throbber
Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 1 of 16
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`Miami Division
`
`CASE NO. 22-cv-21605
`
`MARIETTE WATERS,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC.,
`a Foreign Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
` /
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Plaintiff, MARIETTE WATERS, hereby sues Defendant CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC., a
`
`Foreign Corporation (hereinafter “CELEBRITY”), for damages and demands a jury trial on all issues
`
`so triable.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`1.
`
`This is an action under general maritime law, and the laws of Florida as applicable.
`
`This action is for damages in excess of the required minimal jurisdictional limit of $75,000.00
`
`(Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars), exclusive of costs, attorneys’ fees and interest, and is otherwise
`
`within the jurisdiction of this court.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff is a resident of Pennsylvania. Defendant CELEBRITY is a foreign
`
`corporation with its principal place of business in Miami, Florida. Accordingly, diversity of
`
`citizenship jurisdiction exists for this case under 28 U.S.C. §1332.
`
`-1-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 2 of 16
`
`3.
`
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '1391(b) because Defendant
`
`CELEBRITY resides in this District and is engaged in and doing business in Miami-Dade County,
`
`Florida, with its worldwide headquarters, principal address, and principal place of business located
`
`at 1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida, 33132.
`
`4.
`
`In addition, jurisdiction and venue are proper against Defendant CELEBRITY, as the
`
`passenger ticket contract requires that this action be brought in the United States District Court for
`
`the Southern District in Miami-Dade County, Florida.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiff has complied with all conditions precedent to the filing of this lawsuit.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`Plaintiff MARIETTE WATERS, is a resident of Pennsylvania, over the age of 18,
`
`and otherwise sui juris.
`
`7.
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY is a foreign corporation for profit, engaged in, and doing
`
`business in, Miami-Dade County, Florida, with its worldwide headquarters, principal address, and
`
`principal place of business located at 1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida 33132.
`
`8.
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY is a common carrier engaged in the business of marketing,
`
`selling and operating a cruise line out of various ports within the continental United States, including
`
`Miami, Florida. Defendant CELEBRITY derives substantial revenues from cruises originating and
`
`terminating in various ports in the State of Florida, including Miami-Dade, County, Florida.
`
`9.
`
`At all times material hereto, Defendant CELEBRITY was the bare-boat charterer of
`
`a sea-faring passenger vessel and cruise ship, the Celebrity Apex, hereinafter “subject vessel.”
`
`
`
`10.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY owned, operated, managed,
`
`maintained, supervised, chartered, and/or controlled the subject vessel.
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 3 of 16
`
`11.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY owed a duty to provide competent
`
`medical care and facilities, as well as personnel capable of making sound medical and evacuation
`
`decisions.
`
`12.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY advertised that the subject vessel’s
`
`onboard medical center was staffed by licensed physicians and nurses and that it is well-equipped
`
`to handle most emergencies.
`
`13.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY charged money to passengers for
`
`medical services provided. As such, Defendant CELEBRITY is in the business of providing medical
`
`services to passengers for profit, and owe a non-delegable duty to provide competent and
`
`non-negligent medical care and services.
`
`14.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY owned, operated, controlled, and/or
`
`maintained the medical center aboard the subject vessel.
`
`15.
`
`At all times Defendant CELEBRITY was vicariously and/or jointly liable for the
`
`negligence of all doctors, nurses, and other personnel working in the medical facility of the subject
`
`vessel, who were employees, apparent agents, actual agents and/or joint venturers of Defendant
`
`CELEBRITY.
`
`16.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY had control and/or the right to control
`
`any and all persons working in its medical department.
`
`GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`17.
`
`At all times material, Plaintiff MARIETTE WATERS was a fare-paying passenger
`
`aboard the subject vessel for a seven-day cruise vacation beginning December 4, 2021.
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 4 of 16
`
`18.
`
`On December 9, 2021, Mrs. Waters reported to the shipboard medical center on the
`
`subject vessel for evaluation of a rectal bleed. She was admitted to the medical center and ultimately
`
`diagnosed with a gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The shipboard medical staff noted her hemoglobin
`
`had dropped, and her face was extremely pale. The medical staff explained to Ms. Waters and her
`
`husband that her condition was life-threatening, and she would require emergency blood transfusions
`
`to survive. Ms. Waters signed all necessary paperwork and agreed to the blood transfusions in light
`
`of the medical staff’s statements that she would likely die if she refused. Despite the associated risks
`
`of the blood transfusions, Ms. Waters always expected and believed that Defendant CELEBRITY
`
`would solicit blood, screen donors, and perform the transfusions in a safe and/or reasonable manner
`
`given the available resources, and that Defendant CELEBRITY would follow its own policies,
`
`procedures, and directives relating to transfusions.
`
`19.
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY does not store donor blood on the subject vessel for
`
`transfusions. Therefore, Defendant CELEBRITY attempted to solicit Type A-Negative blood from
`
`guests on the subject vessel via the public address (PA) system. Defendant CELEBRITY ultimately
`
`obtained blood from four passengers who were unknown to Ms. Waters and unknown to Defendant
`
`CELEBRITY. In the course of soliciting the blood, screening the donors, screening the blood, and
`
`administering the transfusions, representatives of Defendant CELEBRITY and its medical staff were
`
`negligent, breached the applicable standards of care, and violated Defendant CELEBRITY’s policies,
`
`procedures, and directives, as described below. As a result, Defendant CELEBRITY’s medical staff
`
`infected Mrs. Waters with HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), which will cause her severe
`
`physical, emotional, and financial harm for the remainder of her life.
`
`-4-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 5 of 16
`
`COUNT I: MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE OF CELEBRITY
`
`Plaintiff affirms and adopts paragraphs 1-19 as though fully set forth herein and further
`
`alleges that:
`
`20.
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY, through its employees, servants, and/or representatives, was
`
`negligent and breached the applicable standard of care owed to Plaintiff by committing one or more
`
`of the following acts and/or omissions:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`j.
`
`k.
`
`Failing to provide reasonably competent medical care to Plaintiff;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to the administration
`of blood transfusions;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to solicitation and
`screening of blood donors;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to screening and
`testing of donor blood;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to the preferred
`selection donors of blood;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to the administration of
`blood transfusions;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to solicitation and
`screening of blood donors;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to screening and testing of
`donor blood;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to the preferred selection
`blood donors;
`
`Failing to adequately rapid test the donor blood for HIV;
`
`Failing to ensure the availability of HIV rapid tests on the subject vessel;
`
`-5-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 6 of 16
`
`l.
`
`m.
`
`n.
`
`o.
`
`p.
`
`q.
`
`r.
`
`Failing to adopt and implement policies and procedures requiring rapid HIV
`testing for all donor blood;
`
`Failing to adequately communicate to its medical staff its policies and
`procedures requiring rapid HIV testing for all donor blood;
`
`Failing to adequately screen blood donors with interviews and written
`questionnaires;
`
`Failing to prioritize and use blood from Plaintiff’s brother, who volunteered
`to donate on the subject vessel and has a matching blood type;
`
`Failing to prioritize crewmembers and medical staff as blood donors, with
`whom Defendant CELEBRITY is familiar and whose health is regularly
`screened and verified;
`
`Failing to ensure that all equipment used for Plaintiff’s transfusions was
`sterile and free of infectious disease;
`
`Failing to medically disembark Plaintiff in the Bahamas, which was
`reasonably feasible, rather than transfusing Plaintiff with untested and
`infected blood.
`
`21.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant CELEBRITY’s negligence and breach
`
`of the applicable standard of care, as described above, Defendant CELEBRITY infected Plaintiff
`
`with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), she suffered pain and suffering, disability,
`
`disfigurement, mental anguish, aggravation of preexisting conditions, inconvenience, scarring, the
`
`loss of the capacity for the enjoyment of life, and has incurred medical expenses in the past and will
`
`incur medical expenses in the future. All of said damages are permanent and continuing in nature.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against the Defendant CELEBRITY for damages
`
`in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits of this Court, as well as post-judgment interest to the
`
`extent allowed by law and attorneys’ fees and costs as may be allowed by law and demands trial by
`
`jury of all issues so triable.
`
`-6-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 7 of 16
`
`COUNT II: VICARIOUS LIABILITY OF CELEBRITY FOR
`MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE BASED UPON ACTUAL AGENCY
`
`Plaintiff realleges, adopts, and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1
`
`through 19 as though originally stated herein.
`
`22.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY owned, operated, controlled, and/or
`
`maintained the medical facility aboard the subject vessel, and was responsible for overseeing the
`
`operations of the shipboard medical center including the selecting, purchasing, and maintaining of
`
`the medical equipment; recruitment, credentialing and staffing of shipboard medical centers with
`
`physicians and nurses; evaluations, training and coaching of shipboard physicians; and acting as a
`
`resource to the shipboard medical personnel and providing guidance and instruction in the event of
`
`a medical emergency in said medical facility.
`
`23.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY controlled and/or maintained the right
`
`of control over the nurses, physicians, and other medical personnel working in its medical facility
`
`in the exercise of their job duties, including the treatment of patients. Defendant CELEBRITY
`
`exercised such control and/or right of control in many different ways, including, but not limited to
`
`the following:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`Setting the standards, criteria and procedures for selecting and hiring said
`personnel;
`
`Credentialing, evaluating, training and coaching shipboard medical
`personnel;
`
`Acting as a resource to the shipboard medical personnel and providing
`guidance and instruction in the event of a medical emergency;
`
`Establishing, adopting and enforcing rules, regulations and protocols for the
`treatment of patients at its medical facility;
`
`-7-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 8 of 16
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`j.
`
`k.
`
`l.
`
`m.
`
`n.
`
`o.
`
`p.
`
`Maintaining and/or exercising the right to both hire and fire said personnel;
`
`Establishing the amount, method and manner of payment for said personnel;
`
`Paying a salary, bonus and benefits to said personnel;
`
`Establishing and enforcing the terms of employment for such personnel,
`including their hours, job duties and the details of their work;
`
`Setting the standards and criteria to determine which patients were to be
`treated by said personnel;
`
`Determining and setting the specific charges for treatment for its passengers
`and requiring that all such charges be paid directly to Defendant
`CELEBRITY on the passenger’s shipboard charge card;
`
`Supplying the tools, workplace and equipment for said personnel to perform
`their job duties;
`
`Determining and selecting the medications, drugs and supplies to be used in
`the ship’s medical facility; purchasing said medications, drugs and supplies
`to stock the medical facility; setting the prices for the use and or sale of such
`medications, drugs and supplies to passengers and requiring the passengers
`to pay it directly for such medical, drugs and supplies on their shipboard
`charge cards;
`
`Advertising the existence of the medical facility as part of its marketing
`campaigns in order to attract passengers;
`
`Treating said personnel as members of its crew, subject to the vessel’s rules
`and regulations and the authority of its officers and requiring them to carry
`out crew functions and wear crew uniforms;
`
`Requiring said personnel to take specific courses and training, including
`those offered by Defendant CELEBRITY;
`
`Agreeing to staff, equip and operate the medical facilities and the provision
`of medical services therein under the industry Guidelines issued by the
`American College of Emergency Physicians and requiring its medical
`personnel to practice medicine and treat patients in accordance with the
`requirements of said Guidelines;
`
`-8-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 9 of 16
`
`q.
`
`r.
`
`s.
`
`Through the use of its shoreside medical department, which is staffed with
`various doctors and other medical personnel that can communicate with its
`ships literally anywhere in the world electronically;
`
`By entering into contracts with various land based hospitals to provide
`medical expertise and requiring their shipboard medical personnel to utilize
`such services in the treatment of passengers and crew in specified situations;
`and
`
`Through the use of electronic technology, including video-conferencing and
`tele-medicine with their shoreside medical department and hospital contract
`providers to control the treatment provided.
`
`24.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY also relied upon and directed its
`
`nurses, physicians, and the other personnel in their medical facility to perform specified duties to
`
`assist them in complying with its regulatory duties and obligations, including but not limited to those
`
`set forth by the U.S. Public Health Service, Drug Enforcement Agency, Coast Guard and Center for
`
`Disease Control.
`
`25.
`
`At all times material, nurses physicians, and medical staff aboard the medical center
`
`of the subject vessel were agents and employees of Defendant CELEBRITY, which was therefore
`
`vicariously liable for the negligent treatment of Plaintiff under the legal principles set forth in Franza
`
`v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Ltd., 772 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir. 2014).
`
`26.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY’s nurses, physicians, and medical staff
`
`were in the regular, full time employment of Defendant CELEBRITY, as salaried members of the
`
`crew, and were subject to Defendant CELEBRITY’s control, discipline, and the Master’s orders.
`
`27.
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY acted as principal to it nurses, physicians, and medical staff
`
`working in the medical center of the subject vessel; acknowledged its agency status with its nurses,
`
`-9-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 10 of 16
`
`physicians, and medical staff, directly and/or indirectly; and is vicariously liable for the negligence
`
`of its nurses, physicians, and medical staff.
`
`28.
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY, through its employees, servants, actual agents, ostensible
`
`agents, servants, and/or representatives, breached its duty to exercise reasonable care under the
`
`circumstances owed to Plaintiff and was negligent and careless by committing one or more of the
`
`following acts and/or omissions:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`j.
`
`k.
`
`Failing to provide reasonably competent medical care to Plaintiff;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to the administration
`of blood transfusions;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to solicitation and
`screening of blood donors;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to screening and
`testing of donor blood;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to the preferred
`selection donors of blood;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to the administration of
`blood transfusions;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to solicitation and
`screening of blood donors;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to screening and testing of
`donor blood;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to the preferred selection
`blood donors;
`
`Failing to adequately rapid test the donor blood for HIV;
`
`Failing to ensure the availability of HIV rapid tests on the subject vessel;
`
`-10-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 11 of 16
`
`l.
`
`m.
`
`n.
`
`o.
`
`p.
`
`q.
`
`r.
`
`Failing to adopt and implement policies and procedures requiring rapid HIV
`testing for all donor blood;
`
`Failing to adequately communicate to its medical staff its policies and
`procedures requiring rapid HIV testing for all donor blood;
`
`Failing to adequately screen blood donors with interviews and written
`questionnaires;
`
`Failing to prioritize and use blood from Plaintiff’s brother, who volunteered
`to donate on the subject vessel and has a matching blood type;
`
`Failing to prioritize crewmembers and medical staff as blood donors, with
`whom Defendant CELEBRITY is familiar and whose health is regularly
`screened and verified;
`
`Failing to ensure that all equipment used for Plaintiff’s transfusions was
`sterile and free of infectious disease;
`
`Failing to medically disembark Plaintiff in the Bahamas, which was
`reasonably feasible, rather than transfusing Plaintiff with untested and
`infected blood.
`
`29.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant CELEBRITY’s negligence and breach
`
`of the applicable standard of care, as described above, Defendant CELEBRITY infected Plaintiff
`
`with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), she suffered pain and suffering, disability,
`
`disfigurement, mental anguish, aggravation of preexisting conditions, inconvenience, scarring, the
`
`loss of the capacity for the enjoyment of life, and has incurred medical expenses in the past and will
`
`incur medical expenses in the future. All of said damages are permanent and continuing in nature.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against the Defendant CELEBRITY for damages
`
`in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits of this Court, as well as post-judgment interest to the
`
`extent allowed by law and attorneys’ fees and costs as may be allowed by law and demands trial by
`
`jury of all issues so triable.
`
`-11-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 12 of 16
`
`COUNT III: VICARIOUS LIABILITY OF CELEBRITY FOR
`MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE BASED UPON APPARENT AGENCY
`
`Plaintiff realleges, adopts, and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1
`
`through 19 as though originally stated herein.
`
`30.
`
`At all times material, Defendant CELEBRITY held out its shipboard nurses,
`
`physicians, and medical staff as being its direct employees and/or its actual agents who work in its
`
`“medical center” on the subject vessel. Defendant CELEBRITY promotes its medical staff and
`
`represents them as being its employees through brochures, internet advertising, and on the subject
`
`vessel.
`
`31.
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY promotes the idea that the medical staff who work in its
`
`“medical centers” are employed by Defendant CELEBRITY as part of a marketing tool to induce
`
`passengers, such as Plaintiff, to buy cruises on its ships, particularly because the cruise line goes to
`
`various foreign ports that may not have adequate medical care.
`
`32.
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY manifested to Plaintiff in this case that its medical staff were
`
`acting as its employees and/or actual agents in various ways, including but not limited to the
`
`following:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`The nurses and physicians worked at what Defendant describes in its
`advertising as its “medical centers”;
`
`The “medical centers” are owned and operated by Defendant CELEBRITY,
`which pays to stock the “medical centers” with all supplies, various
`medicines and equipment;
`
`The passenger is billed directly by Defendant CELEBRITY whereas the
`“medical staff,” are paid salaries by Defendant CELEBRITY to work in the
`“medical centers”;
`
`-12-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 13 of 16
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`j.
`
`Medical records and forms, including Passenger Shipboard Statements which
`are given to guests in the medical center, used Defendant CELEBRITY’s
`letterhead and logo;
`
`The medical staff were given uniforms to wear that include name tags, and
`which have the CELEBRITY name and logo and were required by Defendant
`CELEBRITY to be worn by the nurses and physicians;
`
`Nurses and physicians are considered to be Officers aboard the subject vessel
`and a member of the crew, and were introduced to the passengers as Ship’s
`Officers and members of the crew;
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY put the ship’s nurse and physician under the
`command of the ship’s superior officers, including the Master of the ship;
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY requires the ship’s nurses and physicians to provide
`services in the ship’s “medical center,” which is identified as the
`CELEBRITY medical center, and when Plaintiff went to the ship’s medical
`center to be seen for her condition, she detrimentally relied upon the
`representations that it was owned and operated by the Defendant
`CELEBRITY and staffed with nurses and physicians, who had been selected
`and vetted by Defendant CELEBRITY. Plaintiff would not have authorized
`Defendant’s medical personnel to treat her if she had known that they were
`not employees of CELEBRITY.
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY’s insignias and logos were in various locations
`throughout the medical center; and
`
`The nurses and physicians spoke to Plaintiff as though they had the authority
`to do so on behalf of Defendant CELEBRITY.
`
`33.
`
`At no time did Defendant CELEBRITY represent in any meaningful way to Plaintiff,
`
`or the vessel’s passengers in general, that the vessel’s medical staff were not agents or employees
`
`of Defendant CELEBRITY, and were instead allegedly independent contractors.
`
`34.
`
`Plaintiff at all times detrimentally relied upon the above described representations of
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY, reasonably believing that because it was owned and operated by Defendant
`
`-13-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 14 of 16
`
`CELEBRITY, the medical staff were its employees and had been properly vetted, selected and
`
`trained and were well qualified nurses and physicians.
`
`35.
`
`At all times material, Plaintiff relied upon the above described representations of
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY, which gave rise to their reasonable belief that the nurses and physicians
`
`in the medical facility were its agents and/or employees, which induced their reliance upon such
`
`appearance of agency and accordingly, Defendant CELEBRITY is vicariously liable for the
`
`negligence of its apparent agents under the principles of apparent agency set forth in Franza v. Royal
`
`Caribbean Cruise Ltd., 772 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir. 2014).
`
`36.
`
`Defendant CELEBRITY is vicariously liable under the principles of apparent agency
`
`for the acts and omissions of its apparent agents, servants, and employees, and was negligent and
`
`breached the applicable standard of care owed to Plaintiff by committing one or more of the
`
`following negligent acts and/or omissions:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`Failing to provide reasonably competent medical care to Plaintiff;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to the administration
`of blood transfusions;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to solicitation and
`screening of blood donors;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to screening and
`testing of donor blood;
`
`Deviating from the applicable standard of care relating to the preferred
`selection donors of blood;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to the administration of
`blood transfusions;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to solicitation and
`screening of blood donors;
`
`-14-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 15 of 16
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`j.
`
`k.
`
`l.
`
`m.
`
`n.
`
`o.
`
`p.
`
`q.
`
`r.
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to screening and testing of
`donor blood;
`
`Violating its own policies and procedures relating to the preferred selection
`blood donors;
`
`Failing to adequately rapid test the donor blood for HIV;
`
`Failing to ensure the availability of HIV rapid tests on the subject vessel;
`
`Failing to adopt and implement policies and procedures requiring rapid HIV
`testing for all donor blood;
`
`Failing to adequately communicate to its medical staff its policies and
`procedures requiring rapid HIV testing for all donor blood;
`
`Failing to adequately screen blood donors with interviews and written
`questionnaires;
`
`Failing to prioritize and use blood from Plaintiff’s brother, who volunteered
`to donate on the subject vessel and has a matching blood type;
`
`Failing to prioritize crewmembers and medical staff as blood donors, with
`whom Defendant CELEBRITY is familiar and whose health is regularly
`screened and verified;
`
`Failing to ensure that all equipment used for Plaintiff’s transfusions was
`sterile and free of infectious disease;
`
`Failing to medically disembark Plaintiff in the Bahamas, which was
`reasonably feasible, rather than transfusing Plaintiff with untested and
`infected blood.
`
`37.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant CELEBRITY’s negligence and breach
`
`of the applicable standard of care, as described above, Defendant CELEBRITY infected Plaintiff
`
`with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), she suffered pain and suffering, disability,
`
`disfigurement, mental anguish, aggravation of preexisting conditions, inconvenience, scarring, the
`
`-15-
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-21605-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2022 Page 16 of 16
`
`loss of the capacity for the enjoyment of life, and has incurred medical expenses in the past and will
`
`incur medical expenses in the future. All of said damages are permanent and continuing in nature.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against the Defendant CELEBRITY for damages
`
`in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits of this Court, as well as post-judgment interest to the
`
`extent allowed by law and attorneys’ fees and costs as may be allowed by law and demands trial by
`
`jury of all issues so triable.
`
`DATED: May 25, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`LEESFIELD SCOLARO, P.A.
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`2350 South Dixie Highway
`Miami, Florida 33133
`Telephone:
`305-854-4900
`Facsimile:
`305-854-8266
`E-mail:
`Scolaro@Leesfield.com
`
`By:
`
` /s/ Thomas Scolaro
`THOMAS SCOLARO
`Fla. Bar No. 178276
`JUSTIN B. SHAPIRO
`Fla. Bar No. 92036
`
`-16-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket