throbber
Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 1 of 14
`
`U N ITE D STAT ES D ISTR ICT C O U RT
`SO U TH ER N DISTR ICT O F FL O R ID A
`
`CA SE N O .
`18 U.S.C. j 1349
`18 U.S.C. j 1001(a)(2)
`18 U.S.C. j 981(a)(1)(C)
`
`UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA
`
`VS.
`
`JESSICA PALACIO,
`
`D efendant.
`
`/
`
`IND ICTM EN T
`
`The G rand Jury charges that:
`
`G EN ER AL A LL EG A TIO N S
`
`A t various tim es relevant to this lndictm ent;
`
`Clinical research trials, also know n as clinical investigations, w ere research studies
`
`conducted on voluntaly human subjects designed to answer specitic questions about the safety
`
`or effectiveness of new drugs. Dnlg developers, or ûtsponsors,'' initiated and took responsibility
`
`for clinical research trials.
`
`The United States Food and Drug Administration (1$FDA'') was responsible for
`
`ensuring that dnzgs intended for hum an use were safe and effective. The FDA relied on the
`
`truthfulness and accuracy of the results of clinical research trials to make regulatory decisions
`
`about the approval of new drugs, with the ultim ate goal of ensuring that a11 FDA-approved drugs
`
`w ere safe and effective for their approved uses in hum ans.
`
`Before beginning a clinical research trial, sponsors w ere required to provide the
`
`21-20301-CR-GAYLES/TORRES
`
`May 11, 2021
`
`KS
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 2 of 14
`
`FDA with extensive information regarding the proposed trial, including a detailed investigation
`
`
`
`lan known as a ûistudy protocol.''P
`
`The study protocol described, among other things, the
`
`eligibility criteria for individuals to enroll as study subjects, schedules of tests and procedures,
`
`drug and dosage regim ens, the length of the study, and the health outcom es to be m easured by
`
`the study. Clinical research trials were required to be conducted according to the study protocol,
`
`as well as any applicable laws and FDA regulations.
`
`4. Sponsors generally retained contract research organizations CçCROs'') to oversee
`
`and conduct various aspects of clinical research trials. Sponsors and CRO s typically contracted
`
`with multiple research sites to perform clinical research trials. Under such an arrangement, each
`
`individual research site was responsible for identifying study subjects, enrolling them into the
`
`study, perfonning the study, gathering data, and reporting the data to the sponsor and/or CRO, in
`
`accordance with the study protocol.
`
`Each research site had a principal investigator, also known as a clinical investigator.
`
`The principal investigator was the individual responsible for conducting the clinical investigation
`
`at that site and ensuring that the clinical research trial was conducted according to the study
`
`protocol and in com pliance with a11 applicable FDA regulations. Responsibilities of the principal
`
`investigator included personally conducting or supervising the study, including all requirements
`
`regarding the qualitication of the subjects, the dispensation of study medication, and the
`
`collection and reporting of data; obtaining infonned consent from study subjects; reporting
`
`adverse events that occur during the study; and ensuring that a11 em ployees w orking on the study
`
`m eet those sam e obligations. Sub-investigators w orked tm der the direction of and assisted the
`
`principal investigator in conducting clinical trials.
`
`Principal investigators were also required, by regulation, to prepare and maintain
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 3 of 14
`
`records relating to clinical research trials.
`
`These records, known as iûcase histories,'' included
`
`adequate records of the disposition of the study drug, including dates and quantities of drugs
`
`dispensed to subjects', informed consent fonns and medical records for each subject participating
`
`in the clinical research trial; and records of al1 obselwations and other data pertinent to the
`
`investigation for each subject administered an experimental drug.
`
`The FDA had the authority to inspect clinical investigators to ensure that
`
`investigators were complying with all applicable laws and regulations in conducting clinical
`
`trials. The FDA'S inspection authority included the authority to review case histories and other
`
`records m aintained by the clinical investigator.
`
`Clinical investigators provided to the sponsor and/or CRO the infonnation about
`
`each subject or ellrollee in the study, including his or her medical history, laboratory results, and
`
`reaction to the drug under study. The sponsor then provided the inform ation to the FDA for its
`
`use in evaluating whether the drug was safe and effedive and should be approved for its intended
`
`use.
`
`The D efendant and H er C o-conspirators
`
`Unlimited M edical Research, LLC Cûunlimited M edical Research'') was a medical
`
`clinic incorporated in M iam i, Florida that conducted clinical research trials of new drugs for
`
`pharmaceutical companies and other sponsors. Unlim ited M edical Research's principal place of
`
`business w as on G rand Canal Drive in M iam i-Dade County, M iam i, Florida.
`
`Defendant JESSICA PA LA CIO w as a resident of M iam i, Florida. From in or
`
`around D ecem ber 2013 and continuing thzough in or around Septem ber 2015, PA LA CIO served
`
`as a study coordinator at Unlim ited M edical Research.
`
`1 1. Yvelice Villam an Bencosme was a resident of Hialeah, Florida, and licensed to
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 4 of 14
`
`practice as a m edical doctor in the
`
`State of Florida. From in or around October 2013, and
`
`continuing through in or around Novem ber 2016, Villam an Bencosm e served as a clinical
`
`investigator at Unlimited M edical Research. Villam an Bencosme also operated a private m edical
`
`practice in Pem broke Pines, Florida.
`
`Lisett R aventos w as a resident of M iam i, FL. From in or around N ovem ber 2013
`
`and continuing through in or around M arch 2016, Raventos selwed as a study coordinator and
`
`co-owner of Unlim ited M edical Research.
`
`13. M aytee Lledo was a resident of Hialeah, Florida. From in or around December
`
`1996 and continuing through in or around April 2016, Lledo w as em ployed as a receptionist at
`
`V illam an Bencosm e's private m edical practice in Pem broke Pines, Florida.
`
`14. Person 1 was a resident of M iam i, Florida. From in or around M ay 2012 and
`
`continuing through in or around Septem ber 2017, Person 1 served as a co-ow ner of Unlim ited
`
`M edical Research.
`
`The Clinical Trial
`
`Between at least in or around M ay 2012 and at least in or around Septem ber 2017,
`
`Unlim ited M edical Research was contracted to conduct clinical trials on behalf of sponsors and
`
`CROs located throughout the United States.
`
`16. Am ong the clinical trials Unlim ited M edical Research was contracted to conduct
`
`was a study (the çtstudy'') designed to evaluate the safety and effcacy of an investigational drug
`
`intended to treat pediatric asthm a in children betw een the ages of 4 and 1 1 w ith persistent asthm a.
`
`The Sponsor (sisponsor'') was a multinational pharmaceutical company with a headquarters in
`
`the United States. The CRO (çûCRO'') was a contract research organization based in
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 5 of 14
`
`M assachusetts that the Sponsor contracted with to monitor and oversee the Study.
`
`17. Prior to beginning the Study, Unlimited M edical Research and Yvelice Villaman
`
`B encosm e, as principal investigator, entered into a ççclinical Trial A greem ent'' w ith the CRO ,
`
`which was acting as an independent contractor for the Sponsor. The Clinical Trial Agreement
`
`required, am ong other things, that investigators follow the study protocol. At or around the sam e
`
`tim e, Bencosm e, as the principal investigator responsible for conducting the trial, also signed a
`
`Fonn FDA 1572, in which she agreed to com ply w ith the tenns of the study protocol and a1l
`
`applicable FD A regulations.
`
`18. The Study protocol required subjects to meet certain eligibility criteria to be
`
`enrolled in the study. For example, nmong other things, the Study required subjects to be between
`
`the ages of fotlr and eleven, and have docum ented asthma.
`
`19. The Clinical Trial Agreement between
`
`U nlim ited M edical Research, Yvelice
`
`V illam an Bencosm e, and the CR O, also included a schedule of paym ents the Sponsor w ould pay
`
`Unlimited Medical Research per study subject for each procedure, test office visit, or other event
`
`required under the study protocol, in addition to other fees. The Clinical Trial A greem ent required
`
`Unlimited M edical Research, in turn, to pay individual study subjects directly for their
`
`participation in the clinical trial. Unlim ited M edical Research was generally required to pay study
`
`subjects upon successful completion of an office visit required by the Study protocol.
`
`C O UN T 1
`C onspiracy to C om m it W ire Fraud
`(18 U.S.C. j 1349)
`
`The G enezal A llegations section of this lndictm ent is re-alleged and incorporated
`
`as though fully set forth herein.
`
`Begilm ing in or around Septem ber 2013 and continuing at least tluough in or
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 6 of 14
`
`around April 2017, in M iami-Dade County, in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere, the
`
`defendant,
`
`JESSIC A PA LA CIO ,
`
`did willfully, that is, with the intent to f'urther the object of the ccmspiracy, and knowingly combine,
`
`conspire, confederate, and agree with Yvelice Villam an Bencosm e, Lisett Raventos, M aytee
`
`Lledo, Person One, and with others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit certain
`
`offenses against the United States, that is, to knowingly, and with the intent to defraud, devise and
`
`intend to devise a schem e and artifice to defraud and to obtain m oney and property by m eans of
`
`m aterially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and prom ises, knowing that the
`
`pretenses, representations, and promises were false and fraudulent when m ade, and, for the purpose
`
`of executing the schem e and artifice, did transm it and cause to be transmitted by m eans of wire
`
`comm unication in interstate and foreign comm erce, certain writings, signs, signals, pictures, and
`
`sounds, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.
`
`PURPO SE OF TH E CONSPIRACY
`
`It was the purpose of the conspiracy for JESSICA PA LA CIO and her co-
`
`conspirators to unlawfully enrich them selves by securing a contrad to conduct the Study, and
`
`causing the Sponsor and/or the CRO to m ake paym ents on that contract, by making material false
`
`and fraudulent representations regarding, among other things, subject eligibility for and
`
`participation in the Study.
`
`M A NN ER AN D M EA N S O F TH E C O N SPIR AC Y
`
`The m anner and m eans by which JESSICA PALACIO and their co-conspirators sought
`
`to accomplish the object and purpose of the conspiracy included, among others, the following:
`
`On or about October 25, 2013, Y velice V illam an Bencosm e entered into a Clinical
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 7 of 14
`
`Trial Agreement with the CRO, which was acting on behalf of the Sponsor, to conduct the Study.
`
`Villaman Bencosme agreed to conduct the Study at the Unlimited M edical Research site. As part
`
`of that agreement, Villam an Bencosm e and Unlimited M edical Research agreed to conduct the
`
`Study according to and in compliance with the Study protocol and all applicable laws and
`
`regulations.
`
`5.
`
`To increase the payments received from the CRO under the Clinical Trial
`
`Agreement, JESSICA PALACIO and her co-conspirators falsitied the participation of subjects
`
`in the Study. The Defendant and her co-conspirators entered false inform ation in the case histories
`
`of clinical trial subjects to make it appear that the subjects had, among other things, satisfied the
`
`eligibility criteria to participate in the Study, provided infonned consent to participate in the Study,
`
`received a physical exam ination from Villam an Bencosm e at Unlimited M edical Research in
`
`relation to the Study, received and been adm inistered a Study drug, completed patient assessm ents
`
`required by the Study protocol, reported data as required by the Study protocol, and received
`
`paym ent for visits to Unlimited M edical Research as part of the Study.
`
`JESSICA PALACIO and her co-conspirators recruited and enrolled subjects in
`
`the Study that they knew did not m eet the eligibility criteria set forth in the Study protocol,
`
`including subjects that they knew did not suffer from the medical condition intended to be treated
`
`by the Study drug.
`
`JESSICA PALACIO and her co-conspirators obtained and used personally
`
`identifiable infonnation of third parties, including copies of identification doeum ents such as
`
`drivers' licenses and birth certificates of the pediatric subjects and/or their parents or guardians, to
`
`enroll and falsely portray children as participants in the Study at Unlim ited M edical Research. For
`
`example, Yvelice Villaman Bencosm e and M aytee Lledo obtained personal identification
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 8 of 14
`
`infonnation, such as copies of birth certiticates and drivers' licenses, from pediatric patient
`
`m edical records maintained at Villaman Bencosm e's private m edical practice. JESSICA
`
`PALACIO, Yvelice Villam an Bencosm e, Lisett Raventos, and M aytee Lledo used this
`
`identification infonnation to create and m aintain case histories which falsely portrayed Villam an
`
`Bencosme's patients as subjeds who had consented to participate and in fact participated in the
`
`Study.
`
`8.
`
`ln order to prevent the Sponsor, the CRO, and the FDA from learning that the
`
`defendants had falsified the participation of subjects in the Study, JESSICA PALACIO, Yvelice
`
`Villaman Bencosme, Lisett Raventos, and M aytee Lledo fabricated written case histories, so that
`
`the case histories falsely and fraudulently represented that subjects had participated in the Study
`
`according to the protocol, when, in truth and in fact, those subjects had not participated in the
`
`Study according to the protocol.
`
`9.
`
`JESSICA PALACIO, Yvelice Villaman Bencosm e, Lisett Raventos, and M aytee
`
`Lledo caused false information to be entered in the case histories for the Study, to make it appear
`
`that subjects had, among other things, satisfied the eligibility criteria to participate in the Study,
`
`provided inform ed eonsent to participate in the Study, received a physical exam ination from a
`
`clinical investigator at Unlimited M edical Research, received the Study drug at Unlimited M edical
`
`Research, returned Study drug containers to Unlim ited M edical Research, and received payment
`
`for visits to U nlim ited M edical Research, w hen, in truth and in fact, and as PA LA C IO , V illam an
`
`Bencosm e, and Raventos w ell knew , no such event had occurred.
`
`10. To conceal the fact that the subjeets were not actually participating in the Study as
`
`required by the protocol, one or more defendants discarded, without using, the Study dnzg provided
`
`by the Sponsor, and JESSIC A PA LAC IO , Y velice V illam an B encosm e, Lisetl R aventos, and
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 9 of 14
`
`M aytee Lledo caused false documentation to be placed in the case histories representing that
`
`subjects were taking the Study drug as required by the protocol.
`
`The Study protocol required subjects to place daily telephone calls into an e-diary
`
`system , enter a contidential personal identitication number specific to the subject, and answer
`
`questions to assess the subjects' drug usage, symptoms, and experience. ln order to conceal the
`
`fact that the subjects were not actually participating in the Study as required by the protocol,
`
`JESSICA PALACIO knew that, at the direction of Villam an Bencosm e and Person 1, M aytee
`
`Lledo placed hundreds of telephone calls to the e-dialy system for the Study and provided false
`
`and fictitious answers in response to questions about the subjects' daily drug usage and experience.
`
`The CRO, acting on behalf of the Sponsor, paid Unlim ited M edical Research to
`
`conduct the Study. The CRO 's payments, on behalf of the Sponsor, were deposited into the
`
`U nlim ited M edical R esearch bank account, over w hich Lisett Raventos, Person 1, and others had
`
`control. Unlimited M edical Research bank account funds were distributed to JESSICA
`
`PALA CIO , Y velice V illam an Bencosm e, Lisett Raventos, M aytee Lledo, Person 1, and their co-
`
`conspirators for participation in the clinical trial fraud schem e.
`
`13. Betw een O ctober 2015 and D ecem ber 2016, Person 1, acting at the direction of
`
`Yvelice Villam an Bencosm e, sent numerous electronic messages to the CRO, dem anding that a
`
`final payment be issued to Unlimited M edical Research for the co-conspirators' purportedly
`
`legitim ate work conducting the Study. ln tnzth, and as Person 1 and Bencosme well knew, the co-
`
`conspirators had falsified the participation of subjects in the Study and had not conducted the Study
`
`pursuant to the clinical trial protocol, and consequently no paym ent should have been made by the
`
`CR O to U nlim ited M edical R esearch.
`
`14.
`
`To induce the Sponsor, through the CRO , to enter into a C linical Trial A greem ent
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 10 of 14
`
`with and provide m oney to Unlim ited M edical Research, JESSICA PALACIO and her co-
`
`conspirators m ade and caused others to m ake numerous m aterially false and fraudulent statements
`
`to the Sponsor, the CRO and/or the FDA, including, am ong other things, the following:
`
`M aterially False Statem ents
`
`That Yvelice Villaman Bencosme and Unlimited M edical Research conducted the
`
`Study in accordance with the protocol;
`
`(b) That enrolled subjects satisfied the eligibility criteria for the Study;
`
`That Villaman Bencosme conducted Study-related appointments with subjects at
`
`Unlim ited M edical Research and in accordance with the Study protocol;
`
`(d) That JESSICA PALACIO and Yvelice Villaman Bencosme obtained informed
`
`consent from subjects prior to their emollment in the Study;
`
`(e)
`
`That JESSICA PA LA CIO and other U nlim ited M edical Research staff dispensed
`
`the Study drug to subjects;
`
`(9 That JESSICA PALACIO and other Unlimited M edical Research staff informed
`
`subjects of the e-diary system and instructed subjects to create unique access codes
`
`and PlN num bers for that system ; and
`
`(g) That parents of subjects placed daily phone calls to the e-diary system as required
`
`by the Study protocol.
`
`All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.
`
`C O UN T 2
`False Statem ents
`(18 U.S.C. j 1001(a)(2))
`The General Allegations section of this lndictm ent is re-alleged and incorporated
`
`by reference as though fully set forth herein.
`
`On or about A pril 25, 2017, in M iam i-D ade County, in Southern D istrict of Florida,
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 11 of 14
`
`in a matter within the jurisdiction of the United States Food and Drug Administration, an agency
`
`of the executive branch of the United States Government, the defendant,
`
`JESSIC A PALA C IO ,
`
`did knowingly and willfully make a false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and representation
`
`as to a material fact, in that the Defendant represented in a signed affidavit that she had perfonned
`
`a screening visit for D .H . in the Study, when in truth and in fact, and as the D efendant then and
`
`there well knew, she had not perform ed a screening visit for D.H., in violation of Title 18, United
`
`States Code, Section 1001(a)(2).
`
`FO R FEITUR E A LLEG A TIO N S
`
`The allegations of this lndictment are hereby re-alleged and by this reference f'ully
`
`incorporated herein for alleging forfeiture to the U nited States of A m erica of certain property in
`
`which the defendant, JESSICA PALACIO, has an interest.
`
`2.
`
`Upon conviction of a violation otl or a conspiracy to violate, Title l 8, United States
`
`Code, Section 1343, as alleged in this lndictm ent, the Defendant shall forfeit to the United States
`
`any property, real or personal, which constitutes, or is derived from proceeds traceable to such
`
`offense, pursuant to Title 1 8, United States Code, Secticm 98 1(a)(1)(C).
`
`If any of the property subject to forfeiture, as a result of any act or omission of the
`
`D efendant:
`
`cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
`
`has been transferred or sold to, or deposited w ith, a third person;
`
`has been placed beyond the jurisdicticm of the Court;
`
`has been substantially dim inished in value; or
`
`has been com m ingled w ith other property
`
`which cannot be subdivided
`
`d.
`
`C.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 12 of 14
`
`without difticulty,
`
`the United States shall be entitled to the forfeiture of substitute property under the provisions of
`
`Title 2 l , United States Code, Section 853û8.
`
`A11 pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 98 1(a)(1)(C), and the procedures set
`
`forth in Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, as incorporated by Title 28, United States Code,
`
`Section 2461(c).
`
`A TRU E BILL
`
`F REPER SON
`
`12
`
`./ /
`
`)
`rAy ANTO 10 GONZALEZ
`
`JNG UN TE STATES ATTORNEYACT
`SO U THERN
`TM CT OF FLO RIDA
`
`GU STAV W . EYLER
`D IRECTOR
`CON SUM ER PR OTECTION BM N CH
`U .S. D EPA RTM EN T O F JUSTICE
`
`A -
`
`JOS UiD. ROTHMAN
`K AR A M . TR ASTER
`TRIA L ATTORN EY S
`CON SUM ER PRO TECTION BM N CH
`U .S. DEPA RTM EN T OF JU STICE
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 13 of 14
`UNITED STATESDISTRICT CoIJRT
`SO UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLO RIDA
`
`UNITED STA TESO FAM ERICA
`
`CASE NO .
`
`JESSICA PALACIO,
`
`CERTIFICATE OF TRIAL ATTO RNEY.
`Superseding Case Information:
`
`/
`
`Defendant.
`New defendantts) I''-I Yes I--I No
`CourtDivision: (Select One)
`Numberof newdefendants
`1-17 Miami I--I Key West F-IFTL
`Totalnumberofcounts
`F-IWPB I--I FTP
`1. I have carefully considered the allegations of the indictm ent, the num ber of defendants, the number of proh ble
`witnesses and the legal com plexities of the lndictment/lnformation attached hereto.
`2. l am aware that the information supplied on this statem ent will be relied upon by the Judges of this Court in
`setting their calendars and scheduling crim inal trials under the m andate of the Speedy Trial Act,
`Title 28 U.S.C. Section 3161.
`lnterpreter: (Yes or No) No
`List language and/or dialect
`4. This case will take 10 days for the parties to try.
`5. Please check appropriate category and type of offense listed below:
`(Check only one)
`(Check only one)
`(71
`I 0 to 5 days
`Petty
`Izz
`I I 6 to l 0 days
`Mi nor
`I7r1
`lII 1 1 to 20 days
`Misdemeanor
`E7I
`IV 21 to 60 days
`Felony
`rql
`V 61 days and over
`6. Has this case previously been filed in this District Court? (Yes or No) Yes
`If yes: Judge Bloom
`CaseN o. 20-CR-20190
`(Attach copy of dispositive order)
`Has a complaint been filed in this matter? (Yes or No) No
`lf yes: M agistrate Cmse No.
`Related m iscellaneous num bers:
`Defendantts) in federal custody as of
`Defendantts) in state custody as of
`Rule 20 from the District of
`Is this a potential death penalty case? (Yes or No) NO
`7. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to
`August 9, 2013 (Mag. Judge Alicia 0. Valle)? (Yes or No) No
`8. Does this case originate from a m atter pending in the N orthern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office priorto
`August 8, 20 l 4 (Mag. Judge Shaniek M aynard? (Yes or No) No
`9. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U .S. Attorney's Oftice prior to
`October 3, 2019 (M ag. Judge Jared Strauss)? (Yes or No) No
`
`E1
`(71
`E1
`Ed
`
`*penalty Sheetts) attachi
`
`Jos ua D . Rot m an
`DOJ Trial Attorney
`Coud ID No.
`A5502447
`
`:?
`
`REV 3/l 9/2 1
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-20301-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2021 Page 14 of 14
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT
`SOUTH ERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`PEN ALTY SH EET
`
`JESSICA PA LA CIO
`
`D efendant's N am e:
`C ase N o:
`Count #: 1
`
`Title 18s United States Codes Section 1349
`
`Conspiracy to Com m it W ire Fraud
`
`*M ax Penalty; Twenty (20) years' imprisonment
`
`Count #:
`
`Title 1 8, United States Codes Section 1001(a)(2)
`
`False Statem ents
`
`feM ax Penalty:
`
`Five (5) years' imprisonm ent
`
`Count #:
`
`*M ax Penaltv:
`
`Count #:
`
`*M ax Penaltv:
`*Refers only to possible term of incarceration, does not include possible fines, restitution,
`special assessm ents, parole term s, or forfeitures that m ay be applicable.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket