throbber
Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 158 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA
`
`
`EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of
`themselves and all other similarly situated,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,
`Defendants.
`___________________________________/
`DEFENDANT WILLIAM TREVOR LAWRENCE’S
`INDIVIDUAL MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`
`
`Defendant William Trevor Lawrence (“Mr. Lawrence”), pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and
`
`the Court’s Order Granting in Part the Celebrity Defendants’ (the “Defendants”) Motion to Set
`
`Briefing Page Limits and Briefing Schedule for their Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 132], hereby
`
`files this Individual Motion to Dismiss and states as follows.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`
`
`The crux of this lawsuit concerns the core allegation that Defendants sold or other
`
`otherwise personally participated in the purchase and sale of FTX’s yield-bearing accounts
`
`(“YBAs”), which Plaintiffs allege are unregistered securities. In support of their claims, Plaintiffs
`
`purport to identify a series of representative statements and advertisements attributed to the
`
`Defendants. There is, however, not a single allegation that even suggests Mr. Lawrence did
`
`anything to sell or otherwise personally participate in the purchase and sale of a single YBA by
`
`FTX. As such, the Amended Complaint should be dismissed as to Mr. Lawrence.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Hereinafter, all emphasis is added unless noted otherwise.
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 158 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 2 of 4
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`Plaintiffs allege the Defendants themselves sold YBAs. But as currently pleaded, not one
`
`of the advertisements referenced in the Complaint directly promotes or even references the
`
`purchase and sale of a YBA. Not one.
`
`But the allegations against Mr. Lawrence are particularly inadequate. To wit, the exhibits
`
`attached to the Complaint contradict the claim that Mr. Lawrence entered into an agreement with
`
`FTX. Even more, they fail to allege that Mr. Lawrence engaged in any kind of promotions at all,
`
`much less did he sell or other personally participate in the purchase and sale of YBAs.
`
`Indeed, there is only a single paragraph in the Complaint that contains any allegations
`
`whatsoever regarding Mr. Lawrence. It contains only two sentences. Neither sets forth facts
`
`sufficient to survive dismissal.
`
`In the first sentence of ¶ 225, Plaintiffs allege that Mr. Lawrence became a brand
`
`ambassador for FTX in April 2021. But the source authority Plaintiffs cite reveals that is not
`
`entirely accurate. To be sure, footnote 136 links to a tweet announcing a partnership of some kind
`
`between Mr. Lawrence and “Blockfolio” – not FTX. And it shows a picture of Mr. Lawrence
`
`holding up a jersey that says “Blockfolio” across the chest. But Plaintiffs make no attempt to
`
`explain the relationship between FTX and “Blockfolio” (even though there plainly is one).
`
`Even more, the tweet does not refer to any actual promotions on the part of Mr. Lawrence.
`
`Rather, it suggests that Mr. Lawrence agreed to do promotions – in the future. There is, however,
`
`nothing to suggest that Mr. Lawrence did any promotional work for “Blockfolio” (or FTX for that
`
`matter) – much less anything that reasonably could be construed as Mr. Lawrence having sold or
`
`other otherwise personally participated in the purchase and sale of YBAs by FTX.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 158 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 3 of 4
`
`The second sentence of ¶ 225 quotes a news article as stating “Trevor is someone people
`
`can have a personal and human connection with for [FTX] and to the crypto space.” That is,
`
`however, not accurate. Inserting “FTX” in the bracket is advocacy – not a quote.
`
`To be clear, the article cited in footnote 137 promotes a deal between Mr. Lawrence and
`
`“Blockfolio” – not FTX. Indeed, the title of the article states Trevor Lawrence signed an
`
`endorsement deal with “Blockfolio.” The first sentence references a deal between Mr. Lawrence
`
`and “Blockfolio.” The article quotes Mr. Lawrence as stating he is excited to be teaming up with
`
`“Blockfolio.” And the aforementioned quote reproduced in the Complaint is from Sina Nader –
`
`the COO of “Blockfolio.” She is quoted as saying that “Trevor is someone people can have a
`
`personal and human connection with for us and to the crypto space.” Plaintiffs suggest “us” is a
`
`reference to FTX. It is not. Clearly, “us” is a reference to “Blockfolio” – not FTX.
`
`
`
`But above all else, the article fails to validate the allegation that Mr. Lawrence did any
`
`actual promotional work – for anyone. Indeed, the article does no more than announce a
`
`partnership to do promotional work in the future. But there is not a single allegation to suggest
`
`that Mr. Lawrence did any promotional work of any kind, much less anything that reasonably
`
`could be construed as Mr. Lawrence having sold or otherwise personally participated in the
`
`purchase and sale of YBAs by FTX.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`
`
`To survive dismissal, the Complaint should, at the very least, provide specific allegations
`
`of at least two core facts: (1) that each Defendant entered into an agreement with FTX; and (2) that
`
`each Defendant engaged in promotional activities whereby that Defendant sold or otherwise
`
`personally participated in the sale of YBAs – by FTX. But as regards Mr. Lawrence, the Amended
`
`Complaint does neither. In fact, the allegations pleaded disavow those facts. As such, all claims
`
`pleaded against Mr. Lawrence should be dismissed with prejudice
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 158 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 4 of 4
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`DIMOND KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A.
`Offices at Grand Bay Plaza
`2665 South Bayshore Drive, PH-2B
`Miami, Florida 33133
`Telephone:
`(305) 374-1920
`Facsimile:
`(305) 374-1961
`
`By: /s/ David A. Rothstein
`David A. Rothstein, Esq.
`Fla. Bar No. 995762
`DRothstein@dkrpa.com
`Alexander M. Peraza, Esq.
`Fla. Bar No. 107044
`APeraza@dkrpa.com
`Eshaba Jahir-Sharuz, Esq.
`Fla. Bar No. 1038846
`Eshaba@dkrpa.com
`
` MCANGUS GOUDELOCK & COURIE LLC
`2000 Market Street, Suite 780
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone:
`(484) 406-4334
`Facsimile:
`(215) 501-5374
`Eric A. Fitzgerald (pro hac vice)
`eric.fitzgerald@mgclaw.com
`
`Hillary N. Ladov (pro hac vice)
` hillary.ladov@mgclaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`WILLIAM TREVOR LAWRENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 14, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket