throbber
Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023 Page 1 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`MIAMI DIVISION
`CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM
`EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of
`
`
`themselves and all others similarly situated,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO THE “FTX CELEBRITY DEFENDANTS’”
`EMERGENCY MOTION TO AMEND THE CASE MANAGEEMENT ORDER
`On February 10, 2023, almost two months ago, this Court entered a Standard Order [D.E.
`
`49] in cases with multiple defendants. The same Order has been entered by Chief Judge Altonaga
`
`in the pending Garrison v. Paffrath, 23-20123 [D.E. 19] (against the “FTX Influencers”) and by
`
`Judge Roy Altman in Sizemore v. Zhao, 23-21261 [D.E. 8] (against Binance). Both of those Orders
`
`require the Defendants to file one Response to the Complaint in accordance with the rules of civil
`
`procedure.
`
`Plaintiffs take no position on whether the Court should allow the FTX Celebrity Defendants
`
`to: (a) increase the briefs to 65 and 30 pages, and (b) allow 30 days for Oppositions and Replies.
`
`Most of these Defendants have now been served for months, many of these arguments have been
`
`briefed in other related crypto cases, but Plaintiffs respectfully state that such decision is certainly
`
`for this Court to decide. However, Plaintiffs must take issue with the manner in which Defendants’
`
`counsel proceeded with this Motion.
`
`On Thursday, April 6th, Mr. Carver left a voice message for 4 different Plaintiffs’ counsel
`
`and stated it was very important he talk to them about his Motion to Dismiss, which is due in
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023 Page 2 of 3
`
`Edwin Garrison, et al. v. Samuel Bankman-Fried, et al.
`Case No. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM
`
`approximately one week. Undersigned Counsel were in the process of finalizing and filing a
`
`Motion to Serve FTX Celebrity Defendant Shaquille O’Neal with substitutes service, due to his
`
`evasive actions during the last 4 months.
`
`Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ counsel suggested that the parties discuss the issue on Monday
`
`April 10th, for several reasons, including because: (1) today, April 7th, is Good Friday, (2) we could
`
`not presume how the Court was going to decide the Motion for Mr. O’Neal (would be presumed
`
`served), and (3) we specifically asked Mr. Carver to let us know which FTX defendants he was
`
`speaking for, because we have had issues in the past (in fact, he just filed a new Notice of
`
`Appearance for FTX Defendant Adonis Haslem). Mr. Carver wrote back that we should not deal
`
`with any of other issues and sent us his draft Motion. He stated that he was filing today, whether
`
`he heard from us or not.
`
`As a result, Undersigned Counsel specifically wrote to Mr. Roberto Martinez, counsel for
`
`many of the FTC Celebrity Defendants, and signatory on all of the group pleadings in this matter.
`
`The email was sent at 10:55am this morning, enclosing a courtesy copy of our Motion for Mr.
`
`O’Neal and asked him specifically to: “Just let us know any good time to set a Zoom and we can
`
`discuss organizing this matter. Thx., Adam.” That email was never mentioned in Mr. Carver’s
`
`Local Rule 7.1 Certification, so either Mr. Martinez and Mr. Carver have not spoken, or the email
`
`was simply left out. Undersigned Counsel simply hope that we can have more cooperation and
`
`professionalism as we advance in this litigation.
`
`. Dated: April 7, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Adam Moskowitz
`Adam M. Moskowitz
`Florida Bar No. 984280
`adam@moskowitz-law.com
`Joseph M. Kaye
`Florida Bar No. 117520
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023 Page 3 of 3
`
`Edwin Garrison, et al. v. Samuel Bankman-Fried, et al.
`Case No. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM
`
`joseph@moskowitz-law.com
`THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC
`2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601
`Coral Gables, FL 33134
`Telephone: (305) 740-1423
`
`By: /s/ David Boies
`David Boies
`(Pro Hac Vice)
`Alex Boies
`(Pro Hac Vice)
`BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
`333 Main Street
`Armonk, NY 10504
`Phone: (914) 749–8200
`dboies@bsfllp.com
`
`By: /s/ Stephen Neal Zack
`Stephen Neal Zack
`Florida Bar No. 145215
`BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
`100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800
`Miami, FL 33131
`Office: 305-539-8400
`szack@bsfllp.com
`
`Co-Counsel for Plaintiff and the Class
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the forgoing was filed on April 7, 2023, via
`
`
`
`the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all attorneys of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` By: /s/ Adam M. Moskowitz______
` ADAM M. MOSKOWITZ
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket