throbber
Case 1:21-cv-21698-DPG Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2021 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`MIAMI DIVISION
`
`CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-21698-DPG
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`ATHOS OVERSEAS, LTD.
`
`
`vs.
`
`YOUTUBE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, and
`GOOGLE, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/
`
`NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
`
`
`
`Defendants YouTube, Inc., YouTube, LLC, and Google LLC respectfully submit as
`
`supplemental authority to their pending Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 14) the recent decision from
`
`Judge Edward Davila in Harrington v. Pinterest, Inc., No. 5:20-cv-05290-EJD, 2021 U.S. Dist.
`
`LEXIS 167983 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2021) (Exhibit 1). Like this case, Harrington involves a plaintiff
`
`whose copyrighted works were allegedly uploaded by third parties to an online service (there,
`
`Pinterest). Id. at *3. As here, Plaintiff asserted a claim under Section 1202 of the DMCA, 17 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1202, for alleged removal of copyright management information (“CMI”). Id. Plaintiff alleged
`
`that Pinterest “strip[ped] the images of visible identifying source and/or copyright management
`
`information as well as metadata.” Id. In the attached ruling, Judge Davila dismissed that claim
`
`because the plaintiff failed to offer any plausible allegations that Pinterest acted with the two-tiered
`
`scienter required by the DMCA:
`
`[Plaintiff] does not allege any facts to show that Pinterest’s alleged distribution of
`photographs induced, enabled, facilitated or concealed any particular act of
`infringement by anyone, let alone a pattern of such infringement likely to recur in
`the future. Instead, [the complaint] contains vague and conclusory allegations that
`Pinterest is the source of “rampant” copyright infringement by third parties.
`
`NOTICE OF SUPP. AUTH.
`
`
`-1-
`
`CASE NO. 1:21-CV-21698-DPG
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-21698-DPG Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2021 Page 2 of 4
`
`Id. at *18-19. Notably, the Court relied upon Stevens v. CoreLogic, Inc., 899 F.3d 666 (9th Cir.
`
`2018), for its dismissal. This ruling bears directly on the arguments made at pp. 15-18 of
`
`Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and pp. 9-10 of Defendants’ reply brief in support of that motion.
`
`
`
`Dated: September 8, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLER
`ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A.
`150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
`Miami, Florida 33130
`Telephone: (305) 789-3229
`Facsimile: (305) 789-2664
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jay B. Shapiro
`Jay B. Shapiro, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 776361
`jshapiro@stearnsweaver.com
`David T. Coulter, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 119874
`dcoulter@stearnsweaver.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`Telephone: (212) 999-5800
`Facsimile: (212) 999-5801
`
`
`
`Brian M. Willen, Esq.
`(Pro Hac Vice)
`bwillen@wsgr.com
`Lucy Yen, Esq.
`(Pro Hac Vice)
`lyen@wsgr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel for Defendants
`
`
`NOTICE OF SUPP. AUTH.
`
`
`-2-
`
`CASE NO. 1:21-CV-21698-DPG
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-21698-DPG Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2021 Page 3 of 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 8, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing
`
`document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is
`
`being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the Service List in the
`
`manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or
`
`in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive
`
`Notices of Electronic Filing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Jay B. Shapiro
`JAY B. SHAPIRO, ESQ.
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF SUPP. AUTH.
`
`
`-3-
`
`CASE NO. 1:21-CV-21698-DPG
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-21698-DPG Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2021 Page 4 of 4
`
`SERVICE LIST
`
`Case No. 1:21-cv-21698-DPG
`United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
`
`
`
`Rey Dorta, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 0084920
`Omar Ortega, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 0095117
`Rosdaisy Rodriguez, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 112710
`Natalie A. Ferral, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 1012314
`DORTA & ORTEGA, P.A
`3860 SW 8th Street, PH
`Coral Gables, Florida 33134
`Telephone:(305) 461-5454
`Facsimile: (305) 461-5226
`oortega@dortaandortega.com
`rdorta@dortaandortega.com
`rrodriguez@dortaandortega.com
`nferral@dortaandortega.com
`dcruz@dortaandortega.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF SUPP. AUTH.
`
`
`-4-
`
`CASE NO. 1:21-CV-21698-DPG
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket