throbber
Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 146 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 1 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`MIAMI DIVISION
`
`Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA
`
`
`EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of
`themselves and all other similarly situated,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`v.
`
`SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL AN EXHIBIT TO LARRY DAVID’S DECLARATION IN
`SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
`
`
`
`
`Per Local Rule 5.4, Defendant Lawrence David moves unopposed for leave to file under
`
`seal a confidential exhibit in support of his Declaration filed as an attachment to Defendants
`
`Golden State Warriors, LLC, Larry David, Stephen Curry, Shohei Ohtani, and Naomi Osaka’s
`
`Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. (See ECF No. 139-2.)
`
`1.
`
`The Declaration filed contemporaneously herewith includes as Exhibit A a contract
`
`between Mr. David and various FTX entities.
`
`2.
`
`Generally, the presumption in this District is that proceedings are public and Court
`
`filings are a matter of public record. S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4(a). However, the public’s right of access
`
`is not absolute and “may be overcome by a showing of good cause, which requires balancing the
`
`asserted right of access against the other party’s interest in keeping the information confidential.”
`
`Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc., 480 F.3d 1234, 1246 (11th Cir. 2007) (internal quotations and
`
`citations omitted).
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 146 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 2 of 4
`
`3.
`
`In balancing these interests to determine whether documents should be placed under
`
`seal, courts consider “whether allowing access would impair court functions or harm legitimate
`
`privacy interests, the degree of and likelihood of injury if made public, the reliability of the
`
`information, whether there will be an opportunity to respond to the information, whether the
`
`information concerns public officials or public concerns, and the availability of a less onerous
`
`alternative to sealing the documents.” Id. “A party’s privacy or proprietary interest in information
`
`sometimes overcomes the interest of the public in accessing the information.” Id.
`
`4.
`
`Here, Mr. David’s contract contains confidentiality provisions that prohibit him
`
`from disclosing to any third party the financial or other material terms of the contract. The contract
`
`also contains commercially sensitive and personal information regarding the terms of Mr. David’s
`
`services and intellectual property. Disclosure of the agreement (and terms thereof) could violate
`
`Mr. David’s confidentiality obligations and cause irreparable harm to his personal and commercial
`
`interests. Thus, to honor Mr. David’s obligations under the agreement, and to protect
`
`commercially sensitive information, he requests leave to file Exhibit A to his Declaration under
`
`seal.
`
`5.
`
`Mr. David requests that the Court maintain this record under seal until the
`
`conclusion of this case and further order of the Court.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Mr. David respectfully requests leave to file Exhibit A to his
`
`Declaration under seal.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 146 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 3 of 4
`
`LOCAL RULE 7.1(A)(3) CERTIFICATION
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(3), counsel for Mr. David certifies that they conferred with
`
`counsel for Plaintiffs, on April 13, 2023. Plaintiffs’ counsel stated: “we certainly do not oppose
`
`to [sic] your filing, and we can certainly deal with the document, after we have the chance to
`
`review it and we will let you know if we think it needs/should be filed not under seal and can talk.”
`
`
`
`Dated: April 14, 2023
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.
`255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
`Coral Gables, Florida 33134
`(305) 476-7400
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Roberto Martínez
`Roberto Martínez
`Florida Bar No. 305596
`bob@colson.com
`Stephanie A. Casey
`Florida Bar No. 97483
`scasey@colson.com
`Zachary Lipshultz
`Florida Bar No. 123594
`zach@colson.com
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`Andrew B. Clubok (pro hac vice)
` andrew.clubok@lw.com
`Susan E. Engel (pro hac vice)
` susan.engel@lw.com
`Brittany M.J. Record (pro hac vice)
` brittany.record@lw.com
`555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
`Tel: +1.202.637.2200
`Fax: +1.202.637.2201
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`Marvin S. Putnam (pro hac vice)
` marvin.putnam@lw.com
`Jessica Stebbins Bina (pro hac vice)
` jessica.stebbinsbina@lw.com
`Elizabeth A. Greenman (pro hac vice)
` elizabeth.greenman@lw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 146 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 4 of 4
`
`10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 1100
`Los Angeles, California 90067
`Tel: +1.424.653.5500
`Fax: +1.424.653.5501
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`Michele D. Johnson (pro hac vice)
` michele.johnson@lw.com
`650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor
`Costa Mesa, California 92626-1925
`Tel: +1.714.540.1235
`Fax: +1.714.755.8290
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Lawrence David
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket