or price tag also falls under
`the definition". But is it what exactly Walmart doing, when manipulate the UPC (bar)code, in
`order to overcharge?
`
`If not (its 2nd grade math) please explain that next photo (after you enlarge it).
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 7 of 25
`
`Page 7 of 13
`
`~=-·=-:=<I
`-
`
`s.~s
`-f. 6. 16 _ _..,.
`=10 1
`,--~ -
`5.t4 x 1~5~
`,Joi~ 6:1&
`
`You solved the puzzle?
`
`In paragraph #38 Plaintiff's counsel (on my behalf L.O.L.) explains that for the "benefits"
`provided under the settlement, class members/victims will release any legal claims that
`may arise from OR RELATE to the facts and claims ALLEGED in the complaint.
`
`In your opinion Sirs these resent photos (you will find in the included USB thumb drive) with
`this new and improved way to scam the customers), is related to the original ''trick Walmart
`used to deceive customers advertising with low but FAKE price per unit.?
`
`"Members will release ariy legal claims that may arise from or relate to the facts alleged in the
`Second Amended Complaint ".
`
`This is the main reason Your Honor I declined the Service Award. As the plaintiffs' attorneys
`are fully aware, Walmart use more than few ways to scam people, even for the specific
`category of the weighted products, other than the reduced with fake low price per unit.
`
`While in the settlement WALMART promising to take measures to eliminate such practices,
`up to this moment, I know for a fact that never stopped. May reduced the initial method a bit,
`but in the same time increased similar methods even more aggressively, ruthlessly and
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 8 of 25
`
`Page 8 of 13
`
`diabolically. You see, is the only Supermarket grocery chain, that at the end of the day has so
`many "about to expire" products. People believing that getting a bargain, and take the bait. In
`reality, many times (and recently) when I bought marked as REDUSED products, not only I
`overcharged, but on top were EXPIRED! Even baby food formulas which had expired more
`than a year. At cash register I paid more than the yellow tag indicated, and when I returned it
`and informed the employees that are expired and dangerous, the next week were again on the
`selves (see incl. photo-copies).
`
`Walmart argues in the 1st motion to dismiss, that these allegations do not establish that the unit
`price mistakes were not isolated errors or that the mistakes did not result from a faulty labeling
`machine, computer glitch, or human error.
`
`Watch what you wish for. Should a faulty labeling machine, or a computer glitch justify that the
`last 3 years I discovered and "collected" from hundreds of stores, thousands of visits, more than
`2 terabytes of data consisted of tens of thousands photos, videos, scanned receipts , and even
`more than 70,000 back up color hard-copies of evidences?
`
`Could considered as an isolated error when, simultaneously stores at west east north and south
`of Florida, for months selling the same products with manipulated prices, even when numerous
`times I complained to managers, who agreed/admitted were wrong, agreed to corrected, but
`nothing change because, everything handled from Arkansas main office, and most of the
`times nothing they can do about it?
`
`Last year I worked in my job double shifts up to 80 hours a week in order to cover this quest
`expenses. And I have been not only ripped off by Walmart, but also insulted, humiliated, cyber
`and physical attacked, threatened, and kicked out when I dare to complain.
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 9 of 25
`
`Page 9 of 13
`
`Walmart called the class action "this far-reaching suit''. Also claims Plaintiff does not even
`come close to satisfying X ... Rule 9. "The Complaint contains no specific factual allegations
`as to the "who, what, when, where, and how" of Walmart s alleged Pricing Practice. "
`
`I understand that you are expecting supporting evidences for all these, "allegations" and
`fortunately, an ex-investigating reporter like me, also use as a guide
`the ''who, what, when,
`where, and how" procedures. So, at the end of this letter of objection you will find a link to a
`IS-minute YouTube video. I urged to whoever wish to watch, to use the pause button very
`often, and you will be surprised (not necessary pleasantly) from this tiny visual sample. The
`percentage stolen from customers, it's not just double the profit margin. Much more. When,
`for example (at 12min 43 sec.) a lobster at shelve tag shows $20 per/Lb. and at the register you
`if served at a
`fancy
`seafood
`charged $38 you
`realized
`that would cost
`less
`restaurant.
`
`But the defendant claims that the misrepresentations were so subtle that Plaintiff and other
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 10 of 25
`
`reasoflable consumers failed to notice until a closer inspection was made.
`
`Well WALMART should keep that in mind when I will produce "malpresentations of 1500%.
`Kindly request to please listen CAREFULLY at the end of the video -where a Customer
`Service Manager (to whom I complained) when I insisted why the price is wrong-, her
`respond ...
`
`Page 10 of 13
`
`"HI said why the prices are wrong, I may lose my job"!
`
`www.yolllllbe.com/wald,?v=i9x7Axwm1Lc&feature=emb logo
`
`And last but not least please watch again and again, the price scanner monitors how magically
`instead to read (and charge) the reduced price, shows (and you will pay) the WAS/original.
`
`This video link sent, along with 80 pages of hard evidences/ samples of Walmart's various
`methods of deception and fraudulent over-charges-gouging (included illegal taxation for
`nontaxable items) at stores and online, by MAIL last May, at certain AG Offices, including
`Florida's (who took them 2 months to acknowledge that received), It would take 10 minutes for
`an inspector to visit any Walmart store, purchase the specific products and verify -beyond
`reasonable doubt- the scams which systematically -special during the pandemic- ripping off
`customers. But amazingly nobody dared or bothered to lift a finger. Until one day America see
`it on the News or Social Media, this multi billions dollars scandal will continue to embarrass
`overnment states and cities the so called "CONSUMER PROTECTION AGENCIES".
`
`APPU FIITTTER 6 er
`
`$ 2.97
`
`Walmart sought to have the case dismissed, arguing that Mr. Kukorinis (the plaintiff) was not
`deceived by its pricing practices because, even after he claimed to have noticed the pricing
`discrepancies, he "continued purchasing weighted goods with inco"ect unit prices," and
`willingly paid the price displayed on the packages (They call me masochist?).
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 11 of 25
`
`Page 11 of 13
`
`Thankfully Judge J. MARTINEZ rejected Walmart's argument. 'Contrary to Walmart s
`as.5ertion, ' he ruled, "the fact that Plaintiff continued to purchase weighted goods does
`not negate his injury but may in fact highlight the pervasive effect of the aUeged
`misconducL"' Thank you, your Honor.
`
`Once the Judge ruled that the case could proceed - Walmart and Plaintiffs' counsel (behind his
`back) quickly decided to settle. Allegedly, according to Mr Janchunis he "carefully weighted
`with me - who I was present for the November 2019 1st mediation (true but nothing then
`agreed)," AND available ! ! ! throughout the March 2020 2•d mediation session, where the
`parties hard-fought at arm's len~ (but VIRTUALY).
`
`And that it's NOT TRUE. Since January and up to this day nobody updated me talk, text or
`e-mail me about the case.
`
`And now I am learning from websites that "The costs, risks, and delay of trial and appeal
`weigh in favor of settlement approval" !!!
`
`So The Plaintiff started by A)"accusing Defendant "WALMART actions constitute
`unconscionable, deceptive, or unfair acts or practices because, as alleged herein, Defendant
`advertised, marketed, and sold the Weighted Goods at one value but charged consumers a
`higher value at checkout, thereby offending an established public policy, and engaging in
`immoral, unethical, oppressive, and unscrupulous activities that are and were substantially
`injurious to consumers" ... Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury of claims in this Amended
`Class Action Complaint.
`
`And ended-thanks to successful negotiations- scot free, so DECLARES that B)"Walmart
`does not concede the Plaintiff's allegations, nor does it concede all of the factual
`statements set forth herein. For purposes of this Settlement, however, Walmart does not
`oppose
`the
`filing
`of
`this
`Motion
`for
`Preliminary
`A roval."
`
`So why FTC requires that any retailer who offers price comparisons "should make certain
`that the bargain off er is genuine and truthful, and not contain any deceptive or unfair
`aspect. What about the words of Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton, who built Wal.mart?
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 12 of 25
`
`Page 12 of 13
`
`"Personal and moral integrity is one of our basic fundamentals, and it has to start with
`each of us." "Don't compromise your reputation. It's a precious commodity. Don't
`compromise your integrity ... have a good name."
`
`I guess current CEO should add "The devil is in the details. Toe winner takes it all, the loser
`standing small. Speaking of details please enlarge these photos from the Walmart's site
`www.iet.com which recently "absorbed" by www.walmart.com and get a taste of how their
`"creative math" stolen from its online customers billion by overcharging them up to 1500%
`
`-
`
`&.:mt.
`
`---.u.......
`---..a:,...._._...,.... ... ~ ..... C--..a..JllieFllill~
`.....
`
`-
`
`-
`
`U....,.,._..c.tiallt'Dill..., ...
`
`..... -101..--,q
`
`lMabar Coconut Cream Pie HUit & Nut
`Ban, U oz. 16 count
`8
`
`-
`-
`_____ ,.,._ -
`
`,. ~ -
`
`C
`
`• •
`
`: 0 : : , , • • -2--,-:.:
`
`-
`
`-
`
`.. ., • =
`
`----
`
`-=--ill!II
`
`• 0
`
`-✓
`...,_
`
`-.a-
`
`0
`
`......._,
`S-..'P C
`CJRnlll.tUAOl..•ct . . . d4
`
`•
`
`Uptcn lced Tea, Peach, 16.9 R Oz
`
`-
`
`(cid:143)
`
`-
`
`:
`
`..
`
`•p-
`
`t
`
`ee
`vet
`
`-Q_..,___
`(cid:143) - (cid:173)(cid:143) -(cid:143) c . i -
`(cid:143) - (cid:173)--
`
`(cid:143) --. .. -
`
`(cid:143) - -(cid:173)(cid:143) --·-
`
`In conclusion.
`
`I, Vassilios Kukorinis known as ''Plaintiff' I declare under penalty of perjury that all the above
`is true and correct. I do not oppose this motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, and
`whatever terms the attorneys of both parties agreed, with exceptions:
`
`

`

`' .
`
`'
`
`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 13 of 25
`
`Page 13 of 13
`
`1) Plaintiff not to receive the suggested AWARD PRICE OF$ 25,000.00
`
`2) Understanding that Members of the Class in order to receive the "benefits" provided
`under the settlement, will have to release any legal claims that may arise but, ONLY for the
`facts alleged in the Second Amended Complaint. Not FACTS for related, like the photo
`examples.
`
`3) If it's not mandatory, I do not wish to be present at Court on 21 st of February 2021.
`
`Thank you all for your times and efforts. -
`
`Vassilios Kukorinis
`
`2524 W. De Leon Street
`
`Tampa, FL 33609.
`
`e-mail: Vaskuko@gmail.com
`
`Tel: 347-837 1918
`
`

`

`\
`
`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 14 of 25
`
`ATLANTIC
`SALMON
`){:=~:>
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 15 of 25
`
`t!f1fti1
`
`ATL4.ti11"1.c
`
`SALM01-1
`, ;·-:--~
`= -:;:~~::::;
`
`Fresh Never Frozen
`
`II
`
`~
`
`DD
`(cid:143) co, 8$
`
`D
`
`(cid:143) (]
`
`.
`
`41111
`-·--h,+.-.,•••f-. ~•.-i °'' •
`*--
`8 w ·ra,
`
`_ .. ,nlt·
`:19(cid:141)
`
`7
`
`I
`
`'
`t
`
`I \ ('
`\. ~ "• _ U ;.,._ \\t 0
`
`•I
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 16 of 25
`
`,, ~ , . /
`~
`.
`;f> .
`\ F'J
`ti~~{;,("
`:...\ .r
`· N i
`:r l -'<7 f i .r
`9 "'
`0 ~ ...> ~
`_,t:' r
`.
`• C,
`~
`-Y
`.
`.>
`7
`"
`.
`~ '
`(cid:141)
`.,,,,,-
`
`#~
`'-v,
`~
`
`0
`
`,...:)
`
`-y
`ti
`
`9
`~ t I'
`~ G
`"'
`t
`_,J1-
`~
`- ~
`,a
`
`t:C('
`
`1_ (
`
`~
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 17 of 25
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 18 of 25
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 19 of 25
`
`av
`f{_
`~
`)'\_
`~
`{
`i

`
`~
`
`---,..
`.. -:r.
`~

`s
`~
`=
`
`

`

`)(
`
`a Juk:e&FtuitDrinb f Jatcam
`+) (cid:157) ~ Q
`Jet,
`
`Departm e nt s
`
`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 20 of 25
`·~
`·••Iii*]
`
`II\
`
`is:,~
`
`-
`
`i httpt:/l)ol.Com/c:/QA><Oly-and•household/pantry-..i,ulco-and-fru~-drlnks/61112!714!fopolioncold• 2!
`
`GROCERY & HOUSEHOLD
`
`Search
`
`Q
`
`,/~:"''
`
`"
`
`Pantry
`
`Household
`
`Drugstore
`
`Baby Essentlals
`
`Pet Essentlals
`
`Reorder
`
`-· ·1
`
`8nnd
`
`a Search by brand ...
`
`D Apple&EVe
`0 campbell's
`0 caprisun
`0 Cherry Bay Orchards
`0 Dynamic Health
`Sn.Al.I
`
`Prtoe
`
`D $0-$25
`D $2s-$so
`
`·=
`
`+-
`
`C' Q
`
`~et,
`
`Upton Iced Tea, Peach, 111.0 Fl Oz
`~8✓
`
`Organic 100% Lemon Juice
`
`33
`
`$22.37 ($0.01/0unoe)
`
`$6.17 ($0.03/0unce)
`
`0
`
`Choose Options
`
`San Pellegrino Sparkling Beverage,
`Orange, 11.1 Fl Oz, II ct (Packof4)
`
`11
`~
`$16.87
`
`~
`
`~ a
`
`.... c
`
`-
`
`,
`---
`
`~ a . q
`
`• jtl.cOln ;,.,
`
`., ~, i. - 1 ..
`
`•• t.., 4.i,;1.,: .,.,: O::h,•.1._• •'·ff,lt-.\~1 •,;1 ;-
`
`. ~-
`
`,-.,
`
`... 0 *
`
`'""
`
`--
`
`,,
`
`I\ID lil
`
`-
`
`Departments
`
`GROCERY & HOUSEHOLD
`
`Search
`
`Q
`
`.".
`1\.-.o~!!I
`
`c,
`(.,.It
`
`Pantry
`
`Household
`
`Drugstore
`
`Baby Essentials
`
`Pet Essentials
`
`._.,
`
`Grocery & Housttho1d
`
`• Pa"ltry
`
`3evt:rcges
`
`Juloo•F-Dttnllo
`
`Lipton
`Lipton Iced Tea, Peach, 16.9 Fl Oz
`243-IOUnce
`
`618 . Wrrta • c«YIIJW
`
`'
`$22.37
`
`Get it ~ Fri, Ap,10
`~
`FRIEi! Shipping over $49 & FREE Returns Ql!!!l1
`
`1 v
`
`Add to Carl
`
`Lipton Iced Tea, Peach, 16.9 Fl Oz
`
`618 ,/
`
`$22.37 ($0.01/Ounce)
`
`~
`
`..
`Upton
`A Lipton Iced Tea Pe
`ach, 16.9 Fl Oz
`2434ounce
`'
`e1a I Write!>lr.., '(_...., ~~ Cl1'J\X
`\ ~~ .i
`$22.37
`\ '2._ ~~..u.)
`ooJ. o..\ 'S\l>'le G
`.Q GetitbyFri,Aprc:: ~ '-\ ~g
`
`• •
`
`FREE Shipping over $49 & FREE Returns Detail
`
`•
`
`.P lype he,• to Sf'¥th
`
`Share : f
`
`t>
`
`Fov,: 0
`.~ Cl
`
`... C
`
`.,
`
`,.., . ... , ... 11
`
`':11-, ,,
`
`~ ..
`
`i vi
`
`__ ,.J
`
`1
`
`Add to Cart
`
`

`

`;.f kedlff.HotTNlr:le(cid:127)
`+- · -,. C' Q
`Jet,
`
`leffi" X
`
`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 21 of 25
`
`· 11
`
`ill httpst/jllt.com/surch1bypessMi1sptf~ngs•false&c11tego,ya6717207S92&exp..-l•nctfdal.l&pag~• 2 -·-•-
`
`'""'
`
`••• El*
`
`II\ I!) •
`
`ii
`
`Department~
`
`GROCERY & HOUSEHOLD
`
`Search
`
`Pantry
`
`HouMhold
`
`Drugstore
`
`Baby Eloent11l1
`
`P9t Euential1
`
`.
`
`Reorder
`
`Q
`
`• ~:: . .
`
`ll l f,,l!l i\
`
`==-~
`_ _...,...-,w 0
`
`teapigs, PNlmium Organic Match• Sachets,
`14count
`
`$a4,89
`$14.211 ($0,211/Count)
`
`0
`
`SanP9ilegrlno 1'9sca+ta1, 8.45 A Oz (CaH
`of24) ✓
`
`Raspberry Leaf
`\:,,,,,,,,.,_,,.,,._,,., 11,,4,,11,,,
`
`'*~:;
`
`Traditional Medicinals Organic Herbal T .. ,
`Raapberry L .. f, 1e Ct (Packof18)
`
`$29.82 ($0,01/Ruid Ounceol
`
`$&.26 ($0,02/Count)
`
`< 1
`
`2
`
`SanPellegrino Pesca+tea, 8.45 Fl Oz (Case
`of24)
`
`$29.82 ($0.01/Fluid Ounces) -=-) ,s\,~ 'we
`'2. ~g1 ftoz.
`
`'
`
`, ___ .... )(
`
`P Typt here to search
`
`I-
`
`...,. C' Q
`
`·. o __ ,i hUps:1/jot.conl/pnxluC,,~-.... S-fl-Ol•c:-cf•W02-mdl3!19<1"56ao-• 1,10~
`
`_ · - · ·- ••• 9 -t, I
`
`Jet,
`
`Dq,~rtmcnts
`
`GROCERY & HOUSEHOLD
`
`Pantry
`
`HouHhold
`
`Orugsto,. ~ 1!1Nnti11t
`
`Pwl Eaentialt
`
`_ . ,
`
`Sanpellegrlno &te
`II\ ID• =
`· SanPellegrino Pesca+tea, 8.45 Fl Oz
`(Caseof24)
`
`)- k:«tT ... HotTM& T•e.v..-age& > ~TM
`
`....
`
`8lnpellegrtno •ta
`SanPellegrino Pesca+tea, 8.45 A Oz
`ccaseof24)
`:~:c:__
`
`$29.82
`
`$29.82
`
`Ordawilhin 1t.-flllmn
`.Q, Get It by11N, Apr.
`F1IE£ Shipping ..,., $49 & FREE Retum1 o,tlilt
`
`-=CL
`. .
`
`Order within 1 hr 58 mins
`Get it by Thu, Apr 9
`
`4<"6b 1 57S
`-
`i.'il:> <4cf,r,IS
`~'-'\ ~ ~~ a~
`2.,9t~
`
`Grocery&.tiouMhold > Pantry > Bevereo-
`
`A ,~
`~ ... ,
`
`·~
`
`V
`
`!1!11---·
`.... . - ...... .
`. . P lype here to ,earch
`
`.. .....
`
`~ a - •::
`
`\
`
`-~
`
`Sharo: f
`
`f>
`
`fOYO: <::)
`
`Add to Cart
`
`~.J
`
`Add to Cart
`
`FREE Shipping over $49 & FREE Returns Details
`
`r-~i
`
`

`

`JMG_20200428_130123648
`
`:1te taken .
`April
`
`28
`
`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 22 of 25
`v ,1w&ex
`_:=:.,_
`
`,,~
`__,,,
`
`2020=:J
`
`I
`
`1
`
`01
`
`PM
`
`ze
`7 MB
`
`imen"-il)r 15
`336 X 3264
`
`1ot
`'30 sec. f/1.8 3.95mm
`
`0
`)4
`
`evice
`,oto g(7)
`
`)Ider path
`:\Users\wal\Desktop\April 21 st20
`
`)U! Ce
`1isPC
`
`xation
`impa
`
`./
`I
`
`>l o"<"t\'J i ,,
`
`'O
`
`1-liHd
`
`t)~
`
`~ f> ~\ L 2. s-tl. 1.02. 0
`~"'·~ ,~µ ~ ( r .~
`'t.~~ ~ ......
`~ \'2_, 12.
`\p~
`~u,,\.~ \. (__ Q_ 02............... 'fl,G,.
`"'1 ~7 ~ \:::> \1.
`~ ,~ ';;
`~~
`~~ L~~'b~
`~ \~1I
`'i?\...\J> ~ e<.Jt\k ~
`
`,~~,~"
`
`

`

`,File info
`X
`Case 1:19-cv-20592-JEM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 23 of 25
`I 1MG_20200428_1301~3199
`
`,~
`Clearanc
`
`28
`
`2020
`
`01
`
`PM
`
`i April
`!
`
`l
`
`1
`
`1.4MB
`
`1836' 3264
`
`1/40 sec. f/1.8 3.9Smm
`
`1$0
`113
`
`motog{7)
`
`f.r,j,1,'t pdti1
`C:\Users\wal\Deslrtop\Aplil 215120
`
`This PC
`
`J
`J
`
`.... ,, .. o:i••:; 0
`
`File info
`, IMG_20200428_12S855994
`
`>'
`
`2020 I
`I April
`28
`!1___1_2 __ se __ ™ _]
`
`~·./,'
`1.7M8
`
`[irnenss.ms.
`1836x

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket