`
`United States District Court
`for the
`Southern District of Florida
`
`
`Civil Action No. 22-22706-Civ-Scola
`
`
`Bell Northern Research, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HMD America, Inc., and others,
`Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`Order Entering Partial Stay upon Notice of Settlement
`Plaintiff Bell Northern Research, LLC (“BNR”) and Defendants Wingtech
`Technology Co., Ltd. and Wingtech International, Inc. (collectively, “Wingtech”)
`have settled this action. (ECF No. 198.) By July 28, 2023, the Plaintiff must
`file a stipulation of dismissal, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`41(a)(1)(A)(ii), or a motion to dismiss, consistent with Rule 41(a)(2). The parties
`also move for a stay of all matters in this case between BNR and Wingtech until
`July 28, 2023, which the Court grants. (ECF No. 198.) The Court therefore
`stays all proceedings between BNR and Wingtech until July 28, 2023.
`If the Plaintiff files a stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and
`the parties wish to have this Court retain jurisdiction to enforce any settlement
`agreement, the stipulation of dismissal must include the following sentence:
`“The effectiveness of this stipulation of dismissal is conditioned upon the
`Court’s entry of an order retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the
`parties’ settlement agreement.” This sentence is necessary because a
`stipulation of dismissal is otherwise self-executing and deprives the Court of
`jurisdiction to do anything further. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC,
`677 F.3d 1272, 1280 (11th Cir. 2012).
`This case will remain open because the Plaintiff continues to assert
`claims against the remaining Defendants.
`Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on July 14, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________
`Robert N. Scola, Jr.
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
